@TheUltimatePlaneLover Since you have infantry equipment, there may be something you will like at my military exhibition later... Oh, it could also be something you dislike and feel fortunate about
@TheUltimatePlaneLover By the way, what do you think of card games? I am planning to create our DIY cards based on a World War II card game called Kards
@TheUltimatePlaneLover …
I'm telling you, I want to make my own A40, but you're not happy. Then I exchanged it with a surrender treaty, and you agreed. Then, by repeatedly emphasizing the uncontrollability of the A40D, you hinted at me and triggered a game of air force between us. In the end, I changed direction and ended it all.
*In non war situations, all A40Ds I shoot down are considered legitimate defense
I even told you the name, QX-6 Heavy Angel.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Installing a large number of weapons would make the entire aircraft's configuration appear cluttered, which we gamers may enjoy. However, if placed in a war environment, I think it would be better to disperse them.
@SPsidearm QX-6(Compared to A40D, but canceled due to obstruction and direction change)@TheUltimatePlaneLover @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
It is also because of this that the third article of the non aggression treaty was born
The A40s and T-3 always have a problem called stacking weapons, and I don't want QX-6 to go down this path too
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Do you want to see things like A-fired B-guided missiles, satellite detection, artillery guided drones, data links, electromagnetic interference, and beyond visual range strikes in this world?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Oh, by the way, due to the deviation in our war game theory after the Fourth Military Reform. So I divided my weapons into two worlds. In the world with MDA, the definition of my weapon is entirely determined by TUPL. You know what this means.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 ? I only remember saying that we should start an arms race. You are afraid that I will start a war, and I am also afraid that you will start a war. What do you think is the significance of signing a non aggression treaty?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Also, this matter will not prevent future changes. Lack of funding is just a reason to enter this event. What needs to be developed will continue to develop, what needs to be manufactured will continue to be manufactured, and only some other things will change. You really don't understand why I chose MDA.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 You maintain hostility towards me, I understand. We are not completely in the same camp, and I am also wary of backing you. Perhaps we need more time. You can also choose not to buy.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 What do you think I would do if I didn't have the funds because of this
It's still you who found the path to the worst outcome so quickly
@TheUltimatePlaneLover You're right, and MIG has already showcased its latest submarine with strategic strike capabilities. I don't think it's necessary for me to join in, so I decided to bring out the spirit of joy.
@AManWillDieButNotHisIdeas These combat aircraft are offensive weapons, while landmines are defensive weapons. It's that simple.
How much does it cost to deploy a plane? How much does it cost to build a landmine? Did the money come from a strong wind?
@AManWillDieButNotHisIdeas Based on vibration, the tank approaches and automatically bounces up to attack the top armor of the tank, which has been used in the Russian Ukrainian battlefield.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I am preparing for an attack nuclear submarine. So I want to discuss the possibility of forming a joint fleet in special circumstances in the future.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I suddenly realized that due to our differences in war game concepts, we seem to lack compatibility. How about this: The characteristics of my weapon in your world are entirely up to you.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover There is indeed this issue, which should be a common problem with all FT missiles. However, it seems that the problem is not significant? Breaking through defenses and striking fixed defense facilities is quite difficult, especially since this missile can be equipped on multiple platforms, such as airplanes, warships, and even submarines.
And you can't assume how many air defense facilities are attacking you at the same time
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Can we sell things to him after he is defeated?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Since you have infantry equipment, there may be something you will like at my military exhibition later... Oh, it could also be something you dislike and feel fortunate about
@TheUltimatePlaneLover By the way, what do you think of card games? I am planning to create our DIY cards based on a World War II card game called Kards
@TheUltimatePlaneLover …
I'm telling you, I want to make my own A40, but you're not happy. Then I exchanged it with a surrender treaty, and you agreed. Then, by repeatedly emphasizing the uncontrollability of the A40D, you hinted at me and triggered a game of air force between us. In the end, I changed direction and ended it all.
*In non war situations, all A40Ds I shoot down are considered legitimate defense
I even told you the name, QX-6 Heavy Angel.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover You don't know? Can you guess which plane I signed the surrender agreement for? I specifically came over to tell you.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Installing a large number of weapons would make the entire aircraft's configuration appear cluttered, which we gamers may enjoy. However, if placed in a war environment, I think it would be better to disperse them.
@SPsidearm QX-6(Compared to A40D, but canceled due to obstruction and direction change)@TheUltimatePlaneLover @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
It is also because of this that the third article of the non aggression treaty was born
The A40s and T-3 always have a problem called stacking weapons, and I don't want QX-6 to go down this path too
@KPLBall @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Why are you afraid of suicide attacks? This thing didn't work much in the later stages of World War II.
@SPsidearm @KPLBall Does your MDA Navy not have decent anti-aircraft weapons
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 me too. But there is a saying in the business world, don't look for demand, but create demand.
Of course, the means must be legal
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 What I mean is, since you're sure I haven't expressed any intention of starting a war, what else do you really want?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Do you want to see things like A-fired B-guided missiles, satellite detection, artillery guided drones, data links, electromagnetic interference, and beyond visual range strikes in this world?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 … ? So what do you want?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Oh, by the way, due to the deviation in our war game theory after the Fourth Military Reform. So I divided my weapons into two worlds. In the world with MDA, the definition of my weapon is entirely determined by TUPL. You know what this means.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 ? I only remember saying that we should start an arms race. You are afraid that I will start a war, and I am also afraid that you will start a war. What do you think is the significance of signing a non aggression treaty?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Also, this matter will not prevent future changes. Lack of funding is just a reason to enter this event. What needs to be developed will continue to develop, what needs to be manufactured will continue to be manufactured, and only some other things will change. You really don't understand why I chose MDA.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 You maintain hostility towards me, I understand. We are not completely in the same camp, and I am also wary of backing you. Perhaps we need more time. You can also choose not to buy.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 … So, have you read the article carefully?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 When the military expo opens, you can take a look again. What if there's something you like?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 What do you think I would do if I didn't have the funds because of this
It's still you who found the path to the worst outcome so quickly
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Well, what you said makes perfect sense. Is that why you're not planning to buy my weapons?
wait… Why don't you just make a DIY rocket
@SPsidearm But because I signed a surrender treaty, I cannot choose a neutral or hostile line (not allowed to sell arms to enemy)
As the beginning of this series of events, a best ending and a worst ending were set from the very beginning.
MDA 3:
+1@Christiant2
@JaxHere
@Randomplayer
MDA 2:
@windshifter1
@Karroc9522
@KPLBall
MDA 1:
@TheMouse
@CrestelAeronautics
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
em… A rather strange plane, but it doesn't look like the submarine from last time
Thus, the agreement has been officially reached.
The prerequisite for the event has been met: we need more funding (MDA line).
P
@TheUltimatePlaneLover You're right, and MIG has already showcased its latest submarine with strategic strike capabilities. I don't think it's necessary for me to join in, so I decided to bring out the spirit of joy.
@AManWillDieButNotHisIdeas These combat aircraft are offensive weapons, while landmines are defensive weapons. It's that simple.
How much does it cost to deploy a plane? How much does it cost to build a landmine? Did the money come from a strong wind?
@AManWillDieButNotHisIdeas I don't think they can undertake the same type of task.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Okay, then.
During The Arms Race! (Trigger condition: Research of the same type is currently underway)
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 I don't remember MDA's submarine having this feature. Is it an unpublished version?
@AManWillDieButNotHisIdeas Based on vibration, the tank approaches and automatically bounces up to attack the top armor of the tank, which has been used in the Russian Ukrainian battlefield.
A very good article that surprised me. It's the best I've ever seen in this war. But, you used submarine launched ballistic missiles here, right?
Upgrade the combat readiness level! Super event: JSTQ is concerned.
+1em… Rocket launchers may be questioned for their poor accuracy... How interested are you in attacking top mines?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I am preparing for an attack nuclear submarine. So I want to discuss the possibility of forming a joint fleet in special circumstances in the future.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover By the way, where is the treaty you released? Or should we calculate based on the time I posted?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I suddenly realized that due to our differences in war game concepts, we seem to lack compatibility. How about this: The characteristics of my weapon in your world are entirely up to you.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover There is indeed this issue, which should be a common problem with all FT missiles. However, it seems that the problem is not significant? Breaking through defenses and striking fixed defense facilities is quite difficult, especially since this missile can be equipped on multiple platforms, such as airplanes, warships, and even submarines.
And you can't assume how many air defense facilities are attacking you at the same time
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Um... it's really bad. Fortunately, our military theory chose beyond visual range strike.
@overlord5453 It's too polite of you to issue a treaty in advance before starting a war, isn't it?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover ? I don't think my missile will drag a fuel pipe behind it when flying at Mach 6
@TheUltimatePlaneLover no. The main cockpit in the game will not be destroyed, it will continue to provide coordinates
@KPLBall I don't play with kids who only boast about their ability to modify engine thrust. Remember to use TheMouse's UFOs next time
@KPLBall When this missile strikes, your plane won't sound the alarm
@KPLBall If we're talking about speed, it means you don't understand the terrifying aspect of this missile