@TheUltimatePlaneLover Speaking of which, ZG-6A/B (unreleased) has a self destruct bug that will immediately self destruct if it is generated by AI, and I cannot solve it. As an alternative, I will release a separate missile for the storyline AI
Can be equivalent to ZG-6
@KPLBall Make me laugh so hard. I haven't loaded the picture yet, so I can't see it. Let me ask you - ZG-6A will immediately self destruct when manipulated by AI, so which SAM are you destroying?
@SPsidearm Well... Not really. What I'm saying is that I understand you're tagging someone who made an appointment in advance.
As for M4 and AK... I think we need to consider them based on the current situation, such as the snowy environment in Snowtown
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 @TheUltimatePlaneLover The liftscale value of the wing is 2.5 (Normally, it should be taken as 1. Increasing the value can help improve maneuverability), which causes abnormal shaking of the wing after the aircraft enters the water. This bug was caused by some unknown reason. This is my inference conclusion
@Subsere … Have you tested it separately? Your problem is not because two equations are strung together, but because the output value is problematic, even if there is only one of them, it is still the same.
It's quite troublesome for you to change this problem, but now you have two variables in your hand: LandingGear and GearDown, which correspond to four different situations. Then you can change the judgment from the GearDown variable to two variables, corresponding to the situations you want.
The problem is obvious, it's that your numerical value is incorrect. LandingGear only has 0 and 1 two numbers. I suggest you add a judgment on the LandingGear value to determine whether to release or retract the landing gear
@SPsidearm Radiation engineers emit radiation rays, and their actual effects are similar. We can discuss them together. The biggest difference between you is that you can also fight against tanks.
Also, is your technological point too futuristic
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Indeed, stealth tanks are immune to BFX-20A's autonomous search radar, requiring them to rely on other people's laser guidance
But there is also a solution, or in other words, I am already working on it.
@RB107 It's like this, and based on the weapons I may use in the war, I should be banned immediately after the war ends because they are all classified as OP weapons.
Now I'm completely adding debuffs to myself
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Speaking of which, ZG-6A/B (unreleased) has a self destruct bug that will immediately self destruct if it is generated by AI, and I cannot solve it. As an alternative, I will release a separate missile for the storyline AI
+1Can be equivalent to ZG-6
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
@KPLBall But this is not a plane
My picture has been loaded, you... Forget it, I don't want to say anything more, let TUPL and the shell explain it.
@KPLBall Also, next I will test your MDA's air defense capabilities.@TheUltimatePlaneLover
Is this the soldier you brought out?
@KPLBall Make me laugh so hard. I haven't loaded the picture yet, so I can't see it. Let me ask you - ZG-6A will immediately self destruct when manipulated by AI, so which SAM are you destroying?
Where is my air defense?
Resolution in progress: We need to ensure the safety of our outposts in the sea area more than our allies.
Effect: Deploying NS-1 on the Isle of Wight
@SPsidearm Well... Not really. What I'm saying is that I understand you're tagging someone who made an appointment in advance.
As for M4 and AK... I think we need to consider them based on the current situation, such as the snowy environment in Snowtown
@SPsidearm fine. I know now
… Why only tagged them two
@Zero0Two2
Usually, we reserve space during production, so it is difficult to directly modify the finished product. But you can try model clipping
@BlackGearCompany hum? can you let me see?
@BlackGearCompany different. Equivalent to the difference between zero and non-existent
+1@KPLBall Yeah!
Change calculateDrag to false
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Too small, the details cannot be printed well
@BlackGearCompany Of course you can.
+1@Graingy surely
@Graingy ? 就悬浮器啊… wait… Hovering Device?
@SuperSuperTheSylph @YarisHatchback
+1T̴̡̻͚̪͌̇̓̾̅͝ḫ̵̝̼̬̑͗͌͌̾͝ḭ̴̛̿̉̇͌̚s̴̜̱̥̼̈́̑̋̆̿ ̶̬̬͙̈́̆̏͝͝A̷̰̓̆̔͒̚I̵̡̗̗̥̝͋̀̑̎̕ ̷̥̠̑̆̽̐̕h̴͚͑̇̆̀̈́a̷̭̓̇̈́͛̐̇s̷̨̱̝͉̘͂̿̑͝ ̵̼̖̫͍̏͋̀̽1̷̧̻̞̪̫̮̒̑͋̒͌0̸̧̭͓͋̐̎͊0̵̧̦̹̖̾͛͋%̸̡̻̟̠̈́̾ ̶̛̘͙̫̥͛̌̋s̸̘̒̐̚͝o̶̧̫͆̊̈́̔͝u̴̦̦͓̾̈́̑̾̈́l̷̛̪͋͊̏̚@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 @TheUltimatePlaneLover The liftscale value of the wing is 2.5 (Normally, it should be taken as 1. Increasing the value can help improve maneuverability), which causes abnormal shaking of the wing after the aircraft enters the water. This bug was caused by some unknown reason. This is my inference conclusion
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Normal speed and fast speed do have this bug, but slow speed does not.
This matter is unremarkable - Sociology+3.
@Subsere fine
@Subsere What effect do you ultimately want
@Subsere … interchanging… Wait for me for a moment
@Subsere … Have you tested it separately? Your problem is not because two equations are strung together, but because the output value is problematic, even if there is only one of them, it is still the same.
It's quite troublesome for you to change this problem, but now you have two variables in your hand: LandingGear and GearDown, which correspond to four different situations. Then you can change the judgment from the GearDown variable to two variables, corresponding to the situations you want.
The problem is obvious, it's that your numerical value is incorrect. LandingGear only has 0 and 1 two numbers. I suggest you add a judgment on the LandingGear value to determine whether to release or retract the landing gear
So whats wrong
before tagged
@SPsidearm …
@AeroTactical But there are also neutral people there, and we have a mutual defense relationship
Can you remove this article
Wright Islands outpost
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Of course I would say that. What I mean is how to explain these to him?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover ?
Of course I would say that. What I mean is how to explain these to him?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover My ally just launched a nuclear strike on me, and I don't know what to say, so I've decided to approach you
@SPsidearm This is not futuristic, then what is futuristic?
@SPsidearm Radiation engineers emit radiation rays, and their actual effects are similar. We can discuss them together. The biggest difference between you is that you can also fight against tanks.
Also, is your technological point too futuristic
@SPsidearm RGG? wait a minute… I see.
Whose radiation engineer (Red Alert 2)?
No problem, I specialize in beyond visual range
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Indeed, stealth tanks are immune to BFX-20A's autonomous search radar, requiring them to rely on other people's laser guidance
But there is also a solution, or in other words, I am already working on it.
@SuperSuperTheSylph Thanks!
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I think this is really important because the lag of the equipment will directly cause devastating damage to all FT weapons
+1@RB107 Good luck (¯︶¯)
+1@RB107 It's like this, and based on the weapons I may use in the war, I should be banned immediately after the war ends because they are all classified as OP weapons.
Now I'm completely adding debuffs to myself
... An inexplicable plot. Whose ship is this?
+1@32 What a pity…
This is my university's 3D printer
Happy birthday! ૮₍ ˃̶ ꇴ ˂̶ ₎ა
Happy birthday! ૮₍ ˃̶ ꇴ ˂̶ ₎ა
+1