Flight stuff is defenately not perfect but better than most ppls Me-262s actually. I loved the livery and the way this plane was constructed! Great job and keep it up I added a spotlight to help.
Btw you also need to work on making the shape smooth which means that and fuselage pieces that stick out should be blended into the aircraft. Btw thanks for being nice abt the flight model thing some ppl can get real pissy abt it and you are quite nice. 🥳👍🏻
So on the nose and tail I felt like you just gave up on it as the nose is not accurate at all to the me262. The flight model accelerated too fast and it doesn’t have flaps and the way you did the gaps doesn’t look very good if you want to create that look use silver or black paint with a separator
I’m sorry to be rude but this is a high part count decoration if you going to put this much work into something to make it look realAustin make it fly realistic too.
You could probably afford to make it 400-500 parts plus it’s just the fuselage so I won’t end up taking too many parts. You can always take a rough estimate too@CMAircraftManufacture
Yeah I have the F-18 module in DCS so I pretty much have it down lol. I really only make planes that I’ve “flown” or that other ppl have flown and can give me feedback you can always make a forums post for flight model feedback b4 u finish@2Papi2Chulo
I don’t have patience I guess for nozzles lol I suck at making them I gotta make some better ones on my su-30 the ones I have rn are sort of temporary
@ArchibaldBalence
LG is landing gear and realistic flight model means it flies like the real plane. So same acceleration Turing speeds and radius and same amount of Gs pulled and AOA @ArchibaldBalence
Aaaaahhhghhhh! It looks so good but then you sold out on the unrealistic flight model! If it had a realistic flight model I would have said this is one of the best flankers on here. Btw the LG doesn’t tuck into the inlets they tuck into the bulges on the side of the inlets. Other than those things, amazing construction on this and if you ever need testing for something go ahead and let me know.
I don’t think it should be able to turn this fast but okay
Um I do t think the F-4 used 9Xs I think they only got up to Ps or Ms
Oh hello little plane you look so cold up there in the sky. Would you like a FLAK BLANKET?!
+4Flaps need to be fixed a bit but it looks good. Use fuselage inlets to create the trailing edge
Oof that would look sick motorized @KnightOfRen
K@TheTyphoon
I love ur work btw very nice quality
+1Flight stuff is defenately not perfect but better than most ppls Me-262s actually. I loved the livery and the way this plane was constructed! Great job and keep it up I added a spotlight to help.
+1Would you like to use an unfinished helicopter destroyer that I started building? It needs a lot but you might want to use it.
+1This is pretty cool pretty pretty cool
Texit lol@TheSavageManZ
Okie lemme look@TheSavageManZ
Lol 👍🏻@TheSavageManZ
Btw you also need to work on making the shape smooth which means that and fuselage pieces that stick out should be blended into the aircraft. Btw thanks for being nice abt the flight model thing some ppl can get real pissy abt it and you are quite nice. 🥳👍🏻
You can fix the speed brakes deploying that fast with the smooth function. This is really good btw
You can have the rotators move the flaps at a higher deflection when under speed. And by flaps I mean the mini wings inside the fuselage@ChiChiWerx
Ju-81+ Me-262
+2And also, it’s too wide
So on the nose and tail I felt like you just gave up on it as the nose is not accurate at all to the me262. The flight model accelerated too fast and it doesn’t have flaps and the way you did the gaps doesn’t look very good if you want to create that look use silver or black paint with a separator
Agreed@KLM_747
Huh wack sorry I don’t know this plane I just generally thought it would taper@Hedero
Nice bumper stickers lol I especially like the one that has that sign that starts with T and P
+1Wings need to taper but that’s it. I’m currently paneling my wings from here on out, they just look better
I’m sorry to be rude but this is a high part count decoration if you going to put this much work into something to make it look realAustin make it fly realistic too.
+8Can you do napalm in sp?@EternalDarkness
Noice
Ha
You could probably afford to make it 400-500 parts plus it’s just the fuselage so I won’t end up taking too many parts. You can always take a rough estimate too@CMAircraftManufacture
A little longer and if u used more parts to Crete the fuselage I think it would look superb. Good job on this.
Shamelessly copied from ur post lol
Question: how much of this is urs
Yeah I have the F-18 module in DCS so I pretty much have it down lol. I really only make planes that I’ve “flown” or that other ppl have flown and can give me feedback you can always make a forums post for flight model feedback b4 u finish@2Papi2Chulo
Really love the weapons btw @2Papi2Chulo
Lol btw flight model is a little off on AOA and turn radius but it’s pretty damn good @2Papi2Chulo
WTH how does this only have 14 ups?!!
Lol someone wrapped it in tin foil for the flight home.
+1I’d be up for that maybe a Su-25T or maybe something harder @ArchibaldBalence
I don’t have patience I guess for nozzles lol I suck at making them I gotta make some better ones on my su-30 the ones I have rn are sort of temporary
@ArchibaldBalence
Gs is G Force and AOA is angle of attack
LG is landing gear and realistic flight model means it flies like the real plane. So same acceleration Turing speeds and radius and same amount of Gs pulled and AOA @ArchibaldBalence
Lmao@BogdanX
Btw how did you construct the engine nozzles so well?
Aaaaahhhghhhh! It looks so good but then you sold out on the unrealistic flight model! If it had a realistic flight model I would have said this is one of the best flankers on here. Btw the LG doesn’t tuck into the inlets they tuck into the bulges on the side of the inlets. Other than those things, amazing construction on this and if you ever need testing for something go ahead and let me know.
Wings are not wide enough but it looks good
Any tips for drawing in isometric?
Wow that looks really good!
Lol@asteroidbook345
+1@Diloph lol
nice job on the shape try to get the Federal standard for that color next time so it is a more accurate color and it will look better
+2@Diloph ok that's fine but I'm just saying basing it on stuff is way easier and usually ends up looking better