Good job! I’ve flown a 172 and you got stall physics just right! One thing: roll so normally the Cessna will roll a little bit more even after there is no input. I’m impressed with you doing even the ribs on all the surfaces! Lol it looks great man!
@Diloph I've tried to tell this community that realistic handling and acceleration is important to have a REPLICA if you have crazy specs then It is not a replica. Acceleration in SP depends on lbs of thrust and drag points. I like to make sure my plane has the correct lbs of thrust and then I move on to fine tuning the drag points to achieve realistic max speed and acceleration.
I’m trying to figure out a PID controller method but I can just give you my old one until I can derive the new one. The new one might be a submission into the funky trees challenge@PointlessWhyshouldi
ok lemme give you some advice since I actually made one... THE F-16 SUCKS TO MAKE! This was one of the first planes done with AutoCAD so they were able to make the shape super complex. Second, where the airbrakes are its actually sloped at about 15 degrees. Good job paneling but if you are paneling you probably need to make LG doors, a basic cockpit, and one more word of advice is to buy an f-16 model to find all of the details. Studying the airframe is key to building it. I made a lot of inaccuracies on mine that are little details because I didn't use a model or panel. on your custom surfaces use fuselage inlets. Refer to my build if you need to... the tails surface on mine is actually two pieces. Dont be afraid to try new techniques. The f-16 is HARD to build. I encourage you to take your time and spend time looking at the edges of the plane and how the fuselage flows. If you ever need any help on the F-16 just let me know.
check your turn rates on ur replicas for more realistic performance. You can also do a FBW using a base of ((clamp(((Trim / 2)+Pitch/clamp(((TAS/100)+.1),-100,100)),-1,1)) / 2) - clamp((AngleOfAttack / 300),-1,1) + (Roll / -3) you can take the roll off but the TAS is the speed at which your plane has the most effective turn rate. AOA controls how fast it turns. Looks great btw!
@ChiChiWerx
@jamesPLANESii
@Hedero
@BogdanX
@CRJPILOT900
@ACEPILOT109
F
Lol not too bad ! Lmao
+1Wow very cool! Reminds me of a Draken
A-10 + Me-262 + Corsair???
+2Good job! I’ve flown a 172 and you got stall physics just right! One thing: roll so normally the Cessna will roll a little bit more even after there is no input. I’m impressed with you doing even the ribs on all the surfaces! Lol it looks great man!
What did you change?
WHAT 5 pics!?
Another good build!
Looks okay, nice weapons, and you probably know what else I would say...
@Diloph thats okay, I understand it your build but if you want to get a feel for the real plane realistic handling is key
Overall it looks really good and is well built but the problem I have is that if its supposed to be a replica make it realistic
@Diloph I've tried to tell this community that realistic handling and acceleration is important to have a REPLICA if you have crazy specs then It is not a replica. Acceleration in SP depends on lbs of thrust and drag points. I like to make sure my plane has the correct lbs of thrust and then I move on to fine tuning the drag points to achieve realistic max speed and acceleration.
+1Man, I've taught y'all nothing about realistic acceleration and handling.
+1nice camo man!
Lol nice
Lol@AWESOMENESS360
Lol@AWESOMENESS360
Ok @Jerrrrrrrrry
Cool@PointlessWhyshouldi
Hey @SnoWFLakE0s what functions can you put inside a PID controller and are PIAnd D just numbers?
Btw never use fuselage cones and put the ra dome inside the nose
I’m trying to figure out a PID controller method but I can just give you my old one until I can derive the new one. The new one might be a submission into the funky trees challenge@PointlessWhyshouldi
@PointlessWhyshouldi Fly By Wire. Its extremely FT complicated
ALSO FLIGHT PERFORMANCE MATTERS USE A FBW.
ok lemme give you some advice since I actually made one... THE F-16 SUCKS TO MAKE! This was one of the first planes done with AutoCAD so they were able to make the shape super complex. Second, where the airbrakes are its actually sloped at about 15 degrees. Good job paneling but if you are paneling you probably need to make LG doors, a basic cockpit, and one more word of advice is to buy an f-16 model to find all of the details. Studying the airframe is key to building it. I made a lot of inaccuracies on mine that are little details because I didn't use a model or panel. on your custom surfaces use fuselage inlets. Refer to my build if you need to... the tails surface on mine is actually two pieces. Dont be afraid to try new techniques. The f-16 is HARD to build. I encourage you to take your time and spend time looking at the edges of the plane and how the fuselage flows. If you ever need any help on the F-16 just let me know.
check your turn rates on ur replicas for more realistic performance. You can also do a FBW using a base of ((clamp(((Trim / 2)+Pitch/clamp(((TAS/100)+.1),-100,100)),-1,1)) / 2) - clamp((AngleOfAttack / 300),-1,1) + (Roll / -3) you can take the roll off but the TAS is the speed at which your plane has the most effective turn rate. AOA controls how fast it turns. Looks great btw!
@MAHADI Actually the Anton has a very high roll rate. The D series has a slower roll rate.
@NightmareCorporation lol nice "tie" sort of
Cool! I always wanted to see this happen.. unfortunately I wasn’t able to do that on my TU-160
+2You could always finish this by paneling this looks good btw
I should have made a cockpit lol maybe I would have gotten 6th instead of 9th lol@BogdanX
Np@AircraftoftheRedStar
Thank you!@MAHADI
UAV GANG
+3yeah is is a bit too shiny it hurts my eyes lol. nice thinking tho real smart
redacted@Jesuslivesinyou uhh it would get grinded up? and poof
+1@XAircraftManufacturer np go ahead and check out the AQ linked above as well Im sure you'll like it
+1That is a dangerous website lmao
+2this is where the future of aviation may be but the weight makes it so it cant happen lol only 16 k pounds?!
+1damn this does not like the cobra lol its really fun to fly
@ACEPILOT109 nope I guess not
@ACEPILOT109 you know she blocked me on here never figured out why... did she ever post her old builds back up?
handling is not bad although the wing area is sky-high, but it looks great especially for a 6-hour build. NICE JOB!
lol it looks like a 29 part fish
@JohnnyBoythePilot thanks btw for the spotlight really helps!
+2@JohnnyBoythePilot lol
+2TRY THE AQ-175 TOO! ITS MY FAVORITE!