@Someonefun The completion of that plane will take a long time. I hope you will give it a try and see how much ability and technology you can tap into it
@JuliusCeasor98 Hm... then you are in the early stages of shaping the world. Now your world is basically static, and there are no major events driving world development, and the only descriptions are too vague. Keep going, you can't stop here.
@Someonefun Even if you say that... Alright, guys, let's take a look at what this plane can become with all my high-end technology, even experimental technology
I am used to saving any parts that may be useful to me during the research process of this game, and there are about 197 of them so far. I am not sure which ones are specific.
I originally wanted to see the specific content of your lore, but I couldn't find any more text. I only know the information provided in your two account profiles
@JuliusCeasor98 ... em... Okay, I won't release the revision. In fact, I have already completed the super modification of this aircraft, but it lacks the permission of the original author. I will keep it as a technical reserve for myself.
If you encounter difficulties in making fighter jets in the future, I may be able to help you.
Oh, there's one more thing. I am also writing my own "lore"
@Luisonxd God, my translator doesn't know what "principales" means, I'm sorry. But your aircraft experiences high speed loss and poor energy storage during maneuvering. If there is not enough power to supplement, this will greatly limit its performance.
By the way, the prerequisite for China's willingness to export the J-20 fighter jet is that more advanced fighter jets have been put into service on a large scale, and it will take at least another 50 years. Betraying in this situation will not cause any losses to China, it will only result in you losing one life-saving card.
The prototype is good, but the maneuverability of this fighter jet is very poor. It should be because the aircraft is too small, which prevents the wing area from increasing and results in a larger wing load. But the 300 wing load is not very severe, I suggest you replace the full motion canards to improve performance.
Man, although there are indeed some shortcomings, your work is already superior to most beginners. What you lack is just some experience, and I believe you can improve these issues in the upcoming time. Finally, welcome to SP.
How could it be you again. Let me see... why is the center of gravity and lift center of gravity so far apart? Big sweep wings? Small horizontal tail and control surface? Such a large wing load! It's hopeless, why not build a new one.
@TouhouFan11 Thanks bro. Looking forward to the follow-up of your story. I am going to face the college entrance examination and currently have no time to update my story
@Robomo119E I certainly wouldn't force an enemy aircraft to have meticulous workmanship or similarity, as that would be too difficult for the author and player's phones. But the J-15 has canard wings, which is a very obvious feature.
@SumDood Well, this is designed for fighter jets, making it easier for pilots to focus during air combat without deliberately keeping an eye on data updates on the HUD. I will publish it tonight
This is a fighter jet that adopts this design, you can give it a try.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/sm57DO/PX-9N-Starlight-fight
@SumDood It should be due to the excessive angle of attack leading to a sharp increase in drag. I don't think this is a problem, rather it's a trade-off for aircraft performance. Increasing the angle of attack is the best choice to increase maneuverability without changing the wing area, but the disadvantage is poor energy storage and rapid energy loss. However, due to the powerful engine of this aircraft, which can quickly replenish the lost energy, I did not consider this issue in my design.
@Someonefun The completion of that plane will take a long time. I hope you will give it a try and see how much ability and technology you can tap into it
A completely symmetrical cockpit…
+1@OPTICJATT Now only you know
+1@OPTICJATT If you understand, then there's a problem.
@OPTICJATT Remember the behavior of someone misleading the audience in this tutorial video
This PSM…
The fact once again proves that the purpose of Simpleplanes is beyond my understanding
+1事实再一次刷新了我对简单飞机用途的认识
@JuliusCeasor98 Well... so busy
@JuliusCeasor98 Hm... then you are in the early stages of shaping the world. Now your world is basically static, and there are no major events driving world development, and the only descriptions are too vague. Keep going, you can't stop here.
@Someonefun Even if you say that... Alright, guys, let's take a look at what this plane can become with all my high-end technology, even experimental technology
Its nose really looks like the F100. Regarding your question, just change the number of activationGroup to 0
I am used to saving any parts that may be useful to me during the research process of this game, and there are about 197 of them so far. I am not sure which ones are specific.
I originally wanted to see the specific content of your lore, but I couldn't find any more text. I only know the information provided in your two account profiles
+1而且载弹量高这点没看出来。这种无人机可能的挂点也只有机翼上，而你不仅相比之下机翼短，还把发动机挂上面去了，占用空间。
有个问题。看这架飞机的构型更像是死神无人机之类的，那种最多属于察打一体无人机，应该只能在高空丢导弹。怎么还有机炮？像这种自身生存能力较低的飞机下低空不得被高射机炮等自行防空车往死里打？
@wstu 原来是这样，我还以为是你的哪个飞控的验证机
@JuliusCeasor98 ... em... Okay, I won't release the revision. In fact, I have already completed the super modification of this aircraft, but it lacks the permission of the original author. I will keep it as a technical reserve for myself.
+1If you encounter difficulties in making fighter jets in the future, I may be able to help you.
Oh, there's one more thing. I am also writing my own "lore"
@JuliusCeasor98 Well, this is a innovative setting. Since I feel that you have no ill intentions, I am happy to help you modify this plane.
No VR? God!
@Luisonxd God, my translator doesn't know what "principales" means, I'm sorry. But your aircraft experiences high speed loss and poor energy storage during maneuvering. If there is not enough power to supplement, this will greatly limit its performance.
By the way, the prerequisite for China's willingness to export the J-20 fighter jet is that more advanced fighter jets have been put into service on a large scale, and it will take at least another 50 years. Betraying in this situation will not cause any losses to China, it will only result in you losing one life-saving card.
+1The prototype is good, but the maneuverability of this fighter jet is very poor. It should be because the aircraft is too small, which prevents the wing area from increasing and results in a larger wing load. But the 300 wing load is not very severe, I suggest you replace the full motion canards to improve performance.
+1很有勇气的简介，爱来自爸爸美国
+1Did you really test fly this plane yourself?
+1I don't think this plane can get enough power to fly
这啥飞机？
+1这飞机有什么特别之处吗？我没看出来
Man, although there are indeed some shortcomings, your work is already superior to most beginners. What you lack is just some experience, and I believe you can improve these issues in the upcoming time. Finally, welcome to SP.
How could it be you again. Let me see... why is the center of gravity and lift center of gravity so far apart? Big sweep wings? Small horizontal tail and control surface? Such a large wing load! It's hopeless, why not build a new one.
+1@Justanormalindonesianguy2 Thanks bro. I'm not good at making details, so I hardly ever make real airplanes because they can easily deviate too much.
+1@Someonefun ？
@TouhouFan11 Thanks bro, let's make progress together (Although I don't think I have any time before June)
@TouhouFan11 You can do it, bro. I'm optimistic about you
@TouhouFan11 Thanks bro. Looking forward to the follow-up of your story. I am going to face the college entrance examination and currently have no time to update my story
@Robomo119E … You… I don't know what to say anymore, that's it. Thanks bro.
@Robomo119E I certainly wouldn't force an enemy aircraft to have meticulous workmanship or similarity, as that would be too difficult for the author and player's phones. But the J-15 has canard wings, which is a very obvious feature.
@Robomo119E Okay, I understand now. This is just your fantasy plane.
@Robomo119E J-11 does not have a naval version
@wstu @Justanormalindonesianguy2 @TouhouFan11
@LoneSpaceGaming But Su 33 has canard wings
@Justanormalindonesianguy2 Thanks bro
+1。。。I didn't even recognize it as a "flanker", what kind of plane is this?
@Mousewithamachinegun122 Thanks bro
@SumDood
@wstu @Justanormalindonesianguy2 @TouhouFan11
@wstu @Justanormalindonesianguy2 @TouhouFan11 @SumDood
@SumDood Don't worry, I won't blame you for it. I am very pleased
The signature in red font... In China, it more represents death or wanted. But it's okay, I can understand
@SumDood Well, this is designed for fighter jets, making it easier for pilots to focus during air combat without deliberately keeping an eye on data updates on the HUD. I will publish it tonight
This is a fighter jet that adopts this design, you can give it a try.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/sm57DO/PX-9N-Starlight-fight
@SumDood You are welcome. By the way, I have a new "toy" here, why don't you take a look?
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/qyB0tl/HMDS-Helmet-Sighting
@SumDood It should be due to the excessive angle of attack leading to a sharp increase in drag. I don't think this is a problem, rather it's a trade-off for aircraft performance. Increasing the angle of attack is the best choice to increase maneuverability without changing the wing area, but the disadvantage is poor energy storage and rapid energy loss. However, due to the powerful engine of this aircraft, which can quickly replenish the lost energy, I did not consider this issue in my design.