You can make flare proof guardian missiles by making them insta lock, then you can set their activation group to when the target is moving towards them. Something like rate(TargetDistance)>100
To simulate how notching works irl.
If you want to use the "water injection system" for one of your own planes, just look for the minigun and save it as a subassembly. it should be in the tail, behind the cowl flaps.
This is like if the Super Hornet and a SU-27 had a kid, except both parents where tragically killed in a car accident, so the kid got raised by their weird uncle the MiG-29
This is like if the Kifir had a child with the Super Entard, but, maybe they had a bit of a trio with the Viggen, so you can’t really tell who the dad is
Many people make fun of the "eagle" for its "dumb looks" however others may claim that its about function, not form, and that the eagle is secretly the best fighter jet of its generation. I am here to tell you that those others are dead wrong.
This aircraft, marketed as the "eagle" (not to be confused with the McDonnell-Douglas f-15 "eagle") is claimed to be a supermaneuverable, lightweight, carrier capable "5th gen" fighter. However while it may appear like a cutting-edge combat aircraft it is, in reality nothing but a hoax.
The most important advantages of a modern 5th generation platform are sensor fusion and network warfare. Despite this the eagles designers seem to have completely neglected to install even a basic data-link. This problem becomes even worse when you consider the fact that the eagle has limited situational awareness to begin with, being equipped with only 2 IRST systems nicknamed EYES (Electro-optical Yield Estimation Sensor). This gives the eagle an undeniable disadvantage in BVR combat. Without a radar, datalink, or RWR, pilots will essentially be flying blind with their ears plugged.
In addition, while its flying wing design may allow for some stealth benefits, its radar absorbent coating is fairly primitive, utilizing compound organic geometry known as "feathers". Feather technology is well known to be inferior to modern di-electric silica composite or "iron ball" coatings. Therefore this aircraft can not be considered truly "fith-gen".
Additionally In terms of conventional "4th gen" performance, while this fighter jet has good stol capabilities, it does not have any arrestor gear installed yet and so, it cannot currently operate off of a aircraft carrier. When it comes to "super maneuverability" the airframe does appear to be capable of post stall maneuvers, due to its low wing loading, however, post stall maneuvers alone cannot win a dogfight. Energy retention, and power to weight are arguably more important than PSM capabilities, and in these categories, the eagle suffers drastically, with its awful energy retention it is not capable of sustaining a turn for long, and its weak engine means its cannot re-gain energy lost during PSM maneuvers.
but wait there's more, because the eagle is designed as a "light fighter" it has a extremely limited payload and range. What you end up with is a plane with the capabilities of a T-38 or a L-39, but for the cost of a F-22. Some fighters like the SAAB J-39 Gripen have a similar issue, but
-the Gripen makes up for this by offering a suite of sensors and weapons that other aircraft do not. However, as you can see above, the eagle does not have even the most basic systems one would expect from a fighter of its cost.
2/10, my disappointment is immeasurable, and my day is ruined.
T
+1@ccc12345 sure
+1MUH FREEDOM!!! RAHHHH!!!!
No, but a couple of my friends have played sr2. They Launched Freddy fazbear into the sun
+4@HuskyDynamics01 no he doesn’t, he has 3
+10I like the interior
+1wow, the gear looks great, tag me too please
@ZeroWithSlashedO oops, I got inside to outside mixed up lol. The order you said is correct, I will edit the forum so its correct
Update: see the below comment for IRCCM missile, I will add an explanation above for how it works
@TheCommentaryGuy thanks for the help, I will check out your build tomorrow because I am busy today
Gremlin
+1@hhello1 cool
@Gs You may need to update the XML, here's a tutorial
@Gs I can download all your other posts fine, but not this one
the download button isn't working
@Randomplayer what if instead of
+2FunkyTreesit was calledFreakyTreesI found an old subassembly I named “Blingus” and it was just an entire plane lol
+1@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore lol
when i press ag7 I was like "poggers"
+1wait there's a
FireWeaponsInput!!!!????? why didn't I know about this??awesome build btw
the automatic flaps are a nice touch :)
tag me on the final
I like the bit on the tail that moves
I hate the French
+2T
@LunarEclipseSP except there was maybe a little bit of a threesome with the v-22, so you can’t really tell who the dad is
+1Heres the link
goofy goober
if you want i can upload a version with improved handling
also reduce the fuel to like 50%, so its not so heavy
move the wings back, or remove fuel from the tail
your center of lift is too far forward
@TheUltimatePlaneLover cool, I’ll look into it
You can make flare proof guardian missiles by making them insta lock, then you can set their activation group to when the target is moving towards them. Something like
+1rate(TargetDistance)>100To simulate how notching works irl.
You can put spread on cannons?
+1Attacking the d point
+1@CrestelAeronautics I fixed the code block so it can be copy-pasted
@CrestelAeronautics delete to part at the end that says &1t; and replace it with <
@CrestelAeronautics does it let you fire the missile from the front, or is it disabling the missile?
Thank you for the Target Heading thingy, it was really useful
f-16 turn rate according to growling sidewinder:
+1mommy?
+10this is awesome
If you want to use the "water injection system" for one of your own planes, just look for the minigun and save it as a subassembly. it should be in the tail, behind the cowl flaps.
@Noidtouse pretty much
This is like if the Super Hornet and a SU-27 had a kid, except both parents where tragically killed in a car accident, so the kid got raised by their weird uncle the MiG-29
+2This is like if the Kifir had a child with the Super Entard, but, maybe they had a bit of a trio with the Viggen, so you can’t really tell who the dad is
Anyway, awesome build
Many people make fun of the "eagle" for its "dumb looks" however others may claim that its about function, not form, and that the eagle is secretly the best fighter jet of its generation. I am here to tell you that those others are dead wrong.
This aircraft, marketed as the "eagle" (not to be confused with the McDonnell-Douglas f-15 "eagle") is claimed to be a supermaneuverable, lightweight, carrier capable "5th gen" fighter. However while it may appear like a cutting-edge combat aircraft it is, in reality nothing but a hoax.
+2The most important advantages of a modern 5th generation platform are sensor fusion and network warfare. Despite this the eagles designers seem to have completely neglected to install even a basic data-link. This problem becomes even worse when you consider the fact that the eagle has limited situational awareness to begin with, being equipped with only 2 IRST systems nicknamed EYES (Electro-optical Yield Estimation Sensor). This gives the eagle an undeniable disadvantage in BVR combat. Without a radar, datalink, or RWR, pilots will essentially be flying blind with their ears plugged.
In addition, while its flying wing design may allow for some stealth benefits, its radar absorbent coating is fairly primitive, utilizing compound organic geometry known as "feathers". Feather technology is well known to be inferior to modern di-electric silica composite or "iron ball" coatings. Therefore this aircraft can not be considered truly "fith-gen".
Additionally In terms of conventional "4th gen" performance, while this fighter jet has good stol capabilities, it does not have any arrestor gear installed yet and so, it cannot currently operate off of a aircraft carrier. When it comes to "super maneuverability" the airframe does appear to be capable of post stall maneuvers, due to its low wing loading, however, post stall maneuvers alone cannot win a dogfight. Energy retention, and power to weight are arguably more important than PSM capabilities, and in these categories, the eagle suffers drastically, with its awful energy retention it is not capable of sustaining a turn for long, and its weak engine means its cannot re-gain energy lost during PSM maneuvers.
but wait there's more, because the eagle is designed as a "light fighter" it has a extremely limited payload and range. What you end up with is a plane with the capabilities of a T-38 or a L-39, but for the cost of a F-22. Some fighters like the SAAB J-39 Gripen have a similar issue, but
-the Gripen makes up for this by offering a suite of sensors and weapons that other aircraft do not. However, as you can see above, the eagle does not have even the most basic systems one would expect from a fighter of its cost.
2/10, my disappointment is immeasurable, and my day is ruined.
+1Pog