@DeeganWithABazooka No, the missile is an FT missile, and the starting method is not very important. The reason why shells can be used to start is that I have tied the starting method to the number of shells.
By the way, this is my earliest FT missile, far inferior to current technology
@KPLBall If this is your universe, then of course I have no objections.
But! You must mark it at the beginning!
This is not a warning, but because I am familiar with you, I am able to restrain myself. Let other Chinese people see, that is direct blasting.
Who can withstand splitting someone else's country in half?
This is a mass-produced subsonic missile, so it can be intercepted.
FT is not a symbol of OP, it is just a means of diversifying weapons. But the OP caused by the all-round impact brought by diversified weapons is another matter.
@RestlessGalaxies I noticed that there is a clause in the entry that restricts the G-force. If I cannot meet the requirements, will my eligibility for the competition be cancelled or will all points be deducted for this project
@TheUltimatePlaneLover But the reality is that once a systematic military force is established, it can only be countered by another systematic force. You suggested I target the weak points of three tanks individually,yet what I see is the challenge of simultaneously engaging all three tanks in combat.
My response is that tanks are far more expensive than missiles. I am the "Joint Firepower Strike Doctrine." While the rules explicitly prohibit the deployment of overpowered weapons, the coordinated integration of multiple systematic weapon systems allows for a seamless circumvention of these restrictions.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I've got a grasp of the features of your three tanks, but your perspective has me deeply intrigued. Putting aside your opening two statements for a moment-specifically, 'Your opponent's blindside is the past: ancient tactics prevail.'-are you trying to get me to throw myself into a suicidal armor-penetration arms race with you
here?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Your combat performance here is really confusing. Even electromagnetic cannons specialized in armor-piercing attacks can't penetrate your armor. So let me ask you—what exactly can destroy it?
You said, "Oh, this tank was designed to sacrifice speed for heavy armor." Fine, if regular tank shells can't pierce it, I can accept that as part of its unique characteristics.
But now you're telling me, "Oh, electromagnetic cannons can't penetrate it either"? The whole point of electromagnetic cannon tanks is to sacrifice other capabilities for extreme penetration power. Yet you're claiming even those are useless against it. Then let me ask you—does it make sense that "tanks capable of resisting electromagnetic cannons get destroyed by air-to-surface missiles" or "nuke-resistant tanks are eliminated by guided bombs"? If you insist nothing can destroy this tank, what am I supposed to use? Cruise missiles? Ballistic missiles?
And don't get me started on SPsidearm's M5A1 that can withstand ten electromagnetic cannon hits. If I recall correctly, that's their main battle tank. How exactly are we supposed to destroy that? "Oh, it's made from super materials excavated from the desert"—isn't that just lazy hand-waving lore? Why not claim they collaborated with Martians while you're at it?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I want to know, how exactly am l supposed to destroy a tank that can withstand ten hits from an electromagnetic cannon? With your sudden material science breakthrough, how is anyone else supposed to compete? @SPsidearm
@DeeganWithABazooka Of course, it's a backward product anyway.
@DeeganWithABazooka No, the missile is an FT missile, and the starting method is not very important. The reason why shells can be used to start is that I have tied the starting method to the number of shells.
By the way, this is my earliest FT missile, far inferior to current technology
@UnitedinOne90XCVBNKA "" I think I should launch a massive airstrike and attacks using some AC-130 we bought from the U.S in 1998.
Ya know what, no imma take that back"
It doesn't feel very realistic
@DeeganWithABazooka ? pardon?
@DeeganWithABazooka Wow, indeed.
Sorry, this is an older taglist
@DeeganWithABazooka It should have been shelled by RB107 ships last month and repaired two days later
@KPLBall If this is your universe, then of course I have no objections.
But! You must mark it at the beginning!
This is not a warning, but because I am familiar with you, I am able to restrain myself. Let other Chinese people see, that is direct blasting.
Who can withstand splitting someone else's country in half?
You were supposed to focus on the Congo Civil War Challenge properly. Why did you have to insert your personal agenda here? Are you out of yourmind?
@KPLBall What timeline are you on? Did you invent history?
If you don't provide a clear explanation, I will report you for involvement in politics
West China
East China
你想干嘛?
tell me why
@KPLBall fine bro, I wont tag you next time
@KPLBall so… Have you withdrawn from the war?
This is a mass-produced subsonic missile, so it can be intercepted.
FT is not a symbol of OP, it is just a means of diversifying weapons. But the OP caused by the all-round impact brought by diversified weapons is another matter.
@RB107 (RRHI - Loyalist)
-@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore (Loyalist)
@NominalSituation (Sorbet Onion - Loyalist)
@NerfAddict (MDA - Loyalist)
-@Boeing727200F (MDA - Loyalist)
-@SuperSuperTheSylph (Diable Defense - Loyalist)
@Dracul0Anderson (Skypark - Loyalist?)
-@SPSidearm (DoF Leader - Loyalist?)
-@MonsNotTheMonster (Pearlian Republic - Loyalist)
@JaxHere (MDA - Loyalist)
-@LunarEclipseSP (Snowstone - Loyalist)
@UnitedinOne90 (Loyalist)
@windshifter1 (MDA - Loyalist)
-@Karroc9522 (MDA - Loyalist)
@DeeganWithABazooka (Deegan - Loyalist)
@TheMouse (MDA Leader - Loyalist)
-@Monarchii (The Monarchii - Loyalist)
@SamuelJamesCastor (Snowstone - Loyalist)
@CrestelAeronautics (MDA - Loyalist)
-@TheUltimatePlaneLover (- MDA - Loyalist)
-@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 (MDA - Loyalist)
@Zero0Two2
@BlackGearCompany
@Graingy … Let's forget about it. With this time, my stealth carrier based aircraft have been mass-produced
@Graingy 12 F-225, $240 million USD, no time limit
@Graingy Okay, then I won't force you. Cancel time limit, no rush
@Graingy How much are you raising the price? If it's too much, I'll just use my own
@Graingy 12 F-225, $240 million USD
@Graingy I need 12 planes, the faster the better. Can you give me a price.
@Graingy Do you have a shipboard aircraft? Delivery within two days, you can set the price
@RestlessGalaxies …?
I don't think most people would think of the one you mentioned…
@RestlessGalaxies Um... It makes sense, anyway, limiting G-force only requires adding a correction code to the vector engine
@RestlessGalaxies I noticed that there is a clause in the entry that restricts the G-force. If I cannot meet the requirements, will my eligibility for the competition be cancelled or will all points be deducted for this project
must VTOL?
@Lake so bad
@Someonefun yeah I saw it.
To be honest, I am honored to receive such an evaluation. I hope you can continue to work hard in the future
@Lake surely no
I am sorry to hear that
@Subsere Can you let me see it?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover surely…
@SPsidearm surely
@TheUltimatePlaneLover But the reality is that once a systematic military force is established, it can only be countered by another systematic force. You suggested I target the weak points of three tanks individually,yet what I see is the challenge of simultaneously engaging all three tanks in combat.
My response is that tanks are far more expensive than missiles. I am the "Joint Firepower Strike Doctrine." While the rules explicitly prohibit the deployment of overpowered weapons, the coordinated integration of multiple systematic weapon systems allows for a seamless circumvention of these restrictions.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I've got a grasp of the features of your three tanks, but your perspective has me deeply intrigued. Putting aside your opening two statements for a moment-specifically, 'Your opponent's blindside is the past: ancient tactics prevail.'-are you trying to get me to throw myself into a suicidal armor-penetration arms race with you
here?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover ? wdym
@Subsere Then you just need to write 'Eject' on the detachers
@Subsere "Eject=1"
Which variable did you set for 'Eject'?
?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Your combat performance here is really confusing. Even electromagnetic cannons specialized in armor-piercing attacks can't penetrate your armor. So let me ask you—what exactly can destroy it?
You said, "Oh, this tank was designed to sacrifice speed for heavy armor." Fine, if regular tank shells can't pierce it, I can accept that as part of its unique characteristics.
But now you're telling me, "Oh, electromagnetic cannons can't penetrate it either"? The whole point of electromagnetic cannon tanks is to sacrifice other capabilities for extreme penetration power. Yet you're claiming even those are useless against it. Then let me ask you—does it make sense that "tanks capable of resisting electromagnetic cannons get destroyed by air-to-surface missiles" or "nuke-resistant tanks are eliminated by guided bombs"? If you insist nothing can destroy this tank, what am I supposed to use? Cruise missiles? Ballistic missiles?
And don't get me started on SPsidearm's M5A1 that can withstand ten electromagnetic cannon hits. If I recall correctly, that's their main battle tank. How exactly are we supposed to destroy that? "Oh, it's made from super materials excavated from the desert"—isn't that just lazy hand-waving lore? Why not claim they collaborated with Martians while you're at it?
Congrats on silver!
@SPsidearm I see
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I want to know, how exactly am l supposed to destroy a tank that can withstand ten hits from an electromagnetic cannon? With your sudden material science breakthrough, how is anyone else supposed to compete? @SPsidearm
@SPsidearm I am sorry, how can I use the railgun?
0.001,0.001,0.001…