@Aisienchik06087 Sorry, but here's what the admin said:The rule that was violated was this one:
No sympathy posts or memorial posts. Move those discussions to the forums.
Posts such as this one that are made to recreate a real-life tragedy that took place fall under this category. Sorry for the confusion, hopefully that clears things up for the future.
So I can't create a crash version of the plane anymore; I will do my best to recreate the crash plane in the future while avoiding mentioning the crash.
@SupremeDorian This is not a sympathetic post; it is merely an objective reflection on the aircraft type involved in the air disaster, rather than a subjective commemoration, and it does not include any subjective terms such as memorial or RIP.
However, I believe the punishment is justifiable. I will create a new post that does not contain references to the tragedy and will relocate the condolences and moments of silence for the air crash to the forum.
（Machine translation, may not be accurate）
@Aisienchik06087 No delete,I will keep it, but those two deleted DC-9 posts must wait until the admin unblocks them; in the meantime, I need to think of something else.
@SupremeDorian I'm very sorry, but I don't think there's anything wrong with my behavior, and I don't violate the "Don't create alternate accounts to vote for your stuff. Don't beg other users to vote for your content." In fact, this is just a normal build request, and while the predecessor is not listed, I don't think I'm violating "If you circumvent the predecessor/successor system, then you'll be banned. Do not upload your successor as an original design and credit it to the designer of its predecessor". In fact, this is because my second plane was made using an unuploaded version of the first aircraft, rather than re-downloading and then correcting it......
I hope admins will face the facts and unblock my two posts
(Machine Translation)
非常抱歉，不过我认为我的行为并无不妥，我没有违反“不要创建备用帐户来为自己的东西投票。不要恳求其他用户为您的内容投票。”的规则，事实上这只是正常的构建请求，而且虽然没有列出前身，但我认为我并没有违反“如果您规避前身/后继系统，那么您将被禁止。切勿将继任者作为原创设计上传，，归功于其前身的设计者。”的规则，事实上这是因为我第二架飞机是使用第一架飞机未上传的版本进行制作的，而不是重新将一架飞机下载之后再重新修正的……
我希望管理员能够正视事实并对我的两个帖子作出解封处理
（机器翻译）
@SupremeDorian I'm very sorry, but I don't think there's anything wrong with my behavior, and I don't violate the "Don't create alternate accounts to vote for your stuff. Don't beg other users to vote for your content." In fact, this is just a normal build request, and while the predecessor is not listed, I don't think I'm violating "If you circumvent the predecessor/successor system, then you'll be banned. Do not upload your successor as an original design and credit it to the designer of its predecessor". In fact, this is because my second plane was made using an unuploaded version of the first aircraft, rather than re-downloading and then correcting it......
I hope admins will face the facts and unblock my two posts
(Machine Translation)
非常抱歉，不过我认为我的行为并无不妥，我没有违反“不要创建备用帐户来为自己的东西投票。不要恳求其他用户为您的内容投票。”的规则，事实上这只是正常的构建请求，而且虽然没有列出前身，但我认为我并没有违反“如果您规避前身/后继系统，那么您将被禁止。切勿将继任者作为原创设计上传，，归功于其前身的设计者。”的规则，事实上这是因为我第二架飞机是使用第一架飞机未上传的版本进行制作的，而不是重新将一架飞机下载之后再重新修正的……
我希望管理员能够正视事实并对我的两个帖子作出解封处理
（机器翻译）
@Aisienchik06087 The administrator seems to think I violated the site's rules, but I don't know why
SupremeDorian ：Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
您的帖子已被删除，因为它似乎违反了网站规则。你可以在这里阅读它们
@Aisienchik06087 I don't know why, but it doesn't seem like I deleted it...... If I deleted it, the page will disappear, but it will show that it has been removed
I suspect it may be because the administrator thinks that my plane is plagiarized without any source (in fact, this livery is based on the original DC-9, and the plane has not actually been replaced)
@Aisienchik06087 OK, I will send you the switch for the plane crash and disintegration when it is ready, because I just successfully finished the plane's shape.
@AndrewGarrison So may I ask, when SP2 is in development, will SP1 pause or permanently cease development? Is there a censorship system in multiplayer mode?
666, the battleship is surprisingly equipped with a passive phased array radar😱
666kards玩家😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱
@GaveaMengmeng 我是傻逼
ANDROID MODs SUPPORT R.I.P : (
@Aisienchik06087 However, I will edit the air crash and subjective sections and re-upload the copy.
@Aisienchik06087 Sorry, but here's what the admin said:The rule that was violated was this one:
No sympathy posts or memorial posts. Move those discussions to the forums.
Posts such as this one that are made to recreate a real-life tragedy that took place fall under this category. Sorry for the confusion, hopefully that clears things up for the future.
So I can't create a crash version of the plane anymore; I will do my best to recreate the crash plane in the future while avoiding mentioning the crash.
@SupremeDorian This is not a sympathetic post; it is merely an objective reflection on the aircraft type involved in the air disaster, rather than a subjective commemoration, and it does not include any subjective terms such as memorial or RIP.
However, I believe the punishment is justifiable. I will create a new post that does not contain references to the tragedy and will relocate the condolences and moments of silence for the air crash to the forum.
（Machine translation, may not be accurate）
@Supersoli8 : ) i guess
@Supersoli8 That's only because you're close to Jundroo's US servers! : )
@Aisienchik06087 No delete,I will keep it, but those two deleted DC-9 posts must wait until the admin unblocks them; in the meantime, I need to think of something else.
@Aisienchik06087 I think I should come up with something else, I shouldn't limit myself to airplanes, should I?
@SupremeDorian I'm very sorry, but I don't think there's anything wrong with my behavior, and I don't violate the "Don't create alternate accounts to vote for your stuff. Don't beg other users to vote for your content." In fact, this is just a normal build request, and while the predecessor is not listed, I don't think I'm violating "If you circumvent the predecessor/successor system, then you'll be banned. Do not upload your successor as an original design and credit it to the designer of its predecessor". In fact, this is because my second plane was made using an unuploaded version of the first aircraft, rather than re-downloading and then correcting it......
I hope admins will face the facts and unblock my two posts
(Machine Translation)
非常抱歉，不过我认为我的行为并无不妥，我没有违反“不要创建备用帐户来为自己的东西投票。不要恳求其他用户为您的内容投票。”的规则，事实上这只是正常的构建请求，而且虽然没有列出前身，但我认为我并没有违反“如果您规避前身/后继系统，那么您将被禁止。切勿将继任者作为原创设计上传，，归功于其前身的设计者。”的规则，事实上这是因为我第二架飞机是使用第一架飞机未上传的版本进行制作的，而不是重新将一架飞机下载之后再重新修正的……
我希望管理员能够正视事实并对我的两个帖子作出解封处理
（机器翻译）
@SupremeDorian I'm very sorry, but I don't think there's anything wrong with my behavior, and I don't violate the "Don't create alternate accounts to vote for your stuff. Don't beg other users to vote for your content." In fact, this is just a normal build request, and while the predecessor is not listed, I don't think I'm violating "If you circumvent the predecessor/successor system, then you'll be banned. Do not upload your successor as an original design and credit it to the designer of its predecessor". In fact, this is because my second plane was made using an unuploaded version of the first aircraft, rather than re-downloading and then correcting it......
I hope admins will face the facts and unblock my two posts
(Machine Translation)
非常抱歉，不过我认为我的行为并无不妥，我没有违反“不要创建备用帐户来为自己的东西投票。不要恳求其他用户为您的内容投票。”的规则，事实上这只是正常的构建请求，而且虽然没有列出前身，但我认为我并没有违反“如果您规避前身/后继系统，那么您将被禁止。切勿将继任者作为原创设计上传，，归功于其前身的设计者。”的规则，事实上这是因为我第二架飞机是使用第一架飞机未上传的版本进行制作的，而不是重新将一架飞机下载之后再重新修正的……
我希望管理员能够正视事实并对我的两个帖子作出解封处理
（机器翻译）
@Aisienchik06087 I will file a complaint with the administrator regarding this matter
@Aisienchik06087 The administrator seems to think I violated the site's rules, but I don't know why
SupremeDorian ：Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
您的帖子已被删除，因为它似乎违反了网站规则。你可以在这里阅读它们
@Aisienchik06087 I don't know why, but it doesn't seem like I deleted it...... If I deleted it, the page will disappear, but it will show that it has been removed
I suspect it may be because the administrator thinks that my plane is plagiarized without any source (in fact, this livery is based on the original DC-9, and the plane has not actually been replaced)
@Aisienchik06087 You mean is let me choose XF-11 reconnaissance plane crash or 1956 Grand Canyon mid-air collision disaster(UAL-718&TWA-2)?
@Aisienchik06087 work is over. please see this.https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/kCA3pE/DC-9-15-ITAVIA-870
@Aisienchik06087 OK, I will send you the switch for the plane crash and disintegration when it is ready, because I just successfully finished the plane's shape.
@Aisienchik06087 Do you need to use a Detaches to make a Aircraft disassembly switch?
@Aisienchik06087 Sure!But what makes me curious is why do you need so many DC-9 aircraft?
@Aisienchik06087 不客气！
@AndrewGarrison So may I ask, when SP2 is in development, will SP1 pause or permanently cease development? Is there a censorship system in multiplayer mode?
@GaveaMengmeng 啊？707没有风挡？
你这个怎么也没加风挡玻璃（
@GaveaMengmeng 对 : )
@GaveaMengmeng 我觉得比较麻烦而且加和不加观感都差不多
Very good DC-9, please accept my UPVOTE!
I'm done!
@Aisienchik06087 The work is over,please see this:https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/q0kIWf/DC-9-JAT-AIRYU-AHT
@GaveaMengmeng 给自己气笑了😅👌
我还没改完
@GaveaMengmeng ?!我怎么给这玩意设成公共的了
@Aisienchik06087 Well.I do now
@Aisienchik06087 If I have a time I will to do……ohh, are you want to make a video?
@GaveaMengmeng 谢谢！
@LJh2 感觉你很熟悉的的亚子: )
Very good helicopter! please accept my UPVOTE!
造的比我好 : ( 所以请收下我的赞成!
Good airplane!Please accept my UPOVTE!
@Dreamlinerboi Thanks for the support, although I don't think this is well done : (
I won't make auto pilot : (
I can't use it on V1.11, Please fix this bug : (
@AeroflotBilibili 不好意思，搞错了
@AeroflotBilibili 立马改😭
好看😋
@Hitingxt 我看你就是香撕辣
360卫士就离谱：）
*不好的飞机，对于某位姓林的司令来说🔥
虽然我看不了youtube，但是看到封面是一架北方航空的737，应该是10.2广州白云机场劫机事件吧？（雖然我看不了youtube，但是看到封面是一架北方航空的737，應該是10.2廣州白雲機場劫機事件吧？）