I wasn't concerned about how he use it, but the fact he tried to state that it was his own, which I highly discourage. But given your permission I think this will stay.
@Weaverfish
That's not good enough, you've got to give credit. 20% is yours (and I'm being generous) and the other 80% isn't. Just give credit for the build, simple. @cmbwarrior
@FlyingManiac
Just to let you and the creator know, this isn't your build. Pretty sure this is WeaverFish's B-17. Please remove or give credit or I'll take further action.
Why thank you for your compliment. But really, anyone with time and persistence can make builds of equal or better quality than this. I started off just like anyone else, it's what you do from there on that matters. @Trainzo
Thank for your feedback. I noticed that the flight characteristics were unrealistic, but never got ahead to fixing them. I do however plan on going for more realistic flight characteristics on my next plane. Cheers @Sarpanitu
Nice P-40, especially the having the insignia flush with the fuselage, very well done. The horizontal stab is a bit small, but that’s a small thing. Good job on this!
When I say broken, I mean that the whole point of upvoting is to saying that you like this build and you want others to know that you like it. When you start upvoting because of the person and not the build, that's when the whole system stops functioning correctly, displaying builds that normally shouldn't be on the top pages but are because people are upvoting based on personal relationships, not quality of the build.
@Jacobdaniel
While you generosity is admired, friend or not, it's encouraged that people only upvotes builds that they really personally like, not because they've been told too. Otherwise the whole premise of the system is broken.
What ever you feel comfortable with. Over time we all develop our individual build styles, and thus we know what we are comfortable with. As for plane suggestions, not really sure, maybe something German?
Great job nonetheless, you managed to reach gold in less than a month than I could in 6 months. Then again, I'm not a beast factory like you and simply cannot output that many planes in such a short time period. Congrats once again!
Thank you, still slowly catching up. I remember you talking about making a P-40 one day, so I thought I'd remind you. You seem more than capable of it.
@EpicPigster1
Thank you for such a kind comment. That's definitely next on my list of WW2 bombers, you'll probably see it by the end if the year. Right now I'm working on a P-40 Curtiss fighter so stay tuned. @Datom
Why the clickbait title, it's a trashy, ugly and degrading way of getting upvotes. Please don't use a title like this again, I don't want this to turn into a Youtube like community.
Adding onto what SR said, the wings are one of the main things that you could change. I always find it weird how the flaps look when extended due to this scaling.
Ahh, I was thinking about that method too. I feel like your method though would work better than Rew's because you can achieve greater flex range. The flex range on Rews wings are almost unnoticeable sometimes. @BaconAircraft
I think you managed to achieve the look of the spit much more accurately than mine, so very well done. Thank you for your kind words too.
@CursedFlames
Funny enough I'm doing this as well with my 747-8, I think they use rotators at 0° then they flex because of the lift and weight produces by the wings. Not sure though, will experiment.
@EpicPigster1 @QingyuZhou
1.) Rank wise, not sure, where you are now is underrated perhaps, but that'll change over time.
2.) I do like your ultra detailed series mainly because I make planes similar to them, so I compare occasionally for different things I could do.
3.)
Fw190 for your next detailed plane, be something to fight against with your other planes.
4.)
Nothing more then that, maybe a collaboration one day?
@Franticmatty
Can you check this out?
Could, but he flew the earlier P-40 models, plus I’m not great at people, that’s why you never see people in my planes. @DarthAbhinav
As always, very nice!
Sweet!
@jamesPLANESii
I wasn't concerned about how he use it, but the fact he tried to state that it was his own, which I highly discourage. But given your permission I think this will stay.
@Weaverfish
That's not good enough, you've got to give credit. 20% is yours (and I'm being generous) and the other 80% isn't. Just give credit for the build, simple. @cmbwarrior
Very, even has the guts to saw that he made it himself, so low
@MrTyTheGreat
Post as unlisted, delete and post as public
Or transfer to another build
@MrTyTheGreat
@FlyingManiac
Just to let you and the creator know, this isn't your build. Pretty sure this is WeaverFish's B-17. Please remove or give credit or I'll take further action.
Cheers
@Jasperjl
@Tully2001
Maybe... your language is perfect by the way, no need to be sorry. @NANOMAN
Rew doesn’t even make WW2 aircraft though, he’s the expert on airliners though.
@temporaryaccount
Cheers
@SSSvaSSa
@phanps
Why thank you for your compliment. But really, anyone with time and persistence can make builds of equal or better quality than this. I started off just like anyone else, it's what you do from there on that matters. @Trainzo
Thanks
@Trainzo
Stunning. Looks really good, the story is a nice touch too. @EpicPigster1
Stunning!
Thank for your feedback. I noticed that the flight characteristics were unrealistic, but never got ahead to fixing them. I do however plan on going for more realistic flight characteristics on my next plane. Cheers @Sarpanitu
Nice P-40, especially the having the insignia flush with the fuselage, very well done. The horizontal stab is a bit small, but that’s a small thing. Good job on this!
2nd ones nice, though not sure how you would fade and gradient the bottom undercarriage grey with the fusalage blue. Top one is good too.
When I say broken, I mean that the whole point of upvoting is to saying that you like this build and you want others to know that you like it. When you start upvoting because of the person and not the build, that's when the whole system stops functioning correctly, displaying builds that normally shouldn't be on the top pages but are because people are upvoting based on personal relationships, not quality of the build.
@Jacobdaniel
While you generosity is admired, friend or not, it's encouraged that people only upvotes builds that they really personally like, not because they've been told too. Otherwise the whole premise of the system is broken.
No, they discontinued Underground. It’s no longer supported.
What ever you feel comfortable with. Over time we all develop our individual build styles, and thus we know what we are comfortable with. As for plane suggestions, not really sure, maybe something German?
Thank you, I hope to get there with my new P-40, good luck for the future.
@Datom
Great job nonetheless, you managed to reach gold in less than a month than I could in 6 months. Then again, I'm not a beast factory like you and simply cannot output that many planes in such a short time period. Congrats once again!
Thank you
@DarthAbhinav
It does
@Preteype
Not necessarily, we're both good at different aspects. They'll be good in their own way.
@EpicPigster1
Jeez, at first I thought some of the images were from real life!
Thank you, still slowly catching up. I remember you talking about making a P-40 one day, so I thought I'd remind you. You seem more than capable of it.
@EpicPigster1
You don't have to build for me, I'm a builder myself. I focus on all countries and parties.
@outlinedsalmon4
It's interesting, but not my genre. I'm more WW2/replicas.
@outlinedsalmon4
Thank you for your understanding
@outlinedsalmon4
What about a P-40? There's only two decent onces I've seen, both are out of proportions though. Otherwise you could go with either of them.
I've put this on hold for now, I won't be able to finish it by then. Sorry.
@Aircraftgenerator5000
Thank you for such a kind comment. That's definitely next on my list of WW2 bombers, you'll probably see it by the end if the year. Right now I'm working on a P-40 Curtiss fighter so stay tuned. @Datom
Why the clickbait title, it's a trashy, ugly and degrading way of getting upvotes. Please don't use a title like this again, I don't want this to turn into a Youtube like community.
Adding onto what SR said, the wings are one of the main things that you could change. I always find it weird how the flaps look when extended due to this scaling.
Thanks guys
@SpiritusRaptor @FlyingNarwhal
Yeah there were some key requirements missing from your entry, like countermeasures and weapons. Nonetheless still looks pretty good.
@EpicPigster1
Ahh, I was thinking about that method too. I feel like your method though would work better than Rew's because you can achieve greater flex range. The flex range on Rews wings are almost unnoticeable sometimes. @BaconAircraft
Wings are by far the hardest thing to tackle, flaps, slats and flex too. It's amazing how TSAD members can pull all of that off.
@EpicPigster1
Ahh, we don't know yet though
@Jetpackturtle
I think you managed to achieve the look of the spit much more accurately than mine, so very well done. Thank you for your kind words too.
@CursedFlames
Funny enough I'm doing this as well with my 747-8, I think they use rotators at 0° then they flex because of the lift and weight produces by the wings. Not sure though, will experiment.
@EpicPigster1 @QingyuZhou
Indeed it will, perhaps even soar above. I'd love to see more of this stuff though
@EpicPigster1
Unreal, one of the best WW2 fighters on the website!
Summer, definitely summer