@Decembermin I will aim to make the A340-300 next, though I won't be able to start work on it immediately though. I still have to make the blended winglets for the 767, and update existing planes
Would also like to see the fan blades have a "trim" for painting so we can paint the blades black-ish and the trim white, something similar to the ge90's fan blades.
Regarding when I update the xml files of the planes I intend to modify:
they should be updated not too soon after the b767 has been posted. an accompanying forum post announcing their updated xml files should let you know if the modifications have been made.
Great plane, this just made want to accelerate my plans on giving my 737 and a320 a cockpit interior, but alas, I have other plans worth prioritizing first. Keep up the good work!
@DJRianGamerUwU this can be both the -200 or the -300, they where the same externally, only difference being max weight, range(and maybe no wingtip fences for the -200)
@Decembermin hmm... Ok, for i already have the a340-600 planned, But I'll make both The a330-200 and 300 I guess. the -300 gonna be first, since if I'm not mistaken; the fuselage and wing should be the same as the a340-300
@SilverStar I calibrated the power to weight ratio around the planes OEW (Operating Empty Weight), thats probably why acceleration is high. I took OEW data from Wikipedia and diveded it by the plane's actual weight, then divided the max engine power of both engines(Max thrust x 2(2 engines)) by the result, though there may be additional thrust made by the turbo prop engines. This is how it is for the rest of my planes
@Decembermin yeah, i know that wingtip fences where not standard for early versions of the a310-200, though available as an option. I plan on making this just the -300 version because of the pw4000 engine option, though the -200 and -300 are nearly the same externally(length, wingspan and height). Only difference is apparently the -300 has longer range, higher max payload and maximum take-off weight.
I can help you, try increasing the mass of the wheels, found this trick when I found an old forum post asking on how to stop wheels from exploding, It worked for me. Also, make sure the spring has mass otherwise the gear will be a bit wonky, I'll upload a craft soon as an example
Note: If the outboard spoilers don't deploy when you give a roll command over 0.15 or when the landing gear is up, try downloading the plane again, made a few mistakes whilst tweaking the ft code trying to fix a small problem. had to update it 3 times because of this, shouldn't be a problem now,and shouldn't be a problem for the one with General Electric engines
@waffles101 looks great!
@Decembermin I will aim to make the A340-300 next, though I won't be able to start work on it immediately though. I still have to make the blended winglets for the 767, and update existing planes
@IDontHaveUsernamesLOL @Decembermin @Juno @Powieieii @CarrotSlicingCat @BeastHunter @ayou2005 @AirCrashInvestigationFLR
+4@Max999 yeah, I'm feeling better and the b767 is already finished, but there is still a few things I want to do with it first.
@IDontHaveUsernamesLOL Idk but Its almost done
@IDontHaveUsernamesLOL oof, I was secretly planning on making those, welp
@EugeneDumDum Yeah eventually
@IDontHaveUsernamesLOL sure
@Omgairplane yeah but I'm currently still undecided on which I'm gonna make, heck I might do both
@Omgairplane uhhh ok ;-;
Would also like to see the fan blades have a "trim" for painting so we can paint the blades black-ish and the trim white, something similar to the ge90's fan blades.
+1Regarding when I update the xml files of the planes I intend to modify:
they should be updated not too soon after the b767 has been posted. an accompanying forum post announcing their updated xml files should let you know if the modifications have been made.
@Decembermin yeah sure
Great plane, this just made want to accelerate my plans on giving my 737 and a320 a cockpit interior, but alas, I have other plans worth prioritizing first. Keep up the good work!
@Omgairplane b767-300er
Congrats on 69 updoots
+3@Neowwwww sure
@DJRianGamerUwU this can be both the -200 or the -300, they where the same externally, only difference being max weight, range(and maybe no wingtip fences for the -200)
@waffles101 you can
@SkidmacherF1 looks great mate
+1@AerocomAerospace the pilots kid isn't in the cabin r-r-right?
@Roadtrainbuilder its likely the car engine in the nose wheel, its used for push back
@Augusta81 the a310 is just a a300 but short(and with smaller wings)
+2@Decembermin hmm... Ok, for i already have the a340-600 planned, But I'll make both The a330-200 and 300 I guess. the -300 gonna be first, since if I'm not mistaken; the fuselage and wing should be the same as the a340-300
@Decembermin hmm... I did plan on making the A340-300 after but... Go ahead
@Decembermin probably gonna make a 767-300
@Decembermin hmm, the winglet should've changed, try downloading the plane again and see if the winglet changed
@Decembermin it should be fixed now, try downloading it again
Ye
@Decembermin eh its alright, i can just eyeball the fix, I'll do the fix later. currently 2 A.M here I need to go sleep
@Decembermin oh, didn't have the reference images for it, but at least it's better than nothing
@Decembermin
@SilverStar I calibrated the power to weight ratio around the planes
OEW(Operating Empty Weight), thats probably why acceleration is high. I took OEW data from Wikipedia and diveded it by the plane's actual weight, then divided the max engine power of both engines(Max thrust x 2(2 engines)) by the result, though there may be additional thrust made by the turbo prop engines. This is how it is for the rest of my planesCool, reminds me of an Embraer E-jet
+1@Decembermin in a few days
@Decembermin yeah, i know that wingtip fences where not standard for early versions of the a310-200, though available as an option. I plan on making this just the -300 version because of the pw4000 engine option, though the -200 and -300 are nearly the same externally(length, wingspan and height). Only difference is apparently the -300 has longer range, higher max payload and maximum take-off weight.
@Decembermin changed in what way?
@James2007two keep trying mate, you'll eventually be able to do so. But fon't forget, the important thing is that you have fun
+1Looks like a mix of a m24 chaffee and a sherman firefly, cool
@SyntheticL sure go ahead
@Omgairplane yeah, i plan to upload them a few days before the NEO's do(though i still plan on reworking the A320)
@Powieieii yes
+1Here
Also it will also help if you add dead weight to the fuselage parts the wheels are connected too(assuming they are)
I can help you, try increasing the mass of the wheels, found this trick when I found an old forum post asking on how to stop wheels from exploding, It worked for me. Also, make sure the spring has mass otherwise the gear will be a bit wonky, I'll upload a craft soon as an example
@Decembermin this has the cf6, the cf6 is made by General Electric
@Decembermin motorcycle?
@GuianLorenzo you might like this
I'm impressed, got to love my local low cost carrier's livery.
Part count is as high as the No. Of passengers they cram in to their planes.
+3Note: If the outboard spoilers don't deploy when you give a roll command over 0.15 or when the landing gear is up, try downloading the plane again, made a few mistakes whilst tweaking the
ftcode trying to fix a small problem. had to update it 3 times because of this, shouldn't be a problem now,and shouldn't be a problem for the one with General Electric engines