Um... inheriting the problem of F-33A rolling too sensitively, if I were to fly this plane on the computer, I would go crazy. By the way, the electromagnetic gun can consider adding a proximity fuse
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Speaking of which, seeing nuclear bombs is like PTSD, striving to promote a ban on nuclear weapons. To be honest, I prefer this type because I personally promote precision guided weapons. But your own FAE (all weapons of mass destruction) have almost the same effectiveness as a nuclear bomb. Okay, let me make a suggestion. I don't want small nuclear weapons anymore. I'll switch to thermobaric bombs instead.
To be honest, the Antetus Alliance is very pleased and has added another audience here. We are more than happy to invite you to watch this great show together. However, the audience should have their own criteria
Providing assistance to both parties is acceptable, do not provide too much assistance to the advantageous party. If you ruin this great show, I will hold you accountable.
A tailless delta wing, duckless wing, single vertical tail, single engine, belly inlet... according to these requirements, manufacture an aircraft, right?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover hum… I am not from the MDA camp, so as I have observed that he does not pose a particularly great danger to MDA, I hope he can become a sharpening stone and indulge himself. I didn't expect his surrender.
@SPsidearm How could the modified aircraft possibly have flown MDA's custom aircraft. To surpass the current form of warfare until MDA cannot understand and is helpless.
I didn't even see the tank battle, I only knew that after the storm, MDA continued bombing and won. I hope the next challenger can be stronger and more interesting.
… The situation has escalated to something I don't like to see. S's strategy is worse than I imagined. While MDA Air Force has not completed its transformation yet.
@TheMouse 1. Combining the complex military alliances of the two world wars, it led to a chain reaction between countries, causing local conflicts to evolve into world wars. We will be forced to go to war in this situation, so it is not included in the treaty.
2. During World War II, Britain also guaranteed the independence of Poland. Do you think Britain fulfilled its responsibility? In fact, tearing up treaties between countries is more about losing trust, which is what matters. And those who can sign non aggression treaties either have good relationships or just take what they need.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Yes, it is used in a state of war. The theory of maintaining peace and developing war does not seem to conflict.
I just want to confirm if it is feasible, I call it "obsession/yandere". This psychological theory based on monkey experiments aims to disrupt their fighting will and make them make incorrect judgments.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Add a third clause stating that under the premise of legality, interference with the other party's technological research is not allowed
Artillery specialization is actually not impossible, provided that you are very skilled in artillery tactics. Of course, MDA also need understand artillery tactics, otherwise you would see MDA writing like a fool.
Artillery chauvinism? Do you feel like you didn't die fast enough?
You'd better ensure the efficiency of command and communication in your troops, otherwise if I were your enemy, I would have 100 ways to have your artillery bomb your troops.
Pitch? Nine out of ten questions are stupid, and there is one A40. The angle of attack has reached its limit, causing difficulty in control and even stalling. Your wing's payload is already 800, it's not very suitable for maneuvering. Reduce the weight of the aircraft and increase the wing area, if possible, write a stall control.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Just copy the content I posted, it's the one at the top here. We need two people to jointly release it to confirm that the other party is aware.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover It's basically like this. Um... You've seen that thing on the T-3, so there's no need to emphasize it. Should you publish first, or should I publish first?
@SPsidearm no. I can produce it myself, although I don't know how to do it yet
And it will be converted into electronic warfare aircraft, early warning aircraft, and other special aircraft when the time comes.
Any public treaty involving both parties shall be jointly released by both parties, with the latest release date as the activation time. The provisional validity period is three months, and it can be renewed upon expiration.
Non Aggression Pact Content:
Both parties are prohibited from declaring war on the other party voluntarily; Under no circumstances shall the main forces of both sides engage in combat.
When ETSF is in a hostile camp, it is not allowed to use any navy or air force units (excluding army aviation), and it is prohibited to use missile units and any reconnaissance equipment. ETSF is prohibited from directly stationed at airports, bases, and ports, but deployed in their rear areas.
Under the premise of legality, both parties shall not interfere with each other's technological research
When either party breaches the contract, the agreement is automatically invalidated.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover yes. As long as there are no fundamental issues, at least the current ruling party chooses to love peace. If you're still worried, let's sign a non aggression treaty and discuss the possibility of friendly trade
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Have you forgotten that these weapons cannot be handed over to your enemies, and ETSF does not have the authority to equip them.
Our goal is to ensure our own safety
@TheUltimatePlaneLover bro dont forgot it
Um... inheriting the problem of F-33A rolling too sensitively, if I were to fly this plane on the computer, I would go crazy. By the way, the electromagnetic gun can consider adding a proximity fuse
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Speaking of which, seeing nuclear bombs is like PTSD, striving to promote a ban on nuclear weapons. To be honest, I prefer this type because I personally promote precision guided weapons. But your own FAE (all weapons of mass destruction) have almost the same effectiveness as a nuclear bomb. Okay, let me make a suggestion. I don't want small nuclear weapons anymore. I'll switch to thermobaric bombs instead.
To be honest, the Antetus Alliance is very pleased and has added another audience here. We are more than happy to invite you to watch this great show together. However, the audience should have their own criteria
Providing assistance to both parties is acceptable, do not provide too much assistance to the advantageous party. If you ruin this great show, I will hold you accountable.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover What are you saying to me? It wasn't me who did it.
I always feel like something is missing. Surely, the Great TUPL Summoning Technique!
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
A tailless delta wing, duckless wing, single vertical tail, single engine, belly inlet... according to these requirements, manufacture an aircraft, right?
+1KCC Flying Shark
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover hum… I am not from the MDA camp, so as I have observed that he does not pose a particularly great danger to MDA, I hope he can become a sharpening stone and indulge himself. I didn't expect his surrender.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Am I Anti-MDA-supporter? I show you all the FT missiles first. Am I Anti-MDA-supporter? Am I experiencing schizophrenia?
@SPsidearm Your story will provide us with assistance in developing defense combat theory
@SPsidearm (´థ౪థ ) ☞
@SPsidearm I haven't seen you use it before
@SPsidearm How could the modified aircraft possibly have flown MDA's custom aircraft. To surpass the current form of warfare until MDA cannot understand and is helpless.
@SPsidearm #End.
I didn't even see the tank battle, I only knew that after the storm, MDA continued bombing and won. I hope the next challenger can be stronger and more interesting.
@SPsidearm ?
… The situation has escalated to something I don't like to see. S's strategy is worse than I imagined. While MDA Air Force has not completed its transformation yet.
Our actions must be accelerated
+2what's this? with who?
@TheMouse 1. Combining the complex military alliances of the two world wars, it led to a chain reaction between countries, causing local conflicts to evolve into world wars. We will be forced to go to war in this situation, so it is not included in the treaty.
+12. During World War II, Britain also guaranteed the independence of Poland. Do you think Britain fulfilled its responsibility? In fact, tearing up treaties between countries is more about losing trust, which is what matters. And those who can sign non aggression treaties either have good relationships or just take what they need.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover This may be the best I currently think I can do. After I finish writing the introduction, I will publish it and @ you again.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Sorry, I brought up the topic of fighter jet intelligence…
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Yes, it is used in a state of war. The theory of maintaining peace and developing war does not seem to conflict.
I just want to confirm if it is feasible, I call it "obsession/yandere". This psychological theory based on monkey experiments aims to disrupt their fighting will and make them make incorrect judgments.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Add a third clause stating that under the premise of legality, interference with the other party's technological research is not allowed
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I'm thinking if the A40D has intelligence, can I use psychological warfare tactics against it
em… Does this plane also have spirit
RCE/DoF:
+1@SPSidearm
@AManMayDieButNotHisIdeas only RCE. This matter is not currently related to MDA. If you two can resolve it privately, there won't be so much trouble
Artillery specialization is actually not impossible, provided that you are very skilled in artillery tactics. Of course, MDA also need understand artillery tactics, otherwise you would see MDA writing like a fool.
@AManMayDieButNotHisIdeas Have you notified RCF about this matter
Artillery chauvinism? Do you feel like you didn't die fast enough?
You'd better ensure the efficiency of command and communication in your troops, otherwise if I were your enemy, I would have 100 ways to have your artillery bomb your troops.
Pitch? Nine out of ten questions are stupid, and there is one A40. The angle of attack has reached its limit, causing difficulty in control and even stalling. Your wing's payload is already 800, it's not very suitable for maneuvering. Reduce the weight of the aircraft and increase the wing area, if possible, write a stall control.
let me see
@AManMayDieButNotHisIdeas Do you need me to help you notify others?
@AManMayDieButNotHisIdeas When did you join the war? Where is the declaration of war? Which faction are you from? Why don't you @ other people?
? wait who are you
@TheUltimatePlaneLover If you're not sure, you can skip signing for now. Otherwise, what if I cheat you?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Just copy the content I posted, it's the one at the top here. We need two people to jointly release it to confirm that the other party is aware.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover It's basically like this. Um... You've seen that thing on the T-3, so there's no need to emphasize it. Should you publish first, or should I publish first?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover so do you sign it?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Is this the first time you've heard of the Non-Aggression Pact outside of history class…
@SPsidearm no. I can produce it myself, although I don't know how to do it yet
And it will be converted into electronic warfare aircraft, early warning aircraft, and other special aircraft when the time comes.
@SPsidearm Fine, let them SHANG SHI!(Don't care the meaning)
So what are you planning to do next?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
Any public treaty involving both parties shall be jointly released by both parties, with the latest release date as the activation time. The provisional validity period is three months, and it can be renewed upon expiration.
Non Aggression Pact Content:
Both parties are prohibited from declaring war on the other party voluntarily; Under no circumstances shall the main forces of both sides engage in combat.
When ETSF is in a hostile camp, it is not allowed to use any navy or air force units (excluding army aviation), and it is prohibited to use missile units and any reconnaissance equipment. ETSF is prohibited from directly stationed at airports, bases, and ports, but deployed in their rear areas.
Under the premise of legality, both parties shall not interfere with each other's technological research
When either party breaches the contract, the agreement is automatically invalidated.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
?
My silence is deafening.
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover yes. As long as there are no fundamental issues, at least the current ruling party chooses to love peace. If you're still worried, let's sign a non aggression treaty and discuss the possibility of friendly trade
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Besides, if you need it, I'll sell it to you. Others haven't had the chance yet
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Have you forgotten that these weapons cannot be handed over to your enemies, and ETSF does not have the authority to equip them.
Our goal is to ensure our own safety
@TheUltimatePlaneLover some of my future plan