While canards do have an effect on stealth it does not effect stealth qualities by much and is negligible if it has a stealth coating and the angles on the wings matches the canards.
Nice I always like your builds they are quite sleek. Im sure if you posted at better times you would get more upvotes. You are very underrated in my opinion
@WolfSpark I noticed that one but most of it depends on the altitude the higher you drop the more it spreads and you don't really have that problem. Even though some of the bombs explode mid-air they still spray part shrapnel everywhere. I could do a fix but IDK it might take forever. I took me a week alone to put the code inside the detachers.
@shipster yeah if that thing didn't break down it would have been awesome. Unfortunately, they tried a bunch of new things with it that didn't really work. The modern version of this is the littoral combat ships, oh those things drivetrains suck. They tried to use a combined gas and diesel gear and it just breaks the whole thing down.
My old pfp? Lmfao the bacon suit one? 😂decided it made me look like a meme player so I changed it. Lol the current one I have is a JAS-39 Gripen @zAerospace
See he worked for Honda this entire time! Lol why would they care about this website? That’s literally one of the funniest things I’ve ever heard!@EternalDarkness
I was saying the King tiger was underpowered I know it isn’t always about the caliber, most of the time it has to do with velocity and bullet weight helps sometimes. They improved on the tiger 1 with the king tigers high velocity gun. @shipster
Well I mean I was talking abt mostly stats such as armor, firepower, and K/D ratio but I see what you mean. It is not a reliable tank at all but it sure is a venerable foe. I think he’s talking 1 on 1 cuz the m4 and t34 were technologically not great tanks. They just had numbers. The KT II was basically an upgrade the spawn of the tiger I and the panther so I think of it as taking the best of both worlds from those two.
Ideally it wouldn’t have had such an underpowered engine and it would have been able to actually be able to be produced en masse. Another tank I feel that people forget a lot is the Russian IS-2. Pretty effective at countering German armor.@shipster
Panther out of those options but the King Tiger II was probably the best tank. Although it wasn’t mass produced to to lack of materials a KTII could take out an average of 8 Sherman’s before being put out of action. Most of the time it was taken out by artys or airplane bombs as the armor was much too thick for most allied guns.
Yeah I think that’s hard to do I mean there’s the b-29 tail way but that also isn’t great. I think I was able to do it on my FW-190 but I low key forgot lmao@Hedero
Hey I did notice something although it may have been too hard to implement. The tail section. If you look at pics the tail is blended although idk if there was a weird technique issue here
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook for it not to go in a 360 all you need is a clamp lol. IDK how to make the AI automatically start shooting at you tho on the B-29 so I am trying to figure that out.
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook the problem with auto-aiming tail turrets are the dorsal turrets those things are weird to code. I had an AI B-17 I reworked with auto-turrets. The tail is easy but everything else I pretty hard to do.
Ok everyone chill out. I am quite versed in business so let me try to explain this. There is a difference between profit and revenue. Most of that 4 million (if that figure is right) will go back into the business or go to costs and little is actually leftover as it takes a lot of money to run a video game platform. There's money going to servers, development costs, employee payments, which are probably average, and there's a multitude going other places. Subtract the costs from the revenue and you get profit, probably not much since the costs of the videogame world. If that figure is even scaled the same thing happens. Like @WNP78 said, they dont have 16 extra employees so revenue is also probably less.
Yeah looks deep fried lmao@NightmareCorporation
How tf do you have time to do this
It’s a Su-24 attack aircraft. The game just calls it a hellkeska cuz it’s an off brand@016Hiro
I mean it’s not that big a deal, I just like educating ppl abt this stuff@Homemade1
+1While canards do have an effect on stealth it does not effect stealth qualities by much and is negligible if it has a stealth coating and the angles on the wings matches the canards.
I wish
+3Harrier sold separatelyWhat is the hatch on the back for? Im interested how this thing works in RL
@shipster lol XD
Nice I always like your builds they are quite sleek. Im sure if you posted at better times you would get more upvotes. You are very underrated in my opinion
@Kangy thanks
+1@WolfSpark I noticed that one but most of it depends on the altitude the higher you drop the more it spreads and you don't really have that problem. Even though some of the bombs explode mid-air they still spray part shrapnel everywhere. I could do a fix but IDK it might take forever. I took me a week alone to put the code inside the detachers.
@ArkRoyalTheDDhunter this is what I get for coming on to forums I should have known better
ok let me just say the way you did the sphere was genius lmao
@edensk watch me make a snake next lol jk
@WolfSpark Hey, That cluster munition was awesome. You probably just didn't attach it right or smthn. Thanks though
@shipster yeah if that thing didn't break down it would have been awesome. Unfortunately, they tried a bunch of new things with it that didn't really work. The modern version of this is the littoral combat ships, oh those things drivetrains suck. They tried to use a combined gas and diesel gear and it just breaks the whole thing down.
+1Oh ok lol@OwO
Wut lol@OwO
My old pfp? Lmfao the bacon suit one? 😂decided it made me look like a meme player so I changed it. Lol the current one I have is a JAS-39 Gripen @zAerospace
Thnx@tsampoy
See he worked for Honda this entire time! Lol why would they care about this website? That’s literally one of the funniest things I’ve ever heard!@EternalDarkness
Lol I know most ppl haven’t seen it@rexzion
Low key funny no one ever upvoted my half track! That thing was dope! Guess I just posted it at the wrong time @KnightOfRen @rexzion
Lol thanks@Embo
Weapons are fun to make but I build fighters mostly, i think.@cyanidepls
I was saying the King tiger was underpowered I know it isn’t always about the caliber, most of the time it has to do with velocity and bullet weight helps sometimes. They improved on the tiger 1 with the king tigers high velocity gun. @shipster
Where’d you get the heli in the background btw?
Coolio
Yo these paneling skills are for real! 😱
Wait a second does this have a coffin dance? It should lol
I was about to say you don’t deserve it but now I know you really don’t you click-baiting troll lmao
Well I mean I was talking abt mostly stats such as armor, firepower, and K/D ratio but I see what you mean. It is not a reliable tank at all but it sure is a venerable foe. I think he’s talking 1 on 1 cuz the m4 and t34 were technologically not great tanks. They just had numbers. The KT II was basically an upgrade the spawn of the tiger I and the panther so I think of it as taking the best of both worlds from those two.
Ideally it wouldn’t have had such an underpowered engine and it would have been able to actually be able to be produced en masse. Another tank I feel that people forget a lot is the Russian IS-2. Pretty effective at countering German armor.@shipster
I don’t even know
Ok but if you have crappy internet like me sometimes, it will post it three times due to the sever not responding in time. So yeah. Bad idea.
Panther out of those options but the King Tiger II was probably the best tank. Although it wasn’t mass produced to to lack of materials a KTII could take out an average of 8 Sherman’s before being put out of action. Most of the time it was taken out by artys or airplane bombs as the armor was much too thick for most allied guns.
F-35 now stop trashing it
Yeah I think that’s hard to do I mean there’s the b-29 tail way but that also isn’t great. I think I was able to do it on my FW-190 but I low key forgot lmao@Hedero
Hey I did notice something although it may have been too hard to implement. The tail section. If you look at pics the tail is blended although idk if there was a weird technique issue here
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook oh you dont have to be level???!!!
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook hmmm well i saw someone do it with a gepard but idk how
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook for it not to go in a 360 all you need is a clamp lol. IDK how to make the AI automatically start shooting at you tho on the B-29 so I am trying to figure that out.
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook wait nope it was a b-29
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook the problem with auto-aiming tail turrets are the dorsal turrets those things are weird to code. I had an AI B-17 I reworked with auto-turrets. The tail is easy but everything else I pretty hard to do.
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook wow you really had to do some idea stealing lol
dats kool
go stick your head in the dishwasher. for fun. jk lmao
You had my hopes up, but I was sorrily disappointed when I compared the images! The last three look much more realistic. lol gotcha
+1Ok everyone chill out. I am quite versed in business so let me try to explain this. There is a difference between profit and revenue. Most of that 4 million (if that figure is right) will go back into the business or go to costs and little is actually leftover as it takes a lot of money to run a video game platform. There's money going to servers, development costs, employee payments, which are probably average, and there's a multitude going other places. Subtract the costs from the revenue and you get profit, probably not much since the costs of the videogame world. If that figure is even scaled the same thing happens. Like @WNP78 said, they dont have 16 extra employees so revenue is also probably less.
I thought the devs said they weren't gonna do SP2