Bro, I just finished my college entrance examination and now I feel a bit unfamiliar with this game. So I want to modify this plane to get familiar with it
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Yeah, bro, and your A-40C is also excellent! To be honest, The T-3 has a large number of weapon characteristics, which was learned from the A-40C.
Actually, The success of T3 is not achieved overnight, but rather through continuous learning and accumulation over the past year, which has been transformed into my own skills. This is certainly an epic victory, but it's not yet a time for pride. I still need a long time to learn more. Perhaps in a challenge next year, we can see another "T-3" stand out.
@TheMouse Um... I'm sorry, I've never read his article before. In fact, I have also heard about it and tried to find it, but I did not find it.
My idea originated from @GabrielSatori , and I have been following his articles.
I am very happy because this is the first time I have achieved first place in a challenge. I have been very busy lately, but I am still imagining how to make the challenge more interesting.
em…
By the way, regarding the challenge I previously raised. I really don't have time lately because the college entrance examination will be in two weeks. I will be able to show it to you in about half a month.
I am improving Lackey (which are also variants of the Intimidator) and I am currently stuck because I am not sure what weapons to equip a small mass-produced drone with.
@FOXHOUND26 Great, but a single weapon cannot change the situation. To influence the war situation, at least large-scale production must be achieved, right? So at least you need an industrial scale with large-scale production capacity, right? So your production requires time and money, which cannot be compensated for immediately. The result is that this fighter jet can indeed achieve good results on local battlefields, but its actual influence is still limited.
Moreover, it's better to buy than to build, unless this aircraft can demonstrate stronger combat power than the purchased aircraft. I think it will take a long time to officially convert this fighter jet into the main force of the Air Force. During this period, I don't really feel that internal and external pressures will relax.
@FOXHOUND26 Have ≠ available. As a player, this setting certainly has no impact on building your own aircraft, but if it's in the story, I don't think a newly developed domestic fighter jet can have much competitiveness against strong foreign fighter jets. Just in terms of cost-effectiveness, I think it can already make a country make a choice.
I can't wait to see these planes anymore. I estimate that if the intimidators I have modified join this battle, they will only become their experience pack.
@TheMouse However, I have only set some clear scoring requirements for this situational question (such as a speed score of ≥ 7 and a mobility score of ≥ 5), and added some hidden points (completing a situational emergency requires 5 points, which is generally a more stringent scoring standard, such as a mobility score of ≥ 8). How to obtain hidden points will be prompted in the context, and finally, the aircraft characteristics will be evaluated (such as whether it is a stealth aircraft, whether it is an electronic warfare aircraft, etc.). This is another hidden point, which is also 5)
@TheMouse I have set its explosionscale to 15, so there should be no problem of no damage.
But I can't understand why it can instantly kill an aircraft with 9E+35 health of all parts
@Rb2h The sixth generation jet is indeed a good idea, but I think it is difficult for us to replicate the more intelligent features of the sixth generation machine, and we can only obtain an empty shell. To be honest, if you can't reach the referee's G-spot, it's difficult to widen the gap in "appearance" score through this, and instead, it's easy to be surpassed by the fourth generation aircraft (Russian standard) that places more emphasis on weapon mounting and mobility. This is determined by the rules and characteristics of this game.
@GeneralCorpInc If you think the maneuverability is too high, you can restore the main wing volume to normal size and reduce the area, reducing the wing thickness. However, in pursuit of authenticity, the maneuverability of this missile is low, the feel is not good, and due to the large turning radius, it may be difficult to hit close range targets.
@GeneralCorpInc Missiles first target and then launch.
Suicide drones are launched first, fly to a location, and then select a target.
Suicide drones are designed with humans in the loop, and humans choose their targets.
TV guided missiles are more like suicide drones.
Tomahawk Block4, LRAM, like an intelligent version of a suicide drone.
@Someonefun What can I say... I'm not sure if there are similar ones in other countries, but I use video websites in China to watch tutorials, watch explanations and ask questions to veteran players in forums, ask questions to veteran players in social media group chats, and read the tutorial files they leave there
@Speedhunter yeah, this also makes it very OP. Moreover, the speed and maneuverability of this aircraft are also excellent, with even automatic ejection, HMDS, and vertical takeoff and landing. It is not just a missile truck, but also a strong point in comprehensive air combat.
@TheMouse Compared to the experimental version, the final version adopts three suggestions from you and @TheUltimatePlaneLover
-Two of the flames on the left wing are detached, make sure to reconnect those
-Perhaps add an orbit camera in the center of the aircraft to have a more stable orbit view
And replace faulty weapons
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Well bro, I'm facing a Huge Trouble I find it difficult to test the new version of T-3 because it has a total of 827 parts. I need someone to help me with the testing. I originally intended to use an opportunity to participate in the competition and have the organizer help me test it, but I realized that there are still many works that have not been rated, which means the organizer may not have time. So I hope you can help me test this plane.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Me? Fine, although my entry T-3 did indeed modify someone else's plane, the completion level of that plane was very low, and I made a lot of changes. To be honest, the completion level of the A40C is already very high, and I can't think of any further improvement. The maneuverability and appearance are excellent, and if we really need to make modifications, we can only remake the drone and install intelligent weapons. Moreover, it is unknown whether the second version of T-3 can be released before the deadline, so I apologize that I cannot do so
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Yes, your aircraft is excellent in terms of weapons and maneuverability. While Mobius stands out in appearance, there are significant deficiencies in its maneuverability. Unless special means (Like AOA) are used, it will lose a lot of points as a result. This is our only opportunity. Mobius's design goes beyond traditional concepts, and adding weapons would be troublesome and difficult to achieve as yours. The only problem is that we are not sure what weapons Mobius will be equipped with, after all, there was a work that only used two small nuclear bombs and received 7 points for "weapons", which is the same score as me (I still remember it to this day)
@TheUltimatePlaneLover In fact, I am also modifying my plane. The problem with Mobius is that its weapons are too single (only automatic machine guns), which means that its next version will definitely score more on "weapons" (yes, there will be a second version) and at least improve by about two points. So 41 is actually the lowest possible score I think Mobius will get, which is also the reason why I am very worried, so I am eager to know the score of your plane
I don't know what to say, but OP that go crazy. It has super maneuverability and bomber like weapons, and even drones (although I think this can be improved). This powerful fighter jet, I think, is fully capable of confronting Mobius (Mobius transcends the concept of traditional fighter jets).
Bro, I just finished my college entrance examination and now I feel a bit unfamiliar with this game. So I want to modify this plane to get familiar with it
+1@AndrewTheGarrison Um... I think creating a new account would be a bit too troublesome, and you also seem busy. So I chose the first one
+1@Someonefun Sorry bro, I don't have time recently. I'm about to take the college entrance examination
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Yeah, bro, and your A-40C is also excellent! To be honest, The T-3 has a large number of weapon characteristics, which was learned from the A-40C.
+1Actually, The success of T3 is not achieved overnight, but rather through continuous learning and accumulation over the past year, which has been transformed into my own skills. This is certainly an epic victory, but it's not yet a time for pride. I still need a long time to learn more. Perhaps in a challenge next year, we can see another "T-3" stand out.
@TheMouse Um... I'm sorry, I've never read his article before. In fact, I have also heard about it and tried to find it, but I did not find it.
+1My idea originated from @GabrielSatori , and I have been following his articles.
Oh, by the way. I also plan to serialize a series of articles with T-3 as the main character in July.
+1I am very happy because this is the first time I have achieved first place in a challenge. I have been very busy lately, but I am still imagining how to make the challenge more interesting.
+1em…
+1By the way, regarding the challenge I previously raised. I really don't have time lately because the college entrance examination will be in two weeks. I will be able to show it to you in about half a month.
I am improving Lackey (which are also variants of the Intimidator) and I am currently stuck because I am not sure what weapons to equip a small mass-produced drone with.
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover A great plane! Especially the new type of missile has given me a completely new inspiration.
+1There are still some good aspects to airplanes, you can rest assured of that
+1@FOXHOUND26 4… Okay, it's obvious that this is advantageous
+1@FOXHOUND26 Ideas are feasible, but the road ahead is long and arduous
+1@FOXHOUND26 Great, but a single weapon cannot change the situation. To influence the war situation, at least large-scale production must be achieved, right? So at least you need an industrial scale with large-scale production capacity, right? So your production requires time and money, which cannot be compensated for immediately. The result is that this fighter jet can indeed achieve good results on local battlefields, but its actual influence is still limited.
+1Moreover, it's better to buy than to build, unless this aircraft can demonstrate stronger combat power than the purchased aircraft. I think it will take a long time to officially convert this fighter jet into the main force of the Air Force. During this period, I don't really feel that internal and external pressures will relax.
@FOXHOUND26 Have ≠ available. As a player, this setting certainly has no impact on building your own aircraft, but if it's in the story, I don't think a newly developed domestic fighter jet can have much competitiveness against strong foreign fighter jets. Just in terms of cost-effectiveness, I think it can already make a country make a choice.
+1@STALIN83
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Thanks!
+1I can't wait to see these planes anymore. I estimate that if the intimidators I have modified join this battle, they will only become their experience pack.
+1A very good airplane, I hope to renovate it, is that okay?
+1It looks like YF17 (prototype version of FA18). Looking forward to the actual performance
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Oh, I understand what you mean now
+1@TheMouse However, I have only set some clear scoring requirements for this situational question (such as a speed score of ≥ 7 and a mobility score of ≥ 5), and added some hidden points (completing a situational emergency requires 5 points, which is generally a more stringent scoring standard, such as a mobility score of ≥ 8). How to obtain hidden points will be prompted in the context, and finally, the aircraft characteristics will be evaluated (such as whether it is a stealth aircraft, whether it is an electronic warfare aircraft, etc.). This is another hidden point, which is also 5)
+1Happy birthday!
+1@OkaNieba Well, thank you for correcting it. I am using a translator, so there may be a problem with it
+1It seems that you have many misunderstandings about the J-16, such as the fact that it doesn't have airspeed tube at all.
+1Su30？
+1There is a part in the machine gun position of the nose that is not connected
+1The original product of that automatic anti-aircraft cannon is here
+1@HanakoSan @Randomplayer @TheMouse
@HanakoSan I haven't changed it, so its value is still 1. Anyway, thank you for your explanation
+1@TheMouse I have set its explosionscale to 15, so there should be no problem of no damage.
+1But I can't understand why it can instantly kill an aircraft with 9E+35 health of all parts
@HanakoSan Sorry, but I don't know what "impactDamageScalar" is. I know this, but I don't know its purpose.
+1@Rb2h The sixth generation jet is indeed a good idea, but I think it is difficult for us to replicate the more intelligent features of the sixth generation machine, and we can only obtain an empty shell. To be honest, if you can't reach the referee's G-spot, it's difficult to widen the gap in "appearance" score through this, and instead, it's easy to be surpassed by the fourth generation aircraft (Russian standard) that places more emphasis on weapon mounting and mobility. This is determined by the rules and characteristics of this game.
+1@GeneralCorpInc If you think the maneuverability is too high, you can restore the main wing volume to normal size and reduce the area, reducing the wing thickness. However, in pursuit of authenticity, the maneuverability of this missile is low, the feel is not good, and due to the large turning radius, it may be difficult to hit close range targets.
+1@GeneralCorpInc Missiles first target and then launch.
+1Suicide drones are launched first, fly to a location, and then select a target.
Suicide drones are designed with humans in the loop, and humans choose their targets.
TV guided missiles are more like suicide drones.
Tomahawk Block4, LRAM, like an intelligent version of a suicide drone.
So you want us to help you complete a hand-operated missile? Okay, I'm a bit busy right now. If no one helps you after two days, I'll try to help
+1@Someonefun What can I say... I'm not sure if there are similar ones in other countries, but I use video websites in China to watch tutorials, watch explanations and ask questions to veteran players in forums, ask questions to veteran players in social media group chats, and read the tutorial files they leave there
+1@Speedhunter yeah, this also makes it very OP. Moreover, the speed and maneuverability of this aircraft are also excellent, with even automatic ejection, HMDS, and vertical takeoff and landing. It is not just a missile truck, but also a strong point in comprehensive air combat.
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Thanks bro. Let's meet at the peak.
+1@TheMouse I use nuclear missile instead of timed nuclear bomb. Remember not to get too close to the target.
+1@TheMouse Compared to the experimental version, the final version adopts three suggestions from you and @TheUltimatePlaneLover
+1-Two of the flames on the left wing are detached, make sure to reconnect those
-Perhaps add an orbit camera in the center of the aircraft to have a more stable orbit view
And replace faulty weapons
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Well bro, I'm facing a Huge Trouble I find it difficult to test the new version of T-3 because it has a total of 827 parts. I need someone to help me with the testing. I originally intended to use an opportunity to participate in the competition and have the organizer help me test it, but I realized that there are still many works that have not been rated, which means the organizer may not have time. So I hope you can help me test this plane.
+1Previously: Will the limit of 1000 parts be too high?
+1After calculation: How can I compress it to a thousand parts and still run normally
So busy... If I upload my work on May 9th and don't receive a rating on May 10th, will I lose eligibility?
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Congratulations, bro! It's almost impossible for anyone to get 10, the first place is already in your bag.
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Thank you for your trust, bro. But the more crucial issue is that I don't have time
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Me? Fine, although my entry T-3 did indeed modify someone else's plane, the completion level of that plane was very low, and I made a lot of changes. To be honest, the completion level of the A40C is already very high, and I can't think of any further improvement. The maneuverability and appearance are excellent, and if we really need to make modifications, we can only remake the drone and install intelligent weapons. Moreover, it is unknown whether the second version of T-3 can be released before the deadline, so I apologize that I cannot do so
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Yes, your aircraft is excellent in terms of weapons and maneuverability. While Mobius stands out in appearance, there are significant deficiencies in its maneuverability. Unless special means (Like AOA) are used, it will lose a lot of points as a result. This is our only opportunity. Mobius's design goes beyond traditional concepts, and adding weapons would be troublesome and difficult to achieve as yours. The only problem is that we are not sure what weapons Mobius will be equipped with, after all, there was a work that only used two small nuclear bombs and received 7 points for "weapons", which is the same score as me (I still remember it to this day)
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover In fact, I am also modifying my plane. The problem with Mobius is that its weapons are too single (only automatic machine guns), which means that its next version will definitely score more on "weapons" (yes, there will be a second version) and at least improve by about two points. So 41 is actually the lowest possible score I think Mobius will get, which is also the reason why I am very worried, so I am eager to know the score of your plane
+1I am looking forward to the final score of this aircraft and hope it can reach 41
+1I don't know what to say, but OP that go crazy. It has super maneuverability and bomber like weapons, and even drones (although I think this can be improved). This powerful fighter jet, I think, is fully capable of confronting Mobius (Mobius transcends the concept of traditional fighter jets).
+1