Just me being me whenever I see someone make an afterburner;
In most aircraft, the afterburner detent is at about 80% throttle. I don't really care for having an action group for it, but I'll let it slide.
And for rEaLIsm, the F-16's flaps are controlled automatically. They go down with the gear.
@SeagullOnWood
I under stand funky trees, but I have no clue what the heck is happening in this script.
If you don’t mind me asking, a version of this with with a G-LOC and redout veritable for disabling controls.
I would do it myself, but I’m too dumb.
:)
If the climbing and descend speed is supposed to be V^Y, then it should be 75MPH not knots.
It would be about 73.8kts (or 74 if you round up).
Not a huge deal. Just something I noticed.
I new the V^Y was 74kts, I just wasn’t sure if it was for the C152 or C172. Google says that’s the C172’s V^Y.
Sorry for the tangential comment lol
Just searched it up, I never thought a F-5 could carry AGM-65s, but they can. However, if this is from a similar time to the movie, they would not, it was only after 1995.
Sorry for being such a critic, I do think this is a cool build!
I have flown this multiple times. It’s one of my favorite GA aircraft. As a… *ahem* vertically challenged person, I like the small and compact nature of this plane. I think it’s cozy :)
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes
I clicked on the link fully prepared to close the tap as quick as humanly possible, all for it to actually be a legitimate link.
@ToeTips
It does feel really underpowered, butI don’t want to go over 200hp. It accelerates in a dive really quickly, but I think that’s because I reduced a bunch of drafts make it feel a less underpowered (didn’t do too much), I did code some stuff to make the rear gun only fire when you are in the turrets and you aren’t pointing at the vertical stabilizer. Now thinking about it I could make it so the main guns won’t fire when using the turret.
The last sentence in the second paragraph is a major run on, and AIM (as in AIM-9 Sidewinder) is spelled (or capitalized I guess?) AIM a or AiM. Sorry, I’ve just had grammar hammered into my skull.
This looks amazing, the one thing that would make it better would be turning on smooth front and back on the fuselage pieces.
My Gripes:
You wouldn’t be able to fit a gun in the place it is on this, and the gasses from firing it would go straight into the air intake. The cockpit is too short (you can barely see over it), but that’s it! Other than that this is awesome, this should be front page!
I'll have to test this out later, then I'll give my input
+1@GuardianAerospace @Mousewithamachinegun123
+2I'm not out, spotlight time!
Never mind, it's out!
T
Looks sweet!
@Eggplant
+1That's why I fly the Tomcat ;)
And don't take that comment as an insult, just pitching in my two cents.
Just me being me whenever I see someone make an afterburner;
In most aircraft, the afterburner detent is at about 80% throttle. I don't really care for having an action group for it, but I'll let it slide.
And for rEaLIsm, the F-16's flaps are controlled automatically. They go down with the gear.
Looks incredible!
+1The wings should only fold about 90 degrees.
Sorry for being that guy.
Hmm, interesting design. I haven't seen a gyrocopter/autogyro with a pull prop configuration.
@KornAerospace
650 parts.
I just uploaded an aircraft yesterday (3 hours after this), would it be possible to use it in this challenge?
I might still work on it further.
Is this what the F-104 pilots saw when they looked at their plane?
+3Eh, close enough
Speaking of which, does anyone here with VR mind being a test pilot for my plane?
Hope I make it in time, but I've got a great build brewing!
Yes? Is this the 'merican government? Yes, I found some oil you might wanna dri-
MURICA
150 UPVOTES GUYS!!! DO IT!!!
@SeagullOnWood
I under stand funky trees, but I have no clue what the heck is happening in this script.
If you don’t mind me asking, a version of this with with a G-LOC and redout veritable for disabling controls.
I would do it myself, but I’m too dumb.
:)
...- . .-. -.-- / -.-. --- -. ..-. ..- ... .. -. --.
+1@Pan @TheCommentaryGuy
Oh no... don't get me started on my hight
@Mousewithamachinegun123
You never know…
If the climbing and descend speed is supposed to be V^Y, then it should be 75MPH not knots.
It would be about 73.8kts (or 74 if you round up).
Not a huge deal. Just something I noticed.
I new the V^Y was 74kts, I just wasn’t sure if it was for the C152 or C172. Google says that’s the C172’s V^Y.
Sorry for the tangential comment lol
Jericho trumpet intensifies
Just searched it up, I never thought a F-5 could carry AGM-65s, but they can. However, if this is from a similar time to the movie, they would not, it was only after 1995.
Sorry for being such a critic, I do think this is a cool build!
The interior’s a bit scuffed, but the rest of the plane looks great!
+1I have flown this multiple times. It’s one of my favorite GA aircraft. As a… *ahem* vertically challenged person, I like the small and compact nature of this plane. I think it’s cozy :)
+1MiG-28, not MIG 28. Yes, I’m like that.
Oh no, he’s cracked the code… this is how they designed the A-10…
@Mousewithamachinegun123
You don’t happen to know anyone with SimplePlanes VR who could help me do you?
@Mousewithamachinegun123
Oh yeah, violin sounds… less than great when starting out. I’m sure it’s really discouraging.
@Mousewithamachinegun123
Practice...
And I realized I underestimated my skills.
@Maverick09
If DCS is anything to go by, afterburner should be around 80% throttle, not 95%.
AHH
@oldmate52
Go ahead, it’s open.
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes
+1I clicked on the link fully prepared to close the tap as quick as humanly possible, all for it to actually be a legitimate link.
I know I’m four and a half years late, but if you still need it, I’ll help.
@ToeTips
It does feel really underpowered, butI don’t want to go over 200hp. It accelerates in a dive really quickly, but I think that’s because I reduced a bunch of drafts make it feel a less underpowered (didn’t do too much), I did code some stuff to make the rear gun only fire when you are in the turrets and you aren’t pointing at the vertical stabilizer. Now thinking about it I could make it so the main guns won’t fire when using the turret.
Too many…
Uh… at least five. Then again pretty much all of my builds aren’t really ever done, just like art.
@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore
That’s what I like to call it.
@Aviation
I did
The last sentence in the second paragraph is a major run on, and AIM (as in AIM-9 Sidewinder) is spelled (or capitalized I guess?) AIM a or AiM. Sorry, I’ve just had grammar hammered into my skull.
@TjEDM
+1You’re already up there with the best!
@TjEDHow new to SimplePlanes are you?
Oh no… not another Tomcat that I’m gonna judge way to harshly…
This looks amazing, the one thing that would make it better would be turning on smooth front and back on the fuselage pieces.
My Gripes:
+1You wouldn’t be able to fit a gun in the place it is on this, and the gasses from firing it would go straight into the air intake. The cockpit is too short (you can barely see over it), but that’s it! Other than that this is awesome, this should be front page!
@Walvis
How did you get the mouse to work as an axis? I tried but it doesn't detect it?
@Randomplayer
Bit of a run on with some of those sentences.
I’m disappointed.
There’s no WSO (Spelled WSO not WISO) onboard the F-14, it’s a RIO.
It's my biggest fan!
+3Now Imma use about fifty thousand of these to make a plane fly.
@Rolis
Thanks! :)
@ToeTips
You want a sneak peak of it? I can tag you on the unlisted post if you want.