14.0k ChrisPy Comments

  • German Corsair 3 5.3 years ago

    Ha

  • AD-B20-100 5.3 years ago

    You could probably afford to make it 400-500 parts plus it’s just the fuselage so I won’t end up taking too many parts. You can always take a rough estimate too@CMAircraftManufacture

  • AD-B20-100 5.3 years ago

    A little longer and if u used more parts to Crete the fuselage I think it would look superb. Good job on this.

  • Macchi C205 5.3 years ago

    Shamelessly copied from ur post lol

  • McDonnell F-4E Phantom II 5.3 years ago

    Question: how much of this is urs

  • F/A-18E Super Hornet (VFA-14) 5.3 years ago

    Yeah I have the F-18 module in DCS so I pretty much have it down lol. I really only make planes that I’ve “flown” or that other ppl have flown and can give me feedback you can always make a forums post for flight model feedback b4 u finish@2Papi2Chulo

  • F/A-18E Super Hornet (VFA-14) 5.3 years ago

    Really love the weapons btw @2Papi2Chulo

  • F/A-18E Super Hornet (VFA-14) 5.3 years ago

    Lol btw flight model is a little off on AOA and turn radius but it’s pretty damn good @2Papi2Chulo

  • F/A-18E Super Hornet (VFA-14) 5.3 years ago

    WTH how does this only have 14 ups?!!

  • Cake Air Force (Cake plane) 5.3 years ago

    Lol someone wrapped it in tin foil for the flight home.

    +1
  • 1992 Su-27 5.3 years ago

    I’d be up for that maybe a Su-25T or maybe something harder @ArchibaldBalence

  • 1992 Su-27 5.3 years ago

    I don’t have patience I guess for nozzles lol I suck at making them I gotta make some better ones on my su-30 the ones I have rn are sort of temporary
    @ArchibaldBalence

  • 1992 Su-27 5.3 years ago

    Gs is G Force and AOA is angle of attack

  • 1992 Su-27 5.3 years ago

    LG is landing gear and realistic flight model means it flies like the real plane. So same acceleration Turing speeds and radius and same amount of Gs pulled and AOA @ArchibaldBalence

  • YV-8S "SuperHarrier" 5.3 years ago

    Lmao@BogdanX

  • 1992 Su-27 5.3 years ago

    Btw how did you construct the engine nozzles so well?

  • 1992 Su-27 5.3 years ago

    Aaaaahhhghhhh! It looks so good but then you sold out on the unrealistic flight model! If it had a realistic flight model I would have said this is one of the best flankers on here. Btw the LG doesn’t tuck into the inlets they tuck into the bulges on the side of the inlets. Other than those things, amazing construction on this and if you ever need testing for something go ahead and let me know.

  • WRZZ 1-9 AB 5.3 years ago

    Wings are not wide enough but it looks good

  • Coming Soon 5.3 years ago

    Any tips for drawing in isometric?

  • Coming Soon 5.3 years ago

    Wow that looks really good!

  • F-16 5.3 years ago

    Lol@asteroidbook345

    +1
  • MiG-93 Corbound 5.3 years ago

    @Diloph lol

  • bell P-39 Airacobra 5.3 years ago

    nice job on the shape try to get the Federal standard for that color next time so it is a more accurate color and it will look better

    +2
  • MiG-93 Corbound 5.3 years ago

    @Diloph ok that's fine but I'm just saying basing it on stuff is way easier and usually ends up looking better

  • MiG-93 Corbound 5.3 years ago

    @Diloph it looks okay but it would definitely be better if it were in the same proportions as most military aircraft. Whenever I think abt building a fictional design I always draw a picture that incorporates design elements of different aircraft and then make sure it looks right. Always sketch your designs first helps a ton

  • F-16 5.3 years ago

    @asteroidbook345 its definitely not platinum but I will give credit where it's due this is a gold build.

    +1
  • J-10A Firebird PLAAF 5.3 years ago

    lol I watched the video the PLAAF put out for their J-10s. None of the stuff they were doing was correct and the displays they put on the screen aren't synced to the aircraft.
    watch

    +2
  • F-16 5.3 years ago

    Really nice funky trees btw. If you ever need build testing before a release tag me or someone like ChiChiWerx and BogdanX

    +1
  • F-16 5.3 years ago

    Wow this is going to be one of the first F-16s I've spotlighted. Good flight model except for the acceleration and speed. Good job on weapons, wings and nozzle. Just a few things... AIM-9X should have more maneuverability, it is supposed to be able to take high off bore sight shots pretty easily. Flaps come down when the gear does and the tail shape is a bit wonky. Other than those things this is an amazing build! Reminds me of my debut F-16. Great job! Keep working!

    +1
  • Me 262 P.1100 Gerfalke 5.3 years ago

    Wow I love the functionality of everything! Very in depth!

  • MiG-93 Corbound 5.3 years ago

    It would look better if it was t so long

  • MiG-93 Corbound 5.3 years ago

    Aghhh! The proportions! It’s like ur belgasub! Lmao

    +1
  • SodiumChloride the dummy will fight me irl 5.3 years ago

    Uhh where did he get the “it led you back to me”.... 😂 I figured it out@SodiumChloride

  • He-51?? 5.3 years ago

    C. It’s an He-51C

    +2
  • Can someone identify this? 5.3 years ago

    Nice! I was thinking an A-20G but the fuselage is too big.@BogdanX

  • 5k YAY! is mini plane 5.3 years ago

    I’ve never got NaN on speed and altitude before lmao

    +1
  • Using FT in RCNs to stabilize the plane in hover mode? 5.3 years ago

    It would only work for forwards and backwards tho

  • Using FT in RCNs to stabilize the plane in hover mode? 5.3 years ago

    Use FFFs gyro code for a base

  • [FT Request] Add delay to "infinite" rotators? 5.3 years ago

    Erg there was a post abt this earlier. It has something to do with clamp and lerp

    +1
  • Progress on the Su-30 SM1 and T-38 Talon 5.3 years ago

    Tanks I tried to make it look real smooth @MAHADI

  • J-5 A 5.3 years ago

    @asteroidbook345 I agree

  • Stall Warning Light 5.3 years ago

    @Noname918181 u can always change it

  • Progress on the Su-30 SM1 and T-38 Talon 5.3 years ago

    @ChiChiWerx I hope you like the Sukhoi engines that was a lot of work lol. btw the pics are fixed now

  • Progress on the Su-30 SM1 and T-38 Talon 5.3 years ago

    I fix
    @ItzP1N3APPLZ
    @MAHADI
    @asteroidbook345

    +1
  • Progress on the Su-30 SM1 and T-38 Talon 5.3 years ago

    @MAHADI with the s

  • German Corsair 5.3 years ago

    ok so this is now on page number three of all time planes

  • Progress on the Su-30 SM1 and T-38 Talon 5.3 years ago

    @asteroidbook345 you know how normally when you do the ![]( and then it automatically shifts down to the next line? Well for some reason its not working.

  • Curtiss P-40E Warhawk 5.3 years ago

    @Hedero yep happy building!