7,361 JSTQ Comments

  • MDA-JSTQ Non aggression treaty 1.2 years ago

    @KPLBall Actually, we have already reached an agreement with TUPL and The Mouse on this treaty.

  • MDA-JSTQ Non aggression treaty 1.2 years ago

    This treaty shall come into effect when MDA publishes the same treaty

  • MDA-JSTQ Non aggression treaty 1.2 years ago

    MDA 3:
    @Christiant2
    @JaxHere
    @Randomplayer

  • MDA-JSTQ Non aggression treaty 1.2 years ago

    MDA 2:
    @windshifter1
    @Karroc9522
    @KPLBall

  • MDA-JSTQ Non aggression treaty 1.2 years ago

    MDA 1:
    @TheMouse
    @CrestelAeronautics
    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26

  • MDA-JSTQ Non aggression treaty 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover

  • [TFMR] Arms race, start! 1.2 years ago

    @TheMouse @TheUltimatePlaneLover If there's no problem, I'm ready to announce it, and you remember to announce it too

  • GUYS. ONE. MORE. 1.2 years ago

    what's this

  • [S-War] Operation Astro-Inferno 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover But it's very difficult to create a good series of events, which is what I'm worried about
    He needs a good existing entry point, not something created out of thin air.

  • [S-War] Operation Astro-Inferno 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Then let the situation worsen and keep beating them until they follow the issues. Ignoring is a free choice, and freedom must bear the cost of choice.

    This is just enriching the gameplay, not changing the game objectives.

  • [S-War] Operation Astro-Inferno 1.2 years ago

    I suddenly had an idea, what would happen if we did a series of events?
    For example, starting a conflict and requiring us to implement a resolution, if our speed slows down or we fail to complete it smoothly, it will lead to further escalation of the conflict, make it more difficult to resolve, and ultimately result in terrible consequences

  • Nammo F3N Perforar 1.2 years ago

    Please change hideInside to true in the XML of the glass used as the cockpit, otherwise I won't see anything. Thank you

  • [S-War] Weapons Evaluation Program, Pt. 1 1.2 years ago

    Why is this still being evaluated... Are you going to equip your own troops?

  • Captured [S-War] 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Because at first I thought it was an FT missile, I didn't know who the original author was.

  • Captured [S-War] 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover By the way, I also have FRCM (S-25), which I obtained from S (Why do you think I still gave him the T-3 in the end?) Although that transaction left me very dissatisfied

  • [TFMR] Arms race, start! 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover I have no objections, I also have great respect for him.

    The theory of FT missile hypersonic has also been broken through

  • [TFMR] Arms race, start! 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover @TheMouse So will you sign this treaty or not?

  • Captured [S-War] 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Just for your words, I specially went back to see the M War

  • [FT missile]/[TFMR] LS-1 Air defense missile 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover I will try to break through the last layer of shackles (7900kmh)

  • [S-War] Operation All-out 1.2 years ago

    forget one Spectator
    @AManWillDieButNotHisIdeas

  • Big Problem [Resolved] 1.2 years ago

    To be honest, the only reasonable condition for such activities to occur is for the administrator to be indifferent

  • Big Problem [Resolved] 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover He may not have much presence in reality, but he can search for presence online. You are equivalent to satisfying him.

  • Big Problem [Resolved] 1.2 years ago

    @TheMouse A matter that can be resolved by simply reporting and blacklisting

  • Big Problem [Resolved] 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover … This kind of person is just an internet clown. In reality, things don't go smoothly, but in the internet, they strike hard. Just ignore him and tell the administrator that they can handle it.

    As soon as you promote it, everyone knows, including those who support these statements. You know, on the Internet, traffic promotion is a very rare thing, and you helped him.

  • [S-WAR] We're joining in. 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover …
    First of all, let's talk about your concern: this change will lead to a significant reduction in lethality.
    Both the thermobaric bomb and the FAE belong to the category of sub nuclear weapons, with the difference being that the thermobaric bomb is more advanced than the FAE. Based on this, at the cost of a partial kill radius, it greatly enhances the ability to attack.
    As a sub nuclear weapon, although known as second only to nuclear bombs, its actual lethality is like: a nuclear bomb is worth 100 points, and a sub nuclear weapon is worth 20 points.
    It should be noted that due to their high explosive content, even individual rocket launchers can be equipped with them. But because it is a high explosive bomb, it is not suitable for anti tank operations.

  • [S-WAR] We're joining in. 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover wdym
    Wait a minute, don't you know what a thermobaric bomb is?

  • [FT missile]/[TFMR] LS-1 Air defense missile 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover bro dont forgot it

  • F-33R Railgun Falchion 1.2 years ago

    Um... inheriting the problem of F-33A rolling too sensitively, if I were to fly this plane on the computer, I would go crazy. By the way, the electromagnetic gun can consider adding a proximity fuse

  • [S-WAR] We're joining in. 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Speaking of which, seeing nuclear bombs is like PTSD, striving to promote a ban on nuclear weapons. To be honest, I prefer this type because I personally promote precision guided weapons. But your own FAE (all weapons of mass destruction) have almost the same effectiveness as a nuclear bomb. Okay, let me make a suggestion. I don't want small nuclear weapons anymore. I'll switch to thermobaric bombs instead.

  • [S-WAR] We're joining in. 1.2 years ago

    To be honest, the Antetus Alliance is very pleased and has added another audience here. We are more than happy to invite you to watch this great show together. However, the audience should have their own criteria

    Providing assistance to both parties is acceptable, do not provide too much assistance to the advantageous party. If you ruin this great show, I will hold you accountable.

  • [S-WAR] We're joining in. 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover What are you saying to me? It wasn't me who did it.

  • [S-WAR] We're joining in. 1.2 years ago

    I always feel like something is missing. Surely, the Great TUPL Summoning Technique!
    @TheUltimatePlaneLover

  • [S-War] Operation Astro-Inferno 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover hum… I am not from the MDA camp, so as I have observed that he does not pose a particularly great danger to MDA, I hope he can become a sharpening stone and indulge himself. I didn't expect his surrender.

  • [S-War] Operation Astro-Inferno 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Am I Anti-MDA-supporter? I show you all the FT missiles first. Am I Anti-MDA-supporter? Am I experiencing schizophrenia?

  • [S-War] Operation Astro-Inferno 1.2 years ago

    @SPsidearm Your story will provide us with assistance in developing defense combat theory

  • [S-War] Operation Astro-Inferno 1.2 years ago

    @SPsidearm (´థ౪థ ) ☞

  • [S-War] Operation Astro-Inferno 1.2 years ago

    @SPsidearm I haven't seen you use it before

  • [S-War] Operation Astro-Inferno 1.2 years ago

    @SPsidearm How could the modified aircraft possibly have flown MDA's custom aircraft. To surpass the current form of warfare until MDA cannot understand and is helpless.

  • [S-War] Operation Astro-Inferno 1.2 years ago

    @SPsidearm #End.

    I didn't even see the tank battle, I only knew that after the storm, MDA continued bombing and won. I hope the next challenger can be stronger and more interesting.

  • [S-War] Operation Astro-Inferno 1.2 years ago

    @SPsidearm ?

  • News 1.2 years ago

    what's this? with who?

  • [FT missile]/[TFMR] LS-1 Air defense missile 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover This may be the best I currently think I can do. After I finish writing the introduction, I will publish it and @ you again.

  • F-86D Sabredog Mod 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Sorry, I brought up the topic of fighter jet intelligence…

  • F-86D Sabredog Mod 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Yes, it is used in a state of war. The theory of maintaining peace and developing war does not seem to conflict.

    I just want to confirm if it is feasible, I call it "obsession/yandere". This psychological theory based on monkey experiments aims to disrupt their fighting will and make them make incorrect judgments.

  • [TFMR] Arms race, start! 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Add a third clause stating that under the premise of legality, interference with the other party's technological research is not allowed

  • F-86D Sabredog Mod 1.2 years ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover I'm thinking if the A40D has intelligence, can I use psychological warfare tactics against it

  • F-86D Sabredog Mod 1.2 years ago

    em… Does this plane also have spirit

  • [S-War] One of the few remaining fighters of the RCF intercepted and shot down by Griffins. 1.2 years ago

    @AManMayDieButNotHisIdeas only RCE. This matter is not currently related to MDA. If you two can resolve it privately, there won't be so much trouble

  • [Siroe's funnies, S-War] Platform solos. 1.2 years ago

    Artillery specialization is actually not impossible, provided that you are very skilled in artillery tactics. Of course, MDA also need understand artillery tactics, otherwise you would see MDA writing like a fool.

  • [S-War] One of the few remaining fighters of the RCF intercepted and shot down by Griffins. 1.2 years ago

    @AManMayDieButNotHisIdeas Have you notified RCF about this matter