A day or so for planning. A few hours for building the prototype and a few minutes to put together the actual plane. Also, a few minutes for tweaking the design.
While I'm afraid that I'm not able to build it, I can give a few tips on how one can go about building it.
1: The front landing gear could either be a large landing gear or a wing landing gear attached to a piece of structural wing.
2: The cockpit could be built with a sleek cockpit at the front and a fuselage block directly behind it.
@JovianPat Pusher props also mean that you have to watch your angle of attack during takeoffs and landings to prevent the propeller from striking the ground.
1.COL behind COM
2.Rear landing gear behind COM
3.Control surfaces large enough to control plane
4.Make sure you have enough gear to support the weight
5 Ensure that the engines are powerful enough
6.Ensure that the wings are large enough
LinkShould be this link. @Coen1888
@Coen1888 I think I can.
edit: you'll need the mod file for that.
And accuracy is not an issue.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/1ybwrm8g0qxz1pv/Nuclear%20Device%20Test.spmod?dl=0
download here.
I now have a prototype
Even bigger
The first one was taken from 2000ft. The second was from 4000ft.
I may not be able to build a "normal" nuclear bomb, but a Mk-54 (Davy Crockett) should be possible.
Douglas A-26 Invader
the rotators are obselete. You should remove them. also, the turbofans are not needed.
Do you want a simple cockpit with a yoke or does it have to be more complicated?
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/W320oB/Island-hopper-mark-III
Light push/pull plane
you can actually start braking as soon as the rear wheel touches the ground.
Apparently, the enemy aircraft can't control propeller pitch, which is rather interesting.
I'm not sure if it will work for you, but putting spoilers at the back of the plane works for me.
@NovaTopaz I'm talking about that website. Though I may have remembered wrongly.
I remember when accounts didn't exist and all the planes were from anonymous users.
Space engineers, Flightgear, eve online and simple planes
Versatility and stability.
this 12 months ago.
challenge accepted
I feel that it could do with less powerful engines. Other than that, its a nice plane to fly.
A day or so for planning. A few hours for building the prototype and a few minutes to put together the actual plane. Also, a few minutes for tweaking the design.
Well, I do feel that building some sort of "trim" control is easier than fixing the COM, COL and COT.
While I'm afraid that I'm not able to build it, I can give a few tips on how one can go about building it.
1: The front landing gear could either be a large landing gear or a wing landing gear attached to a piece of structural wing.
2: The cockpit could be built with a sleek cockpit at the front and a fuselage block directly behind it.
Most of it should be easy to build, but the propellers are the tricky part. I'll see what I can do.
It's a pleasant surprise to see that the cruciform tail lasted so long.
Though it's nice to see that the cruciform tail is still there.
It looks nice and flies nice. Overall, its a wonderful plane.
Boeing 747-100SP
Modified a plane for this
I do believe that planes on runways should be no-clipped, which would probably solve the issue of trolls blocking the runways.
@JovianPat Pusher props also mean that you have to watch your angle of attack during takeoffs and landings to prevent the propeller from striking the ground.
I would prefer a Tractor configuration since the pusher configurations is rather problematic.
I do a Mark I to Mark V for a series that share common features.
@Verdnan You are welcome to do so.
For me, it seems as if my propeller planes are underpowered.
1.COL behind COM
2.Rear landing gear behind COM
3.Control surfaces large enough to control plane
4.Make sure you have enough gear to support the weight
5 Ensure that the engines are powerful enough
6.Ensure that the wings are large enough
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/19Tyjt/Island-Hopper-Mark-V
Basically a forward swept wing commercial jet.
One of the first, but not the first.@JacobHardy64
looks and flies very nicely
Probably going to reuse the fuselage to build an Ant2
thanks for the feedback, I will see what I can do to fix it.
nice plane
actually, my meteor had no relation to the real one of the same name.
It's my own design.