You don't get banned for modifying other people's vehicles, it actually helps them thanks to the successor system
The problem lies in circumventing this system or not modifying anything in the vehicle, that can ban you
I also did this a while ago (which I also made a post about)
I've already seen some games with the same system to change the shape of the SR2 fuselage, and I didn't like it at all, it seems very inaccurate, and from what I saw in gameplays, I think I'll stick with the SP system
If I can't use the same as SP in SR2 I honestly won't buy the game
I don't use Instagram, I'm thinking of creating a discord account.
I'll let you know if I create one, but please do you know someone who can answer the question on this forum?
Well, I know that this system isn't the most efficient, and that it loses power at high altitudes, but it's also the best way I've found to make electric single engine aircraft without counter-rotating propellers. Because of this, it is much better suited for a general aviation aircraft.
It also doesn't change the plane's maneuverability much, as I also discovered that the propellers can act as canards. And because it is always rotating, upward lift is almost cancelled, although I found that it modifies (and A LOT) the Yaw, making the plane go into flatspin! But this can be corrected just by lowering the angle of the rotator that does yaw.
And engine not giving an astronomical climb rate is pretty realistic I might say!
You don't get banned for modifying other people's vehicles, it actually helps them thanks to the successor system
+1The problem lies in circumventing this system or not modifying anything in the vehicle, that can ban you
@WinsWings thx :)
+1can i make another entry?
i feel i can do b e t t e r
+1I also did this a while ago (which I also made a post about)
I've already seen some games with the same system to change the shape of the SR2 fuselage, and I didn't like it at all, it seems very inaccurate, and from what I saw in gameplays, I think I'll stick with the SP system
If I can't use the same as SP in SR2 I honestly won't buy the game
+1RUSH Eagle
+1he-112
+1n a s c a r g o v r o o m
+1Keep it up and you'll get platinum in 20 days!
+1Nice generic plane
+1@BaconAircraft
Make it succesorof this Challenge pls
+1Nice
+1Nice
+1@extraordinaryman Thx :)
I'm making another entry right now, which is much more competitive.
Performance is mattering more than details, following this, the new entry is more maneuverable and AI-friendly than this
+1No, I will say *T
+1@ImSimon .
I know this very well, but to make it more beautiful and easier to handle, I did it anyway.
@IceCraftGaming
huehuehuehuheuhehuehuehuehuehue
+1@LonelyAustrianUhlan thx :)
+18 r e a l g a s o l i n e b a t h t u b g o v r o o m
+1Very good :)
+1Certainly one of the best Wildcat replicas I've ever seen.
@asteroidbook345 woosh woosh now its T-6
+1Good airliner :)
+1If you want help with a tank call me :)
+1polish t-6
+1I'm almost 8 months old
+1my phone doesn't run 400+ (this on low physics) parts so I won't download this
+1@DeveloperKorzalerke
I know this, even the Gold score is MUCH higher (higher than SP platinum, or maybe a little lower, I don't remember)
+1Longer vampire with swept wings
+1Also rocket-powered
@BeastHunter
I was dumb and never noticed, and it was in spotlight
+1Thanks, I didn't think you would do it like that lol
+1MP Crazies That Make Mobile Users Depressed
+1construction progress videos
Moar Tutorials!!
SP meme videos
@UmbrellaCorporation ok
+1@UmbrellaCorporation
I don't use Instagram, I'm thinking of creating a discord account.
+1I'll let you know if I create one, but please do you know someone who can answer the question on this forum?
Mm nicely nice
turned a plane of less than 100 parts into this, respect
+1I literally always started from the right side
I don't know, but I find it more comfortable to build custom wings
+1Number 9: autoroll which is caused by landing gear
why do I suffer so much from this to the point of removing any existing physics in it, and it doesnt fix it
+1Why not a F4U Corsair?
+1@Brazilian500
Sim :D
+1Mm nice
+1e
+1Just as the development of my electric motor is in full power!
I will probably make an entry!
+1Q1:
I have one (from the time I didn't know how the unlisted ones worked)
Q2:
hue
Q3:
i d k
Q4:
Sorry, but Escarti gives me a rather high salary, and I do 40 projects in a year and they all fly in 2 years, so i must say RUSH E
Q5:
call @X99STRIKER , he will answer better than me
+1I have some questions
How many entries can I build?
If the old plane is unrealistic, has an ugly design, etc., could I change the design, but doing my best to preserve the original?
+1@extraordinaryman by the way, I have a somewhat unrealistic version of this plane, as it reaches 1000 kph, and goes up to 20,000 meters in altitude!
Here is the post that shows the development of the engine
+1@extraordinaryman
Well, I know that this system isn't the most efficient, and that it loses power at high altitudes, but it's also the best way I've found to make electric single engine aircraft without counter-rotating propellers. Because of this, it is much better suited for a general aviation aircraft.
It also doesn't change the plane's maneuverability much, as I also discovered that the propellers can act as canards. And because it is always rotating, upward lift is almost cancelled, although I found that it modifies (and A LOT) the Yaw, making the plane go into flatspin! But this can be corrected just by lowering the angle of the rotator that does yaw.
And engine not giving an astronomical climb rate is pretty realistic I might say!
But anyway, thanks for your reviews :)
Summary: It's really not impecable
+1N I C E : )
+1this is S P E E D
+1L O C O M O T I V E S
+1supervroomcar
+1@AlmostADev
+1Well the answer is very variable, from 22 to 4
I'm seriously going to have to make an atomically detailed mug?
+1