@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 The key is that the missile will not be disturbed during flight. I know what you want to do, take down your superluminal missile for me.
I really like how you call me the most, and others still need me to slowly build closer relationships.
I have to add that our military observation team has been working all along. In this battle, we successfully established the theories of beyond visual range air combat, coastal defense, parallel bombing, and unrestricted submarine warfare. This is another 3+1 in our fourth military reform, which greatly improves our national defense theory and sets the direction for future military reforms.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 There is always a problem with using missiles, which is that they fly like missiles. If FT technology is used to ensure that the bomb always faces the target and inertia is used as power, it should approach your statement.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 1. What kind of effect do you want it to have in the end
2. Impossible, missiles are the simplest. Why do you think he failed? Which performance did you judge him by?
The simplest way is to use missiles. A slightly more difficult task is to achieve non lockable interference by deceiving the system. The most difficult way is to achieve lock free and tamper proof through FT
@KPLBall After thinking for a moment, I realized that something was quite outrageous, and then I realized that this thing could theoretically enter satellite orbit by breaking through the speed of the first universe. With a little more effort, it could break through the gravitational constraints.
No wonder you said this thing and that space weapons are from the same world
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Since you have infantry equipment, there may be something you will like at my military exhibition later... Oh, it could also be something you dislike and feel fortunate about
@TheUltimatePlaneLover By the way, what do you think of card games? I am planning to create our DIY cards based on a World War II card game called Kards
@TheUltimatePlaneLover …
I'm telling you, I want to make my own A40, but you're not happy. Then I exchanged it with a surrender treaty, and you agreed. Then, by repeatedly emphasizing the uncontrollability of the A40D, you hinted at me and triggered a game of air force between us. In the end, I changed direction and ended it all.
*In non war situations, all A40Ds I shoot down are considered legitimate defense
I even told you the name, QX-6 Heavy Angel.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Installing a large number of weapons would make the entire aircraft's configuration appear cluttered, which we gamers may enjoy. However, if placed in a war environment, I think it would be better to disperse them.
@SPsidearm QX-6(Compared to A40D, but canceled due to obstruction and direction change)@TheUltimatePlaneLover @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
It is also because of this that the third article of the non aggression treaty was born
The A40s and T-3 always have a problem called stacking weapons, and I don't want QX-6 to go down this path too
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Do you want to see things like A-fired B-guided missiles, satellite detection, artillery guided drones, data links, electromagnetic interference, and beyond visual range strikes in this world?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Oh, by the way, due to the deviation in our war game theory after the Fourth Military Reform. So I divided my weapons into two worlds. In the world with MDA, the definition of my weapon is entirely determined by TUPL. You know what this means.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 ? I only remember saying that we should start an arms race. You are afraid that I will start a war, and I am also afraid that you will start a war. What do you think is the significance of signing a non aggression treaty?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Also, this matter will not prevent future changes. Lack of funding is just a reason to enter this event. What needs to be developed will continue to develop, what needs to be manufactured will continue to be manufactured, and only some other things will change. You really don't understand why I chose MDA.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 You maintain hostility towards me, I understand. We are not completely in the same camp, and I am also wary of backing you. Perhaps we need more time. You can also choose not to buy.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 What do you think I would do if I didn't have the funds because of this
It's still you who found the path to the worst outcome so quickly
@TheUltimatePlaneLover You're right, and MIG has already showcased its latest submarine with strategic strike capabilities. I don't think it's necessary for me to join in, so I decided to bring out the spirit of joy.
@AManWillDieButNotHisIdeas These combat aircraft are offensive weapons, while landmines are defensive weapons. It's that simple.
How much does it cost to deploy a plane? How much does it cost to build a landmine? Did the money come from a strong wind?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 The key is that the missile will not be disturbed during flight. I know what you want to do, take down your superluminal missile for me.
I really like how you call me the most, and others still need me to slowly build closer relationships.
+1I have to add that our military observation team has been working all along. In this battle, we successfully established the theories of beyond visual range air combat, coastal defense, parallel bombing, and unrestricted submarine warfare. This is another 3+1 in our fourth military reform, which greatly improves our national defense theory and sets the direction for future military reforms.
Can I keep only the main gun, hull, and some tower?
When is the deadline
Heli
T
@Rb2h I don't think this is repairable, it should be a missile characteristic
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 There is always a problem with using missiles, which is that they fly like missiles. If FT technology is used to ensure that the bomb always faces the target and inertia is used as power, it should approach your statement.
@Rb2h I remember this could cause the bomb to come to a standstill in the air
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 FT only
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 By entering ignotionDelay in the missile XML and filling in the value as 0.02, the tail smoke can be cancelled through a bug
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 1. What kind of effect do you want it to have in the end
2. Impossible, missiles are the simplest. Why do you think he failed? Which performance did you judge him by?
The simplest way is to use missiles. A slightly more difficult task is to achieve non lockable interference by deceiving the system. The most difficult way is to achieve lock free and tamper proof through FT
I have various effects here, what type do you want?
@KPLBall After thinking for a moment, I realized that something was quite outrageous, and then I realized that this thing could theoretically enter satellite orbit by breaking through the speed of the first universe. With a little more effort, it could break through the gravitational constraints.
+1No wonder you said this thing and that space weapons are from the same world
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 ok
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Can we sell things to him after he is defeated?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Since you have infantry equipment, there may be something you will like at my military exhibition later... Oh, it could also be something you dislike and feel fortunate about
@TheUltimatePlaneLover By the way, what do you think of card games? I am planning to create our DIY cards based on a World War II card game called Kards
@TheUltimatePlaneLover …
I'm telling you, I want to make my own A40, but you're not happy. Then I exchanged it with a surrender treaty, and you agreed. Then, by repeatedly emphasizing the uncontrollability of the A40D, you hinted at me and triggered a game of air force between us. In the end, I changed direction and ended it all.
*In non war situations, all A40Ds I shoot down are considered legitimate defense
I even told you the name, QX-6 Heavy Angel.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover You don't know? Can you guess which plane I signed the surrender agreement for? I specifically came over to tell you.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Installing a large number of weapons would make the entire aircraft's configuration appear cluttered, which we gamers may enjoy. However, if placed in a war environment, I think it would be better to disperse them.
@SPsidearm QX-6(Compared to A40D, but canceled due to obstruction and direction change)@TheUltimatePlaneLover @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
It is also because of this that the third article of the non aggression treaty was born
The A40s and T-3 always have a problem called stacking weapons, and I don't want QX-6 to go down this path too
@KPLBall @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Why are you afraid of suicide attacks? This thing didn't work much in the later stages of World War II.
@SPsidearm @KPLBall Does your MDA Navy not have decent anti-aircraft weapons
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 me too. But there is a saying in the business world, don't look for demand, but create demand.
Of course, the means must be legal
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 What I mean is, since you're sure I haven't expressed any intention of starting a war, what else do you really want?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Do you want to see things like A-fired B-guided missiles, satellite detection, artillery guided drones, data links, electromagnetic interference, and beyond visual range strikes in this world?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 … ? So what do you want?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Oh, by the way, due to the deviation in our war game theory after the Fourth Military Reform. So I divided my weapons into two worlds. In the world with MDA, the definition of my weapon is entirely determined by TUPL. You know what this means.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 ? I only remember saying that we should start an arms race. You are afraid that I will start a war, and I am also afraid that you will start a war. What do you think is the significance of signing a non aggression treaty?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Also, this matter will not prevent future changes. Lack of funding is just a reason to enter this event. What needs to be developed will continue to develop, what needs to be manufactured will continue to be manufactured, and only some other things will change. You really don't understand why I chose MDA.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 You maintain hostility towards me, I understand. We are not completely in the same camp, and I am also wary of backing you. Perhaps we need more time. You can also choose not to buy.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 … So, have you read the article carefully?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 When the military expo opens, you can take a look again. What if there's something you like?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 What do you think I would do if I didn't have the funds because of this
It's still you who found the path to the worst outcome so quickly
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Well, what you said makes perfect sense. Is that why you're not planning to buy my weapons?
wait… Why don't you just make a DIY rocket
@SPsidearm But because I signed a surrender treaty, I cannot choose a neutral or hostile line (not allowed to sell arms to enemy)
As the beginning of this series of events, a best ending and a worst ending were set from the very beginning.
MDA 3:
+1@Christiant2
@JaxHere
@Randomplayer
MDA 2:
@windshifter1
@Karroc9522
@KPLBall
MDA 1:
@TheMouse
@CrestelAeronautics
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
em… A rather strange plane, but it doesn't look like the submarine from last time
Thus, the agreement has been officially reached.
The prerequisite for the event has been met: we need more funding (MDA line).
P
@TheUltimatePlaneLover You're right, and MIG has already showcased its latest submarine with strategic strike capabilities. I don't think it's necessary for me to join in, so I decided to bring out the spirit of joy.
@AManWillDieButNotHisIdeas These combat aircraft are offensive weapons, while landmines are defensive weapons. It's that simple.
How much does it cost to deploy a plane? How much does it cost to build a landmine? Did the money come from a strong wind?
@AManWillDieButNotHisIdeas I don't think they can undertake the same type of task.