@AManWillDieButNotHisIdeas Based on vibration, the tank approaches and automatically bounces up to attack the top armor of the tank, which has been used in the Russian Ukrainian battlefield.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I am preparing for an attack nuclear submarine. So I want to discuss the possibility of forming a joint fleet in special circumstances in the future.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I suddenly realized that due to our differences in war game concepts, we seem to lack compatibility. How about this: The characteristics of my weapon in your world are entirely up to you.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover There is indeed this issue, which should be a common problem with all FT missiles. However, it seems that the problem is not significant? Breaking through defenses and striking fixed defense facilities is quite difficult, especially since this missile can be equipped on multiple platforms, such as airplanes, warships, and even submarines.
And you can't assume how many air defense facilities are attacking you at the same time
@TheUltimatePlaneLover But it's very difficult to create a good series of events, which is what I'm worried about
He needs a good existing entry point, not something created out of thin air.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Then let the situation worsen and keep beating them until they follow the issues. Ignoring is a free choice, and freedom must bear the cost of choice.
This is just enriching the gameplay, not changing the game objectives.
I suddenly had an idea, what would happen if we did a series of events?
For example, starting a conflict and requiring us to implement a resolution, if our speed slows down or we fail to complete it smoothly, it will lead to further escalation of the conflict, make it more difficult to resolve, and ultimately result in terrible consequences
@TheUltimatePlaneLover By the way, I also have FRCM (S-25), which I obtained from S (Why do you think I still gave him the T-3 in the end?) Although that transaction left me very dissatisfied
@TheUltimatePlaneLover … This kind of person is just an internet clown. In reality, things don't go smoothly, but in the internet, they strike hard. Just ignore him and tell the administrator that they can handle it.
As soon as you promote it, everyone knows, including those who support these statements. You know, on the Internet, traffic promotion is a very rare thing, and you helped him.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover …
First of all, let's talk about your concern: this change will lead to a significant reduction in lethality.
Both the thermobaric bomb and the FAE belong to the category of sub nuclear weapons, with the difference being that the thermobaric bomb is more advanced than the FAE. Based on this, at the cost of a partial kill radius, it greatly enhances the ability to attack.
As a sub nuclear weapon, although known as second only to nuclear bombs, its actual lethality is like: a nuclear bomb is worth 100 points, and a sub nuclear weapon is worth 20 points.
It should be noted that due to their high explosive content, even individual rocket launchers can be equipped with them. But because it is a high explosive bomb, it is not suitable for anti tank operations.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Okay, then.
During The Arms Race! (Trigger condition: Research of the same type is currently underway)
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 I don't remember MDA's submarine having this feature. Is it an unpublished version?
@AManWillDieButNotHisIdeas Based on vibration, the tank approaches and automatically bounces up to attack the top armor of the tank, which has been used in the Russian Ukrainian battlefield.
A very good article that surprised me. It's the best I've ever seen in this war. But, you used submarine launched ballistic missiles here, right?
Upgrade the combat readiness level! Super event: JSTQ is concerned.
+1em… Rocket launchers may be questioned for their poor accuracy... How interested are you in attacking top mines?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I am preparing for an attack nuclear submarine. So I want to discuss the possibility of forming a joint fleet in special circumstances in the future.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover By the way, where is the treaty you released? Or should we calculate based on the time I posted?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I suddenly realized that due to our differences in war game concepts, we seem to lack compatibility. How about this: The characteristics of my weapon in your world are entirely up to you.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover There is indeed this issue, which should be a common problem with all FT missiles. However, it seems that the problem is not significant? Breaking through defenses and striking fixed defense facilities is quite difficult, especially since this missile can be equipped on multiple platforms, such as airplanes, warships, and even submarines.
And you can't assume how many air defense facilities are attacking you at the same time
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Um... it's really bad. Fortunately, our military theory chose beyond visual range strike.
@overlord5453 It's too polite of you to issue a treaty in advance before starting a war, isn't it?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover ? I don't think my missile will drag a fuel pipe behind it when flying at Mach 6
@TheUltimatePlaneLover no. The main cockpit in the game will not be destroyed, it will continue to provide coordinates
@KPLBall I don't play with kids who only boast about their ability to modify engine thrust. Remember to use TheMouse's UFOs next time
@KPLBall When this missile strikes, your plane won't sound the alarm
@KPLBall If we're talking about speed, it means you don't understand the terrifying aspect of this missile
@KPLBall 7900kmh
@KPLBall Sorry, this sentence usually appears on the Chinese Internet. The meaning is not to disappoint me
@KPLBall Little brat, this is my missile. May I ask where yours is?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I may have more things to do with KPL, can you please not intervene
@KPLBall ok. I have high expectations and respect for you, please don't give me a big piece of shit
@KPLBall If you wish to use it, then I may prefer to use something more than you
@KPLBall Actually, we have already reached an agreement with TUPL and The Mouse on this treaty.
This treaty shall come into effect when MDA publishes the same treaty
MDA 3:
@Christiant2
@JaxHere
@Randomplayer
MDA 2:
@windshifter1
@Karroc9522
@KPLBall
MDA 1:
@TheMouse
@CrestelAeronautics
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
@TheMouse @TheUltimatePlaneLover If there's no problem, I'm ready to announce it, and you remember to announce it too
You look familiar, isn't this an AI bomber for escort missions in the game
+1what's this
@TheUltimatePlaneLover But it's very difficult to create a good series of events, which is what I'm worried about
He needs a good existing entry point, not something created out of thin air.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Then let the situation worsen and keep beating them until they follow the issues. Ignoring is a free choice, and freedom must bear the cost of choice.
This is just enriching the gameplay, not changing the game objectives.
I suddenly had an idea, what would happen if we did a series of events?
For example, starting a conflict and requiring us to implement a resolution, if our speed slows down or we fail to complete it smoothly, it will lead to further escalation of the conflict, make it more difficult to resolve, and ultimately result in terrible consequences
Please change hideInside to true in the XML of the glass used as the cockpit, otherwise I won't see anything. Thank you
Why is this still being evaluated... Are you going to equip your own troops?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Because at first I thought it was an FT missile, I didn't know who the original author was.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover By the way, I also have FRCM (S-25), which I obtained from S (Why do you think I still gave him the T-3 in the end?) Although that transaction left me very dissatisfied
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I have no objections, I also have great respect for him.
The theory of FT missile hypersonic has also been broken through
@TheUltimatePlaneLover @TheMouse So will you sign this treaty or not?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Just for your words, I specially went back to see the M War
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I will try to break through the last layer of shackles (7900kmh)
forget one Spectator
@AManWillDieButNotHisIdeas
To be honest, the only reasonable condition for such activities to occur is for the administrator to be indifferent
@TheUltimatePlaneLover He may not have much presence in reality, but he can search for presence online. You are equivalent to satisfying him.
@TheMouse A matter that can be resolved by simply reporting and blacklisting
@TheUltimatePlaneLover … This kind of person is just an internet clown. In reality, things don't go smoothly, but in the internet, they strike hard. Just ignore him and tell the administrator that they can handle it.
As soon as you promote it, everyone knows, including those who support these statements. You know, on the Internet, traffic promotion is a very rare thing, and you helped him.
@KPLBall But he needs to aim before he can use it. And the issue I pointed out is related to operability
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover …
First of all, let's talk about your concern: this change will lead to a significant reduction in lethality.
Both the thermobaric bomb and the FAE belong to the category of sub nuclear weapons, with the difference being that the thermobaric bomb is more advanced than the FAE. Based on this, at the cost of a partial kill radius, it greatly enhances the ability to attack.
As a sub nuclear weapon, although known as second only to nuclear bombs, its actual lethality is like: a nuclear bomb is worth 100 points, and a sub nuclear weapon is worth 20 points.
It should be noted that due to their high explosive content, even individual rocket launchers can be equipped with them. But because it is a high explosive bomb, it is not suitable for anti tank operations.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover wdym
Wait a minute, don't you know what a thermobaric bomb is?