6,493 JSTQ Comments

  • DL-2B landmine 9 months ago

    @SILVERPANZER In fact, the principle of my landmine is very simple, which is to calculate the distance through coordinates and then automatically explode through a detonation device

    +1
  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Regarding the fight against stealth aircraft, I need to clarify that the characteristic of stealth aircraft is that the distance detected by radar is significantly reduced, but it does not mean that there is none. And stealth effects can be reduced through special radar or special methods (such as special radar multi-directional illumination networks). Even if the fire control radar detects it, it may not lock, but because this missile uses coordinate positioning, it can be launched as long as it is detected. Don't think that stealth fighter jets can do whatever they want, let alone not fully possessing stealth capabilities.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Are you kidding? In my eyes, its only feature is the proximity fuse

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Both methods are possible, currently using a computer, but can be modified. You can also choose to send out detectors to detect their coordinates

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover by the way, what is Seemeing's J2M?

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover If necessary, there are many methods available. But first, at least I need to know what nature this organization is.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover also one say:
    Wkh frruglqdwh srvlwlrqlqj phwkrg rqob uhtxluhv frruglqdwhv.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover so it can.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Also, please let me know the password offset in advance next time

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover B0B和隐形有啥关系吗?(chinese)

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    @CrestelAeronautics Of course, I only recommend the third option. The first two have a problem: I don't know where the missile is. But the third method is similar to cheating.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    @CrestelAeronautics Difficult, but not without. Here are three solutions that are useful even for regular missiles.
    1. Visual air defense. 2. Machine gun protective cover. 3. Hide the cockpit
    I guess someone might say PSM, don't believe him. This missile exploded at a distance of 300 meters.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Good question. For you, I specially downloaded an A52 for testing, and it turned out that under the action of the proximity fuse, the A52 was blown up on the spot.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Ultra high speed flight is the best way to avoid it, but the problem is that you don't know you're locked in

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover The special locking method results in the radar not sounding an alarm and the thermal decoy not functioning, making it difficult to detect.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Funky Trees

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover How about we each take a step back?

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    RCE/DoF and TB:
    @SPSidearm
    @TitanicBuff

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    MDA Allies:
    @Marulk
    @JABH
    @Boeing727200F

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    MDA 3:
    @Christiant2
    @JaxHere
    @Randomplayer

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    MDA 2:
    @windshifter1
    @Karroc9522
    @KPLBall

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    (MDA)
    @TheMouse
    @CrestelAeronautics
    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover But there is a problem that these planes are not suitable for AI due to performance and control issues

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover F-33J M-12C GF-2E PX-9N PX-12B M-20C
    And those who serve as unmanned wingmen: QL-4A YF-28A

  • Aircraft military 010 “MICBMT” 9 months ago

    @StopBreathingMyAir k

  • Aircraft military 010 “MICBMT” 9 months ago

    @StopBreathingMyAir I happen to be researching a similar issue, Maybe I can help you. But I need to confirm first, how do you want it to start and guide?

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover By the way, the T-3 Phoenix arsenal already has 14 types of ground weapons

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover By the way, the reason I initially said this was because I felt that MDA bombing had wiped out your own brains and that you could let go of the issue of air superiority with me. My preset dilemma is to one-on-one MDA and compete for air superiority with an overwhelming number of A40s. Do you have any? Leaving aside missiles (I have a sample of the S25 missile in my hand, which can be mass-produced at any time due to its simplicity), what other aircraft do you use to compete with me for air superiority?

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover You see, you haven't figured it out yet. So when I encounter some strange words, we will ask if he is using another language. This is an exaggerated language art

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover yes
    but we can also say “The scene of the fire rushed to the fire department as soon as possible.”

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover … It seems like you still don't understand, let me give you an example.
    “The scene of the fire rushed to the fire department as soon as possible.”
    Actual meaning: A truck on fire drove into the fire station

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover When I see some strange words on the Chinese Internet, I usually question whether the person really speaks in Chinese first.

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover …? It's best if your speak is English.
    K-2: Children, I missed blaming.

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover I personally don't like hegemonism, so I hope to reach a consensus with you: under non-hostile relations, every A40D I shoot down is a legitimate defense.

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Four: After I have completed the development of the vast majority of cutting-edge weapons, this issue should be actively considered by MDA

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover hum… I don't think we need to worry too much.
    Firstly, in general, I only send ETSF to intervene in the war, and air force units are not allowed to enter. They have difficulty meeting each other. I will not send out a large army unless MDA encounters danger or involves fundamental issues.
    Secondly, QX-6 is a mass-produced aircraft, but pilots are more valuable. Fortunately, we have an automatic skydiving system
    Thirdly, most of the air-to-air missiles carried by QX-6 are mainly FT missiles. Can you guess how many of them are locked onto it when necessary.

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover hum… Actually, when I started designing, I found that it might be more similar to Su34, so I thought that although its uses were similar, the perception of A40D may not be able to detect their relationship.
    Moreover, QX-6 is a VYOL fighter jet (a traditional art form of the T-3 Phoenix arsenal)

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 9 months ago

    In theory, I should have already published an article called 'Must Surpass A40' to announce my intention to develop a new type of attack aircraft and prove that I am not completely slacking off, but why did it not ultimately materialize? Take a look at the war maniacs in the comments section of MDA. If I really did this, even if I surrendered, they would still want to kill me.
    So, the development of FT missiles cannot be stopped, at least that can ensure my own safety at many times

  • Aircraft military 010 “MICBMT” 9 months ago

    @YOURGORILLA1246 I have seen his code, which is only responsible for missile ignition, but it cannot be locked and cannot work properly

  • Aircraft military 010 “MICBMT” 9 months ago

    can it really wotk?

  • [S-war] JSTQ joins RCE camp, but? 9 months ago

    @SPsidearm Of course, I am not completely pretending to join. I am hiding one thing: if you continue to fight while I complete the new attack aircraft, I will immediately mass produce it and hand it over to you. But it takes at least a month to complete the development of that thing.

  • [S-war] JSTQ joins RCE camp, but? 9 months ago

    @SPsidearm no thanks. I prefer weapons that are independent and self reliant.

  • [S-war] JSTQ joins RCE camp, but? 9 months ago

    @SPsidearm hope no wrong, good luck

  • [S-war] JSTQ joins RCE camp, but? 9 months ago

    @SPsidearm Indeed, when you first came to inquire about the T-3, I thought about supporting you because I thought you were playing too poorly and afraid that you would be crushed by MDA, which would make the audience feel bored.

  • [S-war] JSTQ joins RCE camp, but? 9 months ago

    @SPsidearm first.place?

  • [S-war] JSTQ joins RCE camp, but? 9 months ago

    @SPsidearm Yes, I don't want to be allies with someone who doesn't even understand reading comprehension. He can't understand my plan

  • [S-war] JSTQ joins RCE camp, but? 9 months ago

    @SPsidearm Please do not use unofficial history as an excuse. The official has never made a statement, and we all have records of it

  • [S-war] JSTQ joins RCE camp, but? 9 months ago

    @SPsidearm ?

  • [S-war] JSTQ joins RCE camp, but? 9 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover If someone questions me as a traitor to RCE, I can demonstrate it to you. Don't forget, I am researching fighter jets that can rival or even surpass the A40.