@EternalDarkness So I cannot mass tag because they can follow?
What if I m making a challenge and want to notify players of results? without tagging, they will not know where it is.
Seriously, you still need FULL trim at 350mph with a GYRO? That is too fast for a turboprop of this kind to begin with.
Innovation - 10/30
You have custom cockpit, interior, and landing gear, but not much more.
Design - 7/20
The wide fuselage and sharp corners in the nose and tail is unrealistic as it would cause a lot of drag. The landing gear is too small. The engines are too overkill, with only a twin engine layout needed for a plane of this weight. The wing sweep is excessive and its placement causes problems. The props are also too close to both the fuselage and the adjacent engines.
Livery - 3/5
Why it it blue? It would burn in the sun. Also, you neglected to paint the engines.
Description - 18/20
You have a short tutorial and the controls.
Total - 33/120
Thank you for your participation. You will receive 2 upvotes.
@Thecatbaron ok.
I'll calculate the stats and tell you then. You can tell the thrust of the stock engines, and multiply the funky trees and the powerMultiplier.
@WernsterProductions I am very sad after arguing with him. It is not about not winning. It is the fact that Vader Plays is so stubborn and narcissistic. To put the final nail in the coffin, he tagged two mods and said that I am automatically disqualified from all his future competitions. He has not erased this scandal from his profile but we now know who he is.
This is my own opinion. This is how I feel about It. This is not intended to behate speech and I try to keep this to fact as much as possible.
I'm so confused, impressed, and just disoriented all at the same time. I mean, there's a ton of detail in it, but not many custom features. I got mad with Vader plays (the guy who made the challenge) who turned out didn't bother to fly my plane for a single inch (and was thus unable to experience my custom features), nor did he use his OWN point system. When asked about how many points he would give to me and you, he replied that you got 28 points (out of thirty, Design 10, Features 8, and handling 10) and I got 18 (!!!!) (3,10,5). First of all, as much as the fact that your plane is great, It just is not perfectly above and beyond and 10/10 like he describes it to be. Second, it is a FACT that your plane does not have interactive features or custom parts so I don't think you deserve an 8 for custom features.
I'd like to tell you that the only things he claims to have docked me 23% of my points is that the tail fins are too small and the wing taper is "weird". The wing taper is weird only because it is very innovative and boosts efficiency. The tail seems small because the plane is very large. The t-tail configuration makes it look even smaller. Even if it is small, it doesn't need to be big because the mechanical moment of control surface deflection is greater than in other planes because the tail is farther from the CoM (center of mass) than other planes. I mean, as long as it works, it is large enough.
This is just being used as an example. I'm not saying that your plane is bad or mine is good; It's just that yours is good, but could be better.
if you read this post you can just about see the consensus. The challenge was honestly bogus. Still, you won. Congratulations.
PS I have since blocked Vader Plays. I believe he knew his mistake all along. He said things like "this is a tight decision" or "Thank you, I spent all day to decide". How can you spend all day to decide if you only flew one of the two planes. He has since removed both the original challenge post and the winner announcement.
@Nash11 oh.
But that was clearly not a 747.
You have been disqualified on one of your 2 possible submissions. You can still build another one. If you copy another plane and post it for inspiration, better make it clear.
@WNP78
@47parzival41 thanks!
1.1m tall is still a little too small. Try 1.4-1.7m
Still, nice car
@Airbus747SP
LINK TO PLANES
@MrSilverWolf ok
@frame you can also attach the camera to the body too XD
@rexzion I am just tagging the participants of the challenge.
@Kernels good
@Kernels Then you can score 47parzival41's in the form! If you do not want to score the others that's also fine
@Kernels Ok. I will change the form so it allows you to not fly it.
@EternalDarkness Ok thanks
@EternalDarkness So I cannot mass tag because they can follow?
What if I m making a challenge and want to notify players of results? without tagging, they will not know where it is.
@Kernels Also, you still have hope. People are voting on the winner. You can see the form here.
@Kernels It is mainly the gyro. You just have too many engines, which make the plane nose heavy.
@Kernels
Evaluation time.
Bonus/Misc
Gyro Penalty -
-20Performance -
15/40Seriously, you still need FULL trim at 350mph with a GYRO? That is too fast for a turboprop of this kind to begin with.
Innovation -
10/30You have custom cockpit, interior, and landing gear, but not much more.
Design -
7/20The wide fuselage and sharp corners in the nose and tail is unrealistic as it would cause a lot of drag. The landing gear is too small. The engines are too overkill, with only a twin engine layout needed for a plane of this weight. The wing sweep is excessive and its placement causes problems. The props are also too close to both the fuselage and the adjacent engines.
Livery -
3/5Why it it blue? It would burn in the sun. Also, you neglected to paint the engines.
Description -
18/20You have a short tutorial and the controls.
Total -
33/120Thank you for your participation. You will receive 2 upvotes.
Is this double-decker plane for ants or something? It is too small.
disqualified@MrSilverWolf can you make a floating cub? The seaplane version
@Thecatbaron ok.
I'll calculate the stats and tell you then. You can tell the thrust of the stock engines, and multiply the funky trees and the
powerMultiplier.@Thecatbaron How much thrust is this at sea level?
@FireFast212 Thanks!
@cabbage17 actually use this.
@cabbage17 sorry to bother you but try it now. There was a problem in the last one.
@WernsterProductions congratulations on silver!
@WernsterProductions wdym by keeping out of trouble?
ur not in trouble :)
Vader plays probably is XD
@WernsterProductions I am very sad after arguing with him. It is not about not winning. It is the fact that Vader Plays is so stubborn and narcissistic. To put the final nail in the coffin, he tagged two mods and said that I am automatically disqualified from all his future competitions. He has not erased this scandal from his profile but we now know who he is.
@WernsterProductions
This is my own opinion. This is how I feel about It. This is not intended to behate speech and I try to keep this to fact as much as possible.
I'm so confused, impressed, and just disoriented all at the same time. I mean, there's a ton of detail in it, but not many custom features. I got mad with Vader plays (the guy who made the challenge) who turned out didn't bother to fly my plane for a single inch (and was thus unable to experience my custom features), nor did he use his OWN point system. When asked about how many points he would give to me and you, he replied that you got 28 points (out of thirty, Design 10, Features 8, and handling 10) and I got 18 (!!!!) (3,10,5). First of all, as much as the fact that your plane is great, It just is not perfectly above and beyond and 10/10 like he describes it to be. Second, it is a FACT that your plane does not have interactive features or custom parts so I don't think you deserve an 8 for custom features.
I'd like to tell you that the only things he claims to have docked me 23% of my points is that the tail fins are too small and the wing taper is "weird". The wing taper is weird only because it is very innovative and boosts efficiency. The tail seems small because the plane is very large. The t-tail configuration makes it look even smaller. Even if it is small, it doesn't need to be big because the mechanical moment of control surface deflection is greater than in other planes because the tail is farther from the CoM (center of mass) than other planes. I mean, as long as it works, it is large enough.
This is just being used as an example. I'm not saying that your plane is bad or mine is good; It's just that yours is good, but could be better.
if you read this post you can just about see the consensus. The challenge was honestly bogus. Still, you won. Congratulations.
PS I have since blocked Vader Plays. I believe he knew his mistake all along. He said things like "this is a tight decision" or "Thank you, I spent all day to decide". How can you spend all day to decide if you only flew one of the two planes. He has since removed both the original challenge post and the winner announcement.
@KnightOfRen I blocked vader plays so you probably can't tag him on my post.
Even if you do he cannot comment here
@Nash11 oh.
But that was clearly not a 747.
You have been disqualified on one of your 2 possible submissions. You can still build another one. If you copy another plane and post it for inspiration, better make it clear.
@Nash11 @Inuyasha8215 Very well. It is disqualified.
@Nash11 a description please?
@XP yes
@rexzion I left a link if you can’t see
@Pita about the custom thumbnails, yes.
I cant believe the creator of the bogus is now nearly silver. Maybe we should rethink life choices XD
@Pita and even if I don't win, I feel like I shouldn't be second to what was apparently perfectly above and beyond XD
@Pita well it is right to avoid the possibility of bogus altogether
You can read that post to see just HOW I feel right now XD
@WernsterProductions and so that deserves a spotlight
@WernsterProductions you won
@ACEPILOT109 oh thanks!
@ACEPILOT109 not enough effort.
More specifically not enough to present to a platinum user lol
@acepilot109
lol
I regret tagging you
This build is not up to your standard lol
@Jake_
Don't delete ur account
Try this plane
@vader_plays109
@Kernels I'm thinking about it.
I'm not the best at building replicas tho
@XP @Kernels
None of you will use EST on October 31!
You are and will be using EDT
@47parzival41 Does fine tuner scaling make it work?
If so I’ll try
Or you can just scale it yourself
@47parzival41 Please try the reduced part count version. I realize if I scale the plane down many features would break
@47parzival41 didn’t know that.
Anyway, I’ll try to make it smaller.
Does fine tuner scaling work or not?
@47parzival41 I’ll make a mobile friendly version
@vader_plays109
@47parzival41
@Kernels you put the wings forward too much. Try moving it back a bit.