Uh is that a 2045 Trump thing? Mmmmm, don’t know how I feel about that bud. I would only vote for the better of two evils not bc I like him, just saying.@SavageMan
The don’t tread on me was a colonial flag dum dums. It never did or does have any political influence, today it is mostly a pseudo-military flag @SavageMan @spefyjerbf @jamesPLANESii
You know you don’t need the nuke mod right? You can use explosion scalar you make a “nuke” you just convert kilotons to kilograms then divide by 1.8 if you are using a boom 50
@BagelPlane most of the time it is due to too much drag and too much engine power most builds need only a max of 2-3k drag points unless its a cargo plane in which that can go to 5-10k. Then I adjust engine power accordingly. If its a replica, I always calculate proper engine power by dividing RL engine power by the stock engine power to get the power multiplier. After that, I adjust drag points to get the most realistic acceleration and top speed
btw i like your plane construction a lot! The engine power is kind of high though I understand its basically an upgraded A-10 but it shouldn't be accelerating like a fighter jet.
@BagelPlane Doesn't matter. Has a built-in sniper pod which is twice as accurate as the LITENING pod, plus its faster, lighter, more maneuverable, hard to get locked on by SAMs in the area, and its easier to deploy weapons. The F-35 actually has the A-10 beat. BTW using the gun is extremely dangerous in combat scenarios with adequate defenses, since you have to get within 3 miles to fire it, which is plenty of range for a Shilka, ZU-23, MANPAD, or other SAM to smack you out of the sky while you're trying for a strafe. And actually the F-35 was made with Air to Ground Employment in mind. Another point is even though it has 1/2 the weapon capacity, the F-35 can go three times as fast (no this is not an exaggeration) as the A-10 which means it can resupply at a base and even end up dumping more weapons on target depending on the base distance. I would do some research if I were you on the F-35, it's easy for everyone to trash it because it has bugs, but its the most capable airframe of all time, period.
Good job on this! There are some general shape issues that could be worked out, the amraams seem a but large, and it’s turn and acceleration specs are too high but you really took your time on this and it looks really nice and flies okay.Tip: use the “name” function in XML to name your weapons
also, make the explosion scalar smaller for more realistic damage. You have to basically eyeball the maneuverability of the missile and proximity detonation can be anywhere from 0-7m
Lol
Hey you should give me credit I helped you out like a none
Poser
It’s actually a BigBigTheTeaser
IDidIDidTheThing
Excuse me but I am inquiring about the lack of Stukas.
+6It seems you are missing the necessary 400 Stukas to start a blitzkrieg.
😂
I sold out to the trend
I sold out to the trend
Uh is that a 2045 Trump thing? Mmmmm, don’t know how I feel about that bud. I would only vote for the better of two evils not bc I like him, just saying.@SavageMan
+1Btw should have been a Texas flag with a come and take it flag. Lmao @SavageMan
It was based on Ben franklins join or die cartoon 😂
The don’t tread on me was a colonial flag dum dums. It never did or does have any political influence, today it is mostly a pseudo-military flag @SavageMan @spefyjerbf @jamesPLANESii
Jar jar binks
+2@WIZARD2017 thnx
@WIZARD2017 btw what type of nuke is on there
@WIZARD2017 Well how you got it to drop the bombs to drop from bottom to top
@WIZARD2017 I do want to inquire about how you got the bomb sequence to work
@WIZARD2017 oh shoot i tested it on an old edition of mobile i just realized it lol. It would have been cool if you made the turret an autoturret tho
You know you don’t need the nuke mod right? You can use explosion scalar you make a “nuke” you just convert kilotons to kilograms then divide by 1.8 if you are using a boom 50
This is also extremely unstable I would recommend using an extremely restrictive Fly By Wire
@ALRX I think the engines look weird from going to a large diameter to a very small one. I would consider making it larger.
Dude. Awesome! I’ve always wanted revamps of some of the old builds!
Me: I'm bored gonna look at forms
Website: Super Battleship 10 upvotes
Me: Huh Cool
Website: Click
Me: HOLY !&^@#&*!
Because ppl on here get turned on by stupid fuselage art
+1@Ruvien0Republic0Citizen @DOX
NOIIICE GERALD FORD! do things actually work on here, unlike rl lmao? What planes are on there?
kool thanks for this!
kool thanks for this!
+1Thank God ya'll said something abt this
@DOX you could talk to EternalDarkness abt it
@DOX it should violate the post pic editing rule. Normally its only supposed to be text or a pic of the aircraft itself
Did you say F-16?
Facts no point.
+1@Spectres u kinda right tho
AHAHAHAHA lol nice work
Noice
@BagelPlane most of the time it is due to too much drag and too much engine power most builds need only a max of 2-3k drag points unless its a cargo plane in which that can go to 5-10k. Then I adjust engine power accordingly. If its a replica, I always calculate proper engine power by dividing RL engine power by the stock engine power to get the power multiplier. After that, I adjust drag points to get the most realistic acceleration and top speed
btw i like your plane construction a lot! The engine power is kind of high though I understand its basically an upgraded A-10 but it shouldn't be accelerating like a fighter jet.
Wow! Well Done! You can try out the new smooth fuselage thing for the paneling on the cockpit btw. It would look much better.
@BagelPlane Doesn't matter. Has a built-in sniper pod which is twice as accurate as the LITENING pod, plus its faster, lighter, more maneuverable, hard to get locked on by SAMs in the area, and its easier to deploy weapons. The F-35 actually has the A-10 beat. BTW using the gun is extremely dangerous in combat scenarios with adequate defenses, since you have to get within 3 miles to fire it, which is plenty of range for a Shilka, ZU-23, MANPAD, or other SAM to smack you out of the sky while you're trying for a strafe. And actually the F-35 was made with Air to Ground Employment in mind. Another point is even though it has 1/2 the weapon capacity, the F-35 can go three times as fast (no this is not an exaggeration) as the A-10 which means it can resupply at a base and even end up dumping more weapons on target depending on the base distance. I would do some research if I were you on the F-35, it's easy for everyone to trash it because it has bugs, but its the most capable airframe of all time, period.
uh the F-35 DOES NOT suck in the ground attack role.
AGHHHHH your wings are always too small you need to make their depth/width larger! Other than that you always do a great job on these!
Yeah let me know anytime u want someone to look over some stuff on replicas and stuff@Anastvats
Good job on this! There are some general shape issues that could be worked out, the amraams seem a but large, and it’s turn and acceleration specs are too high but you really took your time on this and it looks really nice and flies okay.Tip: use the “name” function in XML to name your weapons
@CanadianSpitfireY2K yeah its my senior year of high school so i have a ton going on the next time I will have a lot of time to build is fall break
+1@CanadianSpitfireY2K idk maybe ill do an apache eventually that is if I stick around for long enough
@KnightOfRen IDK if I'll release it bc I don't want upvotes from it but I'll prob make an unlisted and link it in one of my upcoming builds.
been done but it normally floats on top of the water
been done but it normally floats on top of the water
also, make the explosion scalar smaller for more realistic damage. You have to basically eyeball the maneuverability of the missile and proximity detonation can be anywhere from 0-7m
+1did you know: The MiG 28s in Top gun consisted of 5 F-5s and one T-38A or C?
+1@CanadianSpitfireY2K prob a while from now. IDK what I would even do though. Suggestions?