Profile image

NS Red Globe III

146k Feanor  6.2 years ago
405 downloads
No Tags


General Characteristics

  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 164.0ft (50.0m)
  • Length 1061.7ft (323.6m)
  • Height 142.9ft (43.6m)
  • Empty Weight N/A
  • Loaded Weight N/A

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.036
  • Wing Loading 17.2lbs/ft2 (83.9kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 3,285,922.8ft2 (305,272.5m2)
  • Drag Points 1231983

Parts

  • Number of Parts 577
  • Control Surfaces 40
  • Performance Cost 2,377
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    I've just come up with an idea for an even bigger ship. With six propellers. And fusion reactor/steam turbine powerplants. And mostly automated. And with a helipad on the front capable of landing at least three modified MH-53 Pave Low SAR/ASW helicopters.

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    494 Blackburn

    I know this isn't a build request area but I would like to see what you can do considering you make amazing ships that are basically to scale and I ask you this. Try and put the best amount of detail in to this ok. that is if you want to try this anyways.


    hey @feanor I think this would be a good challenge to make it as detailed as possible and the ship I'm talking about is the USS Montana (bb-67). here some history, details and a few facts the you might not have known for the montana class battleship. I doubt you will read any of this but here it is.


    history, details and facts on the

    Return to Naval Historical Center home page. Return to Online Library listing
    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY -- NAVAL HISTORICAL CENTER
    805 KIDDER BREESE SE -- WASHINGTON NAVY YARD
    WASHINGTON DC 20374-5060
    Photo # NH 61246: Artwork of a Montana class battleship
    Online Library of Selected Images:
    -- U.S. NAVY SHIP TYPES -- BATTLESHIPS --
    Montana Class (BB-67 through BB-71)
    1941 Building Program. Construction cancelled 1943.
    The five battleships of the Montana class, authorized under the 1940 "Two Ocean Navy" building program and funded in Fiscal Year 1941, were the last of their kind ordered by the U.S. Navy. With an intended standard displacement of 60,500 tons, they were nearly a third larger than the preceding Iowa class, four of which were the final battleships actually completed by the United States. The Montanas were intended to carry twelve 16"/50 guns, three more than the earlier class. Protection against underwater weapons and shellfire was also greatly enhanced. They would have been the only new World War II era U.S. battleships to be adequately armored against guns of the same power as their own. To achieve these advances, the Montana class was designed for a slower maximum speed than the very fast Iowas and had a beam too wide to pass through the existing Panama Canal locks.

    Completion of the Montana class would have given the late 1940s U.S. Navy a total of seventeen new battleships, a considerable advantage over any other nation, or probable combination of nations. The Montanas also would have been the only American ships to come close to equalling the massive Japanese Yamato. However, World War II's urgent requirements for more aircraft carriers, amphibious and anti-submarine vessels resulted in suspension of the Montana

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Feanor four props is my favorite. Symmetrical and powerful.

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    146k Feanor

    @KerlonceauxIndustries It doesn't actually need more than one propeller since it just needs to have a maximum speed of 12 knots.

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    I love the concept.

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    Two is not enough, and the props are too big. No offense, just saying.

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    You'd need at least six large props to drive this thing and those props would be practical and "easy" to make.

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    wut

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.6k F4f879

    Is it.. Carrying another ship?! This is awesome

    +2 6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    146k Feanor

    @AceOfSpade @SSSvaSSa @T8flightcrafts Thanks!

    +1 6.2 years ago