134k GalacticaAsia Comments

  • A380 EA 1.6 years ago

    @William930718 I'll look into it

  • Narrow body Airliner Roadmap 1.6 years ago

    @Remaker65998 здравствуйте. Если вам нужна помощь, вы можете прислать мне ссылку на самолет, я буду рад помочь. Извините за поздний ответ, в последнее время я был очень занят.

  • A380 RR 1.7 years ago

    @JamalJones its a car engine hidden in the nose gear, between the wheels.

  • A380 EA 1.7 years ago

    Happy holidays

  • A380 RR 1.7 years ago

    Happy holidays

    +1
  • (Updated)A320[CFM] 1.7 years ago

    @Montana13427645 uhh sure

  • Lj-c3 1.7 years ago

    @LJAircraftmanufacturer Here, see if you like the changes

  • Lj-c3 1.7 years ago

    @LJAircraftmanufacturer Hi sorry for the late reply, but what needs to be changed?

    The nose dive issue could be caused by the plane's CoM being too far forward of the CoL.

  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @Pooplee well it is about time I gave it some love

  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @Josephine785 you can deactivate AG8 to turn them off

    +1
  • De Havilland Canada DHC-8-Q400 GalactiaAsia Airlines 1.8 years ago

    @BeechcraftA35 sure

  • De Havilland Canada DHC-8-Q400 GalactiaAsia Airlines 1.8 years ago

    @XPAAircrafts @BeechcraftA35 This plane is not mine, I helped finish it after @Remaker65998 asked for help but I did not build the the plane itself. So the credit for this plane should go to him/her and not me.

    +4
  • De Havilland Canada DHC-8-Q400 1.8 years ago

    @BeechcraftA35 I helped build it but its not mine

  • Narrow body Airliner Roadmap 1.8 years ago

    @Remaker65998 >DHC-8<

  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @Yeetusyeee I see, happy flying!

  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @XPAAircrafts yes you can, for it to work you need to paint the label black and set the labels emission very high though

    +1
  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @schinaplayer It has been fixed

  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @Yeetusyeee hmm seems that you where right, the landing speed indeed was too slow. I've increased it now, so landing should be easier now

  • custom airbrakes problem 1.8 years ago

    @Escaloplatross I am glad that I was able to help

    +1
  • Narrow body Airliner Roadmap 1.8 years ago

    @Remaker65998 Я могу сделать фары и дверцу шасси, но что вам нужно, чтобы помочь с носовым обтекателем? Кроме того, использование аналогичного винта от моего ATR 72 не позволит использовать винтовые двигатели кроме как в декоративных целях, то есть они не будут создавать тягу. Я решил эту проблему с ATR 72, используя тихий реактивный двигатель, а вас это устраивает

  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @schinaplayer hmm I'll look into it

  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @MactanSpotter339 hmm, for all I know it should be quite mobile friendly for its part count so you try flying it first

  • custom airbrakes problem 1.8 years ago

    maybe it is due to the activation group, since deactivating the activation group locks rotators unless you set 'zeroOnDeactivate' to 'true’

    +2
  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @schinaplayer um, mid flight?

  • what to do 1.8 years ago

    This is sadly the downside on trying to make custom props with this method, you cant add variable pitch to the blades. I've had this problem when making my ATR-72, I tried all rotators, using 2 rotators, and even control bases but none worked. So I made a compromise and just let sit at ground neutral. hopefully someone finds a solution for this. cool plane btw

    +1
  • Narrow body Airliner Roadmap 1.8 years ago

    @Remaker65998 здравствуйте, я с радостью помогу вам закончить DHC-8, только скажите, в чем вам нужна помощь. ох и прости меня, это переведено

    +1
  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @Yeetusyeee It is really sensitive to speed, and in high pitch scenarios(since you're trying to butter) you need more power from the engines to maintain landing speed as drag increases by quite a bit. Try your best not to drop below 105kts(IAS), Ideal landing speed for it is between 105-107kts. you could also try flying a bit faster, you will need to do a shallow approach since you don't descend as fast. The landing speed was chosen for an approach angle of 3 degrees which is the normal approach angle for most airports, so at 105-107kts and pitch angle less than 5 you would be able to maintain altitude which is how I base landing speeds.

  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @MactanSpotter339 are you unable to download it?

  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    made it to the front page wews

  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @Yeetusyeee Do you use the flaps? if your speed is in mph or km/h could make you fly way slower than needed, as for landing well... I don't know how to make butter landings on this thing possible as it is very sensitive

  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @Tupolev90
    @ThatRandomCouchPotato
    -End of requested tags

  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @uptightjumbo
    @FeiGe3
    @Brayden1981

  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @Avionic
    @Zero0Two2
    @Yeetusyeee

  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @XPAAircrafts
    @DEADSHOT16
    @LM0418

  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @servedWithaSliceofCHEESE
    @MAPA
    @JacksEpicGamingYT

  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @Noo
    @XAircraftManufacturer
    @CoachPickles86

  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @IDontHaveUsernamesLOL
    @N0ble
    @L3FT2R1GHT

  • ATR-72 1.8 years ago

    @BeechcraftA35
    @Tupolev90
    @RiggyRunkeySP

  • A350-1000[Major Rework] 1.9 years ago

    @MactanSpotter339 I don't know if I can make it mobile friendly when I make it but I'll try

    +1
  • Engine Test 1.9 years ago

    @Starwarsboi170707 sure

  • Engine Test 1.9 years ago

    @L3FT2R1GHT sure, do note that the 'multiplier' value on the joystick base influences the rpm ex: 'multiplier' 1 = 'rpm' 0.6, If you have a specific rpm in mind, divide it by 0.6 and put the result as the 'multiplier' value.

  • Engine Test 1.9 years ago

    @L3FT2R1GHT I use a control base to make them spin and a rotator set to free-spin so it doesn't produce torque, Practically the same as the spinners on my jets.

  • Engine Test 1.9 years ago

    @L3FT2R1GHT I made the blades using the same technique as the wings, it was a bit hard to get the shape right though. And what do you mean by rotators?

  • [Updated]A330-300[PW] 1.9 years ago

    @Mal0ne go ahead, I don't mind

    +3
  • Engine Test 1.9 years ago

    @IDontHaveUsernamesLOL yes

  • A350-1000[Major Rework] 1.9 years ago

    @Hugio I already have the dc 10, though it is a bit old. The L1011 I'll make eventually

  • A350-1000[Major Rework] 1.9 years ago

    @hellothere28 it's a similar process but instead of connecting it to a piston, you connect it to a rotator.

    If there is a fuselage block attached to the the rotator, you attach the door to the fuselage block connected to the rotator.


    Note: certain doors on some planes that use rotators require very specific nodes to be attached to the rotator otherwise it will not open like it's supposed to. However If there is a fuselage block attached to the rotator, you don't have to worry about it.

  • A350-1000[Major Rework] 1.9 years ago

    @hellothere28
    1st: select the door you want to open
    2nd: open the rotations panel
    3rd: open the attachment editor(below the box with an x)
    4th: disconnect it from the fuselage
    5th: press/click "add connection"
    6th: select any blue node
    7th: find the corresponding piston under the door, and select it
    8th: select the blue node that faces forward or the one that belongs to the part of the piston that extends
    9th: done


    note: this applies to most my builds EXCEPT those that use rotators

  • A350-1000[Major Rework] 1.9 years ago

    @Transair56 not really