Ehh It's hard for me to rebuild an aircraft. Already losing motivation in my current project. Anymore there's so much work that has to go into an aircraft it's hard to finish something enough to upload. @Kangy
Well I was going to upload it a while ago but then I needed a code for the slats which I never asked for and so I just moved on, now the aircraft is sorta outdated and will remain in the scrapyards forever. This post is why I don't make teasers a whole lot anymore. I never know when project won't get finished. @Kangy
This bug is super easy to replicate and doesn't really have anything to do with the new patch. But it's really annoying when creating wings. Basically if you scale a fuselage piece to 2x its current scale to increase the angle of the wing, a wierd shading issue appears on the fuselage and can sometimes be fixed by not having any connections to the fuselage piece, although most times it doesn't work. The shading only happens when you play the simulation btw. For vehicles like an Su-7 or anything with high wing sweeps this is very challenging to work around. Thank you.
Hello! Well it's pretty easy in fact. I use an app called "Phonto". It's a pretty basic app but it's just the one I use. I first take a picture of my aircraft in simpleplanes. I set my ui scale to as little as possible so it doesn't show up in the thumbnail. After I take the photo I want, I go to google and find a logo that I want for my thumbnail. In this case, I wanted the "North American" logo, so after I find the right logo, I search up "Background Remover" on google, then, I simply browse my photo library and input the North American logo, it will remove the colored square from the logo. I then go into phonto, load up my picture from sp, and add the logo with the removed background. You can then eit the size of thr logo on the picture in any scale you want. If you have more auestions don't be afraid to ask! @RachelGardner
Thank alot! BogdanX and 2Papi2Chulo helped a ton with the flight model, if it weren't for Bogdan, my rollrate would've been twice as much as it is now! @Default4
That’s really interesting actually. I could’ve probably tried that and technique but the seams where the glass pieces meet would be very visible still @Sparky6004
Trust me, I studied the cockpit very hard and I've always known what the shape of the canopy frame looks like in real life. But I am curious do you know of a better way to make this canopy then mine? @Sparky6004
Its an incredible technique. It works better for thin wings. Although, when the aspect ratio is too high, the ailerons tend to be curved (which isn't realistic). Control surfaces are almost always perfect flat. That would be the only issue with this airfoil method.
Oh crap don't forgor 💀@FairFireFlight
Hey doodoohead, when are you gonna post this hawt ass fitter?@FairFireFlight
Bro use smoothing
Neah that is a little too much work sadly. @R2d2hunter
I can relate brother@ollielebananiaCFSP
You always impress me with you quickness to respond to comments 😂😂😂 @ollielebananiaCFSP
Haha thanks bro 😆@Mustang51
Thanks brah @gigachad
Ehh It's hard for me to rebuild an aircraft. Already losing motivation in my current project. Anymore there's so much work that has to go into an aircraft it's hard to finish something enough to upload. @Kangy
Well I was going to upload it a while ago but then I needed a code for the slats which I never asked for and so I just moved on, now the aircraft is sorta outdated and will remain in the scrapyards forever. This post is why I don't make teasers a whole lot anymore. I never know when project won't get finished. @Kangy
Are you banned or something? Your account leads me to the home page :p@TheGreatToad
Thanks man! @realSavageMan
Thank you guys! @RAF1 @PapaKernels
Thank you! @DeezDucks
Whoops forgot you weren't a mod :/ @EternalDarkness
This bug is super easy to replicate and doesn't really have anything to do with the new patch. But it's really annoying when creating wings. Basically if you scale a fuselage piece to 2x its current scale to increase the angle of the wing, a wierd shading issue appears on the fuselage and can sometimes be fixed by not having any connections to the fuselage piece, although most times it doesn't work. The shading only happens when you play the simulation btw. For vehicles like an Su-7 or anything with high wing sweeps this is very challenging to work around. Thank you.
Thats so awesome! I can't wait to see the final product! @ollielebananiaCFSP
But you already uploaded this a year ago? Is somethimg different on this one? @ollielebananiaCFSP
Hello! Well it's pretty easy in fact. I use an app called "Phonto". It's a pretty basic app but it's just the one I use. I first take a picture of my aircraft in simpleplanes. I set my ui scale to as little as possible so it doesn't show up in the thumbnail. After I take the photo I want, I go to google and find a logo that I want for my thumbnail. In this case, I wanted the "North American" logo, so after I find the right logo, I search up "Background Remover" on google, then, I simply browse my photo library and input the North American logo, it will remove the colored square from the logo. I then go into phonto, load up my picture from sp, and add the logo with the removed background. You can then eit the size of thr logo on the picture in any scale you want. If you have more auestions don't be afraid to ask! @RachelGardner
OH MY GOD YES WHAT ABOUT, WAIT, WAIT, I SAID WAIT NO STOP WAIT WHAT ARE YOU DOING I SAID WAITINWEDGSIDDHDGSK DHD@handitover
Sir yesir! @Rakoval500k
I doubt it. It wouldn't necessarily be that difficult but I don't have any motivation to make an "H" variant. @SimpleDynamincs
Oh really? I thought the seaosn stayed largely the same around the globe at any given time. @Typhoon03
Summertime? It's january lol @jamesPLANESii
It actually does lol. I literally hadn't seen that one before even building mine @handitover
Thanks man! @Simpleplanesgood99
Yeah I agree with you, always fun to see different buildstyles on different aircraft @PxVector
Thanks @asteroidbook345
Thanks! @MrShenanigansSP
Thank alot! BogdanX and 2Papi2Chulo helped a ton with the flight model, if it weren't for Bogdan, my rollrate would've been twice as much as it is now! @Default4
Sorry about the interior man. I had no idea what else I could add to it. Any tips on what I should add for my next airplane?@Default4
That’s really interesting actually. I could’ve probably tried that and technique but the seams where the glass pieces meet would be very visible still @Sparky6004
Trust me, I studied the cockpit very hard and I've always known what the shape of the canopy frame looks like in real life. But I am curious do you know of a better way to make this canopy then mine? @Sparky6004
Thats awesome! @Sparky6004
Thank you @Driftus
Thankyooooouuuu! @Default4
Yes sir @Default4
Thank you, I considered it a while ago but it was a failed attempt. We'll see though. @DasSchweizeHeliPilot
Its an incredible technique. It works better for thin wings. Although, when the aspect ratio is too high, the ailerons tend to be curved (which isn't realistic). Control surfaces are almost always perfect flat. That would be the only issue with this airfoil method.
Sorry it must be a glitch or something. My tag would be green if I was a curator@AviationCat007
I have no idea. I'm not a curater@AviationCat007
Hmm I have no idea. This is an old build maybe thats why its doing that. @Billion0wonder
I got bored of this plane and uploaded it. Although I think I will take it down @BogdanX
Hehehehehehehe @PapaKernels
Ahh I see. Yeah I have no idea what the cost performance would be though @Kangy
nah I was just joking it doesn't bother me heck if you look at my old descriptions it looks like a monkey typed it lol@Aosullivan799
@Aosullivan799 lmao I don't think I did
I think I got brain cancer trying to read that desc
Wait you said last day? Is today the deadline?
Cause the governor is amazing, he knows whats good @Usairwaysa380