@Potatz I am aware of this.
Problem is, 1900hp would be ridiculously powerful for SP, remember that realism counts here too
A 1000hp engine is more than enough to propel a relatively aerodynamic plane to 550kph
No, sorry.
In my challenges, I refer to "Twin engines" as how many engine parts your plane has.
That means if for some reason you want to make a plane with two engines attached to a single propeller shaft, I would count it as single engine in the challenge.
Summary: In the challenge, I consider a twin-engine aircraft to have more than one engine block
but two engine blocks would still perform better as more propellers still produce more thrust
It's a good plane, not really realistic, but for SP it's very good
One of the things that most spoils simpleplanes in my opinion is the thrust/weight ratio, always try to keep it below 0.600 for jets and 0.1 for prop planes
So the plane will have an acceleration and maximum speed much closer to real life.
This thing is really good but I would recommend using Smoothing on the fuselage, it makes the fuselage look like a one-piece fuselage, not multiple fuselages cut
Jokes aside, it really makes the plane more beautiful
And by the way, your plane reaches speeds much higher than mach 2, it exceeds mach 4, so the design of this plane is wrong
Sorry, this plane is one of the most unrealistic things I've ever seen, but I have to admit, it's a lot of fun.
it flew at a very high altitude, plus it was a stupidly thin wing
he had wings just for gliding, and they weren't straight wings either, they were trapezoidal wings, which apparently can handle mach 1 at high altitude
EDIT: Trapezoidal wings SUPPORT speeds even faster than Delta wings, BUT it needs to be tiny to reach mach 2, look at the F-104, it has trapezoidal wings, but they are tiny! Your plane can handle mach 1 at high altitude, but it would NEVER handle mach 2 considering the size
And it's much more complex than that, it just scratches the surface, I recommend you research for yourself things like area rule or wing shape, supersonic flight is something much more difficult than it seems
I am currently editing your plane so that Mach 2 is realistic
@BRAZUCA kkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Vou mudar quando puder, apenas aproveitei a chance de conseguir um nome de 1 caractere
isso é bem raro, existem apenas 37 possíveis, e eu tenho o segundo ultimo disponível!
@Lake no, you don't understand, straight wings break anything faster than Mach 1.
it is physically impossible to a straight wing go Mach 1, now imagine Mach 2
They work best up to 900kph, if you want more speed use delta or swept wings
You don't get banned for modifying other people's vehicles, it actually helps them thanks to the successor system
The problem lies in circumventing this system or not modifying anything in the vehicle, that can ban you
Correction: it started operating in 1943, not 1942
Nobody understands that you have to have AT LEAST 125 PARTSS!!!????
@MemrWii Can be removed from custom wings, which add a lot of weight to the plane
@Xamesria27
The rules say that mass and drag can be removed from decoration, so you can
@Potatz
You can, as long as they don't produce thrust.
And you couldn't reduce the mass, sorry
+1@ColonelCanada
+1Who dare to tag me?
@Potatz I am aware of this.
Problem is, 1900hp would be ridiculously powerful for SP, remember that realism counts here too
A 1000hp engine is more than enough to propel a relatively aerodynamic plane to 550kph
@MemrWii
No, sorry.
In my challenges, I refer to "Twin engines" as how many engine parts your plane has.
That means if for some reason you want to make a plane with two engines attached to a single propeller shaft, I would count it as single engine in the challenge.
Summary: In the challenge, I consider a twin-engine aircraft to have more than one engine block
but two engine blocks would still perform better as more propellers still produce more thrust
@Walvis oke thx :)
Can i make another entry?
bcuz I'm planning to remake my Caproni Campini N.1
@ALTMTR * Y E S*
crusadee
@X99STRIKER it would still be better to have the session again
+1I thought of "A-29" I thought of the super tucano and not that lol
me too
T
m o b i l e f r e n
+2nice
+1Mmmmmm
n i c e
:)
+3A good entry, relatively realistic, but the HP/Weight Ratio is very high, and the plane takes a veeeeery long time to lose speed in the water
(Uma boa entrada, relativamente realista, mas a Relação HP/Peso é muito alta, e o avião demora muuuuito para perder velocidade na água)
+3@MemrWii thx :)
my E/24 will come here!
+1Oh man :(
+2I hope everything gets resolved
Good luck Kernels
It's a good plane, not really realistic, but for SP it's very good
One of the things that most spoils simpleplanes in my opinion is the thrust/weight ratio, always try to keep it below 0.600 for jets and 0.1 for prop planes
So the plane will have an acceleration and maximum speed much closer to real life.
@BeefSupreme Make a fictional manufacturer
For replicas I don't even need to answer
This thing is really good but I would recommend using Smoothing on the fuselage, it makes the fuselage look like a one-piece fuselage, not multiple fuselages cut
Jokes aside, it really makes the plane more beautiful
+2@Lake I didn't understand your question srry
the plane looks like a trainer, and trainers don't reach mach 4
+1@MrCOPTY uhhh
The challenge is closed, but I forgot to put it in the title warning
r e s u l t s p l e a s e
+1And by the way, your plane reaches speeds much higher than mach 2, it exceeds mach 4, so the design of this plane is wrong
+1Sorry, this plane is one of the most unrealistic things I've ever seen, but I have to admit, it's a lot of fun.
@Stanmich
it flew at a very high altitude, plus it was a stupidly thin wing
he had wings just for gliding, and they weren't straight wings either, they were trapezoidal wings, which apparently can handle mach 1 at high altitude
EDIT: Trapezoidal wings SUPPORT speeds even faster than Delta wings, BUT it needs to be tiny to reach mach 2, look at the F-104, it has trapezoidal wings, but they are tiny! Your plane can handle mach 1 at high altitude, but it would NEVER handle mach 2 considering the size
And it's much more complex than that, it just scratches the surface, I recommend you research for yourself things like area rule or wing shape, supersonic flight is something much more difficult than it seems
I am currently editing your plane so that Mach 2 is realistic
@bosscai
tag
+1you will be tagged when it is posted
@X99STRIKER idk
likely not
Vipah
@ZeroWithSlashed0
M A Y B E
+1you play raid shadow legends
@Lake
im brazilian
its portuguese, not Spanish
@BRAZUCA kkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Vou mudar quando puder, apenas aproveitei a chance de conseguir um nome de 1 caractere
isso é bem raro, existem apenas 37 possíveis, e eu tenho o segundo ultimo disponível!
@Lake no, you don't understand, straight wings break anything faster than Mach 1.
+1it is physically impossible to a straight wing go Mach 1, now imagine Mach 2
They work best up to 900kph, if you want more speed use delta or swept wings
i wish i had those straight wings that go mach 2
+1Damn my electric motor is not allowed
@Mcwalrus yes please
(be aware that I will only be able to test it tomorrow)
@Mrdumb9l191 np
@Titaninfernal1 kkkkkkkkkk
sim
Pretendo voltar ao normal dps
You don't get banned for modifying other people's vehicles, it actually helps them thanks to the successor system
+1The problem lies in circumventing this system or not modifying anything in the vehicle, that can ban you
@Brayden1981
The Minimum Part Count is to ensure that the builds have some quality, making custom wings, a cabin and decals is not that difficult.
MY MINECRAFT PETS NOOOOO
Okay, enough jokes, good plane :)
@IceCraftGaming
+4i agree