494 Blackburn Comments

  • Time Traveler 6.2 years ago

    except that was the point of the original so it could do something that looked cool not just be an insane madhouse launcher like yours and is usable without lag and yours fails the lag part entirely so why try and beat the original when you can't do that infact nobody has beaten that yet for how it works and yours hasn't either.

  • Time Traveler 6.2 years ago

    I know the original here is the link to the original time Traveller

    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/t8G7xv/Xf-TIME-TRAVELER

  • AI Aircraft Mod Challenge 6.3 years ago

    I have a recommendation for you sadly it won't ever be used as an AI but here is the link
    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/gGnPv8/TSADAntonov-An-225
    and here is one more.
    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Rgc8io/Dat-AI-plane-which-is-really-fun-and-easy-to-shoot-down-because-it-is-so-big-and

  • Daedalus 6.3 years ago

    @Bugamashoo yeah you got me there but hey if someone can convert this into a teardrop shape then I would use this more often

  • Daedalus 6.3 years ago

    @Bugamashoo but it is missing one key detail it isn't a tear drop shaped craft that it is said to be

  • HOLY JESUS 6.3 years ago

    lol I have made an engine that hits Max game speed

  • add 5 pass it on 6.3 years ago

    @GermanWarMachine but I would suggest that you add 5 parts to it and keep it going

  • add 5 pass it on 6.3 years ago

    @GermanWarMachine you're. tellin me

  • Graf Zeppelin 6.4 years ago

    @lynbean actually this ship did exist at one point go look up it's history

  • Blackbird 6.4 years ago

    @LangdonRacing why don't you go look at some of the big guys on the site and get some inspiration from the works. I think it may help you get better as you go. :)

  • Blackbird 6.4 years ago

    I believe you new here

  • NS Red Globe III 6.4 years ago

    I know this isn't a build request area but I would like to see what you can do considering you make amazing ships that are basically to scale and I ask you this. Try and put the best amount of detail in to this ok. that is if you want to try this anyways.


    hey @feanor I think this would be a good challenge to make it as detailed as possible and the ship I'm talking about is the USS Montana (bb-67). here some history, details and a few facts the you might not have known for the montana class battleship. I doubt you will read any of this but here it is.


    history, details and facts on the

    Return to Naval Historical Center home page. Return to Online Library listing
    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY -- NAVAL HISTORICAL CENTER
    805 KIDDER BREESE SE -- WASHINGTON NAVY YARD
    WASHINGTON DC 20374-5060
    Photo # NH 61246: Artwork of a Montana class battleship
    Online Library of Selected Images:
    -- U.S. NAVY SHIP TYPES -- BATTLESHIPS --
    Montana Class (BB-67 through BB-71)
    1941 Building Program. Construction cancelled 1943.
    The five battleships of the Montana class, authorized under the 1940 "Two Ocean Navy" building program and funded in Fiscal Year 1941, were the last of their kind ordered by the U.S. Navy. With an intended standard displacement of 60,500 tons, they were nearly a third larger than the preceding Iowa class, four of which were the final battleships actually completed by the United States. The Montanas were intended to carry twelve 16"/50 guns, three more than the earlier class. Protection against underwater weapons and shellfire was also greatly enhanced. They would have been the only new World War II era U.S. battleships to be adequately armored against guns of the same power as their own. To achieve these advances, the Montana class was designed for a slower maximum speed than the very fast Iowas and had a beam too wide to pass through the existing Panama Canal locks.

    Completion of the Montana class would have given the late 1940s U.S. Navy a total of seventeen new battleships, a considerable advantage over any other nation, or probable combination of nations. The Montanas also would have been the only American ships to come close to equalling the massive Japanese Yamato. However, World War II's urgent requirements for more aircraft carriers, amphibious and anti-submarine vessels resulted in suspension of the Montana

  • I have started a mobile friendly boat replica series and I would like suggestions 6.4 years ago

    @Jerushah ok and since have made 3 very detailed ship, I believe this ship will give you a run for your money in size, detail and time on this masive project you have taken and you will be the first in all of SimplePlanes the make the montana (bb-67). also if you need some pics on what it would have look like let me know and I hope all the weapons will be able to fire. other than that I think this will be a good challenge for you and good luck because it will be hard to make it look accurate and detailed and humanly possible. so good luck and be the first to make this legendary ship a reality.

  • I have started a mobile friendly boat replica series and I would like suggestions 6.4 years ago

    I know the ship I'm about to mention will never be mobile friendly but I think it would be a good challenge to make it as detailed as possible and the ship I'm talking about is the USS Montana (bb-67). here some history, details and a few facts the you might not have known for the montana class battleship. I doubt you will read any of this but here it is.


    history, details and facts on the

    Return to Naval Historical Center home page. Return to Online Library listing
    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY -- NAVAL HISTORICAL CENTER
    805 KIDDER BREESE SE -- WASHINGTON NAVY YARD
    WASHINGTON DC 20374-5060
    Photo # NH 61246: Artwork of a Montana class battleship
    Online Library of Selected Images:
    -- U.S. NAVY SHIP TYPES -- BATTLESHIPS --
    Montana Class (BB-67 through BB-71)
    1941 Building Program. Construction cancelled 1943.
    The five battleships of the Montana class, authorized under the 1940 "Two Ocean Navy" building program and funded in Fiscal Year 1941, were the last of their kind ordered by the U.S. Navy. With an intended standard displacement of 60,500 tons, they were nearly a third larger than the preceding Iowa class, four of which were the final battleships actually completed by the United States. The Montanas were intended to carry twelve 16"/50 guns, three more than the earlier class. Protection against underwater weapons and shellfire was also greatly enhanced. They would have been the only new World War II era U.S. battleships to be adequately armored against guns of the same power as their own. To achieve these advances, the Montana class was designed for a slower maximum speed than the very fast Iowas and had a beam too wide to pass through the existing Panama Canal locks.

    Completion of the Montana class would have given the late 1940s U.S. Navy a total of seventeen new battleships, a considerable advantage over any other nation, or probable combination of nations. The Montanas also would have been the only American ships to come close to equalling the massive Japanese Yamato. However, World War II's urgent requirements for more aircraft carriers, amphibious and anti-submarine vessels resulted in suspension of the Montanas in May 1942, before any of their keels had been laid. In July 1943, when it was clear that the battleship was no longer the dominant element of sea power, their construction was cancelled.


    The Montana class would have consisted of five ships, to be constructed at three Navy Yards:
    Montana (BB-67), to be built at the Philadelphia Navy Yard, Pennsylvania;
    Ohio (BB-68), to be built at the Philadelphia Navy Yard;
    Maine (BB-69), to be built at the New York Navy Yard, Brooklyn, New York;
    New Hampshire (BB-70), to be built at the New York Navy Yard; and
    Louisiana (BB-71), to be built at the Norfolk Navy Yard, Portsmouth, Virginia.
    Montana class design characteristics:
    Displacement: 60,500 tons (standard); 70,965 tons (full load)
    Dimensions: 921' 3" (length overall); 121' 2" (maximum beam)
    Powerplant: 172,000 horsepower steam turbines, producing a 28 knot maximum speed
    Armament (Main Battery): Twelve 16"/50 guns in four triple turrets
    Armament (Secondary Battery): Twenty 5"/54 guns in ten twin mountings (ten guns on each side of the ship)
    This page features all the images we have concerning the Montana class battleship design.

    For coverage of other classes of U.S. Navy battleships, see: Battleships -- Overview and Special Image Selection.

    If you want higher resolution reproductions than the digital images presented here, see: "How to Obtain Photographic Reproductions."
    Click on the small photograph to prompt a larger view of the same image.

    Photo #: NH 61246

    Montana class (BB-67--71) battleship

    Artist's conception of this abortive class, whose construction was cancelled on 21 July 1943.
    This artwork depicts the ship fitted with a heavy battery of anti-aircraft guns, as would have been the case had she been completed.

    U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.

    Online Image: 64KB; 740 x 300 pixels

    Photo #: NH 44529

    Montana class (BB-67--71) battleship

    Model representing the preliminary design, circa 1940-41. Photographed circa 1943.

    U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.

    Online Image: 61KB; 740 x 550 pixels

    Photo #: NH 93912

    Montana class (BB-67--71) battleship

    Model photographed at the New York Navy Yard, 26 November 1941. It represents the ship with details somewhat changed from the preliminary design seen in Photo # NH 44529.

    Copied from the Bureau of Ships monograph "United States Battleship Designs for World War II", dated 1 June 1946.

    U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.

    Online Image: 55KB; 740 x 350 pixels

    Photo #: NH 93913

    Montana class (BB-67--71) battleship

    Model photographed at the New York Navy Yard, 26 November 1941. It represents the ship with details somewhat changed from the preliminary design seen in Photo # NH 44529.
    Note rough finish of this model.

    Copied from the Bureau of Ships monograph "United States Battleship Designs for World War II", dated 1 June 1946.

    U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.

    Online Image: 73KB; 415 x 765 pixels

    Photo #: NH 93914

    Montana class (BB-67--71) battleship

    Model photographed at the New York Navy Yard, 26 November 1941. It represents the ship with details somewhat changed from the preliminary design seen in Photo # NH 44529.
    Note rough finish of this model.

    Copied from the Bureau of Ships monograph "United States Battleship Designs for World War II", dated 1 June 1946.

    U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.

    Online Image: 77KB; 410 x 765 pixels

    Photo #: USN 1144964

    Montana class (BB-67--71) model

    Large official model of this abortive class of battleship, photographed at the New York Navy Yard, 7 October 1944. Construction of the five ships of the class had been cancelled in July 1943.

    Official U.S. Navy Photograph.

    Online Image: 60KB; 740 x 405 pixels

    Reproductions of this image may also be available through the National Archives photographic reproduction system as Photo # 428-N-1144964.

    The following images represent preliminary design plans prepared in early 1940 as part of the Montana class design development process. At that time, it was intended that the first ship of this class would have hull number BB-65. None of these plans represent the design finally adopted for the Montana class.

    Photo #: S-511-11

    "Battleship Study - BB65 - Scheme 3 - (1940 Studies)"

    Preliminary design plan prepared for the General Board as part of the process leading to the Montana class (BB-67--71) battleship design.
    This plan, dated 6 February 1940, is for a ship of 52,500 tons standard displacement and 64,500 ton trial displacement, with a main battery of twelve 16"/50 guns, a secondary battery of twenty 5"/38 guns and a 130,000 horsepower powerplant for a speed of 28 knots. Ship's dimensions are: waterline length 860'; waterline beam 114'; draft 36'. Scale of the original drawing is 1/32" = 1'.
    Port side 5" gun arrangement is labeled "previous secondary battery arrangement". Starboard side has a "proposed secondary battery arrangement."

    The original plan is in the 1939-1944 "Spring Styles Book" held by the Naval Historical Center.

    U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.

    Online Image: 763KB; 3000 x 1570 pixels

    Photo #: S-511-12

    "Battleship Study - BB65 - Scheme 4 - (1940 Studies)"

    Preliminary design plan prepared for the General Board as part of the process leading to the Montana class (BB-67--71) battleship design.
    This plan, dated 14 February 1940, is for a ship of 54,500 tons standard displacement and 64,500 tons trial displacement, with a main battery of twelve 16"/50 guns, a secondary battery of twenty 5"/54 guns and a 150,000 horsepower powerplant for a speed of 28 knots. Ship's dimensions are: waterline length 870'; waterline beam 114'; draft 36'. Scale of the original drawing is 1/32" = 1'.
    Port side 5" gun arrangement is labeled "previous secondary battery arrangement". Starboard side has a "proposed secondary battery arrangement."

    The original plan is in the 1939-1944 "Spring Styles Book" held by the Naval Historical Center.

    U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.

    Online Image: 657KB; 3000 x 1575 pixels

    Photo #: S-511-13

    "Battleship Study - BB65 - Scheme 8 - (1940 Studies)"

    Preliminary design plan prepared for the General Board as part of the process leading to the Montana class (BB-67--71) battleship design.
    This plan, dated 15 March 1940, is for a ship of 70,000 tons standard displacement and 82,000 ton trial displacement, with a main battery of twelve 16"/50 guns, a secondary battery of twenty 5"/54 guns and a 320,000 horsepower powerplant for a speed of 33 knots. Ship's dimensions are: waterline length 1050'; waterline beam 120'; draft 35'. Scale of the original drawing is 1/32" = 1'.
    Port side 5" gun arrangement is labeled "previous secondary battery arrangement". Starboard side has a "proposed secondary battery arrangement."

    The original plan is in the 1939-1944 "Spring Styles Book" held by the Naval Historical Center.

    U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.

    Online Image: 451KB; 3000 x 1425 pixels

    The following image represents a preliminary design plan prepared in mid 1940, comparing the Montana class hull profile with that of the Iowa (BB-61) class.

    Photo #: S-511-21

    "Battleship Study, BB 65 - Scheme 1 and BB 61-64 (Incl{usive})"

    Preliminary design plan prepared for the General Board comparing the outboard profile (including superstructure) of the Iowa (BB-61) class battleships with the hull profile of the Montana class.
    This plan is dated 9 July 1940 and shows the Iowa class outboard profile in solid lines and the hull of the Montana class in dashed lines.
    At the time, the Montana class was planned to begin with hull number BB-65, rather than BB-67 as it became after two more Iowas were ordered as BB-65 and BB-66.
    Scale of the original drawings is 1/32" = 1'.

    The original plan is in the 1939-1944 "Spring Styles Book" held by the Naval Historical Center.

    U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.

    Online Image: 128KB; 2000 x 1005 pixels

    For coverage of other classes of U.S. Navy battleships, see: Battleships -- Overview and Special Image Selection.

  • Cruiser Aurora--The symbol of the Octorber Revolution 6.4 years ago

    i wish I had a pc to download this and this is one amazing ship

  • I'm running out of ideas 6.4 years ago

    why not try building the montana bb-67 and bring it to life in here

  • wtf1 reupload 6.4 years ago

    @look np

  • Apache AH-64 New mk 2 6.4 years ago

    @Kevst3r89 hey I just finished up making my SimpleRockets account go and check it out. copy and paste this link

    https://www.simplerockets.com/Account/Manage

  • Apache AH-64 New mk 2 6.4 years ago

    @Kevst3r89 as long as it can fly and move around. I say it is perfectly fine

  • Apache AH-64 New mk 2 6.4 years ago

    @Kevst3r89 want me to put your heli v3 armt through some test and see how it does compared to some other builds I have?

  • Delcom G336-01 by Delphinus 6.4 years ago

    @Helicopterboy ok thanks for letting me know

  • Apache AH-64 New mk 2 6.4 years ago

    thanks for the spotlight @Helicopterboy

  • wtf1 reupload 6.4 years ago

    @look here you go

    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/WgB502/Apache-AH-64-New-mk-2

  • wtf1 reupload 6.4 years ago

    @look wepon spam inbound

  • wtf1 reupload 6.4 years ago

    @look but if you need some wepon spam on something just let me know

  • wtf1 reupload 6.4 years ago

    @look a simpler way of saying that is by going to the forum and asking someone to do a co-op build with you

  • wtf1 reupload 6.4 years ago

    @look well that could be a problem since make something in the same builder but you can publish and tell me what your idea is and and I'll let you know that I've downloaded it then you can remove it or just leave it there, but I'm a person the does a lot of wepon spam and all that good stuff. but if you ant to do a co-op build then go and do a co-op build with me or anyone else here

  • wtf1 reupload 6.4 years ago

    @look here is the link to it

    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/UJ6xOi/DOOM-SHIP-mk2-torpedoes

  • wtf1 reupload 6.4 years ago

    @look the instructions should be in the description

  • wtf1 reupload 6.4 years ago

    @look but have you tried that? it is very fun to use

  • wtf1 reupload 6.4 years ago

    @look I just check my notifications and nice to see you again

  • wtf1 reupload 6.4 years ago

    @look have you tried this yet
    link. https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/UJ6xOi/DOOM-SHIP-mk2-torpedoes
    copy and paste this link if you haven't tried it

  • wtf1 reupload 6.5 years ago

    @look hey do you use mods?

  • MEGA RAM RUNNER 6.5 years ago

    pretty amazing build and greate detail. you have potential of becoming a great builder in this game so keep building and make even greater things. I hope you stay around for many years to come.

  • ???MYSTERY???? truck sneekpeek 6.5 years ago

    @JoeAdkinson13 do you even watch diesel Brothers

  • Cluster Bomb V4 6.5 years ago

    hey didn't you make one similar to this

  • Mega-Ford 8-Door Customised truck 6.5 years ago

    hey I'm just so you know the real name of this truck is the "MEGA RAM RUNNER" pls no insult this beast of a truck that was all custom made by deiselsellersZ.

  • Launcher vehicle 6.5 years ago

  • Launcher vehicle 6.5 years ago

    the result will push my game to the limit ok so this is just a heads-up

  • Launcher vehicle 6.5 years ago

    the result will push my game to the limit ok so this is just a heads-up

  • Launcher vehicle 6.5 years ago

    but here is a hint. it will have a ton of wepons

  • Daedalus 6.5 years ago

    @SledDriver I know but if you do use mods go check out on of my builds if you want and if you do go and look it will be in a dark picture

  • Daedalus 6.5 years ago

    @SledDriver yeah but I gotta hand it to ya it is one amazing build and very strong to. it can handel -300g compared to the expedition vhiche nird which can handel-999g but stability it Winn's hands down and also your builds are to good to be modified I can just look at one of my builds from my profile and it is mentioned for pure destruction but anyways all your builds are amazing so keep up the good work and I hope to see many more builds from you in the years to come. please do that for me and the asnwer to your question is a definite yes.

  • mobile game crasher 6.5 years ago

    @dootdootbananabus that some strong tablet then and hay remove the tank and try and spin it

  • Launcher vehicle 6.5 years ago

    I might have an idea for this if you want to see it let me know if you want to see it

  • New but not origional style. 6.5 years ago

    there's you an upvote for being awesome

  • mobile game crasher 6.5 years ago

    @dootdootbananabus were you using the Google pixel if not you removed the -1millgastank

  • mobile game crasher 6.5 years ago

    @Rustybexter thx I just push my tablet to the limit every time before I put it out is all. go and look or download some of my other builds if you want. LTE me know if you need any thing turned deadly because it would be my pleasure to do that. :) but I wouldn't mind an upvote tho.
    one more thing I made this out of pure boredom

  • dark as night 6.6 years ago

    ok but would you like an infinite gas tank and a few modded wepons @Epup?
    if yes I will let you know when I'm done working on it
    if no well I'll see what I can do. ok
    one more thing I make other builds to something else and I bit destructive if needed,also check out my profile to see what I do with other builds. 2 of them do require you to download a few mods if you want to try them if you want. ok