@GuardianAerospace Dont wanna argue, but is a Mirage IV an attacker or fighter bomber? Lets be honest, you could just say "Strategic bombers only" instead of hard locking a minimum MTOW.
Hey, wanna "report" an innaccuracy. The rear fuselage section should be somewhat straight when viewed from the side, instead if the smooth curve you did.
Maybe you used a bad blueprint?
Any news at all?
+1nah you reached pyrite :)
+1@GuardianAerospace Mirage IV. Mirage FOUR. Not mirage III, V or any other.
an-2 fighter bomber when
@GuardianAerospace Dont wanna argue, but is a Mirage IV an attacker or fighter bomber? Lets be honest, you could just say "Strategic bombers only" instead of hard locking a minimum MTOW.
The second rule is bullshit. Not all bombers are strategical. Better fix that
+1purple gold!
winglets? On a fighter jet?
+1@AndrewGarrison It worked. Thank you very much!
+1@AndrewGarrison
+1@intruder72 this post is two years old 😭
@SILVERPANZER No
@IQinventory I dont mean that
+1you put a bomber on a fighter list
ah yes, H-6, the famous chinese fighter aircraft
+34k image
hampden when
+1best lambo
see you in some months
+1It wants to kill itself because the engines are so powerful they make the nose pitch down.
The plane is made for low speed flying anyways
those are quite modern aircraft for 1936...
An extra: Remember, the tube is the superior aircraft shape.
why is the...
+1why...
why is the spinner egg shaped
Yes or obviously?
+1lets see if my phone doesnt die with this
+1Nice
Try making a rallycar next
zamn
+1@PlanerIndustries9 did you know swing wings are outdated
@Numbers2 i wouldnt count a F-4 as a warbird
But an A-4 prob would, at least on earlier variants
@Boeing727200F delivered
indeed looks like a bentley speed 8 LM
now make a pagani dystopia
+1why no one operates my seaplane
guys remember its fully free and no asking needed
+26584km be like
+1No????
+1brick
+1pyrite
Hey, wanna "report" an innaccuracy. The rear fuselage section should be somewhat straight when viewed from the side, instead if the smooth curve you did.
Maybe you used a bad blueprint?
@jamesPLANESii maybe keep both?
@froge polished rock
tea
+1iron
ngl if israeli aircraft are political then posting a Bf-109 makes you a nazi
+2looks like a toyota engine. 10/10
do you accept suggestions?
If yes, try build a De Havilland DH.88
Not a request, just an idea
where news
wha
+1@IntoTheDesignatedGridZone pea means Part Efficient aircraft not low part aircraft
A 500 part build can be PEA too if every part is used well
quite good
+2@MAPA
@ccc12345 huh?