Hello, it’s me again. Check this out. It’s the double decker propfan-powered Ar-460 by @Marine. It’s a really creative design idea IMO. Don’t you agree?
Hello, I was wondering. Once you finish your L-1011 Tristar, would you like to build double, triple, or even quadruple decker airplanes when you have the time? If yes, it would really be a sight to behold, because I really like gigantic airliners. 😁
Hello, I have an idea for a new gigantic modern looking flying boat much bigger than your ML-422 pegasus flying boat. It would have 5 passenger decks, a cockpit in a similar position as the Airbus A380, and would be powered by 10 GE9X size engines. Does that sound awesome to you? 😀
Hello yet again, here's another fun fact: In 1999, Boeing once studied a further stretch of the 777-300X to 81 meters to carry 60-80 more passengers which would therefore increase the exit limit to 610-630 pax and make it a 747 replacement. Boeing abandoned that concept due to its length breaching the 80x80 limit for airports. Does that sound cool to you? :)
@ForeverPie Actually, first of all the 2x4x2 seating on the 797-900ER is actually of 19' premium economy which is wider than 18' standard economy. Therefore, the upper deck would have room for 3x3x3 standard economy seating. And secondly, the 797-900ER would have optional high density economy at 17', allowing for 3x6x3 seating on the main, possibly increasing the single class capacity to 1300+ pax.
@ForeverPie Oh no, not even close. The A380 is just 238 feet long, whereas the fan made 797-900ER I showed you looks to be much longer than that, possibly 290 feet or bigger. For a double decker like the 797-900ER to seat 800 passengers in 4 classes, it would have to be stretched at the to 290-300 feet.
@ForeverPie Indeed. I'm going to guess that the whole 797-900ER plane including the tail would be 300-310 feet in length, with a wingspan likely as wide as the fuselage is long at around 280-300 feet, a tail height of 90 feet, and would be powered by 4 GE9X engines. Do those sound like good estimates to you?
Excellent work, bro. Do you think might plan to recreate the unbuilt 747-500X, 747-600X, and 747-700X in near future? If yes, that would be very cool to see. :)
Wow! You did an absolutely phenomenal job at creating this old beauty! In fact, this could be the most accurate recreation of the Boeing 707 I have seen by far! I’m incredibly proud of you, bro! 😄
Looking absolutely phenomenal. :D I know that I asked you this before but do you plan on doing the 747 family including the unbuilt variants after you revamp the 767 family? Just a yes or no question. ;)
Hello again. I heard that @Qingyuzhou might be planning to build a 777-10X in the near future. So I was wondering if you might do the same thing. The 777-10X is mostly the same as the 777-9X but is 263 feet long which is 12 feet more than the 777-9X. If you like my offer, that's great! :D
@CenturyAerospace Thanks. The reason why you won't build wide bodies could be that they would have way too many parts I assume.
@Wallaby I know, right?! 😁
Hello, it’s me again. Check this out. It’s the double decker propfan-powered Ar-460 by @Marine. It’s a really creative design idea IMO. Don’t you agree?
No problem at all @Wallaby 😉
You my friend have done an extremely amazing job creating this beauty. It really looks like the real thing. I'm really proud of you my man. ;)
Hello, I was wondering. Once you finish your L-1011 Tristar, would you like to build double, triple, or even quadruple decker airplanes when you have the time? If yes, it would really be a sight to behold, because I really like gigantic airliners. 😁
@MDDJB Thanks. I'm glad you approve.
@MarshallLewisAerospace Sounds great. I'm glad you like my offer. ;)
@MDDJB I was actually just offering it to @MarshallLewisAerospace as a request.
Hello, I have an idea for a new gigantic modern looking flying boat much bigger than your ML-422 pegasus flying boat. It would have 5 passenger decks, a cockpit in a similar position as the Airbus A380, and would be powered by 10 GE9X size engines. Does that sound awesome to you? 😀
@ForeverPie Indeed. And it was probably the largest 777 variant ever proposed.
Hello yet again, here's another fun fact: In 1999, Boeing once studied a further stretch of the 777-300X to 81 meters to carry 60-80 more passengers which would therefore increase the exit limit to 610-630 pax and make it a 747 replacement. Boeing abandoned that concept due to its length breaching the 80x80 limit for airports. Does that sound cool to you? :)
@ForeverPie Actually, first of all the 2x4x2 seating on the 797-900ER is actually of 19' premium economy which is wider than 18' standard economy. Therefore, the upper deck would have room for 3x3x3 standard economy seating. And secondly, the 797-900ER would have optional high density economy at 17', allowing for 3x6x3 seating on the main, possibly increasing the single class capacity to 1300+ pax.
@ForeverPie Oh no, not even close. The A380 is just 238 feet long, whereas the fan made 797-900ER I showed you looks to be much longer than that, possibly 290 feet or bigger. For a double decker like the 797-900ER to seat 800 passengers in 4 classes, it would have to be stretched at the to 290-300 feet.
@ForeverPie Indeed. I'm going to guess that the whole 797-900ER plane including the tail would be 300-310 feet in length, with a wingspan likely as wide as the fuselage is long at around 280-300 feet, a tail height of 90 feet, and would be powered by 4 GE9X engines. Do those sound like good estimates to you?
Excellent work, bro. Do you think might plan to recreate the unbuilt 747-500X, 747-600X, and 747-700X in near future? If yes, that would be very cool to see. :)
Hello, I'm back. Check this out. It's a detailed fan made floor plan of the Boeing 797-900ER. What do you think?
Excellent work yet again! ;)
Incredibly well done, bro. I'm extremely impressed. ;)
You know it! 😆@SouthTunnel2
I know right?! @SouthTunnel2
No problem at all, my good bro! 😉@ForeverPie
Wow! You did an absolutely phenomenal job at creating this old beauty! In fact, this could be the most accurate recreation of the Boeing 707 I have seen by far! I’m incredibly proud of you, bro! 😄
Alright. @ForeverPie
Looking absolutely phenomenal. :D I know that I asked you this before but do you plan on doing the 747 family including the unbuilt variants after you revamp the 767 family? Just a yes or no question. ;)
@WingworksDesignCo Okay. And will it be a narrow body or another smaller wide body?
@WingworksDesignCo No problem at all. ;)
@ALRX No problem, buddy. 😉
Magnificent and sleek plane.
Phenomenal. Looks exactly like the real thing. I'm incredibly proud of you, bro. ;)
Wow! This build is really magnificent and very well detailed. I’m incredibly proud of you, buddy. 😉
@MAHADI I know, right!?
@TU134 No problem at all. ;)
Looks pretty cool.
No problem.
@ForeverPie Good idea. I actually like the Boeing 767 series as well.
What a magnificent airliner. Looks just like the real thing. I'm really proud of you, buddy. What do you plan on building next?
@ForeverPie No problem at all bro. ;)
I have to say, you did really good job making the Lufthansa livery on your A340-600 in the last shot.
Sweet! I bet those photos are gonna look great. @ForeverPie
@ALRX No problem at all. ;)
@ALRX That's pretty cool.
@ALRX That's pretty cool.
What a really spot on impressive prop aircraft. :)
What an incredibly sleek and smooth plane you have there. :)
Hello again. I heard that @Qingyuzhou might be planning to build a 777-10X in the near future. So I was wondering if you might do the same thing. The 777-10X is mostly the same as the 777-9X but is 263 feet long which is 12 feet more than the 777-9X. If you like my offer, that's great! :D
@MrSilverWolf It was that long ago, huh? I don't know either.
@MrSilverWolf I'm gonna guess that the planes's wingspan is around 210-230 feet, is it not?
@MrSilverWolf Okay. How big are the wings and engines?
@MrSilverWolf Oh, I remember you telling me about that back in 2019. Now what specific things do you have to re work on your big tri jet?