106k Hedero Comments

  • Lun Class 4.3 years ago

    Well said my friend! @MintLynx

    +3
  • M.S. 1500 Épervier [90% complete] 4.3 years ago

    On who? @RandomUser09

  • M.S. 1500 Épervier [90% complete] 4.3 years ago

    Thanks! @ACEPILOT109

  • A-20G 4.3 years ago

    @asteroidbook345 I tagged you on this old post so not many people would find it, but about randomusername's gender, she tol me she's actually trans. So male-to-female I presume. But I'm perfectly ok with her being trans, I know some people on the website would make fun of that so just keep this between you and me I guess.

  • M.S. 1500 Épervier [90% complete] 4.3 years ago

    Yeah I'm still friends with her on discord, we rarely talk but I tell you what she is crazy smart. Or at least I think so. She may have Traumatic Brain Injury but that doesn't stop her from doing impressive mathematics. @asteroidbook345

  • M.S. 1500 Épervier [90% complete] 4.3 years ago

    Bruh too bad not a single girl my age is on the website. The only one was randomusername but then she left lmao @asteroidbook345

  • M.S. 1500 Épervier [90% complete] 4.3 years ago

    Not intentionally but yeah sort of. @asteroidbook345

  • M.S. 1500 Épervier [90% complete] 4.3 years ago

    Nah it's still being worked on. I just started it after the Epervier and I need to get the Epervier done first because it's for a challenge. @ssenmodnar

  • M.S. 1500 Épervier [90% complete] 4.3 years ago

    I know right 😂 I couldn't even showcase one normal landing in this thing. @tsampoy

  • M.S. 1500 Épervier [90% complete] 4.3 years ago

    You tryna get people to find my location brah lmao jk @RandomUser09

  • M.S. 1500 Épervier [90% complete] 4.3 years ago

    That's what I thought but it's accurate to the blueprint. @Ergithe

    +1
  • M.S. 1500 Épervier [90% complete] 4.3 years ago

    Lol thanks! @Kangy

    +1
  • M.S. 1500 Épervier [90% complete] 4.3 years ago

    I do have discord. Hedero #9172 I will not be accepting every request I get, to all the people seeing my discord info. I only accept people I know. @HellouUnt

  • M.S. 1500 Épervier [90% complete] 4.3 years ago

    Thank you Bogdan. And yes this airplane IS a rockcrawler with this type of landing gear :-) @BogdanX

  • M.S. 1500 Épervier [90% complete] 4.3 years ago

    Amog Use @HellouUnt

  • M.S. 1500 Épervier [90% complete] 4.3 years ago

    This will be for WarHawk95's challenge, I'm wishing I did a Vautour instead, I am growing tired of this aircraft lol.

  • M.S. 1500 Épervier [90% complete] 4.3 years ago

    That stupid lag spike 🙄

  • Automatic Leading Edge Slats 4.3 years ago

    Well I appreciate your willingness to help but I've just decided by the help of another friend that I'll just set these slats to vtol. If I do more slats in the future I will try to use a rotator instead of a piston and I'll try to use a code. But this time we can just leave it. Thank you though! @lemoose

    +1
  • Grumman X-29 (W.I.P.) 4.3 years ago

    Lol, it's hard work! @KnightOfRen

  • Automatic Leading Edge Slats 4.3 years ago

    Yeah, well it's fine. I'll do something about it. Thanks for trying! @SnoWFLakE0s

  • Grumman X-29 (W.I.P.) 4.3 years ago

    What @KnightOfRen

  • Automatic Leading Edge Slats 4.3 years ago

    I'm using pistons instead of rotators. Would that be the reason it's not working? Cause the slats will shift forward and backwards several times before either sitting full forward or fully retracted. @SnoWFLakE0s

  • Automatic Leading Edge Slats 4.3 years ago

    Except this code used on the aircraft is far more complex then what I need. All I need is for the slats to deploy when exceeding (x) degrees. I don't need them to deploy at low/high speeds or whatever. I tried "AngleOfAttack < 50" but it didn't work. Warhawk95 told me to try it but whenever I put code in it doesn't seem to work as I wish. And of course if you don't feel like messing with code right now that's perfectly fine. @SnoWFLakE0s

  • Automatic Leading Edge Slats 4.3 years ago

    Hey bro, I'm asking you 'cause I don't know if LeMosse is still active on the site or not. But I am making a basic prop plane called the M.S. 1500 Epervier and it utilizes slats. I was wondering what a good code function would be for them. I believe they only deploy based on angle of attack, as they aren't very complex. Thanks ft god. @SnoWFLakE0s

  • EggPlane F-117 4.3 years ago

    I love the aircraft, especially the detailed landing gear!

    +2
  • Grumman X-29 (W.I.P.) 4.3 years ago

    I have decided to never build a float airplane again, those are some of the worst airplanes to make. And the grumman goose has extremely difficult landing gear to build, so no, sorry. And also I am not specifically building any aircraft of a certain manufacturer, I just build aircraft that I like. @R2d2hunter

  • My discord is working again! 4.3 years ago

    I sent you a friend request @MonsterAvgeek

  • Update on discord account 4.3 years ago

    Ok awesome @MonsterAvgeek

  • Grumman J2F-6 Duck 4.3 years ago

    Oh lol, thank you. @Dimitry393

  • Grumman J2F-6 Duck 4.3 years ago

    You asked me 1.3 years ago!? @Dimitry393

  • Grumman J2F-6 Duck 4.3 years ago

    Thankyou mate @hunterfox20

  • Grumman X-29 (W.I.P.) 4.3 years ago

    Lmao yeah @Beefy

  • Update on discord account 4.3 years ago

    Bruh I have no idea, I know nothing about that sort of stuff, 'cause I have issues with the same thing sometimes. @MonsterAvgeek

  • Grumman X-29 (W.I.P.) 4.3 years ago

    Wow that's crazy, I can imagine that wing flutter on this thing could be beyond uncontrollable, but the material composite they use in the winspars fix it I guess. @Starbound

  • Grumman X-29 (W.I.P.) 4.3 years ago

    Yeah the x-31 is crazy but the x-29 was actually called the most unstable in the wikipedia. So I think it's pretty close but the x-29 probably wins.@Starbound

  • Grumman X-29 (W.I.P.) 4.3 years ago

    Whoa I've never responded to someone so fast in my life, I literally logged on exactly when you posted the comment lol. @ChrisPy

  • Grumman X-29 (W.I.P.) 4.3 years ago

    Well that's odd. But I guess that's why its so manueverable. And I'm guessing it has a flight control computer to help stabilize it. @ChrisPy

  • Grumman X-29 (W.I.P.) 4.3 years ago

    The F-22 is unstable? @ChrisPy

  • Grumman X-29 (W.I.P.) 4.3 years ago

    Yep XD@KnightOfRen

  • Grumman X-29 (W.I.P.) 4.3 years ago

    Lol I don't think so! @Cyieed462

    +1
  • F-4EJ Kai Phantom II 07-4836 302nd Sq. 4.3 years ago

    Well it's incredible to say the least, enjoy it! And a great airplane too btw! @JS01

    +1
  • Mig-29 (my best plane) 4.3 years ago

    Sure thing bud @rexzion

  • Mig-29 (my best plane) 4.3 years ago

    Not tryna be rude or anything, but just trying to give advice for this guy for future builds. But, perhaps I'm being a little harsh. @SemedianIndustries

    +3
  • Mig-29 (my best plane) 4.3 years ago

    Not upvoting because of the upvote beg. Please mever ask for upvotes.

    +2
  • Grumman X-29 (W.I.P.) 4.3 years ago

    Wow, that thing flies awful lmao @BaconEggs

  • Grumman X-29 (W.I.P.) 4.3 years ago

    Yeah I'll definitely try it out. @BaconEggs

  • Grumman X-29 (W.I.P.) 4.3 years ago

    True, but the front looks mostly like it, and the nose gear. But nothing else really. @asteroidbook345

  • Grumman X-29 (W.I.P.) 4.3 years ago

    Hmm ok. Thanks for the tip! I'll try to implement that into the final touches of the flight model. @BaconEggs

  • Grumman X-29 (W.I.P.) 4.3 years ago

    How would it not be? It's clearly an f-5. @asteroidbook345