@TheUltimatePlaneLover F-33J. Received, thank you.
Regarding the warning you raised to me, thank you for your reminder. In fact, this is indeed a hassle, and I have been making modifications for a long time. But don't worry too much, even at this stage, its maneuverability is comparable to the T-3.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover When I first saw this plane, I couldn't evaluate it, because I didn't know where to roast first.
Actually, the most important issue is still about rolling. Although this aircraft cleverly uses a cylinder as the control surface and adjusts its speed to 100%, there are still issues with delayed control, which can easily cause excessive rolling and significantly reduce the aircraft's pointing ability.
There is also an issue with the air intake. To be honest, this air intake seems strange to me because the upward opening of the intake has a problem of insufficient air intake during large maneuvers. I have only seen this design on B2 bombers and some bizarre aircraft.
The other issues are relatively easy to handle, and in a nutshell, the potential is very high, far from reaching its limit. If there is really no idea, you can refer to the upgrade content of FA-18E.
By the way, after I complete the renovation, what model should I name it?
To be honest, manufacturing missiles is much easier than manufacturing fighter jets, all you need to do is change the XML. This is actually very unfair to fighter jets. I think you can either dismantle both missiles and only engage in machine gun dogfights; Or you can unify the missile types and decoy of both sides
…Leaving aside the PZL153 itself, what do you mean by the comparison of fighter jets? In fact, the reasons summarized are all missiles, not fighter jets themselves?
@STEAMYcrosby Wait a minute, bro. To ensure the fairness of the competition, I should also be eligible to see your plane. But I found one of them, and where are the two planes?
@Someonefun Because I'm reading a novel... not this
Actually, I have been trying to make new weapons recently, but I gave up due to experimental failure. Plus, I've been quite busy lately, so I haven't posted it yet
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Haha That's up to your choice, at least I'm just someone who enjoys reading stories.
Regarding reverse engineering: I only choose what I need or am interested in doing reverse engineering, because I know that if I want to achieve my dreams, there are still many things I don't understand. As for airplanes like A40, I am more willing to study how to improve this aircraft than to study its technology.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover If you don't have that kind of idea, then I suggest how to do it safely. I am not very familiar with this war, nor am I sure of the level of importance both sides attach to it, so I am not sure if there is a way to make this war more intense and open up sales channels. In fact, ultimately, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive analysis based on your position and the actual situation of the war.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Um... I understand the situation, but your understanding of the political interests I mentioned seems a bit off. What I mean is: Do you want to take advantage of this opportunity, while their new weapons are not yet heavily equipped, to expand their influence and make them heavily rely on you in military equipment, so as to grasp their military lifeline.
You should know that even aiding aircraft does not mean making them combat effective. Ammunition supply and logistics maintenance are both costly and technical matters, and if a country's own strength is insufficient, it is likely to be dragged down as a result. So they ultimately have to find the seller to provide follow-up services. As long as they can't form an independent military industry system one day, there is no need to worry too much about this aspect.
Of course, the final product sold cannot be your most advanced. If you really do this, you deserve to be bitten back. You can start from their weakest areas, or try competing with their superior products with some secondary fighter jets. However, rather than being bitten back by someone, what you should be more worried about is whether he will perform reverse engineering (at least I will)
@TheUltimatePlaneLover You seem hesitant, buddy. I have some ideas, but I have to see your position. As their ally and arms dealer, do you value political or economic interests or both of them?
By the way, when it comes to a war between two arms buyers, why don't you become an arms broker and make huge profits, but rather personally participate in the war?
I'm not accusing you of using other people's custom parts to forcibly acquire AOA capabilities, but at least your plane should be able to fly normally, right? The other two people's planes can at least fly normally, and AOA is the icing on the cake. But your secret weapon can only AOA
@CrestelAeronautics Are you teasing me? Which of their planes like yours that pulls the control lever backwards on the ground, making it stand straight 90 degrees?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover ... It's not supporting attack planes, why should we value armor? Anyway, at least I have determined my upgrade direction - unmanned, miniaturized, and mass-produced development. Loyal wingman is a completely new combat concept, and aerial tanks are outdated.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover em… Bro, maybe you are right
@TheUltimatePlaneLover F-33J. Received, thank you.
Regarding the warning you raised to me, thank you for your reminder. In fact, this is indeed a hassle, and I have been making modifications for a long time. But don't worry too much, even at this stage, its maneuverability is comparable to the T-3.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover When I first saw this plane, I couldn't evaluate it, because I didn't know where to roast first.
Actually, the most important issue is still about rolling. Although this aircraft cleverly uses a cylinder as the control surface and adjusts its speed to 100%, there are still issues with delayed control, which can easily cause excessive rolling and significantly reduce the aircraft's pointing ability.
There is also an issue with the air intake. To be honest, this air intake seems strange to me because the upward opening of the intake has a problem of insufficient air intake during large maneuvers. I have only seen this design on B2 bombers and some bizarre aircraft.
The other issues are relatively easy to handle, and in a nutshell, the potential is very high, far from reaching its limit. If there is really no idea, you can refer to the upgrade content of FA-18E.
By the way, after I complete the renovation, what model should I name it?
@wstu 我高考完了，现在B站回来了
@ThePeruvianQuail I haven't talked much to foreigners and I can't understand your abbreviations
@ThePeruvianQuail ？
@TheMouse Does it mean that the first three can only be tagged?
@ThePeruvianQuail ?
To be honest, manufacturing missiles is much easier than manufacturing fighter jets, all you need to do is change the XML. This is actually very unfair to fighter jets. I think you can either dismantle both missiles and only engage in machine gun dogfights; Or you can unify the missile types and decoy of both sides
…Leaving aside the PZL153 itself, what do you mean by the comparison of fighter jets? In fact, the reasons summarized are all missiles, not fighter jets themselves?
@STEAMYcrosby I know so I ask what is the result
@STEAMYcrosby what?
@STEAMYcrosby Wait a minute, bro. To ensure the fairness of the competition, I should also be eligible to see your plane. But I found one of them, and where are the two planes?
@STEAMYcrosby Fine, I agree. Please remember to tell me the result
em… little A40
@TheMouse …
@Rob119WithA105mmHowitzer em… idk too.
@Rob119WithA105mmHowitzer ?
@TheMouse Em... maybe closer to a novel
First!
@Someonefun 。。。
@Someonefun Did you not notice that the heading displayed on your HUD is opposite to your actual heading?
Not bad, but there are many areas for improvement. For example, your weapon is a bit loose and your cockpit seems to be installed backwards. Come on!
525 parts?
@Someonefun Because I'm reading a novel... not this
Actually, I have been trying to make new weapons recently, but I gave up due to experimental failure. Plus, I've been quite busy lately, so I haven't posted it yet
@LoganTheGameDev He may be right. You can replace its decorative function by making a skirtboard
@Someonefun But I don't think his problem is a problem. He doesn't seem to know how to make cars either
@Someonefun I have never built a tank before
So what's the problem
@Someonefun em… But I not good at this…
…What can I say… I choose to wait for the other two planes to be released before making a comment.
@Someonefun Sorry to hear that
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I'm glad, but I'm sorry, it's midnight Beijing time now.
@byd114514 缩翼都缩成这样了，重点是还不能零半径。
有点小逆天了
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Sorry, but what is TUPL?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Haha That's up to your choice, at least I'm just someone who enjoys reading stories.
Regarding reverse engineering: I only choose what I need or am interested in doing reverse engineering, because I know that if I want to achieve my dreams, there are still many things I don't understand. As for airplanes like A40, I am more willing to study how to improve this aircraft than to study its technology.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover If you don't have that kind of idea, then I suggest how to do it safely. I am not very familiar with this war, nor am I sure of the level of importance both sides attach to it, so I am not sure if there is a way to make this war more intense and open up sales channels. In fact, ultimately, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive analysis based on your position and the actual situation of the war.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Um... I understand the situation, but your understanding of the political interests I mentioned seems a bit off. What I mean is: Do you want to take advantage of this opportunity, while their new weapons are not yet heavily equipped, to expand their influence and make them heavily rely on you in military equipment, so as to grasp their military lifeline.
You should know that even aiding aircraft does not mean making them combat effective. Ammunition supply and logistics maintenance are both costly and technical matters, and if a country's own strength is insufficient, it is likely to be dragged down as a result. So they ultimately have to find the seller to provide follow-up services. As long as they can't form an independent military industry system one day, there is no need to worry too much about this aspect.
Of course, the final product sold cannot be your most advanced. If you really do this, you deserve to be bitten back. You can start from their weakest areas, or try competing with their superior products with some secondary fighter jets. However, rather than being bitten back by someone, what you should be more worried about is whether he will perform reverse engineering (at least I will)
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Sorry, can you put it in a different way? I didn't understand
@TheUltimatePlaneLover ？
@TheUltimatePlaneLover You seem hesitant, buddy. I have some ideas, but I have to see your position. As their ally and arms dealer, do you value political or economic interests or both of them?
By the way, when it comes to a war between two arms buyers, why don't you become an arms broker and make huge profits, but rather personally participate in the war?
@AirPhilippinesFlight541 666, nb
It looks like 00 was intercepted by PX while intercepting an intercontinental ballistic missile, not bad, kid.
@STALIN83 Thanks!
I'm not accusing you of using other people's custom parts to forcibly acquire AOA capabilities, but at least your plane should be able to fly normally, right? The other two people's planes can at least fly normally, and AOA is the icing on the cake. But your secret weapon can only AOA
@CrestelAeronautics Are you teasing me? Which of their planes like yours that pulls the control lever backwards on the ground, making it stand straight 90 degrees?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover ... It's not supporting attack planes, why should we value armor? Anyway, at least I have determined my upgrade direction - unmanned, miniaturized, and mass-produced development. Loyal wingman is a completely new combat concept, and aerial tanks are outdated.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Thank you. By the way, why do you think this plane is a bit behind schedule?