To be honest, manufacturing missiles is much easier than manufacturing fighter jets, all you need to do is change the XML. This is actually very unfair to fighter jets. I think you can either dismantle both missiles and only engage in machine gun dogfights; Or you can unify the missile types and decoy of both sides
…Leaving aside the PZL153 itself, what do you mean by the comparison of fighter jets? In fact, the reasons summarized are all missiles, not fighter jets themselves?
@STEAMYcrosby Wait a minute, bro. To ensure the fairness of the competition, I should also be eligible to see your plane. But I found one of them, and where are the two planes?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Yeah, bro, and your A-40C is also excellent! To be honest, The T-3 has a large number of weapon characteristics, which was learned from the A-40C.
Actually, The success of T3 is not achieved overnight, but rather through continuous learning and accumulation over the past year, which has been transformed into my own skills. This is certainly an epic victory, but it's not yet a time for pride. I still need a long time to learn more. Perhaps in a challenge next year, we can see another "T-3" stand out.
@TheMouse Um... I'm sorry, I've never read his article before. In fact, I have also heard about it and tried to find it, but I did not find it.
My idea originated from @GabrielSatori , and I have been following his articles.
I am very happy because this is the first time I have achieved first place in a challenge. I have been very busy lately, but I am still imagining how to make the challenge more interesting.
@Someonefun Because I'm reading a novel... not this
Actually, I have been trying to make new weapons recently, but I gave up due to experimental failure. Plus, I've been quite busy lately, so I haven't posted it yet
em…
By the way, regarding the challenge I previously raised. I really don't have time lately because the college entrance examination will be in two weeks. I will be able to show it to you in about half a month.
I am improving Lackey (which are also variants of the Intimidator) and I am currently stuck because I am not sure what weapons to equip a small mass-produced drone with.
@FOXHOUND26 Great, but a single weapon cannot change the situation. To influence the war situation, at least large-scale production must be achieved, right? So at least you need an industrial scale with large-scale production capacity, right? So your production requires time and money, which cannot be compensated for immediately. The result is that this fighter jet can indeed achieve good results on local battlefields, but its actual influence is still limited.
Moreover, it's better to buy than to build, unless this aircraft can demonstrate stronger combat power than the purchased aircraft. I think it will take a long time to officially convert this fighter jet into the main force of the Air Force. During this period, I don't really feel that internal and external pressures will relax.
@FOXHOUND26 Have ≠ available. As a player, this setting certainly has no impact on building your own aircraft, but if it's in the story, I don't think a newly developed domestic fighter jet can have much competitiveness against strong foreign fighter jets. Just in terms of cost-effectiveness, I think it can already make a country make a choice.
@wstu 我高考完了，现在B站回来了
@ThePeruvianQuail I haven't talked much to foreigners and I can't understand your abbreviations
@ThePeruvianQuail ？
@TheMouse Does it mean that the first three can only be tagged?
@ThePeruvianQuail ?
To be honest, manufacturing missiles is much easier than manufacturing fighter jets, all you need to do is change the XML. This is actually very unfair to fighter jets. I think you can either dismantle both missiles and only engage in machine gun dogfights; Or you can unify the missile types and decoy of both sides
…Leaving aside the PZL153 itself, what do you mean by the comparison of fighter jets? In fact, the reasons summarized are all missiles, not fighter jets themselves?
@STEAMYcrosby I know so I ask what is the result
@STEAMYcrosby what?
@STEAMYcrosby Wait a minute, bro. To ensure the fairness of the competition, I should also be eligible to see your plane. But I found one of them, and where are the two planes?
@STEAMYcrosby Fine, I agree. Please remember to tell me the result
em… little A40
@AndrewTheGarrison Um... I think creating a new account would be a bit too troublesome, and you also seem busy. So I chose the first one
+1@TheMouse …
@Someonefun Sorry bro, I don't have time recently. I'm about to take the college entrance examination
+1@Rob119WithA105mmHowitzer em… idk too.
@Rob119WithA105mmHowitzer ?
@Majakalona Σ(っ °Д °;)っ
+2Bro! I remember you! The earliest T-3 (first place) was the one I asked you to help test!
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Yeah, bro, and your A-40C is also excellent! To be honest, The T-3 has a large number of weapon characteristics, which was learned from the A-40C.
+1Actually, The success of T3 is not achieved overnight, but rather through continuous learning and accumulation over the past year, which has been transformed into my own skills. This is certainly an epic victory, but it's not yet a time for pride. I still need a long time to learn more. Perhaps in a challenge next year, we can see another "T-3" stand out.
@TheMouse Um... I'm sorry, I've never read his article before. In fact, I have also heard about it and tried to find it, but I did not find it.
+1My idea originated from @GabrielSatori , and I have been following his articles.
@TheMouse Em... maybe closer to a novel
Oh, by the way. I also plan to serialize a series of articles with T-3 as the main character in July.
+1I am very happy because this is the first time I have achieved first place in a challenge. I have been very busy lately, but I am still imagining how to make the challenge more interesting.
+1First!
@Someonefun 。。。
@Someonefun Did you not notice that the heading displayed on your HUD is opposite to your actual heading?
Not bad, but there are many areas for improvement. For example, your weapon is a bit loose and your cockpit seems to be installed backwards. Come on!
525 parts?
@Someonefun Because I'm reading a novel... not this
Actually, I have been trying to make new weapons recently, but I gave up due to experimental failure. Plus, I've been quite busy lately, so I haven't posted it yet
em…
+1By the way, regarding the challenge I previously raised. I really don't have time lately because the college entrance examination will be in two weeks. I will be able to show it to you in about half a month.
I am improving Lackey (which are also variants of the Intimidator) and I am currently stuck because I am not sure what weapons to equip a small mass-produced drone with.
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover A great plane! Especially the new type of missile has given me a completely new inspiration.
+1@LoganTheGameDev He may be right. You can replace its decorative function by making a skirtboard
@Someonefun But I don't think his problem is a problem. He doesn't seem to know how to make cars either
@Someonefun I have never built a tank before
So what's the problem
@Someonefun em… But I not good at this…
There are still some good aspects to airplanes, you can rest assured of that
+1…What can I say… I choose to wait for the other two planes to be released before making a comment.
@Someonefun Sorry to hear that
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I'm glad, but I'm sorry, it's midnight Beijing time now.
@FOXHOUND26 4… Okay, it's obvious that this is advantageous
+1@FOXHOUND26 Ideas are feasible, but the road ahead is long and arduous
+1@FOXHOUND26 Great, but a single weapon cannot change the situation. To influence the war situation, at least large-scale production must be achieved, right? So at least you need an industrial scale with large-scale production capacity, right? So your production requires time and money, which cannot be compensated for immediately. The result is that this fighter jet can indeed achieve good results on local battlefields, but its actual influence is still limited.
+1Moreover, it's better to buy than to build, unless this aircraft can demonstrate stronger combat power than the purchased aircraft. I think it will take a long time to officially convert this fighter jet into the main force of the Air Force. During this period, I don't really feel that internal and external pressures will relax.
@FOXHOUND26 Have ≠ available. As a player, this setting certainly has no impact on building your own aircraft, but if it's in the story, I don't think a newly developed domestic fighter jet can have much competitiveness against strong foreign fighter jets. Just in terms of cost-effectiveness, I think it can already make a country make a choice.
+1@STALIN83
+1@byd114514 缩翼都缩成这样了，重点是还不能零半径。
有点小逆天了
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Thanks!
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Sorry, but what is TUPL?