It scares me too. When I tested it, it went straight into a flat spin. The landing gear is just a slight bit too tall, and it is VERY ugly. Don’t ask me how you got the wings like that. Overall, an awesome entry to the challenge.
This is just stupid. It serves no purpose, and fails at that by having the engines pushing each other. The signboard on top is useless and isn’t even entertaining because it rotates so slowly. This is an amazing entry to the challenge. I will score it later with the others.
The rules did state that effort is optional. However, there is nothing stupid about the build. But the presentation of this is very stupid. I will keep that in mind while scoring. On a positive note, this also flies horribly.
@126 This is why I think maintenance updates should only come on an as needed basis, rather than every year like Jundroo plans to. They break mods and have issues that take lots of time to resolve.
@Nathangaming82075 It is not economical to update this game as it is based on old code and a sequel is being developed. Halting development of a sequel to make an update makes no sense.
@Nathangaming82075 I use it too, as well as many other players, and I have no plans to stop. It makes no logical or financial sense to implement multiplayer in a game not designed to support it running on older code that has a sequel coming next year.
@Nathangaming82075 So a DLC for a nearly 10 year old game that is being replaced soon that is free for members of a single online service that you happen to have? Multiplayer takes time, money, and effort for a game that is being replaced and will likely not be used by many players. It’s wishful thinking at best and a detriment to the development of the sequel at worst.
@Nathangaming82075 SimplePlanes has an old codebase and progress on a sequel is already underway, as well as multiplayer being costly and requiring servers. Game development is difficult, and there is no simple way to add multiplayer to a game as complicated as this.
@KingOfTypos The only issiue with a “make anything” kind it of game is the overlap it would have with current SimplePlanes or Juno. I think the next game should be more focused on a narrower category and make that category amazing.
@ColonelCanada Not mocking you. I wanted to comment this on your forum, but I thought I could make it into a forum with THE INTENT OF SPREADING THE MESSAGE TO STOP. If you think this is mocking, I can take it down. Just saying, I try to be funny too much and your forum was peak comedy, so this was a cheap follow up.
@X99STRIKER It’s happened to me too.
+3And please post it.
+3This is exactly how I feel. VR is amazing.
+3This challenge is getting out of hand.
+3This is very stupid. It is a flying emoji created only to put me out of my misery. It flies badly, and it looks worse. Great work!
+3It scares me too. When I tested it, it went straight into a flat spin. The landing gear is just a slight bit too tall, and it is VERY ugly. Don’t ask me how you got the wings like that. Overall, an awesome entry to the challenge.
+3@X99STRIKER Oh, you’re going to be sorry. Give me your address so I can mail you the phone repair bill when I download this.
+3This is just stupid. It serves no purpose, and fails at that by having the engines pushing each other. The signboard on top is useless and isn’t even entertaining because it rotates so slowly. This is an amazing entry to the challenge. I will score it later with the others.
+3The rules did state that effort is optional. However, there is nothing stupid about the build. But the presentation of this is very stupid. I will keep that in mind while scoring. On a positive note, this also flies horribly.
+3T. That is beautiful.
+3I probably shouldn’t have downloaded this.
+3Plane.
+3Please post the movie on SimplePlanes.com. I’ll upvote all your posts so you can get to the 100 points needed.
+3“Thanks for playing!”
+3You mean paying. It’s a classic Andrew tagline.
It’s so conventional I’m crying.
+3@SPairforce That is the funniest thing I’ve heard in a while. Words cannot express how hard I’m laughing right now. And I mean that.
+3I want you on an interpol watchlist.
+3Just kidding.
Yep. I get this too.
+3No.
+3Go to posts, select the drop down menu, and change it from public to unlisted.
+3The first VR plane in SimplePlanes!
+3And the solar system is one of the Milky Way’s moons.
+3@Vincent
+3@SupremeDorian
@DeezDucks
Step 0: Get beta.
+3@aks2161989 There is a stock version of fine tuner under the rotation menu.
+3Good luck.
+3T
+3I have the exact same problem, especially because 90% of my builds are for challenges.
+3I was (maybe still am) the face of the “bronze build quality with platinum points” user category.
+2@126 This is why I think maintenance updates should only come on an as needed basis, rather than every year like Jundroo plans to. They break mods and have issues that take lots of time to resolve.
+2It’s not a bug, it’s a feature.
+2Rest in peace.
+2@Nathangaming82075 It is not economical to update this game as it is based on old code and a sequel is being developed. Halting development of a sequel to make an update makes no sense.
+2@Nathangaming82075 Ate you talking about mobile mods? Those are not possible because the scripts do not function with software from IOS and Android.
+2@Nathangaming82075 If the multiplayer is paid, you might as well buy SimplePlanes2 instead.
+2@Nathangaming82075 I use it too, as well as many other players, and I have no plans to stop. It makes no logical or financial sense to implement multiplayer in a game not designed to support it running on older code that has a sequel coming next year.
+2@Nathangaming82075 So a DLC for a nearly 10 year old game that is being replaced soon that is free for members of a single online service that you happen to have? Multiplayer takes time, money, and effort for a game that is being replaced and will likely not be used by many players. It’s wishful thinking at best and a detriment to the development of the sequel at worst.
+2@Nathangaming82075 SimplePlanes has an old codebase and progress on a sequel is already underway, as well as multiplayer being costly and requiring servers. Game development is difficult, and there is no simple way to add multiplayer to a game as complicated as this.
+2The second suggestion is a really good idea. More procedural = more better.
+2No wonder it won, the radar signature looks smaller than a SU-57’s as well.
+2BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY. I didn't think this day would come, but Jundroo has outdone what everyone thought was impossible.
+2@SILVERPANZER Some jokes would be too cruel to be jokes.
+2@TheMouse I changed it back to the old SP site default.
+2@KingOfTypos The only issiue with a “make anything” kind it of game is the overlap it would have with current SimplePlanes or Juno. I think the next game should be more focused on a narrower category and make that category amazing.
+2@WinsWings I don’t know if that date will come.
+2@ColonelCanada Not mocking you. I wanted to comment this on your forum, but I thought I could make it into a forum with THE INTENT OF SPREADING THE MESSAGE TO STOP. If you think this is mocking, I can take it down. Just saying, I try to be funny too much and your forum was peak comedy, so this was a cheap follow up.
+2@RepublicOfCursedPlanes It’s worse than a tutorial plane.
+2Or just save it every step like I usually do.
+2@Tanner0501 How about you email me the Apple/android ID? I could sell, I mean use that info as well.
+2@PlaneFlightX Could I interest you in the mobile version as well then?
+2