@omer13, well, I will give you a tip, learn some more and you will become a good builder. Don’t prioritize upvotes because it takes you away from building better to building worse.
This is very detailed, even the undercarriage seems functional (although the appearance, large wheels, and high ground clearance might make it look like a monster truck too high for an occupant to access and leave the vehicle, even though it is possible you make it as accurate as possible to your irl uncle’s car). Too bad I have not enough points to spotlight you. :(
The top looks closer to the actual thing, but the sides do not look close to the actual thing (e.g. oversized canopy, weird nose that does not angle down a bit, oversized inlets, weird and small fins). I would recommend you to also make the sides and the front, practically all sides, inline with the blueprints (you can move the blueprints around by modifying the coordinates, make sure tone side of the blueprints match with the other sides). Otherwise, your replica will not be an accurate one.
. This is how you use it.
@SorasakiHina, moderators may remove the comments section if said comments section becomes full with a large number of inflammatory comments, especially political bickering. I can tell that, because your post appears to be related to the current situation in Ukraine, which is a very sensitive topic as it is a significant and ongoing war.
I like the attention to detail in this build. However...
The autocannons do not have a giant magazine nor another way to reload their bullets. It does not even discharge casings. This makes this build seem unrealistic, despite the realism put into it.
The elevation of the autocannons’ rotation axes does not seem to serve any use, other than making a big target and making the turret flimsy. Put the autocannons in an encasing so it looks more realistic and adds the opportunity to add magazines and casing discharges.
These are just my critiques about this build and may not represent the wider community’s opinions.
How does a golfer survive his free fall?
.
His golf bag is this one, which has a drag parachute, and the golfer deploys it it to slow down his descent, allowing him to survive!
@omer13, this looks but does not look to the mig-29, even the landing gear is odd. Try to use reference images, and also DesignerSuite, where you can use blueprints to make accurate aircraft (like fitting the fuselage, wings, everything within the outlines of the blueprints).
I can see improvements but not enough. The main wing fuselages overlaps with the ailerons, and I the back of the main wing fuselages is not parallel with the back of the main wings. The seat still pierces through the canopy. You should modify the main fuselage so the canopy won’t have to be so low, like making a hump and fuselage slicing it, so you have a flat hole you can fit the canopy onto. I also would like if you put a redirect to this post on your old post (instructions here).
@JerryZePilot, @Bryan5, just as rexzion said, you need to enable aircraft collisions for cannons, since this also applies to bullets from said cannon. If the aircraft collisions were disabled, the bullets might pass through fuselages.
.
If the aircraft collisions for the cannon part were disabled and the problem still persists, please submit a bug report, with sufficient evidence.
A good website for blueprints is www.the-blueprints.com, that is a massive repository of blueprints of various devices and vehicles. The blueprints are mostly free but with conditions, with the rest, such as vector drawings, needing payment for download. You can download even clearer blueprints by having an account (although you need to be 16 years or older, as per terms of use).
Coming to cinemas in coming soon...
.
I am assuming this houseboat is made in the United States of America or Canada as these countries’ everyday houses have an iconic look that is present everywhere (a mostly wooden construction with wooden clapboard siding, and slate roofs) that your houseboat replicates (except the edge pillars need to be a bit thicker). It could have been better with rtgx enabled.
Datcha advises you can get silver in like a week if you make something good enough, although I cannot guarantee the results. We will just see about that...
.
You can use intricate fuselage designs and use blueprints and other references to create better looking aircraft. Focusing on designing building things more than focusing on upvotes helps you create better builds.
I find the text unclear and do not know what you really mean. But, I will give you a tip: you can use and customize the label part. The label part is located in the “cockpit interior” section of the parts tab.
sigh
.
This post of yours may invite the drama again...
.
Look at what some users said, they were concerned your post will bring up another drama. I know you are frustrated, I myself am frustrated but this post may bring more drama into the site than raising awareness and making those users who make “German Corsair Inspired Crafts” (GCIC) refrain from making any further such crafts.
I have seen what appears to be a “German Corsairized” version of the Mil Mi-24 Hind. The one that probably started this trend was another airbrake laden plane, just like the German Corsair but had 4 propellers and the main fuselage is modeled after a bomber .
.
This is because of the ironic and controversial nature of the German Corsair itself, a craft that got a lot of upvotes, despite the poor quality of said craft. These new “German Corsair Inspired Planes” (or “GCIP”) appear to have gained such upvotes due to their correlation with the original German Corsair.
.
And I highly recommend you to please do not report these posts, unless they violate the rules. Any abuse of the reporting system to remove a craft that violates no rules may invite moderator action to your account (no, I am not a moderator).
@BSEW100, have you set the hinge rotator movement degrees to 90 degrees, while the hinge speed is set to 0 (floppy)? That should turn a stiff hinge into a floppy hinge.
.
The same goes to the rotators. However, if you set the rotator movement degrees to 0, then it becomes floppy and the rotator can move 180 degrees (while having the rotator speed automatically set to 0 (floppy); here it says “disabled” instead of “floppy” but may return to the latter if said rotators’ movement degrees is not 0).
I may request that you please specify what is the meaning behind this forum post, since it only has the title “epic point count moment” and not anything else.
There’s a part called a “shock”. It looks like a shock absorber and acts like such, being able to contract and extend and then going back as it was before again. This makes it a good choice for suspension.
.
Try making the double wishbone suspension. I know it looks hard and takes time, but it is relatively simple, at least.
No offense, but it looks like if some mad scientist shrank the back half of the plane. And it won’t likely fly in real life and in SimplePlanes anyways, because of all that huge, bulbous front fuselage of yours. Where did you get the cockpit from anyways?
@SheriffHackdogMCPE, you CAN NOT remove comments in forum posts. These were likely removed as a result of political drama and since there is no mechanism to disable comments, they eventually decided to remove such posts to prevent further political drama.
.
Posts about ongoing wars are more likely to stir up political debate than posts about inactive wars, usually because people can be overprotective when it comes to one or more nations’ interests.
@3doinghiemgane, English is my main language. When communicating with other users, feel free to translate your words into English, using a translator device.
.
There once was a way to post images in comments before, but now you cannot put images in comments. I can give a workaround: [any word you like](image url)
Just replace the phrase “any word you like” into any sentence or word you can say. Also, replace the phrase “image url” into an url to an image, like postimg or discord. Hope it helps.
Multiplayer: Allows you to play multiplayer with your friends in multiplayer servers simply by connecting with any IP address. The most popular server is the one with the IP address of 157.7.214.47.
Trollshield: Necessary to ensure safe play in multiplayer. Adds a bunch of commands for you to use. Be sure to follow the instructions of this mod.
Tracks 2: Allows you to create tracked vehicles with ease.
And that’s all I can find. Have fun with these mods! :)
. Note: All mods (except those integrated into bas SimplePlanes) are only available in the computer version of SimplePlanes.
I don’t think the politics might end soon.
.
Politics not only ruins the building aspect of the game, it also incentivizes other users to put confronting politics and insults at one another, turning this site into a bellhole. As more and more people decided to take politics into their own hands, the rules become harder to enforce. Imagine having to shut down the forums and comments system because of the contents being only political bickering.
.
So please move your politics elsewhere, like discord, if you want to preserve the site and the forums and comments section that way.
@ZeroWithSlashedO, oh sorry, it’s mobile. I thought you were a computer user. Next time, please clarify wether you are using computer or mobile in case you mention that you cannot play mods.
@ZeroWithSlashedO, there is a multiplayer mod you can download. Just download both, multiplayer and trollshield (a mod that gives you more tools to prevent your fun from getting ruined) and you can finally play multiplayer safely.
The blueprints become clearer, only if you have an account (you must be 16 years or older to have an account, according to it’s terms of use). In my opinion, I don’t think this post is advertising (nobody likes advertising spam here and moderators will remove advertising spam that occurs in this site), and you can actually use blueprints to create crafts without consequences on the site. By the way, they also have a policy on royalty-free illustrations the site mostly consists of.
You may need to set the fuselage parts to sufficient buoyancy, which can be found in the settings for said part. As for the propulsion, you may use jet engines above the water as any forms of propulsion, regardless of method, cannot work underwater.
@CarrotSlicingCat, probably no, thank you. Just because I have a good amount of proficiency in law does not mean that I am suitable for a job as a lawyer.
@omer13, well, I will give you a tip, learn some more and you will become a good builder. Don’t prioritize upvotes because it takes you away from building better to building worse.
This is very detailed, even the undercarriage seems functional (although the appearance, large wheels, and high ground clearance might make it look like a monster truck too high for an occupant to access and leave the vehicle, even though it is possible you make it as accurate as possible to your irl uncle’s car). Too bad I have not enough points to spotlight you. :(
The top looks closer to the actual thing, but the sides do not look close to the actual thing (e.g. oversized canopy, weird nose that does not angle down a bit, oversized inlets, weird and small fins). I would recommend you to also make the sides and the front, practically all sides, inline with the blueprints (you can move the blueprints around by modifying the coordinates, make sure tone side of the blueprints match with the other sides). Otherwise, your replica will not be an accurate one.
.
This is how you use it.
@SorasakiHina, moderators may remove the comments section if said comments section becomes full with a large number of inflammatory comments, especially political bickering. I can tell that, because your post appears to be related to the current situation in Ukraine, which is a very sensitive topic as it is a significant and ongoing war.
+1It does not show the image correctly. Are you using this code:
![anyname][imageurl]Replace “
anyname” with any word you want, as long as the name complies the rules.Replace “
imageurl” with the website url of an image (like postimages).If you use this code correctly, you get a working image.
+3I like the attention to detail in this build. However...
These are just my critiques about this build and may not represent the wider community’s opinions.
+4How does a golfer survive his free fall?
+5.
His golf bag is this one, which has a drag parachute, and the golfer deploys it it to slow down his descent, allowing him to survive!
@omer13, this looks but does not look to the mig-29, even the landing gear is odd. Try to use reference images, and also DesignerSuite, where you can use blueprints to make accurate aircraft (like fitting the fuselage, wings, everything within the outlines of the blueprints).
+1@ImSimon, oh right, sorry. There is the underwater camera mod where you can view things under the water
That’s a good armored car. You’re using the tractor 2 wheels. The ratio of part count-detail is quite impressive anyways.
Looks like it came form an American sci-if movie. Where are the ladders for access anyways, eh?
I can see improvements but not enough. The main wing fuselages overlaps with the ailerons, and I the back of the main wing fuselages is not parallel with the back of the main wings. The seat still pierces through the canopy. You should modify the main fuselage so the canopy won’t have to be so low, like making a hump and fuselage slicing it, so you have a flat hole you can fit the canopy onto. I also would like if you put a redirect to this post on your old post (instructions here).
@JerryZePilot, @Bryan5, just as rexzion said, you need to enable aircraft collisions for cannons, since this also applies to bullets from said cannon. If the aircraft collisions were disabled, the bullets might pass through fuselages.
+1.
If the aircraft collisions for the cannon part were disabled and the problem still persists, please submit a bug report, with sufficient evidence.
A good website for blueprints is www.the-blueprints.com, that is a massive repository of blueprints of various devices and vehicles. The blueprints are mostly free but with conditions, with the rest, such as vector drawings, needing payment for download. You can download even clearer blueprints by having an account (although you need to be 16 years or older, as per terms of use).
+2It’s a cannon made for an main battle tank.
The Dummy Part 2: The Return Of The Dummy.
Coming to cinemas in coming soon...
.
I am assuming this houseboat is made in the United States of America or Canada as these countries’ everyday houses have an iconic look that is present everywhere (a mostly wooden construction with wooden clapboard siding, and slate roofs) that your houseboat replicates (except the edge pillars need to be a bit thicker). It could have been better with rtgx enabled.
And so the largest aircraft still in active service is now the Antonov An-124 Ruslan...
SEE YOU OLD DREAMS
+5See you old dreams.
F
+2Datcha advises you can get silver in like a week if you make something good enough, although I cannot guarantee the results. We will just see about that...
+3.
You can use intricate fuselage designs and use blueprints and other references to create better looking aircraft. Focusing on designing building things more than focusing on upvotes helps you create better builds.
@Pasha06, unclear. Please clarify further.
@X99STRIKER, ah I should have put this in a “joke ruining spoiler”. Sorry for spoiling your joke.
I find the text unclear and do not know what you really mean. But, I will give you a tip: you can use and customize the label part. The label part is located in the “cockpit interior” section of the parts tab.
You can try and put a label into the fuselage. The label part is located in the “cockpit interior” section of the parts tab.
@X99STRIKER, Joke Ruining Spoiler.
+1sigh
+1.
This post of yours may invite the drama again...
.
Look at what some users said, they were concerned your post will bring up another drama. I know you are frustrated, I myself am frustrated but this post may bring more drama into the site than raising awareness and making those users who make “German Corsair Inspired Crafts” (GCIC) refrain from making any further such crafts.
I have seen what appears to be a “German Corsairized” version of the Mil Mi-24 Hind. The one that probably started this trend was another airbrake laden plane, just like the German Corsair but had 4 propellers and the main fuselage is modeled after a bomber .
.
This is because of the ironic and controversial nature of the German Corsair itself, a craft that got a lot of upvotes, despite the poor quality of said craft. These new “German Corsair Inspired Planes” (or “GCIP”) appear to have gained such upvotes due to their correlation with the original German Corsair.
.
And I highly recommend you to please do not report these posts, unless they violate the rules. Any abuse of the reporting system to remove a craft that violates no rules may invite moderator action to your account (no, I am not a moderator).
@jamesPLANESii, I have seen what appears to be a “German Corsairized” version of the Mil Mi-24 Hind. The one that probably started this trend was another airbrake laden plane, just like the German Corsair but had 4 propellers and the main fuselage is modeled after a bomber .
+2@BSEW100, have you set the hinge rotator movement degrees to 90 degrees, while the hinge speed is set to 0 (floppy)? That should turn a stiff hinge into a floppy hinge.
.
The same goes to the rotators. However, if you set the rotator movement degrees to 0, then it becomes floppy and the rotator can move 180 degrees (while having the rotator speed automatically set to 0 (floppy); here it says “disabled” instead of “floppy” but may return to the latter if said rotators’ movement degrees is not 0).
I may request that you please specify what is the meaning behind this forum post, since it only has the title “epic point count moment” and not anything else.
These are actually upvotes for the comments.
+5There’s a part called a “shock”. It looks like a shock absorber and acts like such, being able to contract and extend and then going back as it was before again. This makes it a good choice for suspension.
.
Try making the double wishbone suspension. I know it looks hard and takes time, but it is relatively simple, at least.
No offense, but it looks like if some mad scientist shrank the back half of the plane. And it won’t likely fly in real life and in SimplePlanes anyways, because of all that huge, bulbous front fuselage of yours. Where did you get the cockpit from anyways?
+6@FumoCirno, I did not put Reimu into the comic. Why are you mentioning her here?
Are you building a 3 wheeled Asian auto rickshaw, also known as the “Bajaj” in my native Indonesia?
@SheriffHackdogMCPE, then if it were to be build posts, it is likely they were meant to be political enough to warrant a removal from the site.
@SheriffHackdogMCPE, you CAN NOT remove comments in forum posts. These were likely removed as a result of political drama and since there is no mechanism to disable comments, they eventually decided to remove such posts to prevent further political drama.
+2.
Posts about ongoing wars are more likely to stir up political debate than posts about inactive wars, usually because people can be overprotective when it comes to one or more nations’ interests.
@ImSimon, I think it is because of poor internet connection.
@JustWingIt, it’s just an illustrative comic about this made using a program named “create.swf extended”.
+1@ImSimon, what is the problem with MP? Can you describe it in clear detail?
@3doinghiemgane, English is my main language. When communicating with other users, feel free to translate your words into English, using a translator device.
.
There once was a way to post images in comments before, but now you cannot put images in comments. I can give a workaround:
[any word you like](image url)Just replace the phrase “any word you like” into any sentence or word you can say. Also, replace the phrase “image url” into an url to an image, like postimg or discord. Hope it helps.
And that’s all I can find. Have fun with these mods! :)
+1.
Note: All mods (except those integrated into bas SimplePlanes) are only available in the computer version of SimplePlanes.
@KONOJERRYDA, you now can put mods in VR, at least if I remember.
I do not know what are you saying. Please clarify, so I can answer your question.
I don’t think the politics might end soon.
+5.
Politics not only ruins the building aspect of the game, it also incentivizes other users to put confronting politics and insults at one another, turning this site into a bellhole. As more and more people decided to take politics into their own hands, the rules become harder to enforce. Imagine having to shut down the forums and comments system because of the contents being only political bickering.
.
So please move your politics elsewhere, like discord, if you want to preserve the site and the forums and comments section that way.
@ZeroWithSlashedO, oh sorry, it’s mobile. I thought you were a computer user. Next time, please clarify wether you are using computer or mobile in case you mention that you cannot play mods.
+2@ZeroWithSlashedO, there is a multiplayer mod you can download. Just download both, multiplayer and trollshield (a mod that gives you more tools to prevent your fun from getting ruined) and you can finally play multiplayer safely.
THIS IS SPARTAAA!!!
Finally, I can do some SPARTAAA!!! in Simpleplanes!
+2.
Maybe, the ship with the most oars...
The blueprints become clearer, only if you have an account (you must be 16 years or older to have an account, according to it’s terms of use). In my opinion, I don’t think this post is advertising (nobody likes advertising spam here and moderators will remove advertising spam that occurs in this site), and you can actually use blueprints to create crafts without consequences on the site. By the way, they also have a policy on royalty-free illustrations the site mostly consists of.
You may need to set the fuselage parts to sufficient buoyancy, which can be found in the settings for said part. As for the propulsion, you may use jet engines above the water as any forms of propulsion, regardless of method, cannot work underwater.
+3@CarrotSlicingCat, probably no, thank you. Just because I have a good amount of proficiency in law does not mean that I am suitable for a job as a lawyer.