@Jagdtiger131 There was one submission that I allowed which had two props on the nose, one behind the other. I probably would have given this a 6/10 for looks and a 5/10 for features.
@ItsTomcatTuesday Damn it dude! Why didn't you test it and then make alterations before the challenge ended? This would have been a contender for 1st place! It certainly has more novelty now.
@ItsTomcatTuesday I was so disappointed with how it performed, 'cause I thought it was going to be one of the best. You should totally make improvements to it and re-upload this beautiful thing.
Very snazzy. Nice
+1@KudaOni I totally should have just put the cone at an angle against the black backdrop. 'There is a problem with your windows browser'.
@Jagdtiger131 There was one submission that I allowed which had two props on the nose, one behind the other. I probably would have given this a 6/10 for looks and a 5/10 for features.
I hope you didn't mean to post this 4 months ago, 'cause it looks pretty neat. maybe not in the top 10, but better than others I've seen.
@Dogedogeman1 :D
@Bellcat It's a Side-by-side. It's meant for off road
@FarrowTECH You've got less than an hour to submit it.
@Wake8472 Is that link the T.P.P.S.M.A?
@Wake8472 It litterally says in the description that it must be a successor
@FarrowTECH I do that all the time
Everybody else gets an extra four days. I'm going on holiday, so it's more convenient for me.
Those of you who haven't yet submitted something, you are running out of time
@PlaneMaker12022006 well done... I guess.
@PlaneMaker12022006 Just up the Horsepower on the props.
@TWDDerSharkmarine Just read the description again.
@TWDDerSharkmarine Some multi-engine aircraft do have counter rotating propellers.
@TWDDerSharkmarine Go further down the comment chain and you will see.
@mcaircraftcorparation Well you've uploaded the same build twice. You wanna take one down, or what?
@Novaxomix It needs to be a successor
@dogooman1 I'm trying to make this one a bit tougher, 'cause it's got a max part count. All the others with full cockpits are under 150.
@Hiimakeplanes right.
@Hiimakeplanes I didn't even think they existed until you submitted that plane.
@Hiimakeplanes according to Google they do.
@mcaircraftcorporation Is this a better version? I can only do one.
@FarrowTECH Yeah, go ahead.
@FarrowTECH I don't actually know what that is..
Did you mean to post it twice?
@HuskyDynamics01 Any threes that have no leaves and just look like a dead stick are the solid ones.
+1@IAlsoBuildPlane I didn't think of that. Ask @JamesPlanesii about how to make one of those.
+2@HuskyDynamics01 I seem to find all the non slid trees.
+1@HuskyDynamics01 well. That's convenient.
+1@PotatoMan42 then it would be seven.
@PotatoMan42 jeez!
@FazbearAirwaysX what?
@Hiimakeplanes
:O
fair description... I guess.
+1@ThatDr42 Well observed
That’s really hard to see. Zoom in next time
@jamesPLANESii
@winterro your systems are much better than mine.
@Winterro You seen this?
This is beautiful!
+1@ItsTomcatTuesday :D
@ItsTomcatTuesday Damn it dude! Why didn't you test it and then make alterations before the challenge ended? This would have been a contender for 1st place! It certainly has more novelty now.
@BadAtGaming13 I think everyone is.
@ItsTomcatTuesday It still looks to be a bit heavier at the back, but I will try it out and give you my feedback.
@ItsTomcatTuesday I was so disappointed with how it performed, 'cause I thought it was going to be one of the best. You should totally make improvements to it and re-upload this beautiful thing.
+1@BadAtGaming13 There you go.
@BadAtGaming13 also, read the full title...
@BadAtGaming13 you think I would have started judging when I was supposed to be having dinner.