That’s pretty nice (although it would be better if you put another frame pillar in the middle of the windshield, like splitting the windshield into 2). The landing gear looks too small and incorrectly colored. Also, was that upvote from an alternate account of yours?
What a cool drone plane, isn’t it? Only things I do not like are the useless inlets on top of the usual inlets and the navigation lights do not look standard to me (the lamps at the tip of the vertical stabilizers look “floating”, you need to make them fused).
.
I would like more if it is painted in matte gray but up to you.
@Korzalerke, if that is so, then I’ll give that answer to him.
.
@Soardivision160th, the joystick snaps back when you no longer touch it and it’s a feature that you usually see when playing mobile games.
I think you can only embed images if you are bronze.
.
If you don’t know how to embed images, try to use this code; it’s just how you embed URL but has an exclamation mark in front: 
- name is the name that doesn’t get displayed, therefore you can hide any Easter eggs here.
- url is for the image url.
That’s the landing gear, right? You can actually and should rename the aircraft as “landing gear part” and use the “part” tag. You should also clarify wether this part is free to use, has conditions for use, or not.
@Bobyo, hmmm...
.
My theory would be that the cannon has “FireWeapons”, and that any parts on AI aircraft that uses said input may activate if they had successfully locked onto an aircraft. I might test what could the AI do if I replaced the “FireWeapons” input with “FireGuns” input; would it act like a gun?
.
P.S. I have discovered that there is no way to change the input of the cannon part.
Does anyone know how to fix the joystick on mobile because whenever I try to fly forwards, the joy stick snaps back in place.
Unclear. Please clarify further about this so called “bug” you have. You can send me a link to the craft.
My tip would be to probably check the attachments. Make sure that the joystick is attached to the control base.
Sad...
.
Better luck next time. You should designersuite, use blueprints and make the fuselage inline with the blueprints (this is how you use blueprints correctly).
@STLTitans, go to the part properties tab (by clicking or tapping the gear button) and there should be 2 properties that may smoothen the fuselages by their front and back attachments.
Pretty basic, but contains functional parts. Why a gyroscope here? Anyways, good luck with building a good, functional cockpit for VR; I cannot access the plane and see the functions and I do not have VR software because I do not want to have one because it is a waste of money.
Good tank, but I think the part count should be reduced, so I can toy with multiple instances of this build. Also, you may need to smooth your fuselages.
If it’s not a Su-27 flanker, then it’s probably a MiG-29. Those aircraft look very similar to each other but differences can still be seen.
.
If it is not a MiG-29, tell me. There are probably more similar Soviet aircraft.
@XAircraftManufacturer, you can use text labels and code funky trees to make functional guis. Essentially, this makes for a good “glass cockpit”, a type of cockpit with a few screens instead of many gauges. The stock jets (except for the Hellkeska) are one examples of crafts using screens instead of gauges.
This is accurate, although I am disappointed I cannot inspect the cockpit now and the lack of a backstory (the 4 jet engines configuation are too outdated for modern flight nowadays). Imagine if airline companies make liveries on this plane... :)
@CNOceanLin, a successor post should automatically have an auto-credit with a link to the predecessor. I do not know but there has been a glitch where if you save the craft enough, the url might change and no longer counts as a successor.
Looks good but the design reminds me of the days when SimplePlanes was still in an early stage. Good car though. I’d wish it had looked better with smoothing, et cetera.
If you are posting a craft that is related to the current situation in Ukraine (e.g. “Ghost of Kyiv”), do note that said post’s comment section will be filled with political bickering and will eventually be removed because of that; the post may also get repeatedly reported mostly for “harassment”. If you intend your post to be a political statement, do not be surprised to see it removed by a moderator because any and all politics are against the one rule about politics and religion.
The tank has seen improvements, apart from the distracting colors. Now there is one very important question, where is the auto-credit to the original, predecessor post, despite being a successor post?
It’s a good plane for Valentine’s Day, but the Valentine’s Day already passed. The jets should be located behind the wings besides the fuselages, so as not to put enormous strain on the wingtips.
Nice plane. The cockpit needs some adjustments (like hollowing the cockpit by replacing those full fuselages with hollow fuselages and using fuselage cutting techniques.
.
But wait, was that a plane before the updates that brought these features here?
@Korzalerke, sorry, I did not know about Vetrix’s profile picture change. I did not know what the profile pictures look like when Vetrix got hacked because you did not tell me what it looked like. Therefore, I quickly assume it was hacked, judging from how a hacked YouTube channel converts itself into a scam account. Now I am ending this should end because I am running out of arguments and this is going to fill up too much with our useless comments.
@Korzalerke, Actually it is possible to hack then sell those accounts to the black market. I was going to say that these accounts do have little or no commercial value as this is not a famous website to date. I can think up of various methods, such as:
Phishing (like advertising for fake upvotes or being a fake password recovery helper as a bait to give them useful information to hack accounts afterwards).
Brute force access (like trying multiple passwords, likely difficult or outright impossible).
There was one incident though that an account got successfully hacked. Luckily the owner changed it’s password to prevent future hacks.
.
What I actually mean by the “default patterns” are the default profile pictures, like the one you’re using right now, that have distinctive patterns that are generated according to your email address.
@Korzalerke, sorry, this was confusing enough. The first time I thought it was hacked. The profile change and inaccessibility can be a sign of a hacking but you did not tell me the profile changed back to the default patterns. So I misjudged the situation. Thank you for your information though. I will try to learn better, but first tell me how to look into situations correctly so events like this will not happen again.
Judging from this forum post and Korzalerke’s comment, the account might have been taken over by a hacker. This is just my theory regarding this new kind of incident and I cannot guarantee this will be true.
I can see improvements, but...
- Is the landing gear even retracted anyways because the ground clearance for the aircraft appears nonexistent (the underbelly is touching the ground).
- Landing gear probably needs to be a bit bigger. Why not use the stock part named “Landing Gear”?
- The gyroscope is still there. I guess you really have no choice but to retain the gyroscope there. Sorry.
- (NEW) I also want to point out that some of the cockpit buttons are way to big and take up too many space in the center console.
- (NEW) Aircraft would not work without wings, and jet’s are an inefficient way to propel the craft. So why not take the osprey as reference and start to make one big set of straight main wings with rotating propeller pods on either side with xml-resized propellers. Or, you can also put 2 large 8 bladed helicopter blades to create a tandem-rotor aircraft (like the Boeing CH-47 Chinook).
Looks good, but I cannot inspect the cockpit. There should be more window frames in my opinion though. Also, I would recommend a moving turret instead of a fixed gun emplacement instead.
Looks good but the idler wheel appears to be with the other road wheels, which is rare for main battle tanks nowadays. I like how you use glass fuselages to simulate reactive armor.
@Joshi13, skids are on lighter helicopters, whereas larger helicopters need larger landing gear, not only for strength but to allow them to take off horizontally like an autogyro.
.
Also, your cockpit does need improvement. The dashboard clips through the windshield, the texts are not rotated parallel and close to the screens, and I don’t know what are those extra joysticks for. There should be another color for the interior so it does not look like the exterior’s everywhere.
.
By the way, when you create a newer version of the plane, do put a redirect to the new plane on your old plane, so people can view the newer one (instructions here).
@Joshi13, I recommend you use large enough landing gear, via XML, via overload mod in the mods section of the initial game. Big crafts need big enough, realistic wheels.
Well, a literal “airbus” with a good shape. The landing gear looks too small and flimsy for such a large weight as this. I personally don’t like gyroscopes, but I’ll just go ahead and upvote this, since it looks quite realistic apart from the landing gear, small propellers, and gyroscope.
It would have been better without that distracting colors of the tank (which make it look like a low quality successor). By the way, have you created the parts yourself, because it’s pretty detailed. Also, a high part count of 676 does not make it mobile friendly.
Pretty good but the plane is a bit odd. There is no smoothing, the wings rake back like fantasy diesel punk, and the refuel probe is placed on top of a drag-generating structure. I like the design and the good amount of realism though. The cockpit does not need to have that unnecessary strip of light inside.
.
By the way, naming Beriev, created aircraft requires that the word “Be” be placed in front of the numbers, separated by a dash, as in “Beriev Be-12”.
@xNotDumb, I am sorry, but I removed it because it does not feel suitable for me. The original comment explains why you felt me as a stereotypical “nerd”, because of how I interrupt questions like Brainy Smurf.
@xNotDumb, @YYEE, actually you can access the channel just by acccessing the video, via clicking or tapping on the top left text that becomes invisible once the video runs; and by clicking and tapping on the channel name once you have accessed the video. If there is something wrong with my advice, tell me.
That’s pretty nice (although it would be better if you put another frame pillar in the middle of the windshield, like splitting the windshield into 2). The landing gear looks too small and incorrectly colored. Also, was that upvote from an alternate account of yours?
@T8flight, you see these pillars on the corners of wooden houses in North America. That’s what I call “edge pillars”.
What a cool drone plane, isn’t it? Only things I do not like are the useless inlets on top of the usual inlets and the navigation lights do not look standard to me (the lamps at the tip of the vertical stabilizers look “floating”, you need to make them fused).
+1.
I would like more if it is painted in matte gray but up to you.
If ErayTurkish needs some clarification or is confused, please clarify to ErayTurkish, so he can help you out correctly.
@Korzalerke, if that is so, then I’ll give that answer to him.
.
@Soardivision160th, the joystick snaps back when you no longer touch it and it’s a feature that you usually see when playing mobile games.
I think you can only embed images if you are bronze.
+2.
If you don’t know how to embed images, try to use this code; it’s just how you embed URL but has an exclamation mark in front:
-
nameis the name that doesn’t get displayed, therefore you can hide any Easter eggs here.-
urlis for the image url.Why do you need help with this?
That’s the landing gear, right? You can actually and should rename the aircraft as “landing gear part” and use the “part” tag. You should also clarify wether this part is free to use, has conditions for use, or not.
@Bobyo, hmmm...
+1.
My theory would be that the cannon has “FireWeapons”, and that any parts on AI aircraft that uses said input may activate if they had successfully locked onto an aircraft. I might test what could the AI do if I replaced the “FireWeapons” input with “FireGuns” input; would it act like a gun?
.
P.S. I have discovered that there is no way to change the input of the cannon part.
Unclear. Please clarify further about this so called “bug” you have. You can send me a link to the craft.
My tip would be to probably check the attachments. Make sure that the joystick is attached to the control base.
Sad...
+1.
Better luck next time. You should designersuite, use blueprints and make the fuselage inline with the blueprints (this is how you use blueprints correctly).
Here comes...
The Giant, Flying, Aquatic Dinosaur!
The average teenaged high schooler boy’s dream has come true...
So you could actually defeat enemy aircraft by just sitting there and shooting at said aircraft.
+3@STLTitans, go to the part properties tab (by clicking or tapping the gear button) and there should be 2 properties that may smoothen the fuselages by their front and back attachments.
Pretty basic, but contains functional parts. Why a gyroscope here? Anyways, good luck with building a good, functional cockpit for VR; I cannot access the plane and see the functions and I do not have VR software because I do not want to have one because it is a waste of money.
Good tank, but I think the part count should be reduced, so I can toy with multiple instances of this build. Also, you may need to smooth your fuselages.
+1If it’s not a Su-27 flanker, then it’s probably a MiG-29. Those aircraft look very similar to each other but differences can still be seen.
+1.
If it is not a MiG-29, tell me. There are probably more similar Soviet aircraft.
@XAircraftManufacturer, you can use text labels and code funky trees to make functional guis. Essentially, this makes for a good “glass cockpit”, a type of cockpit with a few screens instead of many gauges. The stock jets (except for the Hellkeska) are one examples of crafts using screens instead of gauges.
This is accurate, although I am disappointed I cannot inspect the cockpit now and the lack of a backstory (the 4 jet engines configuation are too outdated for modern flight nowadays). Imagine if airline companies make liveries on this plane... :)
+1The cockpit fuselages aren’t sliced correctly either. The wing position implies that it is a variable wing, but the rotator’s aren’t visible.
@CNOceanLin, a successor post should automatically have an auto-credit with a link to the predecessor. I do not know but there has been a glitch where if you save the craft enough, the url might change and no longer counts as a successor.
I like it, but my way would be to either use SimplePlanes to create pieces (which would be very hard), or use Blender instead.
Looks good but the design reminds me of the days when SimplePlanes was still in an early stage. Good car though. I’d wish it had looked better with smoothing, et cetera.
If you are posting a craft that is related to the current situation in Ukraine (e.g. “Ghost of Kyiv”), do note that said post’s comment section will be filled with political bickering and will eventually be removed because of that; the post may also get repeatedly reported mostly for “harassment”. If you intend your post to be a political statement, do not be surprised to see it removed by a moderator because any and all politics are against the one rule about politics and religion.
The tank has seen improvements, apart from the distracting colors. Now there is one very important question, where is the auto-credit to the original, predecessor post, despite being a successor post?
It’s a good plane for Valentine’s Day, but the Valentine’s Day already passed. The jets should be located behind the wings besides the fuselages, so as not to put enormous strain on the wingtips.
Nice plane. The cockpit needs some adjustments (like hollowing the cockpit by replacing those full fuselages with hollow fuselages and using fuselage cutting techniques.
.
But wait, was that a plane before the updates that brought these features here?
Then why are you not crediting the original artists behind these parts?
@Korzalerke, sorry, I did not know about Vetrix’s profile picture change. I did not know what the profile pictures look like when Vetrix got hacked because you did not tell me what it looked like. Therefore, I quickly assume it was hacked, judging from how a hacked YouTube channel converts itself into a scam account. Now I am ending this should end because I am running out of arguments and this is going to fill up too much with our useless comments.
+1@Korzalerke, Actually it is possible to hack then sell those accounts to the black market. I was going to say that these accounts do have little or no commercial value as this is not a famous website to date. I can think up of various methods, such as:
There was one incident though that an account got successfully hacked. Luckily the owner changed it’s password to prevent future hacks.
.
What I actually mean by the “default patterns” are the default profile pictures, like the one you’re using right now, that have distinctive patterns that are generated according to your email address.
@Korzalerke, sorry, this was confusing enough. The first time I thought it was hacked. The profile change and inaccessibility can be a sign of a hacking but you did not tell me the profile changed back to the default patterns. So I misjudged the situation. Thank you for your information though. I will try to learn better, but first tell me how to look into situations correctly so events like this will not happen again.
Judging from this forum post and Korzalerke’s comment, the account might have been taken over by a hacker. This is just my theory regarding this new kind of incident and I cannot guarantee this will be true.
What is the context of this forum post? If possible, please clarify.
Looks cool and realistic. But you need a good paint job of yours. Anyways, did you build this all by yourself?
I can see improvements, but...
- Is the landing gear even retracted anyways because the ground clearance for the aircraft appears nonexistent (the underbelly is touching the ground).
- Landing gear probably needs to be a bit bigger. Why not use the stock part named “Landing Gear”?
- The gyroscope is still there. I guess you really have no choice but to retain the gyroscope there. Sorry.
- (NEW) I also want to point out that some of the cockpit buttons are way to big and take up too many space in the center console.
- (NEW) Aircraft would not work without wings, and jet’s are an inefficient way to propel the craft. So why not take the osprey as reference and start to make one big set of straight main wings with rotating propeller pods on either side with xml-resized propellers. Or, you can also put 2 large 8 bladed helicopter blades to create a tandem-rotor aircraft (like the Boeing CH-47 Chinook).
Maybe the Wright airport is abandoned. Most large airports have lights per safety and regulation but some airports do not.
@xNotDumb, some of them can contain things that you would soon finish from teasers and/or private chats or planes. I recommend not.
Looks good, but I cannot inspect the cockpit. There should be more window frames in my opinion though. Also, I would recommend a moving turret instead of a fixed gun emplacement instead.
+1Looks good but the idler wheel appears to be with the other road wheels, which is rare for main battle tanks nowadays. I like how you use glass fuselages to simulate reactive armor.
+1@Joshi13, skids are on lighter helicopters, whereas larger helicopters need larger landing gear, not only for strength but to allow them to take off horizontally like an autogyro.
.
Also, your cockpit does need improvement. The dashboard clips through the windshield, the texts are not rotated parallel and close to the screens, and I don’t know what are those extra joysticks for. There should be another color for the interior so it does not look like the exterior’s everywhere.
.
By the way, when you create a newer version of the plane, do put a redirect to the new plane on your old plane, so people can view the newer one (instructions here).
@Joshi13, I recommend you use large enough landing gear, via XML, via overload mod in the mods section of the initial game. Big crafts need big enough, realistic wheels.
Well, a literal “airbus” with a good shape. The landing gear looks too small and flimsy for such a large weight as this. I personally don’t like gyroscopes, but I’ll just go ahead and upvote this, since it looks quite realistic apart from the landing gear, small propellers, and gyroscope.
Ah, yes, goodness. This was a pretty weird race car with a pretty weird interior.
+1It would have been better without that distracting colors of the tank (which make it look like a low quality successor). By the way, have you created the parts yourself, because it’s pretty detailed. Also, a high part count of 676 does not make it mobile friendly.
Pretty good but the plane is a bit odd. There is no smoothing, the wings rake back like fantasy diesel punk, and the refuel probe is placed on top of a drag-generating structure. I like the design and the good amount of realism though. The cockpit does not need to have that unnecessary strip of light inside.
.
By the way, naming Beriev, created aircraft requires that the word “Be” be placed in front of the numbers, separated by a dash, as in “Beriev Be-12”.
Love the copter here. Really accurate at a slightly low part count. I have no negative opinions about the looks.
@xNotDumb, I am sorry, but I removed it because it does not feel suitable for me. The original comment explains why you felt me as a stereotypical “nerd”, because of how I interrupt questions like Brainy Smurf.
And someone made another strangereal...
.
Looks like Tolkien’s world anyways. What are those icebergs a below the continents anyways?
Ah, yes, never seen another functioning transforming robot, since that Optimus Prime build.
@xNotDumb, @YYEE, actually you can access the channel just by acccessing the video, via clicking or tapping on the top left text that becomes invisible once the video runs; and by clicking and tapping on the channel name once you have accessed the video. If there is something wrong with my advice, tell me.