@FOXHOUND26 Great, but a single weapon cannot change the situation. To influence the war situation, at least large-scale production must be achieved, right? So at least you need an industrial scale with large-scale production capacity, right? So your production requires time and money, which cannot be compensated for immediately. The result is that this fighter jet can indeed achieve good results on local battlefields, but its actual influence is still limited.
Moreover, it's better to buy than to build, unless this aircraft can demonstrate stronger combat power than the purchased aircraft. I think it will take a long time to officially convert this fighter jet into the main force of the Air Force. During this period, I don't really feel that internal and external pressures will relax.
@FOXHOUND26 Have ≠ available. As a player, this setting certainly has no impact on building your own aircraft, but if it's in the story, I don't think a newly developed domestic fighter jet can have much competitiveness against strong foreign fighter jets. Just in terms of cost-effectiveness, I think it can already make a country make a choice.
I can't wait to see these planes anymore. I estimate that if the intimidators I have modified join this battle, they will only become their experience pack.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Haha That's up to your choice, at least I'm just someone who enjoys reading stories.
Regarding reverse engineering: I only choose what I need or am interested in doing reverse engineering, because I know that if I want to achieve my dreams, there are still many things I don't understand. As for airplanes like A40, I am more willing to study how to improve this aircraft than to study its technology.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover If you don't have that kind of idea, then I suggest how to do it safely. I am not very familiar with this war, nor am I sure of the level of importance both sides attach to it, so I am not sure if there is a way to make this war more intense and open up sales channels. In fact, ultimately, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive analysis based on your position and the actual situation of the war.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Um... I understand the situation, but your understanding of the political interests I mentioned seems a bit off. What I mean is: Do you want to take advantage of this opportunity, while their new weapons are not yet heavily equipped, to expand their influence and make them heavily rely on you in military equipment, so as to grasp their military lifeline.
You should know that even aiding aircraft does not mean making them combat effective. Ammunition supply and logistics maintenance are both costly and technical matters, and if a country's own strength is insufficient, it is likely to be dragged down as a result. So they ultimately have to find the seller to provide follow-up services. As long as they can't form an independent military industry system one day, there is no need to worry too much about this aspect.
Of course, the final product sold cannot be your most advanced. If you really do this, you deserve to be bitten back. You can start from their weakest areas, or try competing with their superior products with some secondary fighter jets. However, rather than being bitten back by someone, what you should be more worried about is whether he will perform reverse engineering (at least I will)
@TheUltimatePlaneLover You seem hesitant, buddy. I have some ideas, but I have to see your position. As their ally and arms dealer, do you value political or economic interests or both of them?
By the way, when it comes to a war between two arms buyers, why don't you become an arms broker and make huge profits, but rather personally participate in the war?
I'm not accusing you of using other people's custom parts to forcibly acquire AOA capabilities, but at least your plane should be able to fly normally, right? The other two people's planes can at least fly normally, and AOA is the icing on the cake. But your secret weapon can only AOA
@CrestelAeronautics Are you teasing me? Which of their planes like yours that pulls the control lever backwards on the ground, making it stand straight 90 degrees?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover ... It's not supporting attack planes, why should we value armor? Anyway, at least I have determined my upgrade direction - unmanned, miniaturized, and mass-produced development. Loyal wingman is a completely new combat concept, and aerial tanks are outdated.
To be honest, I really want to retrofit this aircraft, but the majority of its maneuverability comes from its extremely low weight and wing load, and in fact, its design is not very stunning. But I really want to change to this plane because I can't bear it to become a background board. Can I modify it?
Yes, that's what I want to see Post-Stall! Great FT formula, the only drawback is that it's difficult to control when it starts. I hope the final version can be improved
You are a bit eager for quick success and instant benefits. Don't you feel that after using AOA, your plane cannot be operated normally? You haven't even set up an activation group. The fact is that this aircraft cannot fly normally without AOA, it is not because this aircraft uses AOA, but because AOA uses this aircraft.
Since you have reached this point, I would rather directly hit the enemy plane with bricks.
@TheMouse em... Actually, I haven't had the experience of posting challenges yet. I will first post an unlisted project to try. So I hope you can help me see if this challenge is reasonable and interesting, also there's no need to worry about missing questions, I have a lot of backup options
@TheMouse However, I have only set some clear scoring requirements for this situational question (such as a speed score of ≥ 7 and a mobility score of ≥ 5), and added some hidden points (completing a situational emergency requires 5 points, which is generally a more stringent scoring standard, such as a mobility score of ≥ 8). How to obtain hidden points will be prompted in the context, and finally, the aircraft characteristics will be evaluated (such as whether it is a stealth aircraft, whether it is an electronic warfare aircraft, etc.). This is another hidden point, which is also 5)
This is a great design that is conducive to quickly deploying combat drones on the battlefield to increase advantages in aerial combat... Although I prefer to carry a suicide reconnaissance drone.
@TheMouse I have set its explosionscale to 15, so there should be no problem of no damage.
But I can't understand why it can instantly kill an aircraft with 9E+35 health of all parts
@Someonefun Sorry to hear that
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I'm glad, but I'm sorry, it's midnight Beijing time now.
@FOXHOUND26 4… Okay, it's obvious that this is advantageous
+1@FOXHOUND26 Ideas are feasible, but the road ahead is long and arduous
+1@FOXHOUND26 Great, but a single weapon cannot change the situation. To influence the war situation, at least large-scale production must be achieved, right? So at least you need an industrial scale with large-scale production capacity, right? So your production requires time and money, which cannot be compensated for immediately. The result is that this fighter jet can indeed achieve good results on local battlefields, but its actual influence is still limited.
+1Moreover, it's better to buy than to build, unless this aircraft can demonstrate stronger combat power than the purchased aircraft. I think it will take a long time to officially convert this fighter jet into the main force of the Air Force. During this period, I don't really feel that internal and external pressures will relax.
@FOXHOUND26 Have ≠ available. As a player, this setting certainly has no impact on building your own aircraft, but if it's in the story, I don't think a newly developed domestic fighter jet can have much competitiveness against strong foreign fighter jets. Just in terms of cost-effectiveness, I think it can already make a country make a choice.
+1@STALIN83
+1@byd114514 缩翼都缩成这样了，重点是还不能零半径。
有点小逆天了
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Thanks!
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Sorry, but what is TUPL?
I can't wait to see these planes anymore. I estimate that if the intimidators I have modified join this battle, they will only become their experience pack.
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Haha That's up to your choice, at least I'm just someone who enjoys reading stories.
Regarding reverse engineering: I only choose what I need or am interested in doing reverse engineering, because I know that if I want to achieve my dreams, there are still many things I don't understand. As for airplanes like A40, I am more willing to study how to improve this aircraft than to study its technology.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover If you don't have that kind of idea, then I suggest how to do it safely. I am not very familiar with this war, nor am I sure of the level of importance both sides attach to it, so I am not sure if there is a way to make this war more intense and open up sales channels. In fact, ultimately, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive analysis based on your position and the actual situation of the war.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Um... I understand the situation, but your understanding of the political interests I mentioned seems a bit off. What I mean is: Do you want to take advantage of this opportunity, while their new weapons are not yet heavily equipped, to expand their influence and make them heavily rely on you in military equipment, so as to grasp their military lifeline.
You should know that even aiding aircraft does not mean making them combat effective. Ammunition supply and logistics maintenance are both costly and technical matters, and if a country's own strength is insufficient, it is likely to be dragged down as a result. So they ultimately have to find the seller to provide follow-up services. As long as they can't form an independent military industry system one day, there is no need to worry too much about this aspect.
Of course, the final product sold cannot be your most advanced. If you really do this, you deserve to be bitten back. You can start from their weakest areas, or try competing with their superior products with some secondary fighter jets. However, rather than being bitten back by someone, what you should be more worried about is whether he will perform reverse engineering (at least I will)
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Sorry, can you put it in a different way? I didn't understand
@TheUltimatePlaneLover ？
@TheUltimatePlaneLover You seem hesitant, buddy. I have some ideas, but I have to see your position. As their ally and arms dealer, do you value political or economic interests or both of them?
By the way, when it comes to a war between two arms buyers, why don't you become an arms broker and make huge profits, but rather personally participate in the war?
@AirPhilippinesFlight541 666, nb
It looks like 00 was intercepted by PX while intercepting an intercontinental ballistic missile, not bad, kid.
@STALIN83 Thanks!
A very good airplane, I hope to renovate it, is that okay?
+1It looks like YF17 (prototype version of FA18). Looking forward to the actual performance
+1I'm not accusing you of using other people's custom parts to forcibly acquire AOA capabilities, but at least your plane should be able to fly normally, right? The other two people's planes can at least fly normally, and AOA is the icing on the cake. But your secret weapon can only AOA
@CrestelAeronautics Are you teasing me? Which of their planes like yours that pulls the control lever backwards on the ground, making it stand straight 90 degrees?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Oh, I understand what you mean now
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover ... It's not supporting attack planes, why should we value armor? Anyway, at least I have determined my upgrade direction - unmanned, miniaturized, and mass-produced development. Loyal wingman is a completely new combat concept, and aerial tanks are outdated.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Thank you. By the way, why do you think this plane is a bit behind schedule?
To be honest, I really want to retrofit this aircraft, but the majority of its maneuverability comes from its extremely low weight and wing load, and in fact, its design is not very stunning. But I really want to change to this plane because I can't bear it to become a background board. Can I modify it?
It's hard to imagine that you would think this plane is very weak…
Yes, that's what I want to see Post-Stall! Great FT formula, the only drawback is that it's difficult to control when it starts. I hope the final version can be improved
You are a bit eager for quick success and instant benefits. Don't you feel that after using AOA, your plane cannot be operated normally? You haven't even set up an activation group. The fact is that this aircraft cannot fly normally without AOA, it is not because this aircraft uses AOA, but because AOA uses this aircraft.
Since you have reached this point, I would rather directly hit the enemy plane with bricks.
AOA…
@TheMouse em... Actually, I haven't had the experience of posting challenges yet. I will first post an unlisted project to try. So I hope you can help me see if this challenge is reasonable and interesting, also there's no need to worry about missing questions, I have a lot of backup options
@TheMouse However, I have only set some clear scoring requirements for this situational question (such as a speed score of ≥ 7 and a mobility score of ≥ 5), and added some hidden points (completing a situational emergency requires 5 points, which is generally a more stringent scoring standard, such as a mobility score of ≥ 8). How to obtain hidden points will be prompted in the context, and finally, the aircraft characteristics will be evaluated (such as whether it is a stealth aircraft, whether it is an electronic warfare aircraft, etc.). This is another hidden point, which is also 5)
+1@TheMouse yeah
@TheMouse ok…
Happy birthday!
+1This is a great design that is conducive to quickly deploying combat drones on the battlefield to increase advantages in aerial combat... Although I prefer to carry a suicide reconnaissance drone.
@OkaNieba Well, thank you for correcting it. I am using a translator, so there may be a problem with it
+1It seems that you have many misunderstandings about the J-16, such as the fact that it doesn't have airspeed tube at all.
+1Su30？
+1There is a part in the machine gun position of the nose that is not connected
+1When is the deadline?
The original product of that automatic anti-aircraft cannon is here
+1@HanakoSan @Randomplayer @TheMouse
@HanakoSan I haven't changed it, so its value is still 1. Anyway, thank you for your explanation
+1@Randomplayer I have set up a proximity fuse for the cannon, so there is no need to worry about this issue
@TheMouse I have set its explosionscale to 15, so there should be no problem of no damage.
+1But I can't understand why it can instantly kill an aircraft with 9E+35 health of all parts
@HanakoSan Sorry, but I don't know what "impactDamageScalar" is. I know this, but I don't know its purpose.
+1