@Stormfur Its actually quite a safe aircraft if you manipulate the flight controls safely, though the landings are traumatising no matter how you fly it.
@randomusername Reverse the input on the front stabilizer?
eg: rear one points left, front one points right
@JamesBleriot I have no idea how to build 1900s cruisers either.
@MegaFox By pumping more ballast to the starboard side of the ship. And since the cargo hold is offset to the starboard side, the cargo will also help to keep the ship stable.
@CLIFFER Its got the speed and roughly the same dimensions as the hood, the survivability of a paper boat, the funnel and guns of the scrapped 1920 South Dakota battleships and the superstructure is a mix between the Hood and a French battleship.
@xGeneralFischx 1: Its a way to punish anyone who thinks that the ship should be able to go a bit faster.
2: I couldn't be bothered to change the maximum propeller RPM despite the fact that I could have done so in less than 30 seconds.
@JediWolf The wing area should be big enough to cover the Vatican. But thanks to sekrit dokuments, I was able to shrink it down. Shame that it doesn't help with the turning circle, though.
Well, Jundroo was giving it away for free on the simplerockets subreddit back in 2014 so I decided to get it.
@ACEPILOT109 The map? its this.
119k/423=0.2813
@Adityo0502 Simpleplanes crashed right ater I uploaded it so I couldn't check if the uploaded version and the latest saved version were the same.
@randomusername Oh yes, its supposed to be a Milwaukee Road EF-1 ripoff.
Nice.
@Disneyremakes43 They were in the 1960s. The 1870 is the intended part count.
1:D
2:D
3: What is "enemy"?
@Shanethepain1 But if "You shall not pass" is only for one balrog, how many balrogs are needed for "They shall not pass"?
@Lahoski107 Are your game physics set to high?
@Stormfur Its actually quite a safe aircraft if you manipulate the flight controls safely, though the landings are traumatising no matter how you fly it.
@Trucker1000 It would be impossible.
@Strikefighter04 Yes. its part of a series with registrations such as UR-FAT, UR-MOM, UR-MUM and UR-GAV.
If its account age, I might be around 0.3 years older.
Yes @JamesBleriot
@JamesBleriot Yes. That merchant hull 1959 on the workshop.
@randomusername Reverse thrust, I guess
Here.
@MasonJ Still working on that cargo ship.
Kind of fixed it here
Changes made:
Changed Wing-3 parts to Wing-2 parts. Wing-3 parts are wobbly while Wing-2 parts aren't.
Disabled propeller collision
The control surfaces might not be what they used to be.
@Stormfur Nope
@ThePilotDude Nope, Accidentally deleted the files.
@Stormfur They were made around two years ago.
@JamesBleriot Possibly...
@TheXDimension32 I think it should be under "part id" and not "Fuselage.State"
@TheXDimension32 Is it put under part id like materials="0" scale="1,1,1" calculateDrag="false" ?
@TheXDimension32 Add calculateDrag="false" ?
@randomusername I have no idea.
@randomusername Reverse the input on the front stabilizer?
eg: rear one points left, front one points right
@JamesBleriot I have no idea how to build 1900s cruisers either.
@JamesBleriot Can't build it. I have no idea how to build space craft like that.
@ThomasRoderick The same frame, engines and toilet.
@blackvultureaeroespace да товарищ
@ThomasRoderick yes
@KAMAKAZI A few hundred AK-47s, swords and ROKS flamethrowers.
@ForeverPie The simpleplanes subreddit
Early access
Aircraft sharing
And when I created an account Also when the target practice boats/aircraft carriers were released.
@MegaFox By pumping more ballast to the starboard side of the ship. And since the cargo hold is offset to the starboard side, the cargo will also help to keep the ship stable.
@MegaFox XML modded gyroscope. Also, the cranes aren't that heavy.
@EH21122005 Oh yes, it will be an excellent scheme.
@Strikefighter04 this one
@Stormfur A carrier for cargo that can fly. You see comrade, it can never be an aircraft carrier.
It kind of looks like a fiat 126
Personally, I have never worked seriously on a replica. (At least not after resizable fueselage blocks were released)
@CLIFFER Its got the speed and roughly the same dimensions as the hood, the survivability of a paper boat, the funnel and guns of the scrapped 1920 South Dakota battleships and the superstructure is a mix between the Hood and a French battleship.
@Stormfur This Russian truck
@xGeneralFischx 1: Its a way to punish anyone who thinks that the ship should be able to go a bit faster.
2: I couldn't be bothered to change the maximum propeller RPM despite the fact that I could have done so in less than 30 seconds.
@xGeneralFischx If it overspeeds, its beause the VTOL is too close to the middle.
@BRuthless Yes, you can upload it.
@D2XD2 Somewhere around 2 to 3 inches with some soviet bias.
@MegaFox Nope, I prefer ships with rounded superstructures
@JediWolf The wing area should be big enough to cover the Vatican. But thanks to sekrit dokuments, I was able to shrink it down. Shame that it doesn't help with the turning circle, though.
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck ok