@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 TUPL told me that he is making a big bomb (FAE), but he himself admits that it is very simple to make
KPL told me that his bomber is very powerful and could ignore my anti-aircraft firepower. Then he showed me a modified engine thrust 23 Mach 140000 resistance bomber
I'm not sure what your weapon is, so it's more interesting to say that it's such a mystery
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Didn't I emphasize it? I am waiting for the rebels to be defeated
I'm also looking forward to your new weapon, both TUPL and KPL have disappointed me a bit
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 The biggest problem with the rebels is their extreme tactics and failure to distinguish who the enemy is, so I will not send troops to support them. I will only wait for their failure to reform their thinking.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 1. Because S deserves it
I have always viewed issues from the perspective of the people, and as a president, I can do the same if it is a free election.
I have already explained to TUPL why we need to assist the rebels, which is not even considered aid because I did not directly send troops. Maybe I was blocked by him and he didn't reply to me, so I'll say it to you again.
People don't need a dictatorship president who lacks the ability and wants to shirk responsibility, and who betrays the country (in reality, a president who was defeated in foreign wars has long been voted out of office)
No ability: lost the invasion war, unable to handle the negative effects of war properly
To shirk responsibility: To be honest, in this situation, we should consider appeasing public anger, at least by publicly apologizing and stepping down. But this guy not only swaggered in the position of president, but after the outbreak of the civil war, he even said, 'I only work as a prime minister (Canonical).' Without thinking who caused all of this, he still shifted the blame.
Betraying the country: not because of a defeat, but because as a ruler, there was a civil war and he demanded assistance from foreign military intervention. I remember the defeat treaty didn't say that you were to be a subordinate, but this is entirely your own internal affairs issue. It's normal for rebels to seek help from outside. But you are the government, which is no different from increasing others' control over you.
Dictatorship: waging a war that has cost people and money, but also lost the battle, causing major negative effects, this did not step down. Is this the freedom of the president?
2. As for whether you have any objections or not, it's not important. Anyway, you couldn't distinguish them from the beginning.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 I have no objections, I am only responsible for providing them with a place to escape when the rebels lose
As a true communist, I advise you to fight faster. If you don't fight, the rebels will become fascists
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Don't worry, it doesn't mean I support them, it's just because of ideology. And I am good friends with you, they will seek help from me, but it is very likely that they will betray me, so I also do not want them to succeed.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover We have decided to provide political asylum for the communist rebels of S, and we will reform their thinking.
People don't need a dictatorship president who lacks the ability and wants to shirk responsibility, and who betrays the country (in reality, a president who was defeated in foreign wars has long been voted out of office)
If necessary, we will send escort troops to bring him back home.
@SPsidearm What I was originally thinking was to help you eliminate the rebels, or to promise political asylum to my comrades. But you give me an extreme revolutionary option
Wait... Sorry my translator seems to have retrieved the keywords and refused to translate. I want to confirm that this will determine our next strategy - is this rebel the Red Tsar or is it similar to Stalin's dictatorship??
After thinking for a moment, I realized that if these rebels really have some skills, then I think it's quite good. It's a good thing for the locals. At least I don't completely reject revengevism, it's better than some surrenderism. But based on their current performance, I think it's just a disaster.
Perhaps what we need to address is not rebellion, but the demands of the people. This is not something that airplanes, cannons, battleships can solve.
@SPsidearm Wow, the translator missed a lot of things for me. When I saw your first sentence, I thought you cherished your people very much. Unfortunately, the method of using borrowed weapons to kill people is not feasible for me, and you cannot evade responsibility for it. In fact, if we really want to pursue responsibility, any reason is acceptable.
Um... in principle, this is your internal affair and Antetus will not interfere.
But based on my understanding of military affairs, I can boldly point out that this will not lead to a second war, because the rebellious people are not aware of the war situation, but the military is absolutely aware.
Just like politicians can make bold statements in front of journalists, but the military dare not act rashly.
Of course, we don't mind taking the opportunity to launch a communist revolution to liberate those who have suffered in wars initiated by imperialist rulers, so let MDA answer it
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 1. Due to the excessive power of the decoy in the game, it is difficult for the missiles to hit the target, and at this time, machine guns are more effective. But FT missile immune decoy, which is difficult to detect, is a good choice. The meaning of the last sentence is that some people use missiles with extremely high speeds to shorten flight time and achieve what is called beyond visual range.
2. My worldview was born from games, but to further improve and form an independent worldview, I need to break free from the limitations of game mechanics.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 The key is that the missile will not be disturbed during flight. I know what you want to do, take down your superluminal missile for me.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 There is always a problem with using missiles, which is that they fly like missiles. If FT technology is used to ensure that the bomb always faces the target and inertia is used as power, it should approach your statement.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 1. What kind of effect do you want it to have in the end
2. Impossible, missiles are the simplest. Why do you think he failed? Which performance did you judge him by?
The simplest way is to use missiles. A slightly more difficult task is to achieve non lockable interference by deceiving the system. The most difficult way is to achieve lock free and tamper proof through FT
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Since you have infantry equipment, there may be something you will like at my military exhibition later... Oh, it could also be something you dislike and feel fortunate about
@TheUltimatePlaneLover By the way, what do you think of card games? I am planning to create our DIY cards based on a World War II card game called Kards
@TheUltimatePlaneLover …
I'm telling you, I want to make my own A40, but you're not happy. Then I exchanged it with a surrender treaty, and you agreed. Then, by repeatedly emphasizing the uncontrollability of the A40D, you hinted at me and triggered a game of air force between us. In the end, I changed direction and ended it all.
*In non war situations, all A40Ds I shoot down are considered legitimate defense
I even told you the name, QX-6 Heavy Angel.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Installing a large number of weapons would make the entire aircraft's configuration appear cluttered, which we gamers may enjoy. However, if placed in a war environment, I think it would be better to disperse them.
@SPsidearm QX-6(Compared to A40D, but canceled due to obstruction and direction change)@TheUltimatePlaneLover @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
It is also because of this that the third article of the non aggression treaty was born
The A40s and T-3 always have a problem called stacking weapons, and I don't want QX-6 to go down this path too
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Do you want to see things like A-fired B-guided missiles, satellite detection, artillery guided drones, data links, electromagnetic interference, and beyond visual range strikes in this world?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Oh, by the way, due to the deviation in our war game theory after the Fourth Military Reform. So I divided my weapons into two worlds. In the world with MDA, the definition of my weapon is entirely determined by TUPL. You know what this means.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 ? I only remember saying that we should start an arms race. You are afraid that I will start a war, and I am also afraid that you will start a war. What do you think is the significance of signing a non aggression treaty?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Also, this matter will not prevent future changes. Lack of funding is just a reason to enter this event. What needs to be developed will continue to develop, what needs to be manufactured will continue to be manufactured, and only some other things will change. You really don't understand why I chose MDA.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 You maintain hostility towards me, I understand. We are not completely in the same camp, and I am also wary of backing you. Perhaps we need more time. You can also choose not to buy.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 TUPL told me that he is making a big bomb (FAE), but he himself admits that it is very simple to make
KPL told me that his bomber is very powerful and could ignore my anti-aircraft firepower. Then he showed me a modified engine thrust 23 Mach 140000 resistance bomber
I'm not sure what your weapon is, so it's more interesting to say that it's such a mystery
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Didn't I emphasize it? I am waiting for the rebels to be defeated
I'm also looking forward to your new weapon, both TUPL and KPL have disappointed me a bit
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 The biggest problem with the rebels is their extreme tactics and failure to distinguish who the enemy is, so I will not send troops to support them. I will only wait for their failure to reform their thinking.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 1. Because S deserves it
I have always viewed issues from the perspective of the people, and as a president, I can do the same if it is a free election.
I have already explained to TUPL why we need to assist the rebels, which is not even considered aid because I did not directly send troops. Maybe I was blocked by him and he didn't reply to me, so I'll say it to you again.
People don't need a dictatorship president who lacks the ability and wants to shirk responsibility, and who betrays the country (in reality, a president who was defeated in foreign wars has long been voted out of office)
No ability: lost the invasion war, unable to handle the negative effects of war properly
To shirk responsibility: To be honest, in this situation, we should consider appeasing public anger, at least by publicly apologizing and stepping down. But this guy not only swaggered in the position of president, but after the outbreak of the civil war, he even said, 'I only work as a prime minister (Canonical).' Without thinking who caused all of this, he still shifted the blame.
Betraying the country: not because of a defeat, but because as a ruler, there was a civil war and he demanded assistance from foreign military intervention. I remember the defeat treaty didn't say that you were to be a subordinate, but this is entirely your own internal affairs issue. It's normal for rebels to seek help from outside. But you are the government, which is no different from increasing others' control over you.
Dictatorship: waging a war that has cost people and money, but also lost the battle, causing major negative effects, this did not step down. Is this the freedom of the president?
2. As for whether you have any objections or not, it's not important. Anyway, you couldn't distinguish them from the beginning.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 I have no objections, I am only responsible for providing them with a place to escape when the rebels lose
As a true communist, I advise you to fight faster. If you don't fight, the rebels will become fascists
It does look pretty good... but there is a problem with the close range gun code at the back, which makes it impossible to aim correctly.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Don't worry, it doesn't mean I support them, it's just because of ideology. And I am good friends with you, they will seek help from me, but it is very likely that they will betray me, so I also do not want them to succeed.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover We have decided to provide political asylum for the communist rebels of S, and we will reform their thinking.
People don't need a dictatorship president who lacks the ability and wants to shirk responsibility, and who betrays the country (in reality, a president who was defeated in foreign wars has long been voted out of office)
If necessary, we will send escort troops to bring him back home.
@SPsidearm ... If that's the case, then well, we won't send troops to help them. But we will provide him with political asylum
@SPsidearm What I was originally thinking was to help you eliminate the rebels, or to promise political asylum to my comrades. But you give me an extreme revolutionary option
@SPsidearm … Lenin's… Do you have a translator? 你指的是跟白军内战时期的，还是成立苏联后的
Wait... Sorry my translator seems to have retrieved the keywords and refused to translate. I want to confirm that this will determine our next strategy - is this rebel the Red Tsar or is it similar to Stalin's dictatorship??
After thinking for a moment, I realized that if these rebels really have some skills, then I think it's quite good. It's a good thing for the locals. At least I don't completely reject revengevism, it's better than some surrenderism. But based on their current performance, I think it's just a disaster.
Perhaps what we need to address is not rebellion, but the demands of the people. This is not something that airplanes, cannons, battleships can solve.
@SPsidearm Wow, the translator missed a lot of things for me. When I saw your first sentence, I thought you cherished your people very much. Unfortunately, the method of using borrowed weapons to kill people is not feasible for me, and you cannot evade responsibility for it. In fact, if we really want to pursue responsibility, any reason is acceptable.
@SPsidearm ? wdym
@SPsidearm It's okay, I don't think TUPL likes it either
@SPsidearm Just right for me to try the latest single soldier top attack rocket
Um... in principle, this is your internal affair and Antetus will not interfere.
But based on my understanding of military affairs, I can boldly point out that this will not lead to a second war, because the rebellious people are not aware of the war situation, but the military is absolutely aware.
Just like politicians can make bold statements in front of journalists, but the military dare not act rashly.
Of course, we don't mind taking the opportunity to launch a communist revolution to liberate those who have suffered in wars initiated by imperialist rulers, so let MDA answer it
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 1. Due to the excessive power of the decoy in the game, it is difficult for the missiles to hit the target, and at this time, machine guns are more effective. But FT missile immune decoy, which is difficult to detect, is a good choice. The meaning of the last sentence is that some people use missiles with extremely high speeds to shorten flight time and achieve what is called beyond visual range.
2. My worldview was born from games, but to further improve and form an independent worldview, I need to break free from the limitations of game mechanics.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Also, I'm not completely following the game, so I don't have compatibility with you guys
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 The key is that the missile will not be disturbed during flight. I know what you want to do, take down your superluminal missile for me.
Can I keep only the main gun, hull, and some tower?
When is the deadline
Heli
T
@Rb2h I don't think this is repairable, it should be a missile characteristic
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 There is always a problem with using missiles, which is that they fly like missiles. If FT technology is used to ensure that the bomb always faces the target and inertia is used as power, it should approach your statement.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 FT only
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 By entering ignotionDelay in the missile XML and filling in the value as 0.02, the tail smoke can be cancelled through a bug
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 1. What kind of effect do you want it to have in the end
2. Impossible, missiles are the simplest. Why do you think he failed? Which performance did you judge him by?
The simplest way is to use missiles. A slightly more difficult task is to achieve non lockable interference by deceiving the system. The most difficult way is to achieve lock free and tamper proof through FT
I have various effects here, what type do you want?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 ok
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Can we sell things to him after he is defeated?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Since you have infantry equipment, there may be something you will like at my military exhibition later... Oh, it could also be something you dislike and feel fortunate about
@TheUltimatePlaneLover By the way, what do you think of card games? I am planning to create our DIY cards based on a World War II card game called Kards
@TheUltimatePlaneLover …
I'm telling you, I want to make my own A40, but you're not happy. Then I exchanged it with a surrender treaty, and you agreed. Then, by repeatedly emphasizing the uncontrollability of the A40D, you hinted at me and triggered a game of air force between us. In the end, I changed direction and ended it all.
*In non war situations, all A40Ds I shoot down are considered legitimate defense
I even told you the name, QX-6 Heavy Angel.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover You don't know? Can you guess which plane I signed the surrender agreement for? I specifically came over to tell you.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Installing a large number of weapons would make the entire aircraft's configuration appear cluttered, which we gamers may enjoy. However, if placed in a war environment, I think it would be better to disperse them.
@SPsidearm QX-6(Compared to A40D, but canceled due to obstruction and direction change)@TheUltimatePlaneLover @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
It is also because of this that the third article of the non aggression treaty was born
The A40s and T-3 always have a problem called stacking weapons, and I don't want QX-6 to go down this path too
@KPLBall @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Why are you afraid of suicide attacks? This thing didn't work much in the later stages of World War II.
@SPsidearm @KPLBall Does your MDA Navy not have decent anti-aircraft weapons
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 me too. But there is a saying in the business world, don't look for demand, but create demand.
Of course, the means must be legal
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 What I mean is, since you're sure I haven't expressed any intention of starting a war, what else do you really want?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Do you want to see things like A-fired B-guided missiles, satellite detection, artillery guided drones, data links, electromagnetic interference, and beyond visual range strikes in this world?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 … ? So what do you want?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Oh, by the way, due to the deviation in our war game theory after the Fourth Military Reform. So I divided my weapons into two worlds. In the world with MDA, the definition of my weapon is entirely determined by TUPL. You know what this means.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 ? I only remember saying that we should start an arms race. You are afraid that I will start a war, and I am also afraid that you will start a war. What do you think is the significance of signing a non aggression treaty?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Also, this matter will not prevent future changes. Lack of funding is just a reason to enter this event. What needs to be developed will continue to develop, what needs to be manufactured will continue to be manufactured, and only some other things will change. You really don't understand why I chose MDA.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 You maintain hostility towards me, I understand. We are not completely in the same camp, and I am also wary of backing you. Perhaps we need more time. You can also choose not to buy.