You can try using 2 rotators, one thats floppy and another to rotate the other rotator/landing gear. To achieve gear tilt in this setup you could add weight to the back or edit the 'centerofmass' on a part. Best example for this is on my a330/a340's; here is an example
It's also possible with control bases, setting it to 'wheel' then make variable with the landing gear code(If gear tilt starts flat be sure the code starts at +1/-1). Then enter the variables name as the input, the 'scale' will handle the gear tilt angle and you can leave the rest. Then go xml edit the control base's 'slepMaximumForce' as it handles how stiff/floppy this setup can be.
I will provide you an example for the control base setup when I post my reworked/updated a330/a340's
@DeadlyDialga hmm, it's probably due to the fact that engine is too strong. Since the speed limit for the push back is now handled FT on the engine instead of the wheels
@PlaneLover001Xd currently making the other engines for the the 747(RR & PW). After that I plan on updating and/or reworking previous planes. Ex; the A320
@SimpleplanesRamadhan1 well I guess you still could go quite fast with full power, But normally airliners almost never travel with full power for prolonged periods of time.
@SimpleplanesRamadhan1 Top speed of a 787-9 is said to be 954km/h or 592.788mph, unless you went into a nose dive I don't know how you acheived 1000mph
@Sense2 I'm planning on it
@Max999 Currently just updating existing planes, but the next plane I could make would either be the A350 or MD-11
@Sense2 It's been fixed, thanks for letting me know
@andavis1969 eventually
You can try using 2 rotators, one thats floppy and another to rotate the other rotator/landing gear. To achieve gear tilt in this setup you could add weight to the back or edit the 'centerofmass' on a part. Best example for this is on my a330/a340's; here is an example
It's also possible with control bases, setting it to 'wheel' then make variable with the landing gear code(If gear tilt starts flat be sure the code starts at +1/-1). Then enter the variables name as the input, the 'scale' will handle the gear tilt angle and you can leave the rest. Then go xml edit the control base's 'slepMaximumForce' as it handles how stiff/floppy this setup can be.
I will provide you an example for the control base setup when I post my reworked/updated a330/a340's
@DOLDI oh oops
@Brololxd yeah
+1@DeadlyDialga fixed it
+1@DeadlyDialga hmm, it's probably due to the fact that engine is too strong. Since the speed limit for the push back is now handled FT on the engine instead of the wheels
@ThatRandomCouchPotato top cruising speed can vary
@Brololxd currently not focused on making new planes but instead I'm updating existing ones
Happy new year everyone
@FeiGe3 I might
+1@PlaneLover001Xd currently making the other engines for the the 747(RR & PW). After that I plan on updating and/or reworking previous planes. Ex; the A320
+2@Mdhell15 idk
@IDontHaveUsernamesLOL oh? Oops lemme fix that
@PlaneLover001Xd @Brololxd
@Max999 progress was slow cuz I was very busy but Its nearly complete should take a few more days.
+1@SimpleplanesRamadhan1 uh what?
@Brololxd maybe 5
@James2007two I'm planning on making one eventually, though it will take a while as I have a lot in plan for the future
+2@SimpleplanesRamadhan1 ye
@Brololxd h@Brololxd Maybe in a couple of weeks
@Brololxd oh thanks
@DOLDI idk
+1@Brololxd I'm going to do the 747-400
+2next
@JacksEpicGamingYT unfortunately not
@JacksEpicGamingYT uhh what?
@HololiveFan it Says on google that delta has 11 A220-300s
+1@Brololxd Currently reworking the A220-300
@SIMPLELI01 uhh what?
@Max999 I'm going to re-do the a220-300, After that... I might do the 747-400
+1@Timothy19452022 um... sure?
@daju123 Pretty sure the B777-200LR and B777-200F have the same raked wingtips as the B777-300ER
@RishantYT747fan it should be fixed now, try downloading it again and see if it is fixed
@FeiGe3 probably going to rework the A220, after that perhaps the 747
+1@SimpleplanesRamadhan1 well I guess you still could go quite fast with full power, But normally airliners almost never travel with full power for prolonged periods of time.
+1@Brololxd Hmm, I don't know
@Brololxd yeah oops
@NusaFly003 sure
@TheDesignate @HololiveFan
@TheDesignate Here, It's been updated
@teddyone02 I will, but don't know when
@teddyone02 idk
@SimpleplanesRamadhan1 Top speed of a 787-9 is said to be 954km/h or 592.788mph, unless you went into a nose dive I don't know how you acheived 1000mph
@DeadlyDialga probably not, but check the.planes successors as someone made it
+1@SimpleplanesJP11 the 2nd was from when the e190 was in testing, I thought it was funny so I included it
Absolutely Beautiful.
I wish I could make my A320's nose as good as this one, I'm always not quite satisfied with it for some reason. You're definitely a promising builder.
+3@GalacticaAsia actually, speaking of freighters... After the e190 is finished, I'm actually interested in making the 777F after that
+1@mitaoweiruantang what is?