29.3k Dragoranos Comments

  • Remaster Challenge [CLOSED] 3.6 years ago

    Can i make another entry?

    bcuz I'm planning to remake my Caproni Campini N.1

  • Petition to add the "All time" session again 3.6 years ago

    @ALTMTR * Y E S*

  • F8U-1P 3.6 years ago

    crusadee

  • Petition to add the "All time" session again 3.6 years ago

    @X99STRIKER it would still be better to have the session again

    +1
  • A-29 next build 3.6 years ago

    I thought of "A-29" I thought of the super tucano and not that lol

  • When two aren't enough ~ 3.6 years ago

    T

  • Scout Miro (Less Parts) 3.6 years ago

    m o b i l e f r e n

    +2
  • An X wing 3.6 years ago

    nice

    +1
  • Another seaplane 3.6 years ago

    Mmmmmm
    n i c e

  • Falken Apuama III 3.6 years ago

    A good entry, relatively realistic, but the HP/Weight Ratio is very high, and the plane takes a veeeeery long time to lose speed in the water

    (Uma boa entrada, relativamente realista, mas a Relação HP/Peso é muito alta, e o avião demora muuuuito para perder velocidade na água)

    +3
  • CLOSED 1931 Schneider Cup Challenge 3.6 years ago

    @MemrWii thx :)

  • Pre-WW2 Challenge (CLOSED) 3.6 years ago

    my E/24 will come here!

    +1
  • I got to say this (plus a hiatus announcement) 3.6 years ago

    Oh man :(
    I hope everything gets resolved
    Good luck Kernels

    +2
  • NIGHT HAWK 3.6 years ago

    It's a good plane, not really realistic, but for SP it's very good

    One of the things that most spoils simpleplanes in my opinion is the thrust/weight ratio, always try to keep it below 0.600 for jets and 0.1 for prop planes

    So the plane will have an acceleration and maximum speed much closer to real life.

  • CLOSED 1931 Schneider Cup Challenge 3.6 years ago

    @BeefSupreme Make a fictional manufacturer

    For replicas I don't even need to answer

  • P-47D-25 3.6 years ago

    This thing is really good but I would recommend using Smoothing on the fuselage, it makes the fuselage look like a one-piece fuselage, not multiple fuselages cut

    Jokes aside, it really makes the plane more beautiful

    +2
  • L-16 E-2 "Stingray" 3.6 years ago

    @Lake I didn't understand your question srry

    the plane looks like a trainer, and trainers don't reach mach 4

    +1
  • (CLOSED) Oceanview Speedway Challenge 3.6 years ago

    @MrCOPTY uhhh

    The challenge is closed, but I forgot to put it in the title warning

  • WW2-Aircraft-Challenge[Closed] 3.7 years ago

    r e s u l t s p l e a s e

    +1
  • L-16 E-2 "Stingray" 3.7 years ago

    And by the way, your plane reaches speeds much higher than mach 2, it exceeds mach 4, so the design of this plane is wrong
    Sorry, this plane is one of the most unrealistic things I've ever seen, but I have to admit, it's a lot of fun.

    +1
  • L-16 E-2 "Stingray" 3.7 years ago

    @Stanmich

    it flew at a very high altitude, plus it was a stupidly thin wing
    he had wings just for gliding, and they weren't straight wings either, they were trapezoidal wings, which apparently can handle mach 1 at high altitude

    EDIT: Trapezoidal wings SUPPORT speeds even faster than Delta wings, BUT it needs to be tiny to reach mach 2, look at the F-104, it has trapezoidal wings, but they are tiny! Your plane can handle mach 1 at high altitude, but it would NEVER handle mach 2 considering the size

    And it's much more complex than that, it just scratches the surface, I recommend you research for yourself things like area rule or wing shape, supersonic flight is something much more difficult than it seems

    I am currently editing your plane so that Mach 2 is realistic

  • Not what you think 3.7 years ago

    @bosscai

    tag
    you will be tagged when it is posted

    +1
  • Q&A 3.7 years ago

    @X99STRIKER idk

    likely not

  • F-16C Viper for SimplePlanes 3.7 years ago

    Vipah

  • Not what you think 3.7 years ago

    @ZeroWithSlashed0

    M A Y B E

    +1
  • Q&A 3.7 years ago

    you play raid shadow legends

  • Vindatto E/34 Cacciatore (Preserie) 3.7 years ago

    @Lake
    im brazilian
    its portuguese, not Spanish

  • Vindatto E/34 Cacciatore (Preserie) 3.7 years ago

    @BRAZUCA kkkkkkkkkkkkkk
    Vou mudar quando puder, apenas aproveitei a chance de conseguir um nome de 1 caractere
    isso é bem raro, existem apenas 37 possíveis, e eu tenho o segundo ultimo disponível!

  • L-16 E-2 "Stingray" 3.7 years ago

    @Lake no, you don't understand, straight wings break anything faster than Mach 1.
    it is physically impossible to a straight wing go Mach 1, now imagine Mach 2
    They work best up to 900kph, if you want more speed use delta or swept wings

    +1
  • L-16 E-2 "Stingray" 3.7 years ago

    i wish i had those straight wings that go mach 2

    +1
  • 20 Gallon Challenge (Closed) 3.7 years ago

    Damn my electric motor is not allowed

  • Vindatto E/34 Cacciatore (Preserie) 3.7 years ago

    @Mcwalrus yes please

    (be aware that I will only be able to test it tomorrow)

  • TLZ with turbine engine 3.7 years ago

    @Mrdumb9l191 np

  • Airsharp 3.7 years ago

    @Titaninfernal1 kkkkkkkkkk

    sim

    Pretendo voltar ao normal dps

  • TLZ with turbine engine 3.7 years ago

    You don't get banned for modifying other people's vehicles, it actually helps them thanks to the successor system
    The problem lies in circumventing this system or not modifying anything in the vehicle, that can ban you

    +1
  • Supermarine S224 (Schneider Cup Challenge) 3.7 years ago

    @Brayden1981
    The Minimum Part Count is to ensure that the builds have some quality, making custom wings, a cabin and decals is not that difficult.

  • SF-12F Skyraider 3.7 years ago

    MY MINECRAFT PETS NOOOOO
    Okay, enough jokes, good plane :)

  • RESULTS! 3.7 years ago

    @IceCraftGaming
    i agree

    +4
  • Supermarine S224 (Schneider Cup Challenge) 3.7 years ago

    @SebastianMelmoth
    It is not qualified, it must have at least 125 parts.
    It's still a good plane

  • 15,000 points pog 3.7 years ago

    @7

    oke
    I will not overcome it

  • Twin-Boom Challenge [CLOSED] 3.7 years ago

    @WinsWings thx :)

    +1
  • Twin-Boom Challenge [CLOSED] 3.7 years ago

    can i make another entry?

    i feel i can do b e t t e r

    +1
  • I went stalking the SR2 website 3.7 years ago

    I also did this a while ago (which I also made a post about)
    I've already seen some games with the same system to change the shape of the SR2 fuselage, and I didn't like it at all, it seems very inaccurate, and from what I saw in gameplays, I think I'll stick with the SP system

    If I can't use the same as SP in SR2 I honestly won't buy the game

    +1
  • CLOSED 1931 Schneider Cup Challenge 3.7 years ago

    @V2 actually you can

  • CLOSED 1931 Schneider Cup Challenge 3.7 years ago

    @Jabuticaba23

    1: yes
    2: It's based on the 1931 edition, so it would be 500+, but any non-supersonic speed is allowed.
    3: the deadline is at the bottom of the description, and no more than 1

  • CLOSED 1931 Schneider Cup Challenge 3.7 years ago

    @7 @Jabuticaba23 @Phoebe

    I updated the rules

  • CLOSED 1931 Schneider Cup Challenge 3.7 years ago

    @7 @Jabuticaba23
    Well, I think from SP physics, a 2000hp engine would be ridiculously powerful, so no.


    I will test them between Wright Island and Krakabloa

  • CLOSED 1931 Schneider Cup Challenge 3.7 years ago

    @Phoebe YES