5,908 JSTQ Comments

  • [S-War] What we really need? The Fourth Military Reform! 6 months ago

    MDA 3:
    @Christiant2
    @JaxHere
    @Randomplayer

  • [S-War] What we really need? The Fourth Military Reform! 6 months ago

    MDA 2:
    @windshifter1
    @Karroc9522
    @KPLBall

  • [S-War] What we really need? The Fourth Military Reform! 6 months ago

    (MDA)
    @TheMouse
    @CrestelAeronautics
    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26

  • [S-War] What we really need? The Fourth Military Reform! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover I remember telling you about the standard invisible effect
    Regarding the fight against stealth aircraft, I need to clarify that the characteristic of stealth aircraft is that the distance detected by radar is significantly reduced, but it does not mean that there is none. And stealth effects can be reduced through special radar or special methods (such as special radar multi-directional illumination networks). Even if the fire control radar detects it, it may not lock, but because this missile uses coordinate positioning, it can be launched as long as it is detected. Don't think that stealth fighter jets can do whatever they want, let alone not fully possessing stealth capabilities.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover he knows

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover for super stealth: still disagree. Please follow the standard stealth effect for stealth fighter jets

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover hum? fun. I will conduct corresponding research, I hope you won't deceive me.
    By the way, this missile has the function of being able to start even without leaving the main cockpit

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover If you don't want to see all Antetus combat units invisible on the battlefield. if you agree, i still disagree.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Addendum: Handheld anti-aircraft missiles are not impractical, but they require more advanced camera angle guidance technology (laser guidance) than currently available.
    The proximity fuse is not difficult to use, but the problem is that it is a rapid fire gun. I don't think my equipment can withstand more than ten shells exploding almost simultaneously.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover
    1.No, I just said it can be achieved, but it's not already available. To be honest, can handheld anti-aircraft missiles be useful?

    2.I have been thinking about this a long time ago, but I feel that I am not allowed to install proximity fuses on the rapid fire gun due to equipment influence fuse

    3.By losing a large number of parts, the system misjudged the plane crash and evaded the marking. You are committing an illegal act, and I will directly determine that you have crashed according to the system's judgment.

  • [S-WAR] testing new weapons systems 6 months ago

    AA nuke?

  • [S-War] Jeez what you guy want 6 months ago

    @KPLBall ok

  • F-63 Wasp 6 months ago

    @KPLBall My discussion with you here only involves aircraft modification, not stance issues.

  • [S-War] Jeez what you guy want 6 months ago

    @KPLBall ? what?

  • F-63 Wasp 6 months ago

    @KPLBall ah ok

  • F-63 Wasp 6 months ago

    … The problem is not small, the angle of attack may be a bit too high, making it difficult to operate. Unfortunately, the wing load of this aircraft is too high and not to my liking, otherwise I would apply to personally help you modify it.

  • [S-War] Jeez what you guy want 6 months ago

    Shutter Bomb… cluster bomb?

  • DL-2B landmine 6 months ago

    @SILVERPANZER In fact, the principle of my landmine is very simple, which is to calculate the distance through coordinates and then automatically explode through a detonation device

    +1
  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Regarding the fight against stealth aircraft, I need to clarify that the characteristic of stealth aircraft is that the distance detected by radar is significantly reduced, but it does not mean that there is none. And stealth effects can be reduced through special radar or special methods (such as special radar multi-directional illumination networks). Even if the fire control radar detects it, it may not lock, but because this missile uses coordinate positioning, it can be launched as long as it is detected. Don't think that stealth fighter jets can do whatever they want, let alone not fully possessing stealth capabilities.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Are you kidding? In my eyes, its only feature is the proximity fuse

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Both methods are possible, currently using a computer, but can be modified. You can also choose to send out detectors to detect their coordinates

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover by the way, what is Seemeing's J2M?

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover If necessary, there are many methods available. But first, at least I need to know what nature this organization is.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover also one say:
    Wkh frruglqdwh srvlwlrqlqj phwkrg rqob uhtxluhv frruglqdwhv.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover so it can.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Also, please let me know the password offset in advance next time

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover B0B和隐形有啥关系吗?(chinese)

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @CrestelAeronautics Of course, I only recommend the third option. The first two have a problem: I don't know where the missile is. But the third method is similar to cheating.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @CrestelAeronautics Difficult, but not without. Here are three solutions that are useful even for regular missiles.
    1. Visual air defense. 2. Machine gun protective cover. 3. Hide the cockpit
    I guess someone might say PSM, don't believe him. This missile exploded at a distance of 300 meters.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Good question. For you, I specially downloaded an A52 for testing, and it turned out that under the action of the proximity fuse, the A52 was blown up on the spot.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Ultra high speed flight is the best way to avoid it, but the problem is that you don't know you're locked in

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover The special locking method results in the radar not sounding an alarm and the thermal decoy not functioning, making it difficult to detect.

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Funky Trees

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover How about we each take a step back?

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    RCE/DoF and TB:
    @SPSidearm
    @TitanicBuff

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    MDA Allies:
    @Marulk
    @JABH
    @Boeing727200F

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    MDA 3:
    @Christiant2
    @JaxHere
    @Randomplayer

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    MDA 2:
    @windshifter1
    @Karroc9522
    @KPLBall

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    (MDA)
    @TheMouse
    @CrestelAeronautics
    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26

  • [S-War] FT missile test successful! 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover But there is a problem that these planes are not suitable for AI due to performance and control issues

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover F-33J M-12C GF-2E PX-9N PX-12B M-20C
    And those who serve as unmanned wingmen: QL-4A YF-28A

  • Aircraft military 010 “MICBMT” 6 months ago

    @StopBreathingMyAir k

  • Aircraft military 010 “MICBMT” 6 months ago

    @StopBreathingMyAir I happen to be researching a similar issue, Maybe I can help you. But I need to confirm first, how do you want it to start and guide?

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover By the way, the T-3 Phoenix arsenal already has 14 types of ground weapons

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover By the way, the reason I initially said this was because I felt that MDA bombing had wiped out your own brains and that you could let go of the issue of air superiority with me. My preset dilemma is to one-on-one MDA and compete for air superiority with an overwhelming number of A40s. Do you have any? Leaving aside missiles (I have a sample of the S25 missile in my hand, which can be mass-produced at any time due to its simplicity), what other aircraft do you use to compete with me for air superiority?

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover You see, you haven't figured it out yet. So when I encounter some strange words, we will ask if he is using another language. This is an exaggerated language art

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover yes
    but we can also say “The scene of the fire rushed to the fire department as soon as possible.”

  • [S-War] (Teaser) Defense of Wright 6 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover … It seems like you still don't understand, let me give you an example.
    “The scene of the fire rushed to the fire department as soon as possible.”
    Actual meaning: A truck on fire drove into the fire station