17.0k GeneralCorpInc Comments

  • [KE-RP] TEC-2 Asuncion 3 months ago

    @rickofrolls how many you'd take, and which country are ya??

  • [KE-RP] FAT-1A "Voodoo" 3 months ago

    @RepublicofWrightIsles idc too. Too much for me, i thought it would be a 1950 rp going slowly in the future.
    .
    Ended up being just "build what you feel like building". So i won't worry myself anymore. I am just making my own rp.

  • Wireless Transmitter Demo 3 months ago

    We got working transmitters before SP2, Damn

  • [KE-RP] FV-390D "Robætikišefælké" Drone Edition 3 months ago

    @RepublicofWrightIsles ye ik. Idc anymore :/ i'll just sent some builds when i feel like it. Making my own rp in the meantime.

  • [KE-RP] TEC-2 Asuncion 3 months ago

    @rickofrolls i can make them 21M/unit.

  • [SGW-RP] 1936 begining RP (overwork fr Xb) 3 months ago

    @BOSKnight gud gud

  • [SGW-RP] 1936 begining RP (overwork fr Xb) 3 months ago

    @BOSKnight then president, taking political decisions, propose/apply requests/needs and so. Political thing.
    You don't want?

  • [SGW-RP] 1936 begining RP (overwork fr Xb) 3 months ago

    @BOSKnight alright. As what? Government, minister, company?

  • [SGW-RP Opening] LCF-3 A-1 "Skandi" 3 months ago

    @BOSKnight can seem. Ik it isn't, so i am not caring much :/

  • [KE-RP] Speed of sound 3 months ago

    @BOSKnight let's mix. SR-71

  • [SGW-RP Opening] LCF-3 A-1 "Skandi" 3 months ago

    @BOSKnight lol, am a company. From germany

  • [SGW-RP Opening] LCF-3 A-1 "Skandi" 3 months ago

    PTR:
    @DeeganWithABazooka
    @Hahahahaahahshs

  • [KE-RP] FV-390D "Robætikišefælké" Drone Edition 3 months ago

    @RepublicofWrightIsles well, as it is an rp, i should say w is needed to say... but well, i won't go insulting recklessly, so i'll do so. Cya

  • [KE-RP] FV-390D "Robætikišefælké" Drone Edition 3 months ago

    @RepublicofWrightIsles 17 years ahead is still more acceptable than 40 or 50 years ahead. Experimentals means no real reliability, means no sells possible, means no officialisation. So you shouldn't publish a plane but a forum with explanations.

  • [KE-RP] TEC-2 Asuncion 3 months ago

    @BOSKnight what. Da hell.
    What dat means???

  • [KE-RP] TEC-2 Asuncion 3 months ago

    @SPWithLizzie ,-, meow? Poor lil hyuman... pat pat

  • [KE-RP] TEC-2 Asuncion 3 months ago

    @SPWithLizzie yea :) fat, like the gap btw irl and this rp tech dev

  • [KE-RP] TEC-2 Asuncion 3 months ago

    Perma tag request:
    @Hahahahaahahshs

  • [KE-RP] TEC-2 Asuncion 3 months ago

    Socket Onion:
    @DeeganWithABazooka
    No-See Jerry:
    @RB107
    Kingdom of Pole-Land:
    @BigHeadEngineering

  • [KE-RP] TEC-2 Asuncion 3 months ago

    Unity Ding-Dong:
    @DeutschFELLA
    Republic of For-Rants:
    @keiyronelleavgeek566
    Republic of Kinda:
    @aMosquito

  • [KE-RP] TEC-2 Asuncion 3 months ago

    Empire of Celestia:
    @LunarEclipseSP
    No-See Jerry Head of Defense:
    @RepublicofWrightIsles
    Republic of Next-In-Co:
    @Aeromax

  • [KE-RP] TEC-2 Asuncion 3 months ago

    Unity Steaks:
    @Bugati87
    Empire of Your-Pan:
    @Technicalstrat
    Kingdom of Bell-Lands:
    @SPWithLizzie

  • [KE-RP] TEC-2 Asuncion 3 months ago

    Republic of Nether-Jim
    @AviationLoverGEEK444
    Republic of Swisher-Man
    @Voytek

  • [KE-RP] TEC-2 Asuncion 3 months ago

    Umbra Defense:
    @SchmooveBrain
    You-Go-Slav-Yeah:
    @NotRob119

  • [KE-RP] FV-390D "Robætikišefælké" Drone Edition 3 months ago

    Gemini stated that even your manned version is very advanced for a 1954 manned aircraft, let along drone. You have done nothing right to defend you thought abt drone being absent in our current RP era.

  • [KE-RP] FV-390D "Robætikišefælké" Drone Edition 3 months ago

    Blud 💀 that a 2040 drone, nowhere near my little drone capable of moving within 95km. You cannot compare. I created the drone specificly as a new vehicle, i didn't slapped it with a flight computer. You're nowhere 1960's capable.
    .
    You kbow what?
    .
    Show me a drone like this with ressembling capacities in 1960 that flew. If you find one, i'll give you a pass.

  • [KE-RP] FAT-1A "Voodoo" 3 months ago

    @RepublicofWrightIsles how coherent is it? A flight computer isn't the thing.

    It is radar LOS guided, up to 95km only. With a flight computer (modern if i understand right), you can control the aircraft from anywhere he can reach. Or even more.
    I take realism, not understandings

  • MJ-4S-2Q 3 months ago

    @SPWithLizzie i talk about control range, as it is written 300 miles control range in the desc...
    .
    Control range is like a range from which you can control the UAV's actions, and 300 miles (~480km) is more than some light manned aircrafts, so for cantrol, it is unrealistic. For max ferry range, flying on it's own near the one controling it, from a modified plane made to control it like that, it is more realistic, but again, as it is a drone, and let's say 1960, it is too heavy, too fast, and engines used are just unrealistic...

  • MJ-4S-2Q 3 months ago

    @SPWithLizzie you should just change wings shapes and make a single engine non-powerful version for a drone. Even with the range, it is still way, way, way too early for a not alr 1960 drone. Nothing realistic :/ if not the range, which is already quite imposing for a drone at our era.

  • [KE-RP] GCI Huge and Fast Development. 3 months ago

    @SPWithLizzie because... uh... well, idk, bcs i didn't saw how the Osprey looks like. I just decided to put a bit of like H-21 from BOSKnight for the RP but with only my game's knowledge, i just put its name for like yk, the game.
    .
    But dw, it only have 4700hp, not 7000 or 8000 like IRL and modernish ones.

  • [KE-RP] GCI Huge and Fast Development. 3 months ago

    @SPWithLizzie ? Yes?

  • [KE-RP] GCI Huge and Fast Development. 3 months ago

    Socket Onion:
    @DeeganWithABazooka
    No-See Jerry:
    @RB107
    Kingdom of Pole-Land:
    @BigHeadEngineering

  • [KE-RP] GCI Huge and Fast Development. 3 months ago

    Unity Ding-Dong:
    @DeutschFELLA
    Republic of For-Rants:
    @keiyronelleavgeek566
    Republic of Kinda:
    @aMosquito

  • [KE-RP] GCI Huge and Fast Development. 3 months ago

    Empire of Celestia:
    @LunarEclipseSP
    No-See Jerry Head of Defense:
    @RepublicofWrightIsles
    Republic of Next-In-Co:
    @Aeromax

  • [KE-RP] GCI Huge and Fast Development. 3 months ago

    Unity Steaks:
    @Bugati87
    Empire of Your-Pan:
    @Technicalstrat
    Kingdom of Bell-Lands:
    @SPWithLizzie

  • [KE-RP] GCI Huge and Fast Development. 3 months ago

    Republic of Nether-Jim
    @AviationLoverGEEK444
    Republic of Swisher-Man
    @Voytek

  • [KE-RP] GCI Huge and Fast Development. 3 months ago

    Umbra Defense:
    @SchmooveBrain
    You-Go-Slav-Yeah:
    @NotRob119

  • Prob Rebuild Challenge[closed] 3 months ago

    Like, we just make a good prop? Or needs to exists a first variant?

  • [KE-RP] Selling surplus. 3 months ago

    @BOSKnight 10M... alr, then 2 units

  • [KE-RP] Selling surplus. 3 months ago

    Can i get 5 H-21 aircrafts?

  • [KE-RP] FAT-1A "Voodoo" 3 months ago

    @RepublicofWrightIsles why? Depends on drones type and role. See the Ryan Firebee. The exact homologue of my drone.

  • [PEA] D-1A “Hellfire” 3 months ago

    @BOSKnight bcs i joined in the rp in 1952, idk how you did, but gg

  • [PEA] D-1A “Hellfire” 3 months ago

    @BOSKnight great

  • [PEA] D-1A “Hellfire” 3 months ago

    @BOSKnight great to know. Because i never heard abt you putting funds in my company :)

  • [PEA] D-1A “Hellfire” 3 months ago

    @BOSKnight Radar uses Radio waves, so yea, it be controlled from any bomber modified to have Radio waves monitory and control, and to be able to control, either use IFR or visual, so it doesn't crashes. It is meant to train crew, so is the reason of low price and capacities.
    .
    And yea, i said to Gemini to tell me how realitic it is for a 1978 drone, and as you see, he concluded it to be lowly realistic for a 1978 drone, way too ahead of 1978, 1978 not 1958. So for 1958, how ahead can we call it? Futuristic.

  • [PEA] D-1A “Hellfire” 3 months ago

    @BOSKnight if it is a civilian engine (like a cylinder engine, like V4/V6/V12 and co., then you can't achieve doing Loitering while being able to have weapons, and even the range is unrealistic... want me to ask Gemini AND deepseek to explain why to you?

  • [PEA] D-1A “Hellfire” 3 months ago

    @BOSKnight it is Visual control, from bombers or ground. Radar control, up to 95km range of control. It is written, i changed nothing