I think getting a i7-6700 and 32gb of ddr4 is a poor choice when you have a 5th gen Nvidia card in there. You should balance it more. The GPU is often the more important part for gaming and shouldn't be cheaped out on. I think trying to get a Ryzen 5 or Ryzen 3 with an RX 460 or RX 470 would be better balanced build.
@Lucasplaysimpleplanes Yeah I think I know that after ONE YEAR, people have told me as well if you bother to check. Seriously, go down and CHECK. I'm quite certain there is also the fix there as well!
I don't think SimplePlanes is a very demanding game to run, anything with a decent quad core and an RX 460 should handle it no problem if you're going for a desktop.
A lot of my planes such as the Mirage 2000B and one that I'm working on react pretty extremely with the wind on the ground. Even with forward and sideways traction at 150%, the Mirage still gets pushed around by a small 5-10 mph cross wind. Take-off is very difficult as the plane almost instantly tends to position itself into the crosswind and swerve off of the runway. Wind mechanics are really fun to play around with however.
May I also suggest that more engine sounds can be chosen for the car engines? Some simple V6, V8, V10 or maybe even a V12 might be fun to have, right now all your high speed race cars and supercars sound like they are powered by a tractor engine.
@Testin123 You can get help from anyone here as well. Being in that group just means that there almost always is someone on to help you really quickly. It's mostly just some tips and advice and minor fixes. No one is going to do an entire half of the project for you.
@FuRiOuSpLaNeS It only makes you mad because you choose to be angered by it. I have to say that "You must be like the top 50 players in SP" to join is utter nonsense. People get invited because they have a good build quality, but above all else it's that their attitudes towards other players is pleasant and someone that people can talk to easily. One of the big reasons a lot of people aren't invited is because they show the exact same temperament as you do. I'm in the chatroom myself and if you think that I'm an idiot or that I consider myself above you then I'm more than happy to correct you on it if I haven't done so sufficiently already. You should've taken the 10 seconds to scroll down and read the previous comments.
@Testin123 The chatroom isn't just Plat players there are a bunch of other people in there to. Sure there are Platinum players that think they are better than everyone else but there are also plenty that don't have the best builds but are socially active on the forums. And yes it also depends on your skill, I haven't checked in awhile but I'm sure there is non-platinum players who build much better than me. I haven't come across it often but any person that's rubbing in their status is a snob and their actions are not necessary.
@Chinaman That has already been established multiple times. This was released a year ago, so you'll have better luck fixing the issue yourself than for me to fix it for you. I recommend setting your physics to high for a start, because it seems apparent you did not read the comments first.
@EternalDarkness Thank you for the high praise! I was actually very lucky to be able to squeeze that relatively detailed front suspension on. You can actually crank the engine up to 750 hp or even 1000hp in XML and it can still go around the bends at full throttle.
@ForeverPie At this rate you'll narrow the rules down to the point where the only livery we can suggest is one that agrees with the one you want or something :T
@Unstable @FoxTech I might redo the P-51B with a British Malcom Hood in the near future, but I will not redo a camouflage pattern like this. The odd proportions and look to this P-51 was mostly due to the fact that I had to make it easier to put this complex camo and the functioning cockpit by Rony.
@ChiChiWerx Yeah acceleration speeds and more options on fuel burn and engine rpm would be great. A fighter jet shouldn't have two mini GE90's to get to it's realistic top speed.
@BaconAircraft I share the same opinion as Bacon, a lot of my jets consume wayy too much fuel than what is realistic. So to make it not have brick turning or a 10 minute flight time I used inf-fuel. I generally never do this on my propeller aircraft as the're fine on the fuel consumption.
@EternalDarkness Nah, I actually like this one better, the old one was a bit light on details and too generic as it was a Sea Hawk. I think the Helicopter you built here (Eurocopter EC175 or something?) looks much better and fits in more with your ships.
I think getting a i7-6700 and 32gb of ddr4 is a poor choice when you have a 5th gen Nvidia card in there. You should balance it more. The GPU is often the more important part for gaming and shouldn't be cheaped out on. I think trying to get a Ryzen 5 or Ryzen 3 with an RX 460 or RX 470 would be better balanced build.
@Flightsonic I can try to help you build one for a budget. I've been trying to make lists for people anyway :P
@Hayhayjam664 @FlyingFanatic Thanks!
@helplesslife You haven't even flown it yet have you.
@Lucasplaysimpleplanes Yeah I think I know that after ONE YEAR, people have told me as well if you bother to check. Seriously, go down and CHECK. I'm quite certain there is also the fix there as well!
@mushr0om Better lighting than the default spotlight in designer would already be great!
Thought it was SweetFX for a second, but this looks much better by far. Will something like this also be in the designer? Anyway, Can't wait!
I don't think SimplePlanes is a very demanding game to run, anything with a decent quad core and an RX 460 should handle it no problem if you're going for a desktop.
Race me with a sailboat my good sir!
The thought of this completely bypassed me!
@TheBroadside Hitting a moving light tank with a laser precise artillery is totally realistic, I don't know what you're talking about.
A lot of my planes such as the Mirage 2000B and one that I'm working on react pretty extremely with the wind on the ground. Even with forward and sideways traction at 150%, the Mirage still gets pushed around by a small 5-10 mph cross wind. Take-off is very difficult as the plane almost instantly tends to position itself into the crosswind and swerve off of the runway. Wind mechanics are really fun to play around with however.
May I also suggest that more engine sounds can be chosen for the car engines? Some simple V6, V8, V10 or maybe even a V12 might be fun to have, right now all your high speed race cars and supercars sound like they are powered by a tractor engine.
@Testin123 You can get help from anyone here as well. Being in that group just means that there almost always is someone on to help you really quickly. It's mostly just some tips and advice and minor fixes. No one is going to do an entire half of the project for you.
@MechWARRIOR57 The internet is a strange and messed up place. But yes I've had some of those problems to.
@MechWARRIOR57 I've forgotten most of the times I got in a disagreement with another member.
@FuRiOuSpLaNeS I'm sure that happens to everyone, you're not alone on that.
@FuRiOuSpLaNeS It's O.K but I do suggest refraining from taking your anger out online, can get you in situations you'd rather not be in.
@MechWARRIOR57 Ahhh I see, I don't go on the voting chat often so I'm not really up to date in that.
@MechWARRIOR57 Yeah, it's unfortunate that some people feel the need to do that. Some people do take it as an elitist membership or something.
@FuRiOuSpLaNeS It only makes you mad because you choose to be angered by it. I have to say that "You must be like the top 50 players in SP" to join is utter nonsense. People get invited because they have a good build quality, but above all else it's that their attitudes towards other players is pleasant and someone that people can talk to easily. One of the big reasons a lot of people aren't invited is because they show the exact same temperament as you do. I'm in the chatroom myself and if you think that I'm an idiot or that I consider myself above you then I'm more than happy to correct you on it if I haven't done so sufficiently already. You should've taken the 10 seconds to scroll down and read the previous comments.
@Testin123 The chatroom isn't just Plat players there are a bunch of other people in there to. Sure there are Platinum players that think they are better than everyone else but there are also plenty that don't have the best builds but are socially active on the forums. And yes it also depends on your skill, I haven't checked in awhile but I'm sure there is non-platinum players who build much better than me. I haven't come across it often but any person that's rubbing in their status is a snob and their actions are not necessary.
@ChaMikey lol np
@TTHHSSSS Np
@LASkey Nah I don't plan on making the SU-100 any time soon because I'm not good with tank tracks.
No 122mm D-25S :(
Lovely plane!
@Rohan @Rohan Don't really go on there anymore because it gets pretty hectic sometimes, and whenever I do I seem to get glossed over.
@Chinaman That has already been established multiple times. This was released a year ago, so you'll have better luck fixing the issue yourself than for me to fix it for you. I recommend setting your physics to high for a start, because it seems apparent you did not read the comments first.
@Halphas np!
Congrats!!
@RedBeard66 I have for awhile, yeah.
@EternalDarkness Thank you for the high praise! I was actually very lucky to be able to squeeze that relatively detailed front suspension on. You can actually crank the engine up to 750 hp or even 1000hp in XML and it can still go around the bends at full throttle.
Pretty pathetic
@GermanAircrafts Yup, I think I know that one year later.
@Price123 It's the exact same as mine just with a different paint job...
@808REKT You can make a car or something with no visible wheel wells, then scale wheels hidden inside.
Now I don't know if I should support this, it seems to me you just scaled the wheels and called it a day.
@KForz mhm
@ForeverPie At this rate you'll narrow the rules down to the point where the only livery we can suggest is one that agrees with the one you want or something :T
@Unstable Thanks :P
Maybe Aer Lingus or the old U.S Airways gray and black livery?
@Unstable @FoxTech I might redo the P-51B with a British Malcom Hood in the near future, but I will not redo a camouflage pattern like this. The odd proportions and look to this P-51 was mostly due to the fact that I had to make it easier to put this complex camo and the functioning cockpit by Rony.
@SimpleFlow @EternalDarkness thank you both :)
@Sparrow007 Thanks for making this :)
Bawls, Brioche :T
Looks bawls
@ChiChiWerx Yeah acceleration speeds and more options on fuel burn and engine rpm would be great. A fighter jet shouldn't have two mini GE90's to get to it's realistic top speed.
@BaconAircraft I share the same opinion as Bacon, a lot of my jets consume wayy too much fuel than what is realistic. So to make it not have brick turning or a 10 minute flight time I used inf-fuel. I generally never do this on my propeller aircraft as the're fine on the fuel consumption.
@EternalDarkness Looks like a EC175 :p
Mhm :T
@EternalDarkness Nah, I actually like this one better, the old one was a bit light on details and too generic as it was a Sea Hawk. I think the Helicopter you built here (Eurocopter EC175 or something?) looks much better and fits in more with your ships.