@TouhouFan11 In fact, the sample weapon has been completed, but I believe its performance does not match its over 170 parts. It is also relatively easy to fix, just adjust the 48 FT formulas at least three times, and I am currently working on it
@TouhouFan11 Thank you, I swear that the weapons I make will definitely impress you. I made a breakthrough yesterday and today I can produce the first experimental sample. If you want to see it, I am willing to showcase it
I must say it amazed me. This bomb uses a completely different technology from mine, but in some aspects it is even better than mine. I feel ashamed for suspecting you before.
But I still want to offer my opinion. You can completely name torpedoes and rockets the same, which can remove unnecessary weapon lists
Bro, I'm worried that you might give up halfway like last time, after all, making weapons is so difficult but important. Perhaps a sense of urgency is the best motivation - so my friend, how about coming to a game? From now on, I will start making a weapon that I have never encountered before, and there are many new designs that I need to gradually explore. So bro, would you like to try to publish weapons before me?
Wishing you success. As a weapon used in the plot, its performance may determine the direction of the plot, so it needs to be controlled within an appropriate range.
@TouhouFan11 I have removed any words that may seem uncomfortable to you, but I have retained my thoughts. You can look at this, not that.
I'm sorry, I can't compromise on this - it can't be an interceptor.
As the name suggests, interceptors refer to aircraft that sacrifice their maneuverability and air combat capabilities for outstanding high-altitude and high-speed performance, and are generally used to intercept important large targets such as bombers. Therefore, for an interceptor, speed is an important indicator, and most aircraft designs should revolve around "speed".
The wings of this aircraft are long and narrow, with a high aspect ratio and low induced drag, resulting in excellent maneuverability …and poor supersonic performance. The increase in wave resistance makes this design unsuitable for supersonic aircraft and is generally used for subsonic aircraft.So this design is not very suitable for supersonic interceptors
It's not that I took it out of context, it's your aircraft design that determines everything. Typical interceptors include the Mig 25 and F14. You can refer to them.
I hope you and your friends can consider carefully, either changing the aircraft positioning or changing the aircraft design.
@TouhouFan11 I also have many friends with depression in China, and it's impossible for me to say such things. Don't worry. I don't know how to say things like "understand you", and until I understand your situation, this sentence is just empty talk. The extreme language I speak of is only a few connotations, without any insulting words or qualities. I'm sorry to hear that.
After clarifying the issue, the repair time for this aircraft should not exceed one minute. The focus is still on identifying the cause of the problem.This is the importance of learning how to fix bugs.
Fixing bugs is not an easy task, and compromising on bugs is not always a good idea. In the future, I will try my best to provide a tutorial specifically to teach people how to fix bugs.
And you only repaired this aircraft, not its problem - you avoided this problem by compromising on the aircraft's performance requirements.
The actual problem with this aircraft is that the angle of attack is too large, causing the wings to stall. The maximum angle of attack of the original aircraft exceeds 20 degrees, while my repaired version has an angle of attack of around 25 degrees; But your aircraft's angle of attack is only about 8 degrees, so it naturally won't cause any problems and hasn't solved the actual problem.
Great repair, you used a different technique than me. But this plane has more problems than you imagine, such as different deflection angles of the left and right canards.
Wow, this ship really surprises me. It reminds me of my experience playing "MW"... Wait, only 123 parts??!
@TouhouFan11 az（中文缩写，没有特殊含义）Looking forward to your new work,bro
我还以为你退游了
@TouhouFan11 Thank you! I have sent you the website for the test product, you can try it out
@TouhouFan11 I have completed two out of eight weapons, and now I will show you.
+1https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/3ryOnV/Unknown-experimental-weapon
@TouhouFan11 In fact, the sample weapon has been completed, but I believe its performance does not match its over 170 parts. It is also relatively easy to fix, just adjust the 48 FT formulas at least three times, and I am currently working on it
Cool
+1@TouhouFan11 Thank you, I swear that the weapons I make will definitely impress you. I made a breakthrough yesterday and today I can produce the first experimental sample. If you want to see it, I am willing to showcase it
@TouhouFan11 Yes, whether it's a competition or a bet, it always belongs to healthy competition, aiming to help us grow together
However, this does not mean that I will give up on weapon development. In the future, I will launch my new weapons
I must say it amazed me. This bomb uses a completely different technology from mine, but in some aspects it is even better than mine. I feel ashamed for suspecting you before.
But I still want to offer my opinion. You can completely name torpedoes and rockets the same, which can remove unnecessary weapon lists
@TouhouFan11 wow
Bro, I'm worried that you might give up halfway like last time, after all, making weapons is so difficult but important. Perhaps a sense of urgency is the best motivation - so my friend, how about coming to a game? From now on, I will start making a weapon that I have never encountered before, and there are many new designs that I need to gradually explore. So bro, would you like to try to publish weapons before me?
Wishing you success. As a weapon used in the plot, its performance may determine the direction of the plot, so it needs to be controlled within an appropriate range.
I still need to make at least three more planes before I can start writing stories... I hope the website can persist until then
Good reference, I will pay an upvote.
@Superliner350 Bro, I don't know why, but, thanks.
+1A very good story, reminds me of Chinese air combat movies.(中国人应该知道我什么意思，请结合前一个人的评论)
+1@TouhouFan11
+2@TouhouFan11 It's okay, that's not a big problem
@Yish42 More precisely, it destroyed the pylon, causing the cannon to fall off completely
+1@Yish42 Maybe you are right
I don't know why, but when slow motion is activated, the cannon may damage itself
Amazing changes! This jet really amazed me!(Sincerely)
@Gabeidkimtall Perhaps you can find something from the official website tutorial
The two episodes with a soothing rhythm helped me relax and unwind.
You can add your own columns, don't say you can't find them
XML→JR→disableBaseMesh→true
@TouhouFan11 Haha, the last time I had a meal was last year.
@TouhouFan11 Maybe it can. A multi-purpose fighter jet that has dropped a bomb is an aerial superiority fighter, which is more suitable.
@TouhouFan11 That's good.I'm going to bed soon. I wish you a happy new year in advance
@TouhouFan11 I have removed any words that may seem uncomfortable to you, but I have retained my thoughts. You can look at this, not that.
I'm sorry, I can't compromise on this - it can't be an interceptor.
As the name suggests, interceptors refer to aircraft that sacrifice their maneuverability and air combat capabilities for outstanding high-altitude and high-speed performance, and are generally used to intercept important large targets such as bombers. Therefore, for an interceptor, speed is an important indicator, and most aircraft designs should revolve around "speed".
The wings of this aircraft are long and narrow, with a high aspect ratio and low induced drag, resulting in excellent maneuverability …and poor supersonic performance. The increase in wave resistance makes this design unsuitable for supersonic aircraft and is generally used for subsonic aircraft.So this design is not very suitable for supersonic interceptors
It's not that I took it out of context, it's your aircraft design that determines everything. Typical interceptors include the Mig 25 and F14. You can refer to them.
I hope you and your friends can consider carefully, either changing the aircraft positioning or changing the aircraft design.
@TouhouFan11 I'm just providing some suggestions, yes, it's ultimately up to you to decide.
@TouhouFan11 I also have many friends with depression in China, and it's impossible for me to say such things. Don't worry. I don't know how to say things like "understand you", and until I understand your situation, this sentence is just empty talk. The extreme language I speak of is only a few connotations, without any insulting words or qualities. I'm sorry to hear that.
@TouhouFan11 No no no no like this I'm sorry sorry sorry.
@TouhouFan11 Okay, it seems like I did something wrong. I'm sorry.
A good ground fighter, but why use a cruise missile to attack the air?
@TouhouFan11 Video…Wait for me to start the VPN
@scorpion2006 …I seem to have only pointed out the problem and not provided any suggestions. If my words give you new ideas, I'm glad.
+1Looking forward to the finished product
After clarifying the issue, the repair time for this aircraft should not exceed one minute. The focus is still on identifying the cause of the problem.This is the importance of learning how to fix bugs.
Fixing bugs is not an easy task, and compromising on bugs is not always a good idea. In the future, I will try my best to provide a tutorial specifically to teach people how to fix bugs.
And you only repaired this aircraft, not its problem - you avoided this problem by compromising on the aircraft's performance requirements.
The actual problem with this aircraft is that the angle of attack is too large, causing the wings to stall. The maximum angle of attack of the original aircraft exceeds 20 degrees, while my repaired version has an angle of attack of around 25 degrees; But your aircraft's angle of attack is only about 8 degrees, so it naturally won't cause any problems and hasn't solved the actual problem.
Great repair, you used a different technique than me. But this plane has more problems than you imagine, such as different deflection angles of the left and right canards.
+1@TouhouFan11 But that is not a long-term solution. The fuselage cannot abandon weapons, and some other characteristics cannot be completely replaced.
This is the first time I have heard about this bug.However, similar bugs may indeed occur when the aircraft turns
@TouhouFan11 Hm... Okay, I think I'll try making an AWACS
@TouhouFan11 Yes, and the central lift body is a very prominent feature. So it's hard for me to say which plane it looks like
@TouhouFan11 Mig-29?The large aspect ratio of the wings of this aircraft makes it more like the FA18.
@TouhouFan11 You're right. But please guess why I asked you which plane to make next.