@BigDoggo
No I wasn't saying it is bad, it is just not AS good.
not AS good does not mean it is bad, I am just saying.
In fact...it is quire decent (it is just that the boxy look of a van kind of hinders the amount of detail you can put onto it and therefore It wasn't too great at first look)
But it works well.
@IzzyIA
These gears are solid! Absolutely the best ones I have seen in the game.
I guess the gyros are for starting the engine...seems like they are not doing anything.
Oh, my 6 year old DELL XPS runs it perfectly fine. (haven't checked the physics, but the desktop have a much higher base quality)
Cool stuff. (I guess make a two-cylinder engine with the same amount of pistons will maybe result better. IDK just guessing)
Good luck with that!
@RailfanEthan
Since these bullet does no damage I think it is possible to create puller-thrusting mechanisms(and I was already tinkering around it)
What should it be called? Water engine?
@breitling
I just know it is a tiltwing and they pack a huge amount of lift(50,000 pounds!)
They were different from tilt-rotor craft like the osprey so had to fly it differently, but I don't know how.
@sexylips35
I tried to make a gun-engine helicopter but that one end up in its own flames(like that one failed)
But I built another tilt-wing with normal engine(because I want to) and that became the 35,000 pound lifting beast
@RailfanEthan
You could've totally hooked the engine up to "pitch", so the fire hose won't need pressing number buttons (on a computer it is fine, but could be a bit tedious on mobile)
water heals...interesting.
Drink more water!
The gauge actually turns! :D
I know you are trying to make the steering wheel turn, but the wheel is round...so you can't actually notice that.(very subtle change but almost none)
putting lights onto it...
@MethaManAircraft @TTHHSSSS
I really want to fly it in real life...
How much do you think a actual one (built by Airbus) cost?
100% carbon-fiber wings could be very expensive...
@WIZARD2017
I am not very impressed/happy about the wings being fake, but I love the amount of work you put into it. The full version runs fine on low graphics(yep, at 30 fps or more on a iPad Air 2).
This type of plane have humongous lift-30,000 pounds with 4x2000 horsepower propeller engine and nothing else. Absolutely monstrous, while still able to fly as a normal plane.
@sexylips35
Well if things explode (because of engine, then sorry, check your physics setting-a low physics setting makes bullets calculated incorrectly and of course...)
If it is the grand slam, take it out.
@haidebiany
2 years ago, when "hacky" things did not exist yet, you created this. No gyro, no VTOL engine's help, just the propeller engine. Technical marvel.
@Othawne
Looks really good, but consider having things to be a lot faster if you want to see it on a plane.
I like the mechanism. but because of stupid physics (no matter the actual "physics" quality setting the mechanism is not realizable. At least on my device it decide to stop working when throttle is greater than 30%.
@breitling
Listen:
3D print it and make it your own trophy
Congrats!
no scaled parts? Oh **, man!
Not shoot for gold (as I am)!
In fact the VTOL engine(the thrust) should be hooked up to throttle and VTOL nozzle to VTOL(for rotating)
@Shocktrooper7591
Can do better at the front, it is ugly...
Hey, try use the "nudge part" thing to nudge the cockpit somewhere else if you want to use other things as the cockpit. (the cockpit sucks)
@otto344
Normally I wouldn't be uploading something like this, but if it is realistic (like my Cessna 172), then sure. This thing deserve an upload. In fact sometimes returning to simplicity results a good time here. Just like it would be in a real one.
Hence the name "SIMPLE PLANES"
@RailfanEthan
I have the thing called school too, but it is okay. Just wondering if you make something other than trains (that should be a yes, right?)
@breitling
I need to pay attention on upvoting or else you might surpass me!
Just kidding...I upvote anything I like
Oh, and you just inspired me to create something like this...
@RailfanEthan
Awww...
Fix it!
I fixed my own laptop-changed the keyboard, cleaned the board, the fan, the cooling system, redone the system, and now it was running quite well.
It was a DELL. 6 years old!
@Minecraftpoweer
Well, it still was one of the only three that have hydraulic suspension in the entire game and the most powerful of all.
I will probably get the Kranvagen for now...
You sure this thing's name is correct? Just asking.
@TTHHSSSS
It flies fine, but as soon as you turn on the "thrust vectoring", it threatens to throw you out of the sky. 180 on a dime sounds good but will lead to stall and...burnt stuff.
Cool idea, although I have used something like that on my wingless flying machine.
@Kaos @TTHHSSSS
No this plane's noce was fine.
The best nose in avoiding drag was in fact not sharp-the sharp one slice through air, but because it is pointy the rushing air will flow past the surface at extreme speed and slow things down. The blunt one will work fine in slower speed, but once it reaches high speed it acts as a "shield" that just magically direct the fast-flowing air around the plane. You doubt me, check the nose on the Spaceshuttles.
Some mistake people sometimes make...
I like this bush plane, but maybe consider having a slightly "thicker" wing-like, increase in width. NOT WINGSPAN!
There are functions the AI don't use (like the flaps). I guess it was... decent. (it won't be hard to build a NORMAL plane and let the AI fly it, would it?)
@Minecraftpoweer
Last time I login and look at that thing was over three month ago. I was not concerned about the gun elevation (up and down), but the gun tranverse (how much the gun can move without moving the hull.) if the tranverse was more than -7,7 in siege mode, then this is what I am looking for.
I guess there is no gun tranverse...?
It do have SOLID dpm.
@andy12347
It was really popular and just the 182 have something like 10 different setups with different landing gear and propeller blade count, with or without floats.
The floats should be a bit narrower, but this one is good enough.
Like it.
@Minecraftpoweer
I really want this thing just because it was a awesome sniper and the HYDRAULIC SUSPENSION!
I thought you have gun tranverse when in siege mode... no?
Yes, the rear is not for fuel. Probably things like tools and stuff.
I really like the gun. BUT, the break nozzle was wrong. (it's okay, just take it off)
The saw-off shorter gun the UDEC and the later model have was a square muzzle breaker
@Minecraftpoweer
It used to be the ultimate lord of terror, with 3360 burst damage able to outright kill a maus
I am putting guns you have on the Strv 103B onto this thing...
@CCXRCC
Oh I was thinking because if you go too quickly the front wheel will go nuts and sometimes the piston explodes and say parts damaged: piston
I was thinking why are you using pistons...
Yep the rear brakes first I was not knowing what I am typing...
@CCXRCC
Very nice!
I personally do not really like road bikes just because the skinny tires. I have MADE a mountain bike from a scavenged bike frame (GT bikes) and bought decent mountain wheel sets (Mavic) and very, very old Shimano 3x8 derailleur. I plan on replacing my current tire (small-block-eight by KENDA) with something more fitting with long-distance urban travel (like, 12 miles! a day). No rack, it still will be a RUGGED commuter.(Suspension was good enough, a ancient DOWN-HILL suspension fork, so going up the pavement is just simple-you ride directly up at it.)
Upvote for effort and derailleur.
OOO Shimano 105! XDDDD
Very nice...
Garmin make bike computers? Mine use a ancient SIGMA one.
Front brake first?
Still works just as well.
But why do you need pistons?
Awww you could have mechanized the derailleur by putting rotators(at least some visuals) but this is more than good.
@rlwn3680 I wounld not upload this plane-it is the same as the person who made it-I would get this off the shelf if were you. I am about to report this as being a spam, you know. Please fix this.
@jamesPLANESii
~~It probably won't based on how it flys~~ It would be a nice thing, though. Moving the wings up forward by 1 block (0.5 unit) will solve he problem.
Probably too many landing gear though...
@BigDoggo
No I wasn't saying it is bad, it is just not AS good.
not AS good does not mean it is bad, I am just saying.
In fact...it is quire decent (it is just that the boxy look of a van kind of hinders the amount of detail you can put onto it and therefore It wasn't too great at first look)
But it works well.
@IzzyIA
These gears are solid! Absolutely the best ones I have seen in the game.
I guess the gyros are for starting the engine...seems like they are not doing anything.
Oh, my 6 year old DELL XPS runs it perfectly fine. (haven't checked the physics, but the desktop have a much higher base quality)
Cool stuff. (I guess make a two-cylinder engine with the same amount of pistons will maybe result better. IDK just guessing)
Good luck with that!
This one, on the other hand, wasn't as good as the other one...
Still, upvotes.
@BigDoggo
Don't thank me. It deserve it.
@RailfanEthan
Since these bullet does no damage I think it is possible to create puller-thrusting mechanisms(and I was already tinkering around it)
What should it be called? Water engine?
@breitling
I just know it is a tiltwing and they pack a huge amount of lift(50,000 pounds!)
They were different from tilt-rotor craft like the osprey so had to fly it differently, but I don't know how.
@sexylips35
+1I tried to make a gun-engine helicopter but that one end up in its own flames(like that one failed)
But I built another tilt-wing with normal engine(because I want to) and that became the 35,000 pound lifting beast
@RailfanEthan
You could've totally hooked the engine up to "pitch", so the fire hose won't need pressing number buttons (on a computer it is fine, but could be a bit tedious on mobile)
water heals...interesting.
Drink more water!
The gauge actually turns! :D
I know you are trying to make the steering wheel turn, but the wheel is round...so you can't actually notice that.(very subtle change but almost none)
putting lights onto it...
@MethaManAircraft @TTHHSSSS
I really want to fly it in real life...
How much do you think a actual one (built by Airbus) cost?
100% carbon-fiber wings could be very expensive...
@sexylips35
+1Ah...
You kind of stole my idea...but I created a VTOL BEAST that lifts 35,000 pound using normal engines
@WIZARD2017
I am not very impressed/happy about the wings being fake, but I love the amount of work you put into it. The full version runs fine on low graphics(yep, at 30 fps or more on a iPad Air 2).
This type of plane have humongous lift-30,000 pounds with 4x2000 horsepower propeller engine and nothing else. Absolutely monstrous, while still able to fly as a normal plane.
@sexylips35
+1Well if things explode (because of engine, then sorry, check your physics setting-a low physics setting makes bullets calculated incorrectly and of course...)
If it is the grand slam, take it out.
@haidebiany
+42 years ago, when "hacky" things did not exist yet, you created this. No gyro, no VTOL engine's help, just the propeller engine. Technical marvel.
@Othawne
Probably because I don't have the mod.
Looks nice. (And I was already playing around your gears)
@SpiritusRaptor
+1But when I was looking for lift and maneuverability, I went here.
@Othawne
Looks really good, but consider having things to be a lot faster if you want to see it on a plane.
I like the mechanism. but because of stupid physics (no matter the actual "physics" quality setting the mechanism is not realizable. At least on my device it decide to stop working when throttle is greater than 30%.
@breitling
Listen:
3D print it and make it your own trophy
Congrats!
no scaled parts? Oh **, man!
Not shoot for gold (as I am)!
In fact the VTOL engine(the thrust) should be hooked up to throttle and VTOL nozzle to VTOL(for rotating)
@Shocktrooper7591
Can do better at the front, it is ugly...
Hey, try use the "nudge part" thing to nudge the cockpit somewhere else if you want to use other things as the cockpit. (the cockpit sucks)
@Shocktrooper7591
You should make a lancaster like O do sometime...
@Shocktrooper7591
For the first big plane, I have seen a lot worse
@otto344
Normally I wouldn't be uploading something like this, but if it is realistic (like my Cessna 172), then sure. This thing deserve an upload. In fact sometimes returning to simplicity results a good time here. Just like it would be in a real one.
Hence the name "SIMPLE PLANES"
@Jundroo Fix this.
@RailfanEthan
I have the thing called school too, but it is okay. Just wondering if you make something other than trains (that should be a yes, right?)
@breitling
Haven't even started it yet.....
I said "to create" meaning I haven't created yet
@otto344
And those are the "basic plane" controls so if your plane use normal control it would be fine.
Oh, and the landing gear will always be "up".
Excluding the landing gear, it is only three part count from the simplest flyable machine(with engine, of course.)
@breitling
I need to pay attention on upvoting or else you might surpass me!
Just kidding...I upvote anything I like
Oh, and you just inspired me to create something like this...
@Aginuzo For one second I was not recognizing it.
Turns out you just have the roof up.
Well, TIN LIZZLE it is.
@RailfanEthan
Awww...
Fix it!
I fixed my own laptop-changed the keyboard, cleaned the board, the fan, the cooling system, redone the system, and now it was running quite well.
It was a DELL. 6 years old!
@Minecraftpoweer
Well, it still was one of the only three that have hydraulic suspension in the entire game and the most powerful of all.
I will probably get the Kranvagen for now...
You sure this thing's name is correct? Just asking.
@TTHHSSSS
It flies fine, but as soon as you turn on the "thrust vectoring", it threatens to throw you out of the sky. 180 on a dime sounds good but will lead to stall and...burnt stuff.
Cool idea, although I have used something like that on my wingless flying machine.
@Kaos @TTHHSSSS
No this plane's noce was fine.
The best nose in avoiding drag was in fact not sharp-the sharp one slice through air, but because it is pointy the rushing air will flow past the surface at extreme speed and slow things down. The blunt one will work fine in slower speed, but once it reaches high speed it acts as a "shield" that just magically direct the fast-flowing air around the plane. You doubt me, check the nose on the Spaceshuttles.
Some mistake people sometimes make...
I like this bush plane, but maybe consider having a slightly "thicker" wing-like, increase in width. NOT WINGSPAN!
@Gestour
Really? I thought that you would say "this is a piece of junk" because there is so few parts.
Well if you say so...thanks! :)
@otto344
Is it hard to build a plane so the AI flies it?
@RenxBlake
Really nice!
Better than mine in terms of looks, but could've done better over physics...(something people really don't care much)
There are functions the AI don't use (like the flaps). I guess it was... decent. (it won't be hard to build a NORMAL plane and let the AI fly it, would it?)
@RailfanEthan
You earned it.
Do you make anything other than rail-related items lately?
@Minecraftpoweer
Last time I login and look at that thing was over three month ago. I was not concerned about the gun elevation (up and down), but the gun tranverse (how much the gun can move without moving the hull.) if the tranverse was more than -7,7 in siege mode, then this is what I am looking for.
I guess there is no gun tranverse...?
It do have SOLID dpm.
@andy12347
It was really popular and just the 182 have something like 10 different setups with different landing gear and propeller blade count, with or without floats.
The floats should be a bit narrower, but this one is good enough.
Like it.
@Minecraftpoweer
I really want this thing just because it was a awesome sniper and the HYDRAULIC SUSPENSION!
I thought you have gun tranverse when in siege mode... no?
Yes, the rear is not for fuel. Probably things like tools and stuff.
I really like the gun. BUT, the break nozzle was wrong. (it's okay, just take it off)
The saw-off shorter gun the UDEC and the later model have was a square muzzle breaker
@Minecraftpoweer
It used to be the ultimate lord of terror, with 3360 burst damage able to outright kill a maus
I am putting guns you have on the Strv 103B onto this thing...
Quite good.
@RailfanEthan
+1"pwn"ed being the word..
@Mostly
Really want this thing just because of its tracks. I mean in World of Tanks.
The Kranvagen also is a solid autoloader with decent armor.
@CCXRCC
+1Oh I was thinking because if you go too quickly the front wheel will go nuts and sometimes the piston explodes and say parts damaged: piston
I was thinking why are you using pistons...
Yep the rear brakes first I was not knowing what I am typing...
@CCXRCC
+1Very nice!
I personally do not really like road bikes just because the skinny tires. I have MADE a mountain bike from a scavenged bike frame (GT bikes) and bought decent mountain wheel sets (Mavic) and very, very old Shimano 3x8 derailleur. I plan on replacing my current tire (small-block-eight by KENDA) with something more fitting with long-distance urban travel (like, 12 miles! a day). No rack, it still will be a RUGGED commuter.(Suspension was good enough, a ancient DOWN-HILL suspension fork, so going up the pavement is just simple-you ride directly up at it.)
Upvote for effort and derailleur.
OOO Shimano 105! XDDDD
Very nice...
Garmin make bike computers? Mine use a ancient SIGMA one.
Front brake first?
Still works just as well.
But why do you need pistons?
Awww you could have mechanized the derailleur by putting rotators(at least some visuals) but this is more than good.
@TrainDude
How do you do that link???
Looks better.
@rlwn3680 I wounld not upload this plane-it is the same as the person who made it-I would get this off the shelf if were you. I am about to report this as being a spam, you know. Please fix this.
@jamesPLANESii
+1~~It probably won't based on how it flys~~ It would be a nice thing, though. Moving the wings up forward by 1 block (0.5 unit) will solve he problem.
Probably too many landing gear though...