I got that part, what I’m saying is that the 4 gyros aren’t even necessary and they degrade the handling. I have one just for yaw and that’s it. This is because normally, you have the rotors providing torque to turn the plane but in this case you need a yaw control so you need one gyro.
Try to steer clear of gyros on helicopters. While some can help in things like autopilot most of them do not help.
@BOXboy
Idea: V-280 but with jet engines instead of props. No wings so the engines would be close to the body and be tilted always.
I know I’m kind of a genius lol jk
@SCP1471 doesn't look bad just make sure your weight, wing loading, and thrust specs are correct when you finish. If the length is a bit off you can always scale it up a bit.
@shipster The A-10s are way too vulnerable to be used in contested airspace. We would risk way too many casualties if we did that. If they went in with F-35s they would be the only tracks on radar anyways. If we want wild weasels well just use the Stand in Attack Weapon on the F-35 which is in development and mount them externally and internally.
Ik these weren't copies I’m saying a good percentage of Chinese aircraft are foreign designs which have been reversed engineered or licensed@asteroidbook345
@CharlesDeGaulle Ah someone who finally understands stealth hahaha. Most radar s at the time it was designed was still X band and I think most AWACS are KU band. Yeah because it needed to fulfill a bunch of requirements from different nations it became a plane which was a hodgepodge of ideas. Yeah, 3 Fords sounds ok and I think they are gonna refurbish some Nimitz's. But that's just some speculation on my part.
@CharlesDeGaulle I'm not sure you can compare Rafale's 1-meter cross-section to the f-35s .005-meter RCS. Yes, it's not invisible but you would need a very powerful ground radar to actually get a detect and even if you do you still won't be able to get a track until the F-35 is in visual range and by that point, he has already fired 6 AMRAAMS at you. Yes, Rafael clearly wins in a dogfight but head to head at BVR the F-35 is going to win.
The helicopter carriers are much more adaptable than a supercarrier and you can get more for your money on the helicopter carriers than with supercarriers. That's why the US is trying to transition to an overwhelming number of small carriers which are lighter, faster, and more adaptable than regular carriers. The US will probably keep 3-4 of the big ones but they are just too expensive for the navy at this point.
Yeah, the F-15 is pretty awesome, when I head to flight school I'm gunning for an F-15EX or some other fast strike aircraft. The F-22 is cool but it certainly needs some work and a better HMCS. The F-35 is currently a mess so I wouldnt want to fly it at least until the fix its current engine problem.
Boeing creates the recommended timetable for maintenance. Also the plane was built in 1995 so only 25 years. I believe they are supposed to operate for 30-35 before they need a complete overhaul. If Boeing did not compensate for accelerated degradation it’s their fault. If the airline didn’t follow the correct plan it’s the airlines fault. But I think Boeing does maintenance for some airlines.
@asteroidbook345
Bc they didn’t check the engines often enough. Maintenance is a Boeing problem not a P&W problem. Even if it broke before the scheduled service time that just means Boeing didn’t do enough testing when they slapped it on. It’s funny though that Lockheed is digging Boeing’s grave. (Lockheed owns P&W)
By the way I really do admire your airplanes you have there like the rafaeles and the typhoons which are some of my favorite fighters. So when I say you air power is inferior I’m not necessarily talking about development because Dassault is pretty much on the same page as other US contractors.@CharlesDeGaulle
Once again I will say that nuculear armament means almost nothing. This is because of mutually assured destruction. So nuclear weapons have little bearing on a modern conflict even one between Russia and the US. I am completely aware that Stalin was terrible but comparing Putin to him doesn’t make Putin any better. As for your comment about him stealing and it doesn’t hurt someone, he stole close to a billion dollars to build his Putin mansion. I’m sure someone else has to pay the price and somehow you are ok with that. Also, have you not seen the riots in Russia’s streets lately? These are all against Putin who does things like changing the constitution so when he leaves office he has immunity allowing him to be exempt from all laws. The man is a crime lord who has his best interests first. For the aircraft carrier incident I read from multiple places that the saphir only launched one salvo. One salvo would not be enough to take out the carrier and escorts but it would damage the aircraft carrier and serenely damage and frigate. So I’m not sure “sunk” is the correct word for that. Although, I’m sure we’ve learned our lesson after that one.
Another misconception you have is that ground vehicles are everything which is false as everyone knows you can’t have ground troops without air support. In the air support category France and Russia are sorely lacking. A single F-35 can take out 4 tanks a trip and not be shot down by air defenses because of its stealth coating. Get 15 F-35s and you can take out platoons at a time.
Yes you have one aircraft carrier. One. 😂
The reason why I’m recommending history sources is because your narrative widely strays from the actual history. That is the only reason. It is not ad-hominem I am honestly trying to help you. Even if you don’t think I’m correct at least read some of it.
As for complete capability I stand by those rankings as nuclear weapons are nothing in an actual war there are just fake threats used to push policy around the globe. They aren’t much more than that.
Here’s a great thesis paper which describes [this a bit] (https://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/doctrine/doe/younger.htm)
May I remind you that I have refuted most of your points earlier and that is why you are bringing up new arguments if you felt you were winning there would be no need for that. So you know when you say that I’m not creating a logical argument you know you are lying. It’s that simple.
@CharlesDeGaulle
Erm your ok. I advise that you build some replicas from blueprints to create a more realistic look on your fictional builds. Make sure you focus on details and that you don’t simplify lines
Cool I have 11k
Feels like a high school reunion photo
Wack
@asteroidbook345 plz pin my comment lmao
there ya go a spotlight
@Raffel very nice
Did you make this yourself or is this supposed to be a successor
This is a Catalina right?
YO THIS GUY HAS AIMBOT THIS IS SO CAP REPORT HIM NOW PLZ
T Rex version of GK Chesterton
@MrShenanigans here
@MrShenanigans ill just link you an unlisted make sure to look at the engine/ wheels and everything else also the fuel
@MrShenanigans you want a hint or you wanna see what i do
@MrShenanigans still easy
@asteroidbook345 @realSavageMan @ForwardUntoDawn
yo what about Blood on the Risers?
That one is my favorite
Also, The gun is supposed to be 30mm and the design was actually very successful so I'm not sure why you are saying it's not.
Aight how bout y’all chill ladies
@MassiveSimurgh @realSavageMan
I took the gyros off and added a few more things would you like me to link you to it?@BOXboy
I got that part, what I’m saying is that the 4 gyros aren’t even necessary and they degrade the handling. I have one just for yaw and that’s it. This is because normally, you have the rotors providing torque to turn the plane but in this case you need a yaw control so you need one gyro.
Try to steer clear of gyros on helicopters. While some can help in things like autopilot most of them do not help.
@BOXboy
Nice but it is a bit hard to control set all the torque attributes to 0 on the rotors and it should be good
Yeah the new F-15EX should be around for the next 5 decades. I kinda want to fly this plane when I get in the air force
Idea: V-280 but with jet engines instead of props. No wings so the engines would be close to the body and be tilted always.
I know I’m kind of a genius lol jk
@SCP1471 yeah, your weight is still way off. would you be ok with me helping you make a good flight model for this plane?
Its ok but it needs less control overlap.Also, you need to list your controls and the LG does not retract on this like the real Mi-35
@SCP1471 doesn't look bad just make sure your weight, wing loading, and thrust specs are correct when you finish. If the length is a bit off you can always scale it up a bit.
@SCP1471 Its actually easier to use a blueprint you don't have to guess on lots of stuff
@shipster They will be using F-15EXs for that role as well
@shipster The A-10s are way too vulnerable to be used in contested airspace. We would risk way too many casualties if we did that. If they went in with F-35s they would be the only tracks on radar anyways. If we want wild weasels well just use the Stand in Attack Weapon on the F-35 which is in development and mount them externally and internally.
Although longer band radars like that have a hard time obtaining a track and are normally just used on search radars and not utilized in track radars
So not rlly underrated
This is a dumb meme
Turns on Applause sign
Why aren’t you using a blueprint
We might just pick up some Rafale’s that would honestly be the best thing instead of building a new aircraft.
Ik these weren't copies I’m saying a good percentage of Chinese aircraft are foreign designs which have been reversed engineered or licensed@asteroidbook345
@CharlesDeGaulle Ah someone who finally understands stealth hahaha. Most radar s at the time it was designed was still X band and I think most AWACS are KU band. Yeah because it needed to fulfill a bunch of requirements from different nations it became a plane which was a hodgepodge of ideas. Yeah, 3 Fords sounds ok and I think they are gonna refurbish some Nimitz's. But that's just some speculation on my part.
reminds me of the F-135 jet engine. How I wish the F-35 had thrust vectoring
Although some are cool
@CharlesDeGaulle I'm not sure you can compare Rafale's 1-meter cross-section to the f-35s .005-meter RCS. Yes, it's not invisible but you would need a very powerful ground radar to actually get a detect and even if you do you still won't be able to get a track until the F-35 is in visual range and by that point, he has already fired 6 AMRAAMS at you. Yes, Rafael clearly wins in a dogfight but head to head at BVR the F-35 is going to win.
The helicopter carriers are much more adaptable than a supercarrier and you can get more for your money on the helicopter carriers than with supercarriers. That's why the US is trying to transition to an overwhelming number of small carriers which are lighter, faster, and more adaptable than regular carriers. The US will probably keep 3-4 of the big ones but they are just too expensive for the navy at this point.
Yeah, the F-15 is pretty awesome, when I head to flight school I'm gunning for an F-15EX or some other fast strike aircraft. The F-22 is cool but it certainly needs some work and a better HMCS. The F-35 is currently a mess so I wouldnt want to fly it at least until the fix its current engine problem.
i agree
@asteroidbook345 I know southwest works with Boeing and American might too
@asteroidbook345 i think maintenance is their own then
Yeah there are a lot of factors in this one. Was it an American Airlines or southwest? I can’t remember @FeiWu
Boeing creates the recommended timetable for maintenance. Also the plane was built in 1995 so only 25 years. I believe they are supposed to operate for 30-35 before they need a complete overhaul. If Boeing did not compensate for accelerated degradation it’s their fault. If the airline didn’t follow the correct plan it’s the airlines fault. But I think Boeing does maintenance for some airlines.
@asteroidbook345
Oh yeah sorry lol but Boeing is at fault for not doing more rigorous testing@asteroidbook345
Bc they didn’t check the engines often enough. Maintenance is a Boeing problem not a P&W problem. Even if it broke before the scheduled service time that just means Boeing didn’t do enough testing when they slapped it on. It’s funny though that Lockheed is digging Boeing’s grave. (Lockheed owns P&W)
Yerp it looks good@FasterThanLight
By the way I really do admire your airplanes you have there like the rafaeles and the typhoons which are some of my favorite fighters. So when I say you air power is inferior I’m not necessarily talking about development because Dassault is pretty much on the same page as other US contractors.@CharlesDeGaulle
Once again I will say that nuculear armament means almost nothing. This is because of mutually assured destruction. So nuclear weapons have little bearing on a modern conflict even one between Russia and the US. I am completely aware that Stalin was terrible but comparing Putin to him doesn’t make Putin any better. As for your comment about him stealing and it doesn’t hurt someone, he stole close to a billion dollars to build his Putin mansion. I’m sure someone else has to pay the price and somehow you are ok with that. Also, have you not seen the riots in Russia’s streets lately? These are all against Putin who does things like changing the constitution so when he leaves office he has immunity allowing him to be exempt from all laws. The man is a crime lord who has his best interests first. For the aircraft carrier incident I read from multiple places that the saphir only launched one salvo. One salvo would not be enough to take out the carrier and escorts but it would damage the aircraft carrier and serenely damage and frigate. So I’m not sure “sunk” is the correct word for that. Although, I’m sure we’ve learned our lesson after that one.
Another misconception you have is that ground vehicles are everything which is false as everyone knows you can’t have ground troops without air support. In the air support category France and Russia are sorely lacking. A single F-35 can take out 4 tanks a trip and not be shot down by air defenses because of its stealth coating. Get 15 F-35s and you can take out platoons at a time.
Yes you have one aircraft carrier. One. 😂
The reason why I’m recommending history sources is because your narrative widely strays from the actual history. That is the only reason. It is not ad-hominem I am honestly trying to help you. Even if you don’t think I’m correct at least read some of it.
As for complete capability I stand by those rankings as nuclear weapons are nothing in an actual war there are just fake threats used to push policy around the globe. They aren’t much more than that.
Here’s a great thesis paper which describes [this a bit] (https://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/doctrine/doe/younger.htm)
May I remind you that I have refuted most of your points earlier and that is why you are bringing up new arguments if you felt you were winning there would be no need for that. So you know when you say that I’m not creating a logical argument you know you are lying. It’s that simple.
@CharlesDeGaulle
Erm your ok. I advise that you build some replicas from blueprints to create a more realistic look on your fictional builds. Make sure you focus on details and that you don’t simplify lines