@KnightOfRen You can get a plane up to 800 parts on most devices 400 is a good part count you should shoot for. That doesn't have any lag on all devices even at high physics.
I got some things to help you out while building. Use more parts and don’t oversimplify curves and angles. When drawing or replicating something our brains want to simplify the lines. You have to take your time and be as accurate as possible. That’s how you make better planes. And not to be mean but it doesn’t look “blueprint accurate” at all.
BTW the US has over 2k aircraft that means the US could send over considerably more aircraft that we have in reserve. This also does not include our European allies and many more of our pacific ones...
Clearly you are the troublemaker here. You said that your country would easily invade. How is that not aggressive? The US will not give Taiwan F-35s because we are worried about a technology breach in Taiwan since many Taiwanese military officials have been caught sending sensitive data to China. Espionage operations in Taiwan make it a very dangerous place to sell the fighters. This is why 2016 Obama declined the sale of F-16s. The US alone currently has over 600 aircraft just in the pacific region. China has a total of 1000 viable combat fighters. The us also has about 20 destroyers and cruisers in the region and with Japanese, South Korean, and Taiwanese support the US side has about 1,400+ fighters, 100 destroyers/frigates, and 3 to 4 carriers in the area. I think the odds are considerably in our favor especially since the USAF is combat proven, the majority of the PLAAF has never seen combat.@MikeWallace
Lol, idk, you could do it with magnets I think and an activation group. You use the time delays like in the LG scripts and put it in there. Ik the delay stuff works with most gizmo parts. @AsteroidAsteroidTheBook
Really? Cause Taiwan has a lot of support from other countries. Invading would be suicide for the government, it would be the equivalent of the Germans invading Czechoslovakia. China is currently not capable of near peer war, while China has many advanced technologies, most of them aren’t reliable. For example China hasn’t found a way to make reliable and efficient afterburning turbofan engines. I doubt China will make an attempt on Taiwan in the next ten years. Their force size, structure, and efficiency is not where it needs to be to go to war. @MikeWallace
@EngineerOtaku whoops my internet is really bad so it'll repeat comments sometimes. There's no point to making a super fighter anyways it's just not fun cause it just destroys everything its the reason nukes arent fun in games
Uh is that a 2045 Trump thing? Mmmmm, don’t know how I feel about that bud. I would only vote for the better of two evils not bc I like him, just saying.@SavageMan
The don’t tread on me was a colonial flag dum dums. It never did or does have any political influence, today it is mostly a pseudo-military flag @SavageMan @spefyjerbf @jamesPLANESii
You know you don’t need the nuke mod right? You can use explosion scalar you make a “nuke” you just convert kilotons to kilograms then divide by 1.8 if you are using a boom 50
@KnightOfRen You can get a plane up to 800 parts on most devices 400 is a good part count you should shoot for. That doesn't have any lag on all devices even at high physics.
Also, the f-16 does not have an air brake like that. Anyways, keep building!
+1I got some things to help you out while building. Use more parts and don’t oversimplify curves and angles. When drawing or replicating something our brains want to simplify the lines. You have to take your time and be as accurate as possible. That’s how you make better planes. And not to be mean but it doesn’t look “blueprint accurate” at all.
+1😂 The FedEx truck is literally a package bazooka!
Kinda facts tho. Then they don’t have to be concerned on how to figure other stuff out and they can focus on building technique and structure
+1Nice presentation. Very cool.
Noice
LOOOOONG boi
BTW the US has over 2k aircraft that means the US could send over considerably more aircraft that we have in reserve. This also does not include our European allies and many more of our pacific ones...
Clearly you are the troublemaker here. You said that your country would easily invade. How is that not aggressive? The US will not give Taiwan F-35s because we are worried about a technology breach in Taiwan since many Taiwanese military officials have been caught sending sensitive data to China. Espionage operations in Taiwan make it a very dangerous place to sell the fighters. This is why 2016 Obama declined the sale of F-16s. The US alone currently has over 600 aircraft just in the pacific region. China has a total of 1000 viable combat fighters. The us also has about 20 destroyers and cruisers in the region and with Japanese, South Korean, and Taiwanese support the US side has about 1,400+ fighters, 100 destroyers/frigates, and 3 to 4 carriers in the area. I think the odds are considerably in our favor especially since the USAF is combat proven, the majority of the PLAAF has never seen combat.@MikeWallace
You can just do the beat IG. Ppl would still know what it is.@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook
Coolio
Lol, idk, you could do it with magnets I think and an activation group. You use the time delays like in the LG scripts and put it in there. Ik the delay stuff works with most gizmo parts. @AsteroidAsteroidTheBook
Good job on the carrier btw. You shouldn’t make aggressive statements on your post though.
Really? Cause Taiwan has a lot of support from other countries. Invading would be suicide for the government, it would be the equivalent of the Germans invading Czechoslovakia. China is currently not capable of near peer war, while China has many advanced technologies, most of them aren’t reliable. For example China hasn’t found a way to make reliable and efficient afterburning turbofan engines. I doubt China will make an attempt on Taiwan in the next ten years. Their force size, structure, and efficiency is not where it needs to be to go to war. @MikeWallace
+1It best have a "La Cucaracha" horn
You deserve more upvotes on ur stuff :(
+1this is pretty cool.
@EngineerOtaku whoops my internet is really bad so it'll repeat comments sometimes. There's no point to making a super fighter anyways it's just not fun cause it just destroys everything its the reason nukes arent fun in games
+1@EngineerOtaku LMAO I HATE ACE COMBAT. It will actually have realistic specs and weapons
@EngineerOtaku LMAO I HATE ACE COMBAT. It will actually have realistic specs and weapons
@EngineerOtaku LMAO I HATE ACE COMBAT. It will actually have realistic specs and weapons
No, I don’t think I did anything. I was just messing lol @BnanaX
Lol
Hey you should give me credit I helped you out like a none
Poser
It’s actually a BigBigTheTeaser
IDidIDidTheThing
Excuse me but I am inquiring about the lack of Stukas.
+6It seems you are missing the necessary 400 Stukas to start a blitzkrieg.
😂
I sold out to the trend
I sold out to the trend
Uh is that a 2045 Trump thing? Mmmmm, don’t know how I feel about that bud. I would only vote for the better of two evils not bc I like him, just saying.@SavageMan
+1Btw should have been a Texas flag with a come and take it flag. Lmao @SavageMan
It was based on Ben franklins join or die cartoon 😂
The don’t tread on me was a colonial flag dum dums. It never did or does have any political influence, today it is mostly a pseudo-military flag @SavageMan @spefyjerbf @jamesPLANESii
Jar jar binks
+2@WIZARD2017 thnx
@WIZARD2017 btw what type of nuke is on there
@WIZARD2017 Well how you got it to drop the bombs to drop from bottom to top
@WIZARD2017 I do want to inquire about how you got the bomb sequence to work
@WIZARD2017 oh shoot i tested it on an old edition of mobile i just realized it lol. It would have been cool if you made the turret an autoturret tho
You know you don’t need the nuke mod right? You can use explosion scalar you make a “nuke” you just convert kilotons to kilograms then divide by 1.8 if you are using a boom 50
This is also extremely unstable I would recommend using an extremely restrictive Fly By Wire
@ALRX I think the engines look weird from going to a large diameter to a very small one. I would consider making it larger.
Dude. Awesome! I’ve always wanted revamps of some of the old builds!
Me: I'm bored gonna look at forms
Website: Super Battleship 10 upvotes
Me: Huh Cool
Website: Click
Me: HOLY !&^@#&*!
Because ppl on here get turned on by stupid fuselage art
+1@Ruvien0Republic0Citizen @DOX
NOIIICE GERALD FORD! do things actually work on here, unlike rl lmao? What planes are on there?
kool thanks for this!
kool thanks for this!
+1