@47parzival41 I KNOW they look ugly. Look, I tried.
All of them are due to either design limitations or oversights and my general carelessness. With the exception of the C250, all the planes were based on very old designs. The most extreme example is the RJ200 line of planes, which dates back to before I created this account a year and a half ago. You see, this account is quite old, but I wasn't active until 2 months ago. This plane looks bad because the nose does not curve smoothly (I had no choice unless you want to make passengers to crawl through the plane, and because the gear is too tall (also no choice because of the engines. Ngl, I resent my designs but don't know how to make them better.
@KLM_747 As a note, you need to be beyond gold. I like your ambition. There are people who are popular on the website who do not deserve to be as popular as they are. The opposite is also the case, and you are a prime example. Keep up the good work. I cannot. Your commitment deserves a follow.
@KLM_747 I'll remove the T for tag then. It already takes TWO WHOLE MINUTES to load ur 757 and I won't bother with this one lol
I did not see your warning.
You are beyond average in all aspects, including commitment to the SP community. I cannot even do 1000 parts even if I try my hardest, and it would take me well over a year if I did it.
@KLM_747 it takes three months?
I don’t understand why projects take soooo long lol.
And I am a full time student too. I thought gold and platinum people have a lot more commitment than people like me. How does it work?
@47parzival41 about the takeoff distance, this plane only performs like this when empty (the condition of it now). If you add some weight it needs more distance. At MLW the plane needs half of Wright airport to take off
@KLM_747 Hello. You know, I only follow if people bother to be friendly to me and help me along the way. I know some people think this way too. You are only supposed to follow people you truly support, and not just to get to know their builds. I have enough planes in my Jet Stream already lol, even though I only follow 10 people.
@SimpleSW To be very honest, yes. But this is just a small design oversight. The wings are too thin and that's why it is long. But the wingspan does not entirely depend on fuselage width; it depends on weight. As a rule of thumb, the wingspan should be about the same as the length. But some planes which have a high fuselage weight to width ratio (like double decker planes because it is twice as heavy as a normal plane) may seem to have long wings. In this case, thank you for your suggestion, but you need to know this is not always the case. This is a regional airliner and the cabin is supposed to be narrower, but it still needs wings that can lift its entire weight. I made the plane a bit long, to be honest.
@47parzival41 Just don't use 100% thrust lol
The thrust is for altitude performance. I recommend using 60-75% thrust on takeoff (slightly on the low side to be realistic but still viable)
@WernsterProductions Hello.
I made a post for you to vote on your favorite plane in my airliner challenge!
You can even give a score to this plane of yours. click here
@EternalDarkness So I cannot mass tag because they can follow?
What if I m making a challenge and want to notify players of results? without tagging, they will not know where it is.
Seriously, you still need FULL trim at 350mph with a GYRO? That is too fast for a turboprop of this kind to begin with.
Innovation - 10/30
You have custom cockpit, interior, and landing gear, but not much more.
Design - 7/20
The wide fuselage and sharp corners in the nose and tail is unrealistic as it would cause a lot of drag. The landing gear is too small. The engines are too overkill, with only a twin engine layout needed for a plane of this weight. The wing sweep is excessive and its placement causes problems. The props are also too close to both the fuselage and the adjacent engines.
Livery - 3/5
Why it it blue? It would burn in the sun. Also, you neglected to paint the engines.
Description - 18/20
You have a short tutorial and the controls.
Total - 33/120
Thank you for your participation. You will receive 2 upvotes.
@Thecatbaron ok.
I'll calculate the stats and tell you then. You can tell the thrust of the stock engines, and multiply the funky trees and the powerMultiplier.
@rexrexThezion @Kernels You know, I am changing my mind. I don't know how to build these lol
+2but I will try to make a small boat
@47parzival41 I KNOW they look ugly. Look, I tried.
All of them are due to either design limitations or oversights and my general carelessness. With the exception of the C250, all the planes were based on very old designs. The most extreme example is the RJ200 line of planes, which dates back to before I created this account a year and a half ago. You see, this account is quite old, but I wasn't active until 2 months ago. This plane looks bad because the nose does not curve smoothly (I had no choice unless you want to make passengers to crawl through the plane, and because the gear is too tall (also no choice because of the engines. Ngl, I resent my designs but don't know how to make them better.
@KLM_747 As a note, you need to be beyond gold. I like your ambition. There are people who are popular on the website who do not deserve to be as popular as they are. The opposite is also the case, and you are a prime example. Keep up the good work.
I cannot. Your commitment deserves a follow.
@KLM_747 I'll remove the T for tag then. It already takes TWO WHOLE MINUTES to load ur 757 and I won't bother with this one lol
I did not see your warning.
You are beyond average in all aspects, including commitment to the SP community. I cannot even do 1000 parts even if I try my hardest, and it would take me well over a year if I did it.
@WernsterProductions ok.
@47parzival41 spotlight yay
thank you!
@WernsterProductions for it to behave like armor, change
healthto a very high, 1000+ value@KLM_747 it takes three months?
I don’t understand why projects take soooo long lol.
And I am a full time student too. I thought gold and platinum people have a lot more commitment than people like me. How does it work?
@XAircraftManufacturer wdym?
@47parzival41 about the takeoff distance, this plane only performs like this when empty (the condition of it now). If you add some weight it needs more distance. At MLW the plane needs half of Wright airport to take off
@XP hey, there is some dihedral!
@47parzival41 I probably need one more than you. I live in california and am literally 4 miles away from a 15000 acre fire
@KLM_747 Hello. You know, I only follow if people bother to be friendly to me and help me along the way. I know some people think this way too. You are only supposed to follow people you truly support, and not just to get to know their builds. I have enough planes in my Jet Stream already lol, even though I only follow 10 people.
NO T
+2@47parzival41 I added gifs lol
enjoy
@SimpleSW To be very honest, yes. But this is just a small design oversight. The wings are too thin and that's why it is long. But the wingspan does not entirely depend on fuselage width; it depends on weight. As a rule of thumb, the wingspan should be about the same as the length. But some planes which have a high fuselage weight to width ratio (like double decker planes because it is twice as heavy as a normal plane) may seem to have long wings. In this case, thank you for your suggestion, but you need to know this is not always the case. This is a regional airliner and the cabin is supposed to be narrower, but it still needs wings that can lift its entire weight. I made the plane a bit long, to be honest.
@47parzival41 Just don't use 100% thrust lol
The thrust is for altitude performance. I recommend using 60-75% thrust on takeoff (slightly on the low side to be realistic but still viable)
LINK TO FINAL VERSION
@Noobybits123567 I now have more points that you thanks to YOU!
Thank you so much for the upvote and spotlight!
@XP the tanker is bad XD
@XP there is a link above that
@XAircraftManufacturer you made some for ur X liner 7. Did you not finish it?
@Cabbage17 also, an early congrats for 7k!
+1@Cabbage17 Yes!
+1I subscribed on YT. Thank you!
Still a nice plane
Hello. I think now that you're silver, you should build a little better. Maybe build a custom wing?
@47parzival41 I smell you from 10 minutes ago XD
@47parzival41 ok hi lol
@noobybits123567
@WernsterProductions Hello.
I made a post for you to vote on your favorite plane in my airliner challenge!
You can even give a score to this plane of yours.
click here
@WNP78
@47parzival41 thanks!
1.1m tall is still a little too small. Try 1.4-1.7m
Still, nice car
@Airbus747SP
LINK TO PLANES
@MrSilverWolf ok
@frame you can also attach the camera to the body too XD
@rexzion I am just tagging the participants of the challenge.
@Suubk27 @47parzival41 @airlinerbuilder @WernsterProductions
+1@Kernels good
@Kernels Then you can score 47parzival41's in the form! If you do not want to score the others that's also fine
@Kernels Ok. I will change the form so it allows you to not fly it.
@EternalDarkness Ok thanks
@EternalDarkness So I cannot mass tag because they can follow?
What if I m making a challenge and want to notify players of results? without tagging, they will not know where it is.
@Kernels Also, you still have hope. People are voting on the winner. You can see the form here.
@Kernels It is mainly the gyro. You just have too many engines, which make the plane nose heavy.
@Kernels
Evaluation time.
Bonus/Misc
Gyro Penalty -
-20Performance -
15/40Seriously, you still need FULL trim at 350mph with a GYRO? That is too fast for a turboprop of this kind to begin with.
Innovation -
10/30You have custom cockpit, interior, and landing gear, but not much more.
Design -
7/20The wide fuselage and sharp corners in the nose and tail is unrealistic as it would cause a lot of drag. The landing gear is too small. The engines are too overkill, with only a twin engine layout needed for a plane of this weight. The wing sweep is excessive and its placement causes problems. The props are also too close to both the fuselage and the adjacent engines.
Livery -
3/5Why it it blue? It would burn in the sun. Also, you neglected to paint the engines.
Description -
18/20You have a short tutorial and the controls.
Total -
33/120Thank you for your participation. You will receive 2 upvotes.
@Suubk27 You, like..., just HAVE to win lol
+1Is this double-decker plane for ants or something? It is too small.
disqualified@MrSilverWolf can you make a floating cub? The seaplane version
@Thecatbaron ok.
I'll calculate the stats and tell you then. You can tell the thrust of the stock engines, and multiply the funky trees and the
powerMultiplier.@Thecatbaron How much thrust is this at sea level?