@Kangy These are special cases. I am not considering the structural limit of the aircraft, but the maximum speed in level flight.I honestly don't know why anyone would think differently.
If (x) gains more players, it doesn't mean that (y) loses.
And SP should focus on being different and original, not stealing from FlyOut (even though I would love to see that cross-section editor in SP).
Many attack planes, for example, would never need this. I see no reason for this rule.
I'm making a light attack plane and I can't put 2000 liters in it.
@Dathcha We want to go to space because we want to discover more. I really want to know what's on that star I saw, without even knowing her name. It's also a matter of survival, Earth's resources will eventually run out, no matter what you say. The ocean does have a lot of interesting things, but that doesn't mean that space has nothing. Distance is an obstacle, not a limiter, even if it's a bigger hurdle than we can currently cross. And for not having anything interesting within a reasonable distance, see Europa, Titan, Mars, Pluto, and the Oort Cloud. You will NEVER see anything in detail in a telescope, no matter how powerful it is. Space junk will be solved with reusable rockets.
I know this won't change your opinion but if you research more about space you would absolutely love it. Try it!
@jamesPLANESii
Bomber bing
bunber binb
+1Realism +4000000000000
@Randomplayer
There is no limit, but only one will be evaluated.
why youtube kids lol
+1@Kangy If you made it that way (supersonic in dive) you would probably earn more points in realism. Just to be clear
Thats detailed!
+1@Kangy These are special cases. I am not considering the structural limit of the aircraft, but the maximum speed in level flight.I honestly don't know why anyone would think differently.
I cannot qualify an aircraft that breaks 2.5 mach.
It's still pretty cool so upvote
View the latest comments on this post
If (x) gains more players, it doesn't mean that (y) loses.
+1And SP should focus on being different and original, not stealing from FlyOut (even though I would love to see that cross-section editor in SP).
Sometimes I feel like Walvis has access to things that mere commoners like us can't even dream of having.
WALVIS SECRET DEV TEAM MEMBER??1?1?1
+7@Randomplayer ok
@Gabriel747 Eu já disse que não a um tempo atrás.
Minimum 80 parts...
+1I will remove this damn rule.
T
@Kangy Thanks!
@Bryan5 Thanks!
+1T
Suqói Esiu-vintiset
+1You basically supported the weight of the ship using a toilet paper roll.
+2Top ten most mobile ships
+7Yes. Your builds always get lots of upvotes, a challenge won't go unnoticed (unlike mine...)
T
Now where is the first gen one?
@jamesPLANESii ik that but still
And yes Trollhunters is the best show i've seen in months. you should finish it
@LieutenantSOT just make a in-game photo mode like J:NO
@HuskyDynamics01 An National Netgraphics Original
@Yourlocalhuman ok
+1@Yourlocalhuman yeah srry. I made my own truck, but I was just bugging in a way that I couldn't solve so I just used yours.
Sorry for not asking your permission.
how can i compensate?
@BaconAircraft
Why are you asking this here? Go for Quora, way better for that. Most people here can't even legally.gamble
Gave up on the attack plane, now embrace cannons. Heavy mortar almost ready
+1@CL125 yes
@Yourlocalhuman ok
Minimum 2000 liters of fuel?
Many attack planes, for example, would never need this. I see no reason for this rule.
I'm making a light attack plane and I can't put 2000 liters in it.
This comment was made on a phone
+1@Dathcha
I don't believe it really changed your mind
Thanks :)
@Dathcha We want to go to space because we want to discover more. I really want to know what's on that star I saw, without even knowing her name. It's also a matter of survival, Earth's resources will eventually run out, no matter what you say. The ocean does have a lot of interesting things, but that doesn't mean that space has nothing. Distance is an obstacle, not a limiter, even if it's a bigger hurdle than we can currently cross. And for not having anything interesting within a reasonable distance, see Europa, Titan, Mars, Pluto, and the Oort Cloud. You will NEVER see anything in detail in a telescope, no matter how powerful it is. Space junk will be solved with reusable rockets.
I know this won't change your opinion but if you research more about space you would absolutely love it. Try it!
+3Replace {} with ()
+1For a true scientist, anything is a success. Unless 300~ people die in the process, that means partial failure.
Don't ask what a catastrophic failure is.
+3T
+1why
physics is for newbs
@Gabriel747
+1Não uso whatsapp na maior parte do tempo
@Gabriel747 sim
+1@Richflysplanes Yes, Also please make it a successor
Also rename it to AU-1 Corsair, fits better on korean war
How do you make such a beautiful car?
+1@SourDoughBread ok
Does not reach minimum part count.
@DatRoadTrainGuy19 a skeleton casually approaching a child
explanation
Thanks @Leehopard for the spotlight!
Music name pls