@Apollo018362 i just googled tbh, and the info was from the english wiki page, its specs are based on the A-5A variation wiki page link to the blueprint i used
@Zero0Two2 Quite a few people tend to do this kinda thing that i do, its kinda like the cars in gta, based on (and by now basically almost identical to) the real thing but named something else to fit into the in game universe, i do the same thing but with planes i make for the WCU challenge, simple as that.
@TheTomatoLover Yeah, i havent fitted any airbrakes on this variant but if i release an updated one i will definetly do that. On landings i didnt seem to have any issues yet but if you were landing at 270mph that might have been the issue since the landing speed is supposed to be around 215mph. Landing gear could be a bit more fragile than usual since its kinda weirdly built up.
@Corn8 maybe its the collisions on it? i think i might have those turned off... worked fine when i tested them against ground targets but i guess aircraft are just built different.
@GabrielFangster70 multiple reasons really, first its made for a war challenge and i didnt wanna use the real name for it, second i do not consider it perfect enough to call it a replica, third i wanted to piss featherwing off a bit
@16 Its the best way to improve in stuff imo, as long as its not perfect its not the real deal. If i take a look at my builds from when i started a year ago i feel embarassed cuz they are pretty dookie.
@Brian777 at least make the thrust to weight realistic so it doesnt go mach 2 in 5 seconds, also because of the elevators slow movement its very wobbly
saying that it flies is an overstatement, even a toddler flies if you toss it hard enough
+8@Olegsandr its an S-3 viking at home not an a6
+2Creative name, although the real Aviatrix AV.37 will be a different aircraft.
+1nicely done
+1@Apollo018362 go on, its a fun little build, mine isnt exactly mobile friendly anyways
+1@Apollo018362 i just googled tbh, and the info was from the english wiki page, its specs are based on the A-5A variation wiki page
+1link to the blueprint i used
@Airplanegeek13532 yeah his bomber is pretty similar to the b57B, though his is more fictional
+1@Zero0Two2 Quite a few people tend to do this kinda thing that i do, its kinda like the cars in gta, based on (and by now basically almost identical to) the real thing but named something else to fit into the in game universe, i do the same thing but with planes i make for the WCU challenge, simple as that.
+1@FeatherWing i really dont know why you are malding this much about a virtual airplane, grow a pair and get a life, cheers
+1@FeatherWing ill name them as exact replicas when i think they are passable for exact replicas
+1@SquashyEgg war challenge united, its a discord server @Samfpanzer @Rondine
+1@Erc90F4RU yeah it is a fictional equal of a hurricane i just dont like making real stuff for the WCU challenge, also thx
+1@TheTomatoLover Yeah, i havent fitted any airbrakes on this variant but if i release an updated one i will definetly do that. On landings i didnt seem to have any issues yet but if you were landing at 270mph that might have been the issue since the landing speed is supposed to be around 215mph. Landing gear could be a bit more fragile than usual since its kinda weirdly built up.
+1@Krikkit42 thanks, i would have called it an S-3 replica but the landing gear doors, the bomb bay and the canopy arent quite perfect
+1where yaw control
+1IMPORTANT NOTE:it is a bit out of scale
+1epic plane
@AVFLYER Looks simple enough, ill keep that in mind, next build is a Foxhound though
@Corn8 yep, it was the cannon collisions, go into the xml on the cannons and turn disableAircraftCollisions to false. should fix your problem
@Corn8 maybe its the collisions on it? i think i might have those turned off... worked fine when i tested them against ground targets but i guess aircraft are just built different.
@Corn8 ag 2 im pretty sure
People who wanted to be tagged:
@Boeing727200F
@Corn8
@Boeing727200F
@DatTrainGuy19
@Fantomas what
@ComradeInCommune yeah no i dont think so, i started building a ye-2 instead
@ComradeInCommune it says that there are some troubles with loading the plane file
@GabrielFangster70 multiple reasons really, first its made for a war challenge and i didnt wanna use the real name for it, second i do not consider it perfect enough to call it a replica, third i wanted to piss featherwing off a bit
@16 Its the best way to improve in stuff imo, as long as its not perfect its not the real deal. If i take a look at my builds from when i started a year ago i feel embarassed cuz they are pretty dookie.
Yappasaurus rex
@Liquidfox01 yeah the custom nozzles and missiles add quite a few parts
@Hahahahaahahshs read important notes part
@XAircraftManufacturer neat
@XAircraftManufacturer yeah, im Hungarian so i though i would do something Hungarian this time
@L1nus i messed up the intakes and engine cover things so from there i just rolled with the fictional concept
@L1nus not accurate enough so i went with my own fictional thing
cock of gor
@RickIndustry basically
@Johnpork yes just make sure to give credit
Note that the pictures on the thumbnail are a bit inaccurate since they do not feature the flap mechanism fairings
SORRY FOR REUPLOAD BUT THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH THE CONTROL SURFACES
@Erc90F4RU walmart typhoon
@TheHamburgerCorperation fix the bomb bay too, cuz rn it can be opened in the wrong way
@ThatRandomCouchPotato the brakes are useable outside of the cockpit too, you just have to start the plane up
@ThatRandomCouchPotato it does have air brakes, did you start hydraulics and then press the brakes button?
IF YOU HAVE ANY ISSUES PLEASE LET ME KNOW
T
@Scrabble5555 the game tops out at 360 quintillion sadly so i cant go faster lol
intakes are a tad goofy
@PlanebuilderSeb tune it so that it works well
@Brian777 at least make the thrust to weight realistic so it doesnt go mach 2 in 5 seconds, also because of the elevators slow movement its very wobbly