18.8k F104Deathtrap Comments

  • Abaddon (EVE Online) 7.6 years ago

    @DimaKosheleFF Nice, I always thought it looked like a knight with his lance lowered for battle charging forward atop his charger. Is that what you're flying?

  • Abaddon (EVE Online) 7.6 years ago

    Gonna do any more Eve ships?

  • Abaddon (EVE Online) 7.6 years ago

    @Stingray Eve Online is beautiful. The ships look nice, but the galaxies and planets and stars are mind-blowingly gorgeous. The thing is, it's not like Simpleplanes or Elite, you don't "steer" your ship so much as click on stuff and tell it to go places. It's an MMO, and they usually let you play for 2 weeks for free, sometimes even longer, so if you wanted to check it out, you could do so without paying anything.

  • Abaddon (EVE Online) 7.6 years ago

    @Stingray Advice from someone who played 2 years: have fun NOW, it doesn't get any better with the bigger ships.

  • Abaddon (EVE Online) 7.6 years ago

    More of a Tempest man, myself.

  • 1969 Plymouth road runner 7.6 years ago

    @QuantausAviation When I told my wife about the horn she was like "That is my new favorite car!"

  • I Have Really Bad News Guys, Legit This Time. 7.6 years ago

    Yeah, make something else. How about a De Havilland Comet 88?

  • MESSERSCHMITT and SPITFIRE 7.6 years ago

    @Iamsilverdahedgie That's all for music, by the way. For games, just get something with a microohone that fits your budget and has good reviews.

  • MESSERSCHMITT and SPITFIRE 7.6 years ago

    @Iamsilverdahedgie RULE #1: Beats are way overpriced. They aren't bad but they cost twice what they're worth, and people bootleg them a lot, so don't waste your cash on them.

    Otherwise, it depends on how much you want to spend. You can pick up a good pair of Sony headphones for 50 bucks, people who work in radio use them a lot because they're cheap but sound very clear. Read the reviews though, quality varies depending on which set you choose.

    If you're willing to spend more than $100 you can pick up a set of studio-quality headphones. I wouldn't pay more the $200 though, because higher quality headphones reveal defects in the recording more than anything else. Audiotechnica makes a set called ATH-M50 that sound great, even with really heavy bass they stay very clear and crisp. If that's too much money, check out the SR-80 series from Grado Labs, they're not quite as amazing in the bass department but are still amazingly good for their price.

    TLDR: Dont buy Beats, don't spend more than 200 bucks and read the reviews on this website. It's easy to drop a lot of cash, but don't. Good headphones reveal defects in recordings, like seeing someone you think is attractive from far away but then you get closer and realize they're covered in acne and have crossed eyes.

    I posted this here in an old forum page because we cant send direct messages.

  • KATY PARIE 7.6 years ago

    If there's one thing I've learned in life, it's that whatever music you enjoy sounds like absolute crap to everyone else. This is especially true for pop music, which is prone to passing fads that rarely hold up well over time. If you're really passionate about music, do yourself a huge favor: save up for a great set of headphones and keep your music to yourself. Music is a lot more enjoyable when you can lose yourself in it without worrying about other people.

    PS -If you need any recommendations on headphones, I can help you out.

    +5
  • XXA-35 7.6 years ago

    Simple, but good. Very nice.

  • Pz. Kpfw. II ausf C 7.6 years ago

    Stug III ausf G

    Or

    Jagdpanzer 38 "Hetzer"

  • Nordan NA-3 Lark 7.6 years ago

    @JohnnyBoythePilot Things got pretty messy in the late 40's, they had been developing so many new planes for so long it got to be a real chore just figuring out what was what. Eventually they re-renamed it the RF-61C, which makes more sense. Can you imagine all the "clickbait hate" if I posted a propeller plane as "the F-15" ? HA!

  • Guess the part count [CLOSED] 7.6 years ago

    800

  • Nordan NA-3 Lark 7.6 years ago

    @JohnnyBoythePilot Yeah, the Widow is a favorite of mine. There was a stripped down, highspeed photo-recon version called the Reporter. Sleek and gorgeous, maybe I'll make something like that only with radar and a few 20mm cannons.

  • MiG-25P "Foxbat-A" FINAL 7.6 years ago

    @Ironghost Thanks! They took forever.

  • MiG-37 "Ferret-E" (5th generation) 7.6 years ago

    I like it! It's got that harsh, retro-futuristic 1970's look to it, like the F117. Very sci fi, very cool concept.

    +1
  • Nordan NA-3 Lark 7.6 years ago

    @JohnnyBoythePilot I've been meaning to make a heavy for some time. My B-26 almost fits the bill (once you dump all the bombs) but I want to make a true nightfighter, something with radar and a huge pair of radials. It takes me forever to make anything though, and I've got a whole series of planes I want to do first. Argh! Anyway, looking forward to your next build.

  • Nordan NA-3 Lark 7.6 years ago

    You got talent. I love these "heavy fighter" designs like the Beaufighter or Lightning. I especially like the fixed, streamlined landing gear, it gives it a very authentic 1930's look.

  • PAC P7A Samson 7.6 years ago

    SOLID!

    +1
  • White Horizon WH-I 7.6 years ago

    @Ephwurd I don't think I follow your line of reasoning. However, Zharappa is correct that it is ultimately a matter of preference.

  • HELP PLEASE!!!! 7.6 years ago

    It is pretty fun to swoop around in. I'm working on a float plane right now, this was good practice. Anyway, good luck, I hope you build more of these.

  • White Horizon WH-I 7.6 years ago

    @Ephwurd If you put the rotors on an activation group, they'll retain their position. Mostly it's just easier to track moving targets with pitch+roll. Either way, this cannon-thing is awesome.

  • B-17G 7.6 years ago

    @Scottydoestuff Sorry, I'll explain. A lot of people obsess over details when they make a replica, but miss the big picture, the overall proportions. This thing you made is better than that and I like it.

  • Which one should I build? (Again XD) 7.6 years ago

    GT XT, it will travel better on the various islands.

  • HELP PLEASE!!!! 7.6 years ago

    CLICK ME

    I got it flying, but I had to change it all around and you probably won't like it. Anyway, good luck.

    +1
  • White Horizon WH-I 7.6 years ago

    @Zharapparbyell Great! I learned the hard way building turrets for my bombers, I'm glad you like it. Good luck with your future builds.

  • B-17G 7.6 years ago

    YES! You clearly spent some time getting it right, awesome job.

  • Securitytron Mk-II (Yes-Man) 7.6 years ago

    Best RPG ever!

  • White Horizon WH-I 7.6 years ago

    Looks great. If you make the inputs pitch and roll people could control it with a mouse, much easier than using sliders.

  • HELP PLEASE!!!! 7.6 years ago

    Don't worry, this is a common problem that is totally fixable. The center of thrust is too high, pulling the nose downward. To countaract this you need three things. (1) A great big tail surface strong enough to pull that nose up. (2) You need to use the fine tuning tool to angle the Great Big Tail so that it will pull the nose up, 5 degrees should do it, but test it out. (3) Speed. You will need air moving fast enough over the tail to overpower the tendancy to nose down. The bigger the tail, the less speed you'll need, but it's also a good idea not to go full throttle untill you're already moving pretty fast, pull the throttle up slowly.

    +1
  • Tupolev TU 22 Blinder 7.6 years ago

    Sure thing, man. I'm a fool for these old Russian birds.

  • should I make this? 7.6 years ago

    @QuantausAviation Good luck, amigo

  • should I make this? 7.7 years ago

    You'll probably have less trouble with Gen 1.

  • Messerschmitt Me-410 A-1 U-2 7.7 years ago

    Very nice.

  • should I make this? 7.7 years ago

    You've got good taste!

  • I had an accident..... 7.7 years ago

    @Minecraftpoweer Hopefully you won't lose any functionality, thumbs are important!

  • I had an accident..... 7.7 years ago

    BRUTAL

  • Supermarine Spitfire MkVb(tropical)(0.3mi) 7.7 years ago

    OMG ITS SO CUTE! I like your style.

    +1
  • Sadako 7.7 years ago

    This is the best kind of crazy!

  • What do you want to see me build? 7.7 years ago

    The mystery machine!

  • MESSERSCHMITT and SPITFIRE 7.7 years ago

    How about you? Just returned, any ideas?

  • Mikoyan MiG-17 Collab with @Luuk2909 7.7 years ago

    Awww, Mig17s are the BEST! Fast, maneuverable, beautiful. This thing looks great!

  • MESSERSCHMITT and SPITFIRE 7.7 years ago

    @JackTheBestBoss I AM working on something. I've been away too long, I missed the newest update and there are so many people making top quality planes now! I was working on a B29 for someone but several people put up really good ones in the last couple months so that frees me up to make a plane I've wanted to build for a looooooong time. I can't say what it is, but I will give a hint: it's pre-WW2 and it's gorgeous.

  • F-105D Thunderchief 7.7 years ago

    @ProcessedPlAnEs Thanks for the spotlight!

  • Northrop F-5 Plus fighter 7.7 years ago

    @mikoyanster yes sir!

  • Northrop F-5 Plus fighter 7.7 years ago

    "HEY! THIS THING IS AMAZ-oh, Mikoyanster, right."