@winterro How did you do it with the European eel? Liftscale doesn't appear in the list of variables on Overload when I try to do it. I add the variable, then it disappears...
@winterro The flippers I'm adding are for stability, rather than propulsion. I was thinking if adding a strip of wing paneling down the spine of the animal. I was unwilling to put propulsion in the build so that it could move underwater like this thing.
@winterro If you were making a Mosasaur that was controlled like this, how would you do it? I'm trying to make one without an engine, but it doesn't want to move forward.
@Manisdead I think it's common courtesy to give each entry an upvote as the creator of the challenge.
BTW, 3 and a half months is a tad long for people to remember about your challenge. If you find that submissions grind to a halt, maybe post a reminder.
@Jagdtiger131 There was one submission that I allowed which had two props on the nose, one behind the other. I probably would have given this a 6/10 for looks and a 5/10 for features.
@winterro How did you do it with the European eel? Liftscale doesn't appear in the list of variables on Overload when I try to do it. I add the variable, then it disappears...
@winterro The flippers I'm adding are for stability, rather than propulsion. I was thinking if adding a strip of wing paneling down the spine of the animal. I was unwilling to put propulsion in the build so that it could move underwater like this thing.
@winterro I've done it with body segments, because a Mosasaur uses its tail to move. should I put wings within those or something?
@winterro If you were making a Mosasaur that was controlled like this, how would you do it? I'm trying to make one without an engine, but it doesn't want to move forward.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Engine type was not at all specified. I only mention planes with props because those are the only real ones I know of.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover What makes you think it's not going to be?
@SpetzavodHeavyIndustries I'm not closing this for 10 hours.
@SpetzavodHeavyIndustries That's not specified, just keep going. I'm closing this some time tomorrow
@SpetzavodHeavyIndustries I guess one where the wings aren't fully fused. Think you can make it in 24 hours?
@asteroidbook345 Yeah
@Manisdead I think it's common courtesy to give each entry an upvote as the creator of the challenge.
BTW, 3 and a half months is a tad long for people to remember about your challenge. If you find that submissions grind to a halt, maybe post a reminder.
@Mousewithamachinegun122 @TheUltimatePlaneLover I'd like to see you try. That would be very impressive.
@Kerbango I based the body of the craft of an Airboat
/:0
@KudaOni I totally should have just put the cone at an angle against the black backdrop. 'There is a problem with your windows browser'.
@Jagdtiger131 There was one submission that I allowed which had two props on the nose, one behind the other. I probably would have given this a 6/10 for looks and a 5/10 for features.
I hope you didn't mean to post this 4 months ago, 'cause it looks pretty neat. maybe not in the top 10, but better than others I've seen.
@Dogedogeman1 :D
@Bellcat It's a Side-by-side. It's meant for off road
@FarrowTECH You've got less than an hour to submit it.
@Wake8472 Is that link the T.P.P.S.M.A?
@Wake8472 It litterally says in the description that it must be a successor
@FarrowTECH I do that all the time
Everybody else gets an extra four days. I'm going on holiday, so it's more convenient for me.
Those of you who haven't yet submitted something, you are running out of time
@PlaneMaker12022006 well done... I guess.
@PlaneMaker12022006 Just up the Horsepower on the props.
@TWDDerSharkmarine Just read the description again.
@TWDDerSharkmarine Some multi-engine aircraft do have counter rotating propellers.
@TWDDerSharkmarine Go further down the comment chain and you will see.
@mcaircraftcorparation Well you've uploaded the same build twice. You wanna take one down, or what?
@Novaxomix It needs to be a successor
@dogooman1 I'm trying to make this one a bit tougher, 'cause it's got a max part count. All the others with full cockpits are under 150.
@Hiimakeplanes right.
@Hiimakeplanes I didn't even think they existed until you submitted that plane.
@Hiimakeplanes according to Google they do.
@mcaircraftcorporation Is this a better version? I can only do one.
@FarrowTECH Yeah, go ahead.
@FarrowTECH I don't actually know what that is..
Did you mean to post it twice?
@PotatoMan42 then it would be seven.
@PotatoMan42 jeez!
@FazbearAirwaysX what?
@Hiimakeplanes
:O
@ThatDr42 Well observed
That’s really hard to see. Zoom in next time
@jamesPLANESii
@winterro your systems are much better than mine.
@Winterro You seen this?
@ItsTomcatTuesday :D