It may be true you work very hard on making your planes fly well. But you also have to understand that a majority of the larger users put a lot of effort into making their plane detailed and aesthetically pleasing. It's pretty natural that people look at something that catches their eye, if it looks nice in the thumbnail, people will click on it. It is a bit unfair that users get overlooked, but this is a website and the points are only imaginary. I would find more satisfaction in comments than upvotes. Detail isn't everything but it certainly is a big part.
Scaling is really not essential to have a good replicas being 1:1 is more of a novelty than a requirement. There are plenty of Spitfire replicas in real life but the're all smaller.
@LiamW as long as it's a pic d say it's fine. Console pheasent really only refers to the people who prefer the console platform over pc. Using an Xbox controller may be considered odd but it's only a preference.
I actually really like this one, having the novelty and satisfaction of making the perfect model aircraft or anything on this workbench without having to spend loads of money on paint and model kits. This is splendid I'll try using this for my uploads!
Basically as far as I know ValvE tried making a console to run their steam interface on what I presume was the big picture mode on Steam. But the platform was a flop and now nobody remembers it. Like why would you use a controller when mouse and keyboard is that much more accurate for aiming?
@MailboxIsMyGender Now you see, to save me the trouble and brain cells I generally ignore people like this. I suggest you do as well beyond the first comment.
@Snap615 Yeah all I was doing was pointing out the failing points if this were to be real. If it was an SPG it would probably have to have the turret scrapped and have a new casemate or larger turret built around the gun.
I can give you many real life reasons why this is not fixed.
1). This is a LIGHT tank, that means it's meant for scouting. You do not need a behemoth 120mm gun.
2). The 120mm gun is very heavy, there is no room inside the already very cramped auto-loading turret to add more counterweight. Therefor this tank would always have a depressed gun
3). Loading shell's the weight of 3 small children each is very hard for the auto-loading system in this WWII prototype. Unless you're okay with 5 minute long reloads I don't find this very viable
Some very underrated fighters you have here!
Simpler than this
Lemme just lock the driver side door from the insi- oh wait no hold on.
This is one of my favorite jets ever! Thanks for making this!
@Moronindustries this is also a funny name tag.
This is really sexy!
It may be true you work very hard on making your planes fly well. But you also have to understand that a majority of the larger users put a lot of effort into making their plane detailed and aesthetically pleasing. It's pretty natural that people look at something that catches their eye, if it looks nice in the thumbnail, people will click on it. It is a bit unfair that users get overlooked, but this is a website and the points are only imaginary. I would find more satisfaction in comments than upvotes. Detail isn't everything but it certainly is a big part.
@Othawne Mmm nice, Can I know your specs :>
Shame we can't cover it in tissue :>
Boi one of my friends fired her thinkpad mobo to today :<. Get a new one soon if your cpu and gpu aren't fried as well!
Looks a bit like the Sylph Fighter from Yukikaze.
Supernova by Laszlo is a very nice song. One of the best parts is that the comment section is polluted with LinusTechTip fans. ;)
Now I'm gonna post mine I just finished today >:)
Scaling is really not essential to have a good replicas being 1:1 is more of a novelty than a requirement. There are plenty of Spitfire replicas in real life but the're all smaller.
And maybe some more tools and such hanging on the wall?
@Cadin may I consider putting some filled out or empty blueprint papers laid out and rolled up on the table?
@LiamW as long as it's a pic d say it's fine. Console pheasent really only refers to the people who prefer the console platform over pc. Using an Xbox controller may be considered odd but it's only a preference.
I actually really like this one, having the novelty and satisfaction of making the perfect model aircraft or anything on this workbench without having to spend loads of money on paint and model kits. This is splendid I'll try using this for my uploads!
Basically as far as I know ValvE tried making a console to run their steam interface on what I presume was the big picture mode on Steam. But the platform was a flop and now nobody remembers it. Like why would you use a controller when mouse and keyboard is that much more accurate for aiming?
@Ctracerx2 well that was a public chat for the entirety of the SP site. This will be different.
Oh so it was you... Yeah makes sense now.
I'm still pushing for a migration to Discord :P
Specs?
@Othawne Sank zu, how abotu that?
@ChaMikey No problem! I've lost some motivation and inspiration over the last 2 months but I'm trying to regain that! Not going anywhere :P
@Othawne fank cuo
@geekr np
I don't get the practicality of having a monster low rider but nice!
made on android? nonesense!
I guessed it right xD
@Cedy117 @Treadmill103 Thank you!
@jamesPLANESii Lovely I'll accept that right away!
@MailboxIsMyGender Only after you, oh hold on you already have half your foot in it.
@OrionAstronaut Thanks!
Nice but two hull machine guns? Where is the driver? xD
@RailfanEthan @EliteIndustries1 ??
@808REKT Hmmm I'll think about it!
@808REKT Thanks
You know I made a p-51 as well? Here :P
@AdrianFlyingAce Maybe I have other things to do with my time... I'll upload it when I want.
@MailboxIsMyGender Now you see, to save me the trouble and brain cells I generally ignore people like this. I suggest you do as well beyond the first comment.
It's O.K, grades and school come first. I'm sure we can all wait!
@Snap615 Yeah all I was doing was pointing out the failing points if this were to be real. If it was an SPG it would probably have to have the turret scrapped and have a new casemate or larger turret built around the gun.
@Stampede And that's a bad thing?
I can give you many real life reasons why this is not fixed.
1). This is a LIGHT tank, that means it's meant for scouting. You do not need a behemoth 120mm gun.
2). The 120mm gun is very heavy, there is no room inside the already very cramped auto-loading turret to add more counterweight. Therefor this tank would always have a depressed gun
3). Loading shell's the weight of 3 small children each is very hard for the auto-loading system in this WWII prototype. Unless you're okay with 5 minute long reloads I don't find this very viable
@Moronindustries Thanks
Soo sexy!
@JoddyFubuki788 you'll just die tired.
@bjac0 Tanks dere m8