6,705 JSTQ Comments

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Of course, what you said also makes sense. After all, we are based on SP (such as the radar default TWS (tracking and locking at the same time, no radar alarm will be triggered in tracking state), and only one person can be locked at the same time). It's not too outrageous., just don't be too unreasonable.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover I have decided to add a setting to my FT missile: although it is easy to hide because the fire control radar does not respond, some high-precision millimeter wave radars can still detect it. Unless the volume of the FT missile is further reduced

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover If a group of people are using the game's powerful and unsolvable settings, what's the point of fighting this war?
    Please do not throw your brain as a bomb during the bombing. Thank you.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover You're right, but this is a wargame. In the game, your plane has already been determined by the system to have crashed.

    You know, modifying the power of a bomb is very simple. Can we throw hundreds of nuclear bombs at will in war?

  • [S-War] What we really need? The Fourth Military Reform! one year ago

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Mainly, after we signed the agreement, we realized that the conditions for signing must have been my surrender, but I did not join the camp at that time. So actually, I joined the war to surrender

  • [S-War] What we really need? The Fourth Military Reform! one year ago

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 The surrender agreement I signed before I joined the war. The main content is to restrict my assistance to MDA enemies and allow me to start manufacturing QX-6 (similar in function to A40)

  • [S-War] What we really need? The Fourth Military Reform! one year ago

    RCE/DoF and TB:
    @SPSidearm
    @TitanicBuff

  • [S-War] What we really need? The Fourth Military Reform! one year ago

    MDA Allies:
    @Marulk
    @JABH
    @Boeing727200F

  • [S-War] What we really need? The Fourth Military Reform! one year ago

    MDA 3:
    @Christiant2
    @JaxHere
    @Randomplayer

  • [S-War] What we really need? The Fourth Military Reform! one year ago

    MDA 2:
    @windshifter1
    @Karroc9522
    @KPLBall

  • [S-War] What we really need? The Fourth Military Reform! one year ago

    (MDA)
    @TheMouse
    @CrestelAeronautics
    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26

  • [S-War] What we really need? The Fourth Military Reform! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover I remember telling you about the standard invisible effect
    Regarding the fight against stealth aircraft, I need to clarify that the characteristic of stealth aircraft is that the distance detected by radar is significantly reduced, but it does not mean that there is none. And stealth effects can be reduced through special radar or special methods (such as special radar multi-directional illumination networks). Even if the fire control radar detects it, it may not lock, but because this missile uses coordinate positioning, it can be launched as long as it is detected. Don't think that stealth fighter jets can do whatever they want, let alone not fully possessing stealth capabilities.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover he knows

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover for super stealth: still disagree. Please follow the standard stealth effect for stealth fighter jets

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover hum? fun. I will conduct corresponding research, I hope you won't deceive me.
    By the way, this missile has the function of being able to start even without leaving the main cockpit

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover If you don't want to see all Antetus combat units invisible on the battlefield. if you agree, i still disagree.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Addendum: Handheld anti-aircraft missiles are not impractical, but they require more advanced camera angle guidance technology (laser guidance) than currently available.
    The proximity fuse is not difficult to use, but the problem is that it is a rapid fire gun. I don't think my equipment can withstand more than ten shells exploding almost simultaneously.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover
    1.No, I just said it can be achieved, but it's not already available. To be honest, can handheld anti-aircraft missiles be useful?

    2.I have been thinking about this a long time ago, but I feel that I am not allowed to install proximity fuses on the rapid fire gun due to equipment influence fuse

    3.By losing a large number of parts, the system misjudged the plane crash and evaded the marking. You are committing an illegal act, and I will directly determine that you have crashed according to the system's judgment.

  • [S-WAR] testing new weapons systems one year ago

    AA nuke?

  • [S-War] Jeez what you guy want one year ago

    @KPLBall ok

  • F-63 Wasp one year ago

    @KPLBall My discussion with you here only involves aircraft modification, not stance issues.

  • [S-War] Jeez what you guy want one year ago

    @KPLBall ? what?

  • F-63 Wasp one year ago

    @KPLBall ah ok

  • F-63 Wasp one year ago

    … The problem is not small, the angle of attack may be a bit too high, making it difficult to operate. Unfortunately, the wing load of this aircraft is too high and not to my liking, otherwise I would apply to personally help you modify it.

  • [S-War] Jeez what you guy want one year ago

    Shutter Bomb… cluster bomb?

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Regarding the fight against stealth aircraft, I need to clarify that the characteristic of stealth aircraft is that the distance detected by radar is significantly reduced, but it does not mean that there is none. And stealth effects can be reduced through special radar or special methods (such as special radar multi-directional illumination networks). Even if the fire control radar detects it, it may not lock, but because this missile uses coordinate positioning, it can be launched as long as it is detected. Don't think that stealth fighter jets can do whatever they want, let alone not fully possessing stealth capabilities.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Are you kidding? In my eyes, its only feature is the proximity fuse

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Both methods are possible, currently using a computer, but can be modified. You can also choose to send out detectors to detect their coordinates

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover by the way, what is Seemeing's J2M?

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover If necessary, there are many methods available. But first, at least I need to know what nature this organization is.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover also one say:
    Wkh frruglqdwh srvlwlrqlqj phwkrg rqob uhtxluhv frruglqdwhv.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover so it can.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Also, please let me know the password offset in advance next time

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover B0B和隐形有啥关系吗?(chinese)

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @CrestelAeronautics Of course, I only recommend the third option. The first two have a problem: I don't know where the missile is. But the third method is similar to cheating.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @CrestelAeronautics Difficult, but not without. Here are three solutions that are useful even for regular missiles.
    1. Visual air defense. 2. Machine gun protective cover. 3. Hide the cockpit
    I guess someone might say PSM, don't believe him. This missile exploded at a distance of 300 meters.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Good question. For you, I specially downloaded an A52 for testing, and it turned out that under the action of the proximity fuse, the A52 was blown up on the spot.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Ultra high speed flight is the best way to avoid it, but the problem is that you don't know you're locked in

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover The special locking method results in the radar not sounding an alarm and the thermal decoy not functioning, making it difficult to detect.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Funky Trees

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover How about we each take a step back?

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    RCE/DoF and TB:
    @SPSidearm
    @TitanicBuff

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    MDA Allies:
    @Marulk
    @JABH
    @Boeing727200F

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    MDA 3:
    @Christiant2
    @JaxHere
    @Randomplayer

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    MDA 2:
    @windshifter1
    @Karroc9522
    @KPLBall

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    (MDA)
    @TheMouse
    @CrestelAeronautics
    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover But there is a problem that these planes are not suitable for AI due to performance and control issues

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright one year ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover F-33J M-12C GF-2E PX-9N PX-12B M-20C
    And those who serve as unmanned wingmen: QL-4A YF-28A